Low Income Voters (>$50,000/year) Put Joe in the White House

Calls for "socialism" hurt Democrats in swing districts, cost them the Senate and almost cost them the House.
Another example of how neither party has a clue. The Left has gone too far Left, and the GOP has gone all Trumpy.

The nutters are so full of themselves that their eyes are closed shut.

Knowing this, not sure how you could in good faith vote for a ticket that everyone knows will result in a Harris presidency. Talk about full left, nuts stuff. It is just nonsensical.
 
The election turned because college-educated white voters - particularly college-educated women - swung hard for Biden.


Calls for "socialism" hurt Democrats in swing districts, cost them the Senate and almost cost them the House.
Who was calling for socialism? It certainly wasn’t dumb Joe or whoring Kamala. I seem to recall the right wing media gaslighting their consumers. Is that what you’re referring to?
Just look at Kam's dream agenda, then even you can connect the dots.....I hope.
Kamala’s a neocon like you. Try to not accept right wing propaganda.
She's a communist like you.
 
Yeah, offer them the free shit. They'll catch on
How much "free shit" have the richest ten percent of Americans received since the Gipper came to DC?
tde-03.jpg

Can the 1% really pay for the ‘free stuff’ Democrats want?

"Want every student to have free access to state universities?

"It would cost $47 billion, covered by the $55 billion the Times says boosting taxes on the 115,000 highest-income households to 40% of their income would raise in its first year.

"Raise taxes on the top 1% of earners from about 33% to 40%, and you’d collect $157 billion the first year, the Times calculates."
None, asshole. Keeping what you've earned is not "recieving free shit."
 
What percentage of voters earning less than $50,000 a year would you classify as political "moderates"? How many of those voters would benefit from Medicare for All or partial amortization of all student debt?

"NOVEMBER 13, 2020
Low Income Voters Turned Out for Biden, Now They Need Relief
BY SARAH ANDERSON – MARGOT RATHKE"

"According to early polls, voters with household incomes of less than $50,000 in 2019 broke for Biden by 55 to 43 percent — a 12 point margin, compared to 8 four years ago.

"This helped overcome Trump’s gains among households with incomes above $100,000 — from 45 percent in 2016 to just over half in 2020.

"At least 6 million more people in low-income households voted in 2020 compared to 2016."

Once again, Democrats lost the White vote.
650px-1964_Electoral_Map.png

What happened in 1964 to cause that?
So make the tax code... the first 50 thousand dollars tax free. No federal tax.
 
What percentage of voters earning less than $50,000 a year would you classify as political "moderates"? How many of those voters would benefit from Medicare for All or partial amortization of all student debt?

"NOVEMBER 13, 2020
Low Income Voters Turned Out for Biden, Now They Need Relief
BY SARAH ANDERSON – MARGOT RATHKE"

"According to early polls, voters with household incomes of less than $50,000 in 2019 broke for Biden by 55 to 43 percent — a 12 point margin, compared to 8 four years ago.

"This helped overcome Trump’s gains among households with incomes above $100,000 — from 45 percent in 2016 to just over half in 2020.

"At least 6 million more people in low-income households voted in 2020 compared to 2016."

Once again, Democrats lost the White vote.
650px-1964_Electoral_Map.png

What happened in 1964 to cause that?


Its easier to go out and vote yourself a living instead of earning one, that's for sure. And that's the Democrat secret, Free Stuff is what a lot of people want.
 
The election turned because college-educated white voters - particularly college-educated women - swung hard for Biden.


Calls for "socialism" hurt Democrats in swing districts, cost them the Senate and almost cost them the House.
Who was calling for socialism? It certainly wasn’t dumb Joe or whoring Kamala. I seem to recall the right wing media gaslighting their consumers. Is that what you’re referring to?
Just look at Kam's dream agenda, then even you can connect the dots.....I hope.
Kamala’s a neocon like you. Try to not accept right wing propaganda.
She's a communist like you.
Yes, but only to easily duped righties like you.
 
Calls for "socialism" hurt Democrats in swing districts, cost them the Senate and almost cost them the House.
Another example of how neither party has a clue. The Left has gone too far Left, and the GOP has gone all Trumpy.

The nutters are so full of themselves that their eyes are closed shut.

Knowing this, not sure how you could in good faith vote for a ticket that everyone knows will result in a Harris presidency. Talk about full left, nuts stuff. It is just nonsensical.
To someone like you, sure.

If a person doesn't care much for Option A and votes for it anyway, it must be that they think even less of Option B.

I think a child could understand that.
 
Yeah, offer them the free shit. They'll catch on
Rich folks have been running away with federal contracts for decades. Now, who is "them?"
Cons think only the poor get lots of free shit. They have no comprehension of the enormous free shit the rich get.

Nobody gives me shit!!
The gov only takes! They took 500K from the Wife and I this year.
BS dude. Just do a simple screenshot of that. Leave out the personal info. Just a little screen shot. Do it.

Dont care whether you believe me or not.
 
It is a shame, because it was President Trumps actions that put 4 -5 thousand extra dollars of income into those households.
Who told you that, Trump or Mnuchin?

This is how much American workers saved during the first year after Trump tax overhaul

"Almost 890,000 more returns showed taxes owed under the first year of the Trump tax cuts, the data show. At the same time, the sum total of those tax bills, $170 billion, was still $1 billion smaller than in the last year under the previous tax code.

• "The IRS issued almost 2 million fewer refunds on a year-over-year basis, amounting to almost $360 million less in refunds."
 
Yeah, offer them the free shit. They'll catch on
Rich folks have been running away with federal contracts for decades. Now, who is "them?"
Cons think only the poor get lots of free shit. They have no comprehension of the enormous free shit the rich get.

Nobody gives me shit!!
The gov only takes! They took 500K from the Wife and I this year.
BS dude. Just do a simple screenshot of that. Leave out the personal info. Just a little screen shot. Do it.

Dont care whether you believe me or not.
Yes you do care. You replied.
Show me the 500K. Prove it.
 
It is a shame, because it was President Trumps actions that put 4 -5 thousand extra dollars of income into those households.
Who told you that, Trump or Mnuchin?

This is how much American workers saved during the first year after Trump tax overhaul

"Almost 890,000 more returns showed taxes owed under the first year of the Trump tax cuts, the data show. At the same time, the sum total of those tax bills, $170 billion, was still $1 billion smaller than in the last year under the previous tax code.

• "The IRS issued almost 2 million fewer refunds on a year-over-year basis, amounting to almost $360 million less in refunds."
That was because the people were allowed to keep more of their money as they earned it, instead of having it taken from by the IRS and then refunded at the end of the year....Not that hard to realize this..
 
Yeah, offer them the free shit. They'll catch on
Rich folks have been running away with federal contracts for decades. Now, who is "them?"
Cons think only the poor get lots of free shit. They have no comprehension of the enormous free shit the rich get.

Nobody gives me shit!!
The gov only takes! They took 500K from the Wife and I this year.
BS dude. Just do a simple screenshot of that. Leave out the personal info. Just a little screen shot. Do it.

Dont care whether you believe me or not.
Yes you do care. You replied.
Show me the 500K. Prove it.

Like Trumps taxes...it's none of your business.
 
Those low-income voters are apparently too uninformed, or just don't care, that they did better under Trump than they have ever done. Wages rose more under Trump than they had risen since the 1990s. Also, the Trump tax cuts included a huge increase in the Earned Income Tax Credit. Low-income voters also benefitted from the low gas prices, which resulted substantially from Trump's pro-energy energy policies. And many, many low-income folks were unemployed under Obama were able to get jobs under Trump--I guess it never dawned on them that there was a connection between Trump's pro-growth economic policies and their newly found employment.

If Biden gets his anti-business economic agenda through Congress and sucks over $1 trillion from the economy, I can't wait to hear low-income voters start complaining when the economy slows down as a result. I will remind them, "Hey, folks, YOU voted for this."
"Who are you gonna believe, me or your own lyin' eyes?"

-- Democrats to the poors
 
It should tell Democrats something they can't win without buying votes.

It should...but it won't.
It tells Democrats and Republicans corporate oligarchs have bought the electoral process, the courts and media, and the lobbyists who write the legislation that allows one percent of Americans to accumulate obscene amounts of wealth and unchecked political power.
5dd46126500f8.image.jpg

Those who "think" Don the Con's a populist aren't likely to notice.
bernie-sanders-once-again-asking-you-to-ignore-20th-century-body-count-ideology.jpg
 
Yeah, offer them the free shit. They'll catch on
How much "free shit" have the richest ten percent of Americans received since the Gipper came to DC?
tde-03.jpg

Can the 1% really pay for the ‘free stuff’ Democrats want?

"Want every student to have free access to state universities?

"It would cost $47 billion, covered by the $55 billion the Times says boosting taxes on the 115,000 highest-income households to 40% of their income would raise in its first year.

"Raise taxes on the top 1% of earners from about 33% to 40%, and you’d collect $157 billion the first year, the Times calculates."
None, asshole. Keeping what you've earned is not "recieving free shit."
i-have-never-understood-why-it-is-greed-to-want-to-keep-the-money-you-have-earned-but-not-gree...jpg
 
Biden carried several different demographics that is considered vulgar to mention, namely,

  • government dependent,
  • employed but unproductive (Academe, the Arts, foundations, etc.),
  • government employed - NON uniformed,
  • too rich to be impacted by Leftist policies, and of course,
  • People of Color.
In fact, if the franchise were limited to productive, private-sector-employed citizens, the Democrats would get a "smattering" of votes, and that's about it.

Hell, if they re-instituted Literacy Tests for voters, half of the Democrats' constituency would be disqualified.
Unless you're printing your own currency, you're as government dependent as Trump and all his little Turds
fposter,small,wall_texture,product,750x1000.u11.jpg

How would Trump do on a literacy test?
 

Forum List

Back
Top