Air America was on 66 stations when it went down. It had 63 stations that over the years left due to format changes. One of the largest subscribers was Clear Channel. The problem was suck ass ratings. Some of those stations that dropped AA, went to Catholic radio, Mexican music, many went to sports radio.
Their ratings on average was an astounding 1.3. Portland, Or had the highest ratings at 3.7. The New York flagship station was WWRL, with a whooping 0.5, that was the flagship station! Who in the hell was listening?
So spare us all the big business bull shit, the boycott rash of shit, blame it on the radio hosts, they sucked.
And those AirAmerica hosts are still on WWRL today --- dumbass.
And the ratings still suck, dumbass and it still blows the liberals theory that big bad corporate America put the company under. It had terrible ratings, when your flagship station couldn't pull a 1.0, you know you suck.
You're talking the NYC market, cretin. Have any idea how many listeners are in that market, and how much even 0.01 represents? And what the fuck do you know about its ratings? Do you have a book?
Nor does it blow the theory; WWRL, to continue the example, is a 25kw daytime station that reduces to 5kW at night. WABC, by comparison, is 50kW day and night. That's a different class. Or take the stations in my area: Lush Rimjob and Hannity and that crowd are on one ClearChannel station; Schultz and Miller et al are on another. Guess which one has to shut down at sunset. Lather, rinse, repeat.
And anyway you're still enslaved to this naive idea that the purpose of a radio program is to draw the largest possible audience. If you believe that, then you can't believe the ideology of the content is the driving factor. Listeners don't tune in for ideologies. They tune in for spectacle.
Last edited: