Loretta Lynch sworn in as the 83rd US AG

Statistikhengst

Diamond Member
Nov 21, 2013
45,564
11,756
2,070
deep within the statistical brain!!
Loretta_Lynch.jpg


Loretta Lynch Sworn in As Attorney General - NBC News

Video at the link.


Her bio:

Loretta Lynch - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

She was finally sworn-in ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY DAYS after having been nominated by President Obama to replace outgoing AG Eric Holder. She will serve 634 days, until the end of President Obama's 2nd-term as our President.


Congratulations to AG Lynch.


Oh, and in reference to this thread:

Block Loretta Lynch!

Guess that didn't quite work out for you. Once again, Pres. Obama won.
 
Yawn...

It's Holder with a Vagina. And there is NOTHING good that can come from THAT!

S2D2
 
exactly correct , she is afemale 'holder' , might be worse as 'j. bush' and mrobama wanted her voted on and approved . 'lynch' is just another corrupt Statist !!
 
she is anti Second Amendment Moonglow !! And if she is going to go after Constitutional abusers she needs to start looking in the highest offices of the USA Government .
 
naw , just advertising , maybe others don't know that she is Anti American Rights 'Daws' . I'm just advertising that fact while highlighting the fact that a 'repub' named j. bush wanted her in office .
 
why is this pile of shit thread polluting the Politics Board?
 
....and you silly libs think that right wingers in the senate do nothing....See, it only took them 170 days to do what was inevitable...LOL
 
they didn't have to confirm her NAT , I wish they wouldn't have confirmed her , The only one that woulda been hurt woulda been 'holder' as he is the guy that wanted out to retire or something.
 
they didn't have to confirm her NAT , I wish they wouldn't have confirmed her , The only one that woulda been hurt woulda been 'holder' as he is the guy that wanted out to retire or something.


NO, pissmore......the senate's responsibility is to advise and consent...Lynch was qualified and it took some quid pro quo by the democrats just to get those thorny republicans to consent.
 
no reason for them to CONSENT Nat , they shoulda held out and made 'holder' stay in the regime !!
 
Well, if Obama nominates someone for any other post, they could go for about 350 days next time...

Right wingers in the senate are simply hoping that Obama's nominees die of old age while waiting for them to get off their fat arses and vote.
 
Well, if Obama nominates someone for any other post, they could go for about 350 days next time...

Right wingers in the senate are simply hoping that Obama's nominees die of old age while waiting for them to get off their fat arses and vote.


These days, they don't even need to get off their fat arses. There's a little button you press where your seat is....
but it costs about 1/2 of a calorie to do that...
 
no reason for them to CONSENT Nat , they shoulda held out and made 'holder' stay in the regime !!

Is this because of "new-found-love" of Holder?
The senate's job is to either consent or reject....NOT to sit on their asses and do nothing on a nominee for almost 6 months....PERIOD !!!
 
These days, they don't even need to get off their fat arses. There's a little button you press where your seat is....
but it costs about 1/2 of a calorie to do that...

Yep, those "poor babies" are so overworked...Maybe that little button should be installed in some of the bars where Boehner likes to hand out at.
 
Naw , nothing like that NAT but with holder its the theory that you are better off with the Enemy that you know than getting a new Enemy that you don't know . Besides that , whats the problem with MAKING 'holder' hang around especially when you know that he doesn't want to hang around !! Easy , just withhold Consent NAT !!
 
Yet when Harry Reid turned the Senate into the legislation graveyard the left could not have cared less. As far as Lynch goes I doubt she will be much different than Holder time will tell.
 

Forum List

Back
Top