Yes, this is the CDZ. I have violated no rules here.
It is relevant because you are attacking libertarian thought when you stand in the same pool. There is nothing wrong with libertarians having a range of political worldviews as that is actually preferable to complete agreement without real debate. That does not make libertarianism a ‘muddled’ as you claim. That is a silly argument. ALL political persuasions have a varied degree of views and libertarianism is no different in that respect.
So far, you have been given several examples of views already, some held by large majorities of libertarians. Just because you choose not to understand where we are coming for does not mean that the libertarian philosophy is devoid of any positions any more than conservatives are devoid of any positions.
It is relevant because you are attacking libertarian thought when you stand in the same pool. There is nothing wrong with libertarians having a range of political worldviews as that is actually preferable to complete agreement without real debate. That does not make libertarianism a ‘muddled’ as you claim. That is a silly argument. ALL political persuasions have a varied degree of views and libertarianism is no different in that respect.
So far, you have been given several examples of views already, some held by large majorities of libertarians. Just because you choose not to understand where we are coming for does not mean that the libertarian philosophy is devoid of any positions any more than conservatives are devoid of any positions.
Last edited by a moderator: