Listening to Jesus

[Skull Pilot]

If you hear JEEBUS talking to you then you need to be committed immediately

 

[hobelim]

Gods kingdom has not arrived to the earth yet.

After Nebuchadnezzar lived like a dumb beast for seven years he raised his eyes and said this,

"It has seemed good to me to declare the signs and wonders which the Most High God has done for me. "How great are His signs And how mighty are His wonders! His kingdom is an everlasting kingdom And His dominion is from generation to generation. "

Jesus said that some of those standing around listening to him would not die before they saw this same thing, the kingdom of God in power over the world of man. That was a very long time ago....




If you look around and see no sign of God's kingdom on earth, you are still living like a dumb beast who doesn't have enough sense to get out of the rain or look up and see whats going on over his head.....




Jesus said that the laws of God would remain in effect and in full force for as long as heaven and earth endure....That means the kingdom of God has always been, is, and will be in existence and in power over the people of this world ever since the beginning when divine law was first given as a light..

The Kingdom has already come. The law remains in effect and in full force. You lie in the name of God, mislead others to do the same, (which amounts to murder), and consequently see nothing.

You have your reward already.

Unless you repent you will never enter the kingdom of Heaven.

"Outside are dogs and sorcerers, murders and idolators, and all those who only love and practice deceit."

 

[BreezeWood]

.
thankfulness is a holiday without religion, christianity ... something the unthankful are incapable of.

.

Communism is naturalized humanism. Karl Marx

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

.

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy ...

it's customary to attribute quotes to their source ... whether relevant or not.


.

Only one is a direct quote. I paraphrased some and added my own ideas. Bite me if you don't like it. My signature line will only accomodate so many lines.

Michail Bakunins sozial-politischer Briefwechsel mit Alexander Ivanovitsch Herzen. Stuttgart, 1895.

G. Le Bon. Psychologie du socialisme. (Quotations refer to Russian translation, Psikhologiia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

S. Frank. "Etika nigilizma" ("The Ethics of Nihilism," in Russian). In: Vekhi (Landmarks), Moscow, 1909.

S. Bulgakov. Pervokhristianstvo i noveishii sotsializm (Early Christianity and Modern Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1911.

S. Bulgakov. Khristianstvo i sotsializm (Christianity and Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1917

W. Gurian. Der Bolschewismus. Freiburg, 1931 giia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955

I. Shafarevich. The Socialist Phenomeon, 1980 by Harper & Row

.

I paraphrased some and added my own ideas.

real clever especially the clarity ... and you are leading us to believe Jesus was a capitalist --- is why he was crucified by the Jews and Romans -

inquisitor, yours is truly a curious religion.

.

lol, I have not gotten within 100 miles of Jesus. Nice try though. The reality is that you are trying to defend socialism without admitting you are for socialism.

.

The reality is that you are trying to defend socialism without admitting you are for socialism.

so claims the inquisitor ...



BW: - real clever especially the clarity ... and you are leading us to believe Jesus was a capitalist --- is why he was crucified by the Jews and Romans - .

lol, I have not gotten within 100 miles of Jesus.

again, that makes a lot of sense, christian ... were you referring to what was written by your masters.

.

 

[ding]

Is that the best you have? It's like you are not even trying. Have you tried mocking Him directly?

I only mock those with no clue. Like you.

Are you afraid to mock God?

That would make me just like you. Afraid of invisible, unproven rulers.

But you are afraid of Him, Mudda. Don't feel bad. You are not the first atheist I have come across who was afraid to mock God. In fact, it seems to be a common trait.

Whether I mock him or not doesn't take away from the fact that your god is a douchesack who needs people to idolize him/her or else he chars them in a fire.

No. It is not whether you do or don't. You don't. You won't. Why? Because you fear Him. Calling Him a douchesack isn't mocking Him. Try harder. C'mon big talker, challenge Him to teach you a lesson. Make sure you do it in every post just to show us how you don't fear Him.

 

[ding]

so claims the inquisitor ...

Yes, that is exactly what I claim. You are trying to defend socialism without admitting you are for socialism.

 

[ding]

again, that makes a lot of sense, christian ... were you referring to what was written by your masters.

No. I am referring to what was written by...

Michail Bakunins sozial-politischer Briefwechsel mit Alexander Ivanovitsch Herzen. Stuttgart, 1895.

G. Le Bon. Psychologie du socialisme. (Quotations refer to Russian translation, Psikhologiia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

S. Frank. "Etika nigilizma" ("The Ethics of Nihilism," in Russian). In: Vekhi (Landmarks), Moscow, 1909.

S. Bulgakov. Pervokhristianstvo i noveishii sotsializm (Early Christianity and Modern Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1911.

S. Bulgakov. Khristianstvo i sotsializm (Christianity and Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1917

W. Gurian. Der Bolschewismus. Freiburg, 1931 giia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955

I. Shafarevich. The Socialist Phenomeon, 1980 by Harper & Row

 

[ding]

Communism is naturalized humanism. Karl Marx

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

.

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy ...

it's customary to attribute quotes to their source ... whether relevant or not.


.

Only one is a direct quote. I paraphrased some and added my own ideas. Bite me if you don't like it. My signature line will only accomodate so many lines.

Michail Bakunins sozial-politischer Briefwechsel mit Alexander Ivanovitsch Herzen. Stuttgart, 1895.

G. Le Bon. Psychologie du socialisme. (Quotations refer to Russian translation, Psikhologiia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

S. Frank. "Etika nigilizma" ("The Ethics of Nihilism," in Russian). In: Vekhi (Landmarks), Moscow, 1909.

S. Bulgakov. Pervokhristianstvo i noveishii sotsializm (Early Christianity and Modern Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1911.

S. Bulgakov. Khristianstvo i sotsializm (Christianity and Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1917

W. Gurian. Der Bolschewismus. Freiburg, 1931 giia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955

I. Shafarevich. The Socialist Phenomeon, 1980 by Harper & Row

.

I paraphrased some and added my own ideas.

real clever especially the clarity ... and you are leading us to believe Jesus was a capitalist --- is why he was crucified by the Jews and Romans -

inquisitor, yours is truly a curious religion.

.

lol, I have not gotten within 100 miles of Jesus. Nice try though. The reality is that you are trying to defend socialism without admitting you are for socialism.

.

The reality is that you are trying to defend socialism without admitting you are for socialism.

so claims the inquisitor ...



BW: - real clever especially the clarity ... and you are leading us to believe Jesus was a capitalist --- is why he was crucified by the Jews and Romans - .

lol, I have not gotten within 100 miles of Jesus.

again, that makes a lot of sense, christian ... were you referring to what was written by your masters.

.

What is your religion again?

 

[Mudda]

I only mock those with no clue. Like you.

Are you afraid to mock God?

That would make me just like you. Afraid of invisible, unproven rulers.

But you are afraid of Him, Mudda. Don't feel bad. You are not the first atheist I have come across who was afraid to mock God. In fact, it seems to be a common trait.

Whether I mock him or not doesn't take away from the fact that your god is a douchesack who needs people to idolize him/her or else he chars them in a fire.

No. It is not whether you do or don't. You don't. You won't. Why? Because you fear Him. Calling Him a douchesack isn't mocking Him. Try harder. C'mon big talker, challenge Him to teach you a lesson. Make sure you do it in every post just to show us how you don't fear Him.

I see nothing to fear, and all you have is theories that may or may not even make any sense.

 

[Mudda]

so claims the inquisitor ...

Yes, that is exactly what I claim. You are trying to defend socialism without admitting you are for socialism.

You are trying to defend nonsense without admitting that what you say is nonsense. I declare you both even.

 

[ding]

Are you afraid to mock God?

That would make me just like you. Afraid of invisible, unproven rulers.

But you are afraid of Him, Mudda. Don't feel bad. You are not the first atheist I have come across who was afraid to mock God. In fact, it seems to be a common trait.

Whether I mock him or not doesn't take away from the fact that your god is a douchesack who needs people to idolize him/her or else he chars them in a fire.

No. It is not whether you do or don't. You don't. You won't. Why? Because you fear Him. Calling Him a douchesack isn't mocking Him. Try harder. C'mon big talker, challenge Him to teach you a lesson. Make sure you do it in every post just to show us how you don't fear Him.

I see nothing to fear, and all you have is theories that may or may not even make any sense.

So then you have no good reason not to mock Him.

 

[Mudda]

That would make me just like you. Afraid of invisible, unproven rulers.

But you are afraid of Him, Mudda. Don't feel bad. You are not the first atheist I have come across who was afraid to mock God. In fact, it seems to be a common trait.

Whether I mock him or not doesn't take away from the fact that your god is a douchesack who needs people to idolize him/her or else he chars them in a fire.

No. It is not whether you do or don't. You don't. You won't. Why? Because you fear Him. Calling Him a douchesack isn't mocking Him. Try harder. C'mon big talker, challenge Him to teach you a lesson. Make sure you do it in every post just to show us how you don't fear Him.

I see nothing to fear, and all you have is theories that may or may not even make any sense.

So then you have no good reason not to mock Him.

No reason at all.

 

[ding]

But you are afraid of Him, Mudda. Don't feel bad. You are not the first atheist I have come across who was afraid to mock God. In fact, it seems to be a common trait.

Whether I mock him or not doesn't take away from the fact that your god is a douchesack who needs people to idolize him/her or else he chars them in a fire.

No. It is not whether you do or don't. You don't. You won't. Why? Because you fear Him. Calling Him a douchesack isn't mocking Him. Try harder. C'mon big talker, challenge Him to teach you a lesson. Make sure you do it in every post just to show us how you don't fear Him.

I see nothing to fear, and all you have is theories that may or may not even make any sense.

So then you have no good reason not to mock Him.

No reason at all.

Except that you are afraid to mock Him because you believe He exists.

 

[BreezeWood]

Whether I mock him or not doesn't take away from the fact that your god is a douchesack who needs people to idolize him/her or else he chars them in a fire.

No. It is not whether you do or don't. You don't. You won't. Why? Because you fear Him. Calling Him a douchesack isn't mocking Him. Try harder. C'mon big talker, challenge Him to teach you a lesson. Make sure you do it in every post just to show us how you don't fear Him.

I see nothing to fear, and all you have is theories that may or may not even make any sense.

So then you have no good reason not to mock Him.

No reason at all.

Except that you are afraid to mock Him because you believe He exists.

.

Except that you are afraid to mock Him because you believe He exists.

what has the Almighty to do with your vindictive hatred of socialism and not too dissimilar to their scriptural presence in your bible in regards to humanity by the sullen disregard for comradary ...

.

.

 

[Mudda]

Whether I mock him or not doesn't take away from the fact that your god is a douchesack who needs people to idolize him/her or else he chars them in a fire.

No. It is not whether you do or don't. You don't. You won't. Why? Because you fear Him. Calling Him a douchesack isn't mocking Him. Try harder. C'mon big talker, challenge Him to teach you a lesson. Make sure you do it in every post just to show us how you don't fear Him.

I see nothing to fear, and all you have is theories that may or may not even make any sense.

So then you have no good reason not to mock Him.

No reason at all.

Except that you are afraid to mock Him because you believe He exists.

Unless your god is deaf, he's heard me mock him plenty of times. Geez, you theists sure are pushy. Always want more. Not satisfied with reality, you have to make shit up.

 

[ding]

No. It is not whether you do or don't. You don't. You won't. Why? Because you fear Him. Calling Him a douchesack isn't mocking Him. Try harder. C'mon big talker, challenge Him to teach you a lesson. Make sure you do it in every post just to show us how you don't fear Him.

I see nothing to fear, and all you have is theories that may or may not even make any sense.

So then you have no good reason not to mock Him.

No reason at all.

Except that you are afraid to mock Him because you believe He exists.

.

Except that you are afraid to mock Him because you believe He exists.

what has the Almighty to do with your vindictive hatred of socialism and not too dissimilar to their scriptural presence in your bible in regards to humanity by the sullen disregard for comradary ...

.

.

Socialism is the form evil has taken in the cosmic battle between good and evil.

 

[Mudda]

I see nothing to fear, and all you have is theories that may or may not even make any sense.

So then you have no good reason not to mock Him.

No reason at all.

Except that you are afraid to mock Him because you believe He exists.

.

Except that you are afraid to mock Him because you believe He exists.

what has the Almighty to do with your vindictive hatred of socialism and not too dissimilar to their scriptural presence in your bible in regards to humanity by the sullen disregard for comradary ...

.

.

Socialism is the form evil has taken in the cosmic battle between good and evil.

Got any proof at all of a cosmic battle between good and evil?

 

[ding]

So then you have no good reason not to mock Him.

No reason at all.

Except that you are afraid to mock Him because you believe He exists.

.

Except that you are afraid to mock Him because you believe He exists.

what has the Almighty to do with your vindictive hatred of socialism and not too dissimilar to their scriptural presence in your bible in regards to humanity by the sullen disregard for comradary ...

.

.

Socialism is the form evil has taken in the cosmic battle between good and evil.

Got any proof at all of a cosmic battle between good and evil?

Michail Bakunins sozial-politischer Briefwechsel mit Alexander Ivanovitsch Herzen. Stuttgart, 1895.

G. Le Bon. Psychologie du socialisme. (Quotations refer to Russian translation, Psikhologiia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

S. Frank. "Etika nigilizma" ("The Ethics of Nihilism," in Russian). In: Vekhi (Landmarks), Moscow, 1909.

S. Bulgakov. Pervokhristianstvo i noveishii sotsializm (Early Christianity and Modern Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1911.

S. Bulgakov. Khristianstvo i sotsializm (Christianity and Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1917

W. Gurian. Der Bolschewismus. Freiburg, 1931 giia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955

I. Shafarevich. The Socialist Phenomeon, 1980 by Harper & Row

 

[Mudda]

No reason at all.

Except that you are afraid to mock Him because you believe He exists.

.

Except that you are afraid to mock Him because you believe He exists.

what has the Almighty to do with your vindictive hatred of socialism and not too dissimilar to their scriptural presence in your bible in regards to humanity by the sullen disregard for comradary ...

.

.

Socialism is the form evil has taken in the cosmic battle between good and evil.

Got any proof at all of a cosmic battle between good and evil?

Michail Bakunins sozial-politischer Briefwechsel mit Alexander Ivanovitsch Herzen. Stuttgart, 1895.

G. Le Bon. Psychologie du socialisme. (Quotations refer to Russian translation, Psikhologiia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

S. Frank. "Etika nigilizma" ("The Ethics of Nihilism," in Russian). In: Vekhi (Landmarks), Moscow, 1909.

S. Bulgakov. Pervokhristianstvo i noveishii sotsializm (Early Christianity and Modern Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1911.

S. Bulgakov. Khristianstvo i sotsializm (Christianity and Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1917

W. Gurian. Der Bolschewismus. Freiburg, 1931 giia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955

I. Shafarevich. The Socialist Phenomeon, 1980 by Harper & Row

Got any real scientific proof or just more fartsmoke?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I think following Jesus's instructions would be great.

I just wish more than a small percentage of Christians would do so.

 

[ding]

Except that you are afraid to mock Him because you believe He exists.

.

Except that you are afraid to mock Him because you believe He exists.

what has the Almighty to do with your vindictive hatred of socialism and not too dissimilar to their scriptural presence in your bible in regards to humanity by the sullen disregard for comradary ...

.

.

Socialism is the form evil has taken in the cosmic battle between good and evil.

Got any proof at all of a cosmic battle between good and evil?

Michail Bakunins sozial-politischer Briefwechsel mit Alexander Ivanovitsch Herzen. Stuttgart, 1895.

G. Le Bon. Psychologie du socialisme. (Quotations refer to Russian translation, Psikhologiia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

S. Frank. "Etika nigilizma" ("The Ethics of Nihilism," in Russian). In: Vekhi (Landmarks), Moscow, 1909.

S. Bulgakov. Pervokhristianstvo i noveishii sotsializm (Early Christianity and Modern Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1911.

S. Bulgakov. Khristianstvo i sotsializm (Christianity and Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1917

W. Gurian. Der Bolschewismus. Freiburg, 1931 giia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955

I. Shafarevich. The Socialist Phenomeon, 1980 by Harper & Row

Got any real scientific proof or just more fartsmoke?

You didn't ask for scientific proof. You asked for proof, which I gave to you. So now... after I have given you the proof you asked for, you have decided that you want scientific proof. Sorry that doesn't exist. Why would you believe that science could answer that question? So what proof do you have that it isn't?