Let's be honest

[JakeStarkey]

Let's be honest

 

[Rocko]

Lmfao. The most dishonest USMB poster calls for honesty.

We left Iraq prematurely under Obama. Period.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Rocko shows his anti-American agenda of the far right with such a comment.

Bush refused to use the 400,000 troops required until it could only keep the lid on not change matters. Maliki would not compromise on SOFA, and sux to be you, Rocko, because if you were the only troop in Iraq, I would have had BHO sign it.

The cartoon is an excellent example of Rumsfeld not paying attention to his caution of being cautious about the "known unknown" as well as ignoring the law of unintended consequences.

The invasion of Iraq has unleashed the forces of radical Islam the which we had no idea.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Lmfao. The most dishonest USMB poster calls for honesty.

We left Iraq prematurely under Obama. Period.

I immediately started laughing when I saw jake was the OP

 

[Mr. H.]

Plenty of Democrats were complicit regarding the Iraq incursion.
Don't fool yourself, fool.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Lmfao. The most dishonest USMB poster calls for honesty.

We left Iraq prematurely under Obama. Period.

I immediately started laughing when I saw jake was the OP

That shows you are an extremely foolish far right reactionary drone bot.

The cartoon is correct. Bush let the genie out of the bottle, and it cannot be put back in because of Bush's terrible regime change of almost six years.

No way is open for a far right escape on this issue: they own it.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Plenty of Democrats were complicit regarding the Iraq incursion.
Don't fool yourself, fool.

'Complicit' in that Bush sold them on bad military analysis, which allowed him to invade and mismanage the whole god-forsaken debacle. No 72 virgins for you, fool.

 

[longknife]

Lmfao. The most dishonest USMB poster calls for honesty.

We left Iraq prematurely under Obama. Period.

I immediately started laughing when I saw jake was the OP

Me too.

 

[Dad2three]

Plenty of Democrats were complicit regarding the Iraq incursion.
Don't fool yourself, fool.

Yet 60% of Dems in Congress voted against Dubya's war of choice. Go figure the decider NEVER has to accept responsibility for ANY of his decisions and the 'party of personal responsibility' marches on!

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Let's be honest

Some nations can only be held together by a strongman. Then again, Iraq wasn't supposed to be a nation. Like Israel, another Western Power disaster in the making.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

At least conservatives are consistent when it comes to ignoring facts and the truth.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The far right reactionary 'waa' bots are wailing on schedule.

If the international community cobbles a joint military force, the good guys can cobble a corridor from Turkey to Baghdad to Basra. But nothing more.

It galls me that we have to work with Iran, but there is no other option.

That force will have to be western Christian and ME Islamic nations.

 

[Harry Dresden]

At least conservatives are consistent when it comes to ignoring facts and the truth.

No_Reply_Jones strikes again....

 

[jwoodie]

The invasion of Iraq has unleashed the forces of radical Islam the which we had no idea.

Please explain your thesis that radical Islam did not exist prior to the invasion of Iraq.

 

[Avatar4321]

Always am.

 

[Mr. H.]

Plenty of Democrats were complicit regarding the Iraq incursion.
Don't fool yourself, fool.

'Complicit' in that Bush sold them on bad military analysis, which allowed him to invade and mismanage the whole god-forsaken debacle. No 72 virgins for you, fool.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The invasion of Iraq has unleashed the forces of radical Islam the which we had no idea.

Please explain your thesis that radical Islam did not exist prior to the invasion of Iraq.

Wrong, ignorant question. Ask intelligent ones or be ignored.

 

[Avatar4321]

The invasion of Iraq has unleashed the forces of radical Islam the which we had no idea.

Please explain your thesis that radical Islam did not exist prior to the invasion of Iraq.

I don't think that's his thesis.

He is arguing that removing Saddam took the cap off of it and brought it to the surface.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Thank you, Avatar4321. jwoodie knows that too, I believe, but we can ask him and his buds this:"Do you agree with Avatar4321's point"

 

[deltex1]

Rocko shows his anti-American agenda of the far right with such a comment.

Bush refused to use the 400,000 troops required until it could only keep the lid on not change matters. Maliki would not compromise on SOFA, and sux to be you, Rocko, because if you were the only troop in Iraq, I would have had BHO sign it.

The cartoon is an excellent example of Rumsfeld not paying attention to his caution of being cautious about the "known unknown" as well as ignoring the law of unintended consequences.

The invasion of Iraq has unleashed the forces of radical Islam the which we had no idea.

Jake may not be honest, but he sure is incomprehensible