Macron: "Ukraine could fall very quickly."

And what will happen to europe, then?
That depends on what the European countries decide to do, I guess. For Russia, it about Ukraine not becoming a Nato member. When Ukraine surrenders, neutrality will be one of the conditions for peace.
I have the strong feeling that Russia is not interested in attacking other countries. They don´t stop telling us though to form our opinion. If they decide to send us against Russia, Putin will have no choice. This would also involve Belarus in the conflict.
If Russia continues after Ukraine, that would have a severe impact on the public opinion in Russia. There would be no support.
 
That depends on what the European countries decide to do, I guess. For Russia, it about Ukraine not becoming a Nato member. When Ukraine surrenders, neutrality will be one of the conditions for peace.
I have the strong feeling that Russia is not interested in attacking other countries. They don´t stop telling us though to form our opinion. If they decide to send us against Russia, Putin will have no choice. This would also involve Belarus in the conflict.
If Russia continues after Ukraine, that would have a severe impact on the public opinion in Russia. There would be no support.


ok, but does Putin need support?
 
ok, but does Putin need support?
Of course. Do you think that Russia forces the people to the front lines, while Ukrainians line up at the recruitment offices?

Use a translator for this website. Ukraine´s largest TV networks runs a portal that is exclusively about mobilization. Here you learn what´s up in Ukraine firsthand. It differs totally from what our propaganda repeats every day:
 
Of course. Do you think that Russia forces the people to the front lines, while Ukrainians line up at the recruitment offices?

Use a translator for this website. Ukraine´s largest TV networks runs a portal that is exclusively about mobilization. Here you learn what´s up in Ukraine firsthand. It differs totally from what our propaganda repeats every day:

russia can send people from prisons
 
russia can send people from prisons
Ukraine too. They even plan to draft them:


That is what I meant with Propaganda. They just report what they like and the most is being "cancelled", you will never know, unless you broaden your news horizon.
 
If Russia continues after Ukraine, that would have a severe impact on the public opinion in Russia. There would be no support.
The only severe impact you may expect is overwhelming support. But there won't be any drive West I'm afraid except for Transnistria. Tribaltics are what everybody would want to punish, for all the nasty shit they've been involved in over the last decades but Putin is too mild of a dictator, though there is some hope he'll think of something to give them a real reason to dislike Russians.
 
It is the Ukrainians, and specifically Zelensky, who are to blame for this war. At the time the clown came to power, the Minsk agreements had already been signed by all interested parties. He just had to fulfill it point by point and that's all.
The stumbling block was the introduction of UN peacekeepers - the agreement said that the peacekeepers were to stand along the line of demarcation of the warring parties - i.e. LDNR and Ukraine, but the ukro scoundrels demanded that they stand along the border of Ukraine and Russia.
That is, they wanted to literally organize a terrorist attack on the recalcitrant inhabitants of Donbas. Naturally, neither the LDNR themselves nor Russia, as the guarantor of the agreements, could agree to this. Well, you know all about what happened next.
 
Here is the reality about Afghanistan:

And it is not a secret that Trump fired war hawk Bolton because Bolton opposed Trump´s war plans. Trump said so. And the Lima Group rejected his war plans, too.

Netanyahu rejected his war plans, too. America, too. Money for war against Iran has been ruled out in the budgets under Trump. And Trump bombed Syria twice without any evidence for his claims.
Actually Multicultie to Think Inferior Natives Can Be Our Allies

Every President since 2008 has been stuck with the mess created by the Heirguardsman and Darth Evader. As for Israel, that ignorance of the world situation goes back to when Eisenhower betrayed the Israelis in the 1956 Suez War, depriving them of the necessary defense of annexing the Sinai.
 
It seems you got it wrong.



So it was Trump who wanted war and Bolton opposed the idea.

"Trump repeatedly suggested Venezuela invasion, stunning top aides – report
The administration officials are said to have taken turns in trying to talk the president out of the idea in August of last year"

This is also what Bolton says in his book:
"President Trump said it would be “cool” to invade Venezuela and that the South American country was “really part of the United States,” according to a forthcoming book authored by former White House national security adviser John Bolton."

Shamelot Charisma

The Monroe Doctrine was effective until JFK let Cuban patriots get slaughtered on the beaches of the Bay of Pigs.
 
Actually Multicultie to Think Inferior Natives Can Be Our Allies

Every President since 2008 has been stuck with the mess created by the Heirguardsman and Darth Evader. As for Israel, that ignorance of the world situation goes back to when Eisenhower betrayed the Israelis in the 1956 Suez War, depriving them of the necessary defense of annexing the Sinai.
Those Biden voters who claim the Israelis are occupiers forget that the region has been conquered by the Muslims.
 
In fact the doctrine was about non-intervention. But it turned out to be a bulwark against European colonial countries only.
All Republics Go Bananas

Actually, President Monroe wanted to annex the whole Caribbean. He told Jackson to take Cuba after taking Florida. But the Deep State, which was anti-expansion, forced Monroe to stop his Manifest Destiny. Like the British heiristocracy before them, the ruling class wanted to cram Americans into coastal territory only.
 




 

Forum List

Back
Top