The linchpin of all other rights and freedoms is the right to property, Gomer.
The right to own property, as a defense against Tyranny. The right to citizenship and the right to vote, as a defense against Tyranny. They are compatible.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The linchpin of all other rights and freedoms is the right to property, Gomer.
Universal suffrage is as sure a path to the tyranny of the mob as there is.The linchpin of all other rights and freedoms is the right to property, Gomer.
The right to own property, as a defense against Tyranny. The right to citizenship and the right to vote, as a defense against Tyranny. They are compatible.
Huggy accurately describes Rabbi's hopes and deliberate intentions.
Does it disturb you that your views agree with a vile anti-Semite?
It's what's called an "analogy", Chumlee.Not far fetched at all.
Nobody belongs in the game without a buy-in.
Therin lies the problem with your version of what society and our nations goals should be. You think it is a game. Thank you for making that point.
Thanks for proving that you're as dumb as a bag of hammers.
Universal suffrage is as sure a path to the tyranny of the mob as there is.The linchpin of all other rights and freedoms is the right to property, Gomer.
The right to own property, as a defense against Tyranny. The right to citizenship and the right to vote, as a defense against Tyranny. They are compatible.
The balance against this is that the tenant class were to have their say at the state level (states were free to make any election law they wanted), then represented in the Senate via Senators appointed by the state legislatures.
The enacting of the 17th Amendment basically federalized mob rule.
When the Us was founded, most of the rest of the world was ruled by kings. In a kingdom, only the landowners had status. It is not surprising that some of the founders held this idea of citizenship.
Remember, women then didn't vote, and could only be beaten with a switch a large around as the thumb. Then there was that "peculiar institution" we call slavery.
I don't think it is an idea for today.
But those were the good old days, where white christian males had all the rights and were able to force everybody to live by their standards, according to the hacks
That direct path was in the jury box, which has been usurped by the judicial oligarchy.Universal suffrage is as sure a path to the tyranny of the mob as there is.The right to own property, as a defense against Tyranny. The right to citizenship and the right to vote, as a defense against Tyranny. They are compatible.
The balance against this is that the tenant class were to have their say at the state level (states were free to make any election law they wanted), then represented in the Senate via Senators appointed by the state legislatures.
The enacting of the 17th Amendment basically federalized mob rule.
I believe that the straighter path to Justice is through Stronger establishment of Our Rights, Individual Rights, that includes Privacy, Property, and Voice. The Constitution protect's the Individual, whether in the majority or minority, based on higher principle, ethics, and a sense of impartial justice. The sad thing is how easily that is forgotten. The question should not be who get's to manipulate, but to what end.
We are a Republic, founded in Federalism, not Nationalism. We have so lost our way.
Huggy accurately describes Rabbi's hopes and deliberate intentions.
Does it disturb you that your views agree with a vile anti-Semite?
No doubt.The right to own property is so much more than real estate. From the clothes on your back, to your wallet, to the tools of your trade, to food, clothing, possessions, no Government should have the right to them without due process. The rule of law applies to all.
That direct path was in the jury box, which has been usurped by the judicial oligarchy.Universal suffrage is as sure a path to the tyranny of the mob as there is.
The balance against this is that the tenant class were to have their say at the state level (states were free to make any election law they wanted), then represented in the Senate via Senators appointed by the state legislatures.
The enacting of the 17th Amendment basically federalized mob rule.
I believe that the straighter path to Justice is through Stronger establishment of Our Rights, Individual Rights, that includes Privacy, Property, and Voice. The Constitution protect's the Individual, whether in the majority or minority, based on higher principle, ethics, and a sense of impartial justice. The sad thing is how easily that is forgotten. The question should not be who get's to manipulate, but to what end.
We are a Republic, founded in Federalism, not Nationalism. We have so lost our way.
That we have so lost our way is correct.
No doubt.The right to own property is so much more than real estate. From the clothes on your back, to your wallet, to the tools of your trade, to food, clothing, possessions, no Government should have the right to them without due process. The rule of law applies to all.
However, if you give the tenant the power to vote themself the property of the land owner they'll do so every time.
Due process and the rule of law was to be seen to in the jury box.
I know the left may not understand this but Locke believed that a citizen was someone who owned property because government was formed to protect the property of each individual within the community therefore the only people who needed government were those that owned property therefore were citizens of that government.
I know it seems barbaric to say that only property owners are citizens but is it really that far fetched of an idea? When I have a dispute with another citizen over something I own I use my government to protect what I think is rightfully mine. It would not seem very plausible to go into a Canadian court and ask them to settle the dispute.
That's a great idea.
If this were 1674.
Why don't we just say "white males who own property are only citizens" and be done with it.
Nobody paid federal taxes on their productivity back then, and the land ownership requirement was for federal elections. The states made their own election laws insofar as participation was concerned.Not far fetched at all.
Nobody belongs in the game without a buy-in.
Exactly what is that buy in? Just asking because I pay taxes to the federal government but dont own any property (land).
At this point, we've been dragged by progressives/socialists so far from the republic set forth, that the men who set it fort would be appalled.
Actually, if you were a woman and your name was on the land patent you could vote....That just didn't happen very often.In America, you could become part of the gentry through your own efforts, rather than merely being a member of the lucky sperm club...That was the idea.
As long as you were white and male. That's part of being in the lucky sperm club.
Likewise, the 3/5 compromise was made to get the Constitution ratified. It was designed to further perfect the Articles of Confederation, not be to be be-all-end-all.
Leeches. Can't live with 'em. Can't fulfill all your sick, twisted medieval fantasies without 'em. I do give coo points to folks who have accessories for the "let's play dress up" times though.
*wanders off to look for my fur lined handcuffs...where the hell did I leave them last?....."
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNC0kIzM1Fo]YouTube - John Paul Young - Love Is In The Air (1978)[/ame]Why mince words ya slimey fuck? How about "Jew Hater"? My people , the Irish, are hard workers...not the thieves in the night that you represent. On a personal note how's this for a comparrison of ethics and values. My grandfather on my mom's side started a "penny bank" in the 30's to help working and non working people buy appliances and other modest purchases charging very low interest and forgiving those that failed to pay under those very difficult circumstances. He was very wealthy and there were few government programs to help the unemployed and destitute at that time. Your kind would only make loans if there was a high likelyhood that you could repossess something and make the borrowers life even harder. I don't have to put you down ..do I Rabbi?.. You know who and what you are. Go fuck yourself...now run along ....its a long day and I doubt you have met your quota of people to cheat today.
How many Irish sit on the Supreme Court? How many Irish have won the Nobel Prize? How many Irish head banks?
Your people are a bunch of low class drunks and trouble makers.
you two deserve each other.