Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Don't blame Dot Com , he ? Just read the title of the article and copied it, doubtful he? even read the article and understood what actually happened.
There is a world of difference between an accidental discharge and opening fire on someone. Your thread title is misleading and pure hyperbole
And to be clear, you agree the guy shouldn't have had a gun on campus since they have a no gun policy?
He is just exercising his second amendment rights to protect himself from cannonballs .......you can't be too safe
Your pretense that people are not attacked at or on their way to or on their from, what should normally be considered safe places is as dishonest as the thread title.
Kids and pools can be pretty obnoxious......you can't be too safe
Hey you little fucker....you splash me once more and I'll shoot your little ass
Don't blame Dot Com , he ? Just read the title of the article and copied it, doubtful he? even read the article and understood what actually happened.
There is a world of difference between an accidental discharge and opening fire on someone. Your thread title is misleading and pure hyperbole
And to be clear, you agree the guy shouldn't have had a gun on campus since they have a no gun policy?
He is just exercising his second amendment rights to protect himself from cannonballs .......you can't be too safe
Your pretense that people are not attacked at or on their way to or on their from, what should normally be considered safe places is as dishonest as the thread title.
Kids and pools can be pretty obnoxious......you can't be too safe
Hey you little fucker....you splash me once more and I'll shoot your little ass
Perhaps someone should take a gun safety course so they can learn the difference between opening fire on a group and an accidental discharge of a gun. For the record the permit holder should be required to retake the course .
Too mild a punishment
He should be forced to write..."I will not open fire on children" 100 times
What he had concealed was the slightest degree of intelligence.
Guns don't just go off. Whatever he did, he did it. He deserves the maximum punishment. Of course, he should never legally be able to carry a firearm in public again.
Anyone defending firearm possession and especial carrying has to condemn this type of person.
You know guns don't shoot; people shoot.
Tragic, but noooooo, you can't have my concealed guns or my concealed rights.
Im a pro- gun vet BUT not a pro rw- nutter supporter
Sent from my VS415PP using Tapatalk
Don't blame Dot Com , he ? Just read the title of the article and copied it, doubtful he? even read the article and understood what actually happened.There is a world of difference between an accidental discharge and opening fire on someone. Your thread title is misleading and pure hyperbole
And to be clear, you agree the guy shouldn't have had a gun on campus since they have a no gun policy?
He is just exercising his second amendment rights to protect himself from cannonballs .......you can't be too safe
Your pretense that people are not attacked at or on their way to or on their from, what should normally be considered safe places is as dishonest as the thread title.
Kids and pools can be pretty obnoxious......you can't be too safe
Hey you little fucker....you splash me once more and I'll shoot your little ass
And you just lied again.
It is almost as though, on some level, you realize that you are wrong, that your position on the issue CANNOT be defended honestly based on it's merits.
BUt you still hold to it, despite knowing that.
What is your real reason for hating guns and gun ownership?
Don't blame Dot Com , he ? Just read the title of the article and copied it, doubtful he? even read the article and understood what actually happened.
And to be clear, you agree the guy shouldn't have had a gun on campus since they have a no gun policy?
He is just exercising his second amendment rights to protect himself from cannonballs .......you can't be too safe
Your pretense that people are not attacked at or on their way to or on their from, what should normally be considered safe places is as dishonest as the thread title.
Kids and pools can be pretty obnoxious......you can't be too safe
Hey you little fucker....you splash me once more and I'll shoot your little ass
And you just lied again.
It is almost as though, on some level, you realize that you are wrong, that your position on the issue CANNOT be defended honestly based on it's merits.
BUt you still hold to it, despite knowing that.
What is your real reason for hating guns and gun ownership?
How can you be so gullible to buy into his "accident" claims?
Why else would he be packing?
He is just exercising his second amendment rights to protect himself from cannonballs .......you can't be too safe
Your pretense that people are not attacked at or on their way to or on their from, what should normally be considered safe places is as dishonest as the thread title.
Kids and pools can be pretty obnoxious......you can't be too safe
Hey you little fucker....you splash me once more and I'll shoot your little ass
And you just lied again.
It is almost as though, on some level, you realize that you are wrong, that your position on the issue CANNOT be defended honestly based on it's merits.
BUt you still hold to it, despite knowing that.
What is your real reason for hating guns and gun ownership?
How can you be so gullible to buy into his "accident" claims?
Why else would he be packing?
Because it is obvious to everyone that that is what happened, even to you.
YOu are just being a liar.
THe other possible reasons for "packing" have been explained to you, repeatedly over time, many times.
It is not credible that you don't know them.
YOu are lying more when you pretend that you can't think of any other "reasons".
Doesn't it raise any red flags with you that you have to lie so much and so blatantly to make even a pretend "point" in support of your stupid position on this issue?
Your pretense that people are not attacked at or on their way to or on their from, what should normally be considered safe places is as dishonest as the thread title.
Kids and pools can be pretty obnoxious......you can't be too safe
Hey you little fucker....you splash me once more and I'll shoot your little ass
And you just lied again.
It is almost as though, on some level, you realize that you are wrong, that your position on the issue CANNOT be defended honestly based on it's merits.
BUt you still hold to it, despite knowing that.
What is your real reason for hating guns and gun ownership?
How can you be so gullible to buy into his "accident" claims?
Why else would he be packing?
Because it is obvious to everyone that that is what happened, even to you.
YOu are just being a liar.
THe other possible reasons for "packing" have been explained to you, repeatedly over time, many times.
It is not credible that you don't know them.
YOu are lying more when you pretend that you can't think of any other "reasons".
Doesn't it raise any red flags with you that you have to lie so much and so blatantly to make even a pretend "point" in support of your stupid position on this issue?
He was packing because he was fed up with kids splashing him. So he pulled his gun and shot at them
How many adults haven't been tempted to do the same?
how many times have gun nutters told us that guns don't go off by accident?Don't blame Dot Com , he ? Just read the title of the article and copied it, doubtful he? even read the article and understood what actually happened.
And to be clear, you agree the guy shouldn't have had a gun on campus since they have a no gun policy?
He is just exercising his second amendment rights to protect himself from cannonballs .......you can't be too safe
Your pretense that people are not attacked at or on their way to or on their from, what should normally be considered safe places is as dishonest as the thread title.
Kids and pools can be pretty obnoxious......you can't be too safe
Hey you little fucker....you splash me once more and I'll shoot your little ass
And you just lied again.
It is almost as though, on some level, you realize that you are wrong, that your position on the issue CANNOT be defended honestly based on it's merits.
BUt you still hold to it, despite knowing that.
What is your real reason for hating guns and gun ownership?
How can you be so gullible to buy into his "accident" claims?
Why else would he be packing?
What he had concealed was the slightest degree of intelligence.
Guns don't just go off. Whatever he did, he did it. He deserves the maximum punishment. Of course, he should never legally be able to carry a firearm in public again.
Anyone defending firearm possession and especial carrying has to condemn this type of person.
You know guns don't shoot; people shoot.
From the report it certainly seems he did not do it on purpose.
Your problem with this man is not that he made a mistake. YOur problem is that he is a gun owner.
Everything else is a rationalization for your desired witch hunt.
No one was hurt. The man's behavior will be investigated and if found negligent he will be dealt with.
I imagine he's been fired over his back plenty of time's.So Dot, tell us.
When you open fire on a target you intend to hit, do you fire your pistol from inside your pocket? Doesn't that make it kind of hard to aim? I mean if you're going to open fire on something with the intention of hitting it, one does need to aim. Right?
----------------------
