Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Did you agree with jurors in the O.J., civil trail?Right, just like the jurors in the OJ trial. LOL
Of course not. The trial was moved to a predominantly Black area that Johnny Cochrane knew would be biased in favor of OJ. The entire trial was a waste of time since the jury ignored the evidence and immediately came back with their innocent verdict.Did you agree with jurors in the O.J., civil trail?
Jurors in the Simpson Civil Trial
Welcome to Famous Trials, the Web’s largest and most visited collection of original essays, trial transcripts and exhibits, maps, images, and other materials relating to the greatest trials in world history. “Famous Trials” first appeared on the Web in 1995, making this site older than about...famous-trials.com
Have they sat through a jury trial or just watched Fox News?
Do you support the actions of Donald Trump in this case?
Trump fucking a Porn Star while his wife is home with an infant is unethicalHey here's a newsflash: lots of things are morally questionable or unethical but are not ILLEGAL
Because you all are the New Puritans, you don't understand the difference.
Did you notice " with intent to commit another crime..." the other crime is never specified. In the real world that would cause this entire action to fail. Not only would the other crime have to be identified but proved.Another flop...
Vague? Do you have brain damage?
read the indictment:
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, by this indictment, accuses
the defendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST
DEGREE, in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:
The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017,
with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission
thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoice
from Michael Cohen dated February 14, 2017, marked as a record of the Donald J. Trump
Revocable Trust, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.
SECOND COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE,
in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:
The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017,
with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission
thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry in
the Detail General Ledger for the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, bearing voucher number
842457, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.
THIRD COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by th...
Can "Bullshit" Be Used as an Adjective?
https://chroniclesmagazine.org/web/alvin-braggs-witch-trial/ The linked essay simplifies the current Trump "hush money" trial in a way that explains the legal failings and - I dare say - atrocities incorporated therein. He is accused of concealing information pertaining to a "crime," which...www.usmessageboard.com
If he did buy her silence with business funds, that would be a misdemeanor and the statute ran long ago.Trump fucking a Porn Star while his wife is home with an infant is unethical
Buying her silence with Business funds is illegal
YOU voted for the guy
FelonyIf he did buy her silence with business funds, that would be a misdemeanor and the statute ran long ago.
Did you notice " with intent to commit another crime..." the other crime is never specified. In the real world that would cause this entire action to fail. Not only would the other crime have to be identified but proved.
Msn on msn, you people keep repeating that shit like a mantra. try and keep up.
Ken White: We know a lot more now about the D.A.’s theory of the case than we did before. There was a lot of speculation about whether the predicate crime — the one Trump was promoting by falsifying records — was going to be federal or state, and whether it was going to be campaign-finance related or election-interference related. Now the prosecutors have shown their hand, and their lead theory is going to be that Trump meant to interfere unlawfully with an election by concealing information that the voters might have considered. A case tends to look stronger after the prosecution picks a theory and commits to it. The evidence of deliberate falsification of records is going to be very strong.
Opinion | ‘It’s a Very Winnable Case’: Three Writers Dissect the Trump Trial
Debate and analysis about the case, jury selection and anticipation for a potential witness.www.nytimes.com
No. They attached it to a felony using the funds to conceal the commission of another crime. But never mention the crime.Felony
