Let's say Hansen is right???? What do we do?

Discussion in 'Environment' started by Matthew, Nov 20, 2012.

  1. Matthew
    Offline

    Matthew Blue dog all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    51,825
    Thanks Received:
    4,913
    Trophy Points:
    1,885
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Ratings:
    +17,115
    Let's say Hansen is right???? Let's give him the benefit of being right in this thread. We really do see warming at .25-.3c per decade all the way to 2100. What would you suggest us do? Let's say we get 3 to 4c warmer than today by 2100.

    A few idea's
    -Build sea walls around cities that are within 5 feet of sea level.
    -Move cities, towns, etc to higher ground
    -Work on toughing up grains, etc to sustain themselves through drought and flood

    What else do we do?
     
    Last edited: Nov 20, 2012
  2. Matthew
    Offline

    Matthew Blue dog all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    51,825
    Thanks Received:
    4,913
    Trophy Points:
    1,885
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Ratings:
    +17,115
    How would you skeptics handle 4c+ of warming in 88 years? If you were the one to make sure that this nation did well.
     
  3. bripat9643
    Offline

    bripat9643 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Messages:
    71,822
    Thanks Received:
    8,738
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +31,278
    Enjoy the warm weather and low food prices. Also enjoy the lower heating bills.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. anotherlife
    Offline

    anotherlife Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2012
    Messages:
    2,817
    Thanks Received:
    143
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Location:
    Cross-Atlantic
    Ratings:
    +633
    Isn't this current warming supposed to be like the previous cycle of it, when the diluted golf current lost its warming power and the ice-sheets returned to New York and Paris? I think that 90 % of geologic history saw a 25 C higher average global temperature than today, and the current period's cool spike is a result of the forming of the central American land bridge cutting off half the warming waters from the Pacific. Is this correct? If yes, then we have nothing to be afraid of, I think.
     
  5. SSDD
    Offline

    SSDD Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    9,152
    Thanks Received:
    932
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,398
    If hansen is right then there will be a great deal of money to be made in ballistic umbrellas due to the droppings of the flying pigs.
     
  6. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,997
    Thanks Received:
    2,625
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,960
    Slowing down emissions isn't even considered? :eusa_eh:
     
  7. anotherlife
    Offline

    anotherlife Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2012
    Messages:
    2,817
    Thanks Received:
    143
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Location:
    Cross-Atlantic
    Ratings:
    +633
    If Hansen is right, then start buying up land at the strategic locations, that's the best thing that you can do, I think.
     
  8. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    49,435
    Thanks Received:
    5,814
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +11,993
    Pattycake, you are truly an idiot.
     
  9. Toddsterpatriot
    Offline

    Toddsterpatriot Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    28,640
    Thanks Received:
    3,938
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +11,949
    If you think we should build a few dozen new nuclear power plants and reprocess the spent fuel sitting in cooling pools at current plants, I'm all for it.
     
  10. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    49,435
    Thanks Received:
    5,814
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +11,993
    No, that is not correct. If you are speaking of the Younger Dryas, much differant starting points, and causes.

    For analogs to current climatic events, you have to look at the beginnings of events like the PT extinction period and the PETM.

    Point is, we have over 7 billion people on earth that depend on agriculture to live. As the climate gets more variable, the yeild from that agriculture gets more problamatic.

    No, we are not going to die out as a species, but we may see a dramitic population reduction.
     

Share This Page