Let's say Hansen is right???? What do we do?

Discussion in 'Environment' started by Matthew, Nov 20, 2012.

  1. Matthew
    Online

    Matthew Blue dog all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    49,655
    Thanks Received:
    4,595
    Trophy Points:
    1,885
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Ratings:
    +15,140
    Let's say Hansen is right???? Let's give him the benefit of being right in this thread. We really do see warming at .25-.3c per decade all the way to 2100. What would you suggest us do? Let's say we get 3 to 4c warmer than today by 2100.

    A few idea's
    -Build sea walls around cities that are within 5 feet of sea level.
    -Move cities, towns, etc to higher ground
    -Work on toughing up grains, etc to sustain themselves through drought and flood

    What else do we do?
     
    Last edited: Nov 20, 2012
  2. Matthew
    Online

    Matthew Blue dog all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    49,655
    Thanks Received:
    4,595
    Trophy Points:
    1,885
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Ratings:
    +15,140
    How would you skeptics handle 4c+ of warming in 88 years? If you were the one to make sure that this nation did well.
     
  3. bripat9643
    Offline

    bripat9643 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Messages:
    67,764
    Thanks Received:
    8,068
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +27,284
    Enjoy the warm weather and low food prices. Also enjoy the lower heating bills.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. anotherlife
    Offline

    anotherlife Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2012
    Messages:
    2,364
    Thanks Received:
    119
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Location:
    Cross-Atlantic
    Ratings:
    +515
    Isn't this current warming supposed to be like the previous cycle of it, when the diluted golf current lost its warming power and the ice-sheets returned to New York and Paris? I think that 90 % of geologic history saw a 25 C higher average global temperature than today, and the current period's cool spike is a result of the forming of the central American land bridge cutting off half the warming waters from the Pacific. Is this correct? If yes, then we have nothing to be afraid of, I think.
     
  5. SSDD
    Offline

    SSDD Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    7,878
    Thanks Received:
    819
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,515
    If hansen is right then there will be a great deal of money to be made in ballistic umbrellas due to the droppings of the flying pigs.
     
  6. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,543
    Thanks Received:
    2,554
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,661
    Slowing down emissions isn't even considered? :eusa_eh:
     
  7. anotherlife
    Offline

    anotherlife Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2012
    Messages:
    2,364
    Thanks Received:
    119
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Location:
    Cross-Atlantic
    Ratings:
    +515
    If Hansen is right, then start buying up land at the strategic locations, that's the best thing that you can do, I think.
     
  8. Old Rocks
    Online

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,452
    Thanks Received:
    5,409
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,296
    Pattycake, you are truly an idiot.
     
  9. Toddsterpatriot
    Offline

    Toddsterpatriot Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    26,073
    Thanks Received:
    3,641
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +10,036
    If you think we should build a few dozen new nuclear power plants and reprocess the spent fuel sitting in cooling pools at current plants, I'm all for it.
     
  10. Old Rocks
    Online

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,452
    Thanks Received:
    5,409
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,296
    No, that is not correct. If you are speaking of the Younger Dryas, much differant starting points, and causes.

    For analogs to current climatic events, you have to look at the beginnings of events like the PT extinction period and the PETM.

    Point is, we have over 7 billion people on earth that depend on agriculture to live. As the climate gets more variable, the yeild from that agriculture gets more problamatic.

    No, we are not going to die out as a species, but we may see a dramitic population reduction.
     

Share This Page