Left wing racists force white owners of restaurant to close...because they cook Mexican food....

[iceberg]

Looks like the market has spoken.

Isn't that capitalism?

Ayup! And the market can be fickle.

Maybe the OP is suggesting we pass a law preventing the SJWs from talking to people.

And is it wrong for us to take issue over the reasons these SJWs decided that it's wrong for whites to make burritos? Is it wrong to think the ousting of Eich (Firefox) because of his position on gay marriage, was totally inappropriate?

No, not at all.

Sure there was no "force" or "policy", that ran these girls out of business...the real issue is SJWs squashing diversity, "Mexicans can only make burritos." Wanting to shut down other people's voice, business, whatever, when we should be voting and promoting freedom. THIS IS NOT FREEDOM, SJWs do NOT want nor BELIEVE in actual freedom. Not of speech, or conscious, beliefs, or religion.

40% of Millennials OK with limiting speech offensive to minorities

Poll: 51% of Democrats support criminalizing hate speech - Hot Air

LOOK at these articles, this is a very bad direction we are taking. Also ask yourself, what constitutes hate speech these days? The term hate speech has gotten immensely broader. This is the issue we are taking up with the social justice warriors in this situation. The fact that they do not believe in basic freedoms, to the point where they believe MAKING FOOD IS STRICTLY BASED ON SKIN COLOR!!!! This is straight up RACIST!! And these people are voting to have this agenda done. Get your head out of the sand and recognize this problem, we should together (left and right) shame these reincarnated puritans the same way they shamed these white girls out of business, something that they probably made a big financial risk to undertake and now are SOL. These SJWs are our new puritans.

"THIS IS NOT FREEDOM, SJWs do NOT want nor BELIEVE in actual freedom. Not of speech, or conscious, beliefs, or religion."

I have to agree with the last part. Most of the lefties I talk to either don't understand freedom, or fear it. But the same goes for most conservatives I talk to. And FREEDOM is exactly what this is. You have every right to complain about it, but no one's freedom is being violated.

Well I think there is a case for liable & slander, and in that case, yes freedoms were violated. Being a con artist is punishable since you are technically stealing from people, which is infringing on their property rights, there is no 1st amendment protecting people who use the first to infringe on others rights. Is it wrong to make and sell Mexican food as a non-Mexican? No not at all. Is it wrong to cause harm to defame a business who does so in order to effect their lively Hood, yes it is wrong. This does not make it wrong to be against non Mexicans making Mexican food, but when you take it to the level of publicly trying to shut down someone else's business...I think that's moving into slander and liable.

How were they defamed?

Who defamed them?

Describe this "case" you see.

my sister defamed me once.

once....

 

[sakinago]

Looks like the market has spoken.

Isn't that capitalism?

Ayup! And the market can be fickle.

Maybe the OP is suggesting we pass a law preventing the SJWs from talking to people.

And is it wrong for us to take issue over the reasons these SJWs decided that it's wrong for whites to make burritos? Is it wrong to think the ousting of Eich (Firefox) because of his position on gay marriage, was totally inappropriate?

No, not at all.

Sure there was no "force" or "policy", that ran these girls out of business...the real issue is SJWs squashing diversity, "Mexicans can only make burritos." Wanting to shut down other people's voice, business, whatever, when we should be voting and promoting freedom. THIS IS NOT FREEDOM, SJWs do NOT want nor BELIEVE in actual freedom. Not of speech, or conscious, beliefs, or religion.

40% of Millennials OK with limiting speech offensive to minorities

Poll: 51% of Democrats support criminalizing hate speech - Hot Air

LOOK at these articles, this is a very bad direction we are taking. Also ask yourself, what constitutes hate speech these days? The term hate speech has gotten immensely broader. This is the issue we are taking up with the social justice warriors in this situation. The fact that they do not believe in basic freedoms, to the point where they believe MAKING FOOD IS STRICTLY BASED ON SKIN COLOR!!!! This is straight up RACIST!! And these people are voting to have this agenda done. Get your head out of the sand and recognize this problem, we should together (left and right) shame these reincarnated puritans the same way they shamed these white girls out of business, something that they probably made a big financial risk to undertake and now are SOL. These SJWs are our new puritans.

"THIS IS NOT FREEDOM, SJWs do NOT want nor BELIEVE in actual freedom. Not of speech, or conscious, beliefs, or religion."

I have to agree with the last part. Most of the lefties I talk to either don't understand freedom, or fear it. But the same goes for most conservatives I talk to. And FREEDOM is exactly what this is. You have every right to complain about it, but no one's freedom is being violated.

Well I think there is a case for liable & slander, and in that case, yes freedoms were violated. Being a con artist is punishable since you are technically stealing from people, which is infringing on their property rights, there is no 1st amendment protecting people who use the first to infringe on others rights. Is it wrong to make and sell Mexican food as a non-Mexican? No not at all. Is it wrong to cause harm to defame a business who does so in order to effect their lively Hood, yes it is wrong. This does not make it wrong to be against non Mexicans making Mexican food, but when you take it to the level of publicly trying to shut down someone else's business...I think that's moving into slander and liable.

How were they defamed?

Who defamed them?

Describe this "case" you see.

Whites making burritos is cultural appropriation...it is not.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Ayup! And the market can be fickle.

Maybe the OP is suggesting we pass a law preventing the SJWs from talking to people.

And is it wrong for us to take issue over the reasons these SJWs decided that it's wrong for whites to make burritos? Is it wrong to think the ousting of Eich (Firefox) because of his position on gay marriage, was totally inappropriate?

No, not at all.

Sure there was no "force" or "policy", that ran these girls out of business...the real issue is SJWs squashing diversity, "Mexicans can only make burritos." Wanting to shut down other people's voice, business, whatever, when we should be voting and promoting freedom. THIS IS NOT FREEDOM, SJWs do NOT want nor BELIEVE in actual freedom. Not of speech, or conscious, beliefs, or religion.

40% of Millennials OK with limiting speech offensive to minorities

Poll: 51% of Democrats support criminalizing hate speech - Hot Air

LOOK at these articles, this is a very bad direction we are taking. Also ask yourself, what constitutes hate speech these days? The term hate speech has gotten immensely broader. This is the issue we are taking up with the social justice warriors in this situation. The fact that they do not believe in basic freedoms, to the point where they believe MAKING FOOD IS STRICTLY BASED ON SKIN COLOR!!!! This is straight up RACIST!! And these people are voting to have this agenda done. Get your head out of the sand and recognize this problem, we should together (left and right) shame these reincarnated puritans the same way they shamed these white girls out of business, something that they probably made a big financial risk to undertake and now are SOL. These SJWs are our new puritans.

"THIS IS NOT FREEDOM, SJWs do NOT want nor BELIEVE in actual freedom. Not of speech, or conscious, beliefs, or religion."

I have to agree with the last part. Most of the lefties I talk to either don't understand freedom, or fear it. But the same goes for most conservatives I talk to. And FREEDOM is exactly what this is. You have every right to complain about it, but no one's freedom is being violated.

Well I think there is a case for liable & slander, and in that case, yes freedoms were violated. Being a con artist is punishable since you are technically stealing from people, which is infringing on their property rights, there is no 1st amendment protecting people who use the first to infringe on others rights. Is it wrong to make and sell Mexican food as a non-Mexican? No not at all. Is it wrong to cause harm to defame a business who does so in order to effect their lively Hood, yes it is wrong. This does not make it wrong to be against non Mexicans making Mexican food, but when you take it to the level of publicly trying to shut down someone else's business...I think that's moving into slander and liable.

How were they defamed?

Who defamed them?

Describe this "case" you see.

Whites making burritos is cultural appropriation...it is not.

Of course it is.

I'm not saying that cultural appropriation is a bad thing, but your statement above (which you haven't attributed to anyone, a requirement for "defamation") isn't false (also a requirement for defamation).

 

[Pogo]

Btw clueless OP --- even leaving aside the absence of "Liberals" or any "politics" in this story -------------

--------------------------------------------------- where the fuck do you get "racist"?

What, is "burrito" a friggin' race now too?

 

[Pogo]

Stealing recipes is wrong.

I'm not even sure it's possible to do that. Don't think you can even copyright it.

Food is food. You take ingredients A, B, C and D and make X. If two cooks make it exactly the same way, so what?

Personally I never make anything the same way twice. And I'll take models from anywhere, use what I like and toss what I don't, and add my own. Sounds like that's what these ladies did.

It is unethical to set-up a diner close to another and in competition by stealing the recipe of those who created it.

Still disagree. It's not possible to "steal" a recipe. If ingredients A, B, C and D go together, then they go together. It's simply following a model that works. There's no way a recipe can be "intellectual property". Especially when we're talking burritos. It's just a round flat bread rolled up with ---- whatever you put in there.

 

[Camp]

And is it wrong for us to take issue over the reasons these SJWs decided that it's wrong for whites to make burritos? Is it wrong to think the ousting of Eich (Firefox) because of his position on gay marriage, was totally inappropriate?

No, not at all.

Sure there was no "force" or "policy", that ran these girls out of business...the real issue is SJWs squashing diversity, "Mexicans can only make burritos." Wanting to shut down other people's voice, business, whatever, when we should be voting and promoting freedom. THIS IS NOT FREEDOM, SJWs do NOT want nor BELIEVE in actual freedom. Not of speech, or conscious, beliefs, or religion.

40% of Millennials OK with limiting speech offensive to minorities

Poll: 51% of Democrats support criminalizing hate speech - Hot Air

LOOK at these articles, this is a very bad direction we are taking. Also ask yourself, what constitutes hate speech these days? The term hate speech has gotten immensely broader. This is the issue we are taking up with the social justice warriors in this situation. The fact that they do not believe in basic freedoms, to the point where they believe MAKING FOOD IS STRICTLY BASED ON SKIN COLOR!!!! This is straight up RACIST!! And these people are voting to have this agenda done. Get your head out of the sand and recognize this problem, we should together (left and right) shame these reincarnated puritans the same way they shamed these white girls out of business, something that they probably made a big financial risk to undertake and now are SOL. These SJWs are our new puritans.

"THIS IS NOT FREEDOM, SJWs do NOT want nor BELIEVE in actual freedom. Not of speech, or conscious, beliefs, or religion."

I have to agree with the last part. Most of the lefties I talk to either don't understand freedom, or fear it. But the same goes for most conservatives I talk to. And FREEDOM is exactly what this is. You have every right to complain about it, but no one's freedom is being violated.

Well I think there is a case for liable & slander, and in that case, yes freedoms were violated. Being a con artist is punishable since you are technically stealing from people, which is infringing on their property rights, there is no 1st amendment protecting people who use the first to infringe on others rights. Is it wrong to make and sell Mexican food as a non-Mexican? No not at all. Is it wrong to cause harm to defame a business who does so in order to effect their lively Hood, yes it is wrong. This does not make it wrong to be against non Mexicans making Mexican food, but when you take it to the level of publicly trying to shut down someone else's business...I think that's moving into slander and liable.

How were they defamed?

Who defamed them?

Describe this "case" you see.

Whites making burritos is cultural appropriation...it is not.

Of course it is.

I'm not saying that cultural appropriation is a bad thing, but your statement above (which you haven't attributed to anyone, a requirement for "defamation") isn't false (also a requirement for defamation).

Technically, a burrito is simply a flour tortilla with closed ends wrapped around a filling. The Mexican style meat, beans, and cheese type are the most common, but fillings can differ greatly. I make one stuffed with German style chicken and dumplings.

 

[Pogo]

No, not at all.

"THIS IS NOT FREEDOM, SJWs do NOT want nor BELIEVE in actual freedom. Not of speech, or conscious, beliefs, or religion."

I have to agree with the last part. Most of the lefties I talk to either don't understand freedom, or fear it. But the same goes for most conservatives I talk to. And FREEDOM is exactly what this is. You have every right to complain about it, but no one's freedom is being violated.

Well I think there is a case for liable & slander, and in that case, yes freedoms were violated. Being a con artist is punishable since you are technically stealing from people, which is infringing on their property rights, there is no 1st amendment protecting people who use the first to infringe on others rights. Is it wrong to make and sell Mexican food as a non-Mexican? No not at all. Is it wrong to cause harm to defame a business who does so in order to effect their lively Hood, yes it is wrong. This does not make it wrong to be against non Mexicans making Mexican food, but when you take it to the level of publicly trying to shut down someone else's business...I think that's moving into slander and liable.

How were they defamed?

Who defamed them?

Describe this "case" you see.

Whites making burritos is cultural appropriation...it is not.

Of course it is.

I'm not saying that cultural appropriation is a bad thing, but your statement above (which you haven't attributed to anyone, a requirement for "defamation") isn't false (also a requirement for defamation).

Technically, a burrito is simply a flour tortilla with closed ends wrapped around a filling. The Mexican style meat, beans, and cheese type are the most common, but fillings can differ greatly. I make one stuffed with German style chicken and dumplings.

That sounds scrumptious. I often make 'em with an omelette in the morning, with whatever fillings strike my fancy at the time.

 

[Camp]

Well I think there is a case for liable & slander, and in that case, yes freedoms were violated. Being a con artist is punishable since you are technically stealing from people, which is infringing on their property rights, there is no 1st amendment protecting people who use the first to infringe on others rights. Is it wrong to make and sell Mexican food as a non-Mexican? No not at all. Is it wrong to cause harm to defame a business who does so in order to effect their lively Hood, yes it is wrong. This does not make it wrong to be against non Mexicans making Mexican food, but when you take it to the level of publicly trying to shut down someone else's business...I think that's moving into slander and liable.

How were they defamed?

Who defamed them?

Describe this "case" you see.

Whites making burritos is cultural appropriation...it is not.

Of course it is.

I'm not saying that cultural appropriation is a bad thing, but your statement above (which you haven't attributed to anyone, a requirement for "defamation") isn't false (also a requirement for defamation).

Technically, a burrito is simply a flour tortilla with closed ends wrapped around a filling. The Mexican style meat, beans, and cheese type are the most common, but fillings can differ greatly. I make one stuffed with German style chicken and dumplings.

That sounds scrumptious. I often make 'em with an omelette in the morning, with whatever fillings strike my fancy at the time.

A little bit of filling goes a long way. I use about two tablespoons of filler per 7 inch tortilli burritio. With filler ingredients that aren't to liguidy you can strech that out to three tablespoons. I like to give them a quick fry in a pan with a film of olive oil to help them hold together and give them a crunchy texture.

 

[Preacher]

The snowflakes should visit Moundsville,West Virginia where the Chinese eatery is RUN and OWNED and STAFFED by white folks. True story. I have eaten there.

 

[Pogo]

And the funny thing...Starbucks did the same thing but with Coffee..the founder was in Italy and wanted to recreate the experience he had there.......

Maybe that is why the left hates Starbucks...

Oh bullshit. Starbucks is a ripoff of Peet's -- which is in San Francisco.

And it's a coffee chain. There is no planet on which "the left" or "the right" or any other political faction -- "hates" a coffee chain. You need to dial the hallucinogens down a few million notches.

 

[Pogo]

How were they defamed?

Who defamed them?

Describe this "case" you see.

Whites making burritos is cultural appropriation...it is not.

Of course it is.

I'm not saying that cultural appropriation is a bad thing, but your statement above (which you haven't attributed to anyone, a requirement for "defamation") isn't false (also a requirement for defamation).

Technically, a burrito is simply a flour tortilla with closed ends wrapped around a filling. The Mexican style meat, beans, and cheese type are the most common, but fillings can differ greatly. I make one stuffed with German style chicken and dumplings.

That sounds scrumptious. I often make 'em with an omelette in the morning, with whatever fillings strike my fancy at the time.

A little bit of filling goes a long way. I use about two tablespoons of filler per 7 inch tortilli burritio. With filler ingredients that aren't to liguidy you can strech that out to three tablespoons. I like to give them a quick fry in a pan with a film of olive oil to help them hold together and give them a crunchy texture.

I've recently taken on making spring rolls with Vietnamese rice paper rolls. It's much the same principle at least as far as wrapping. With a homemade nut butter sauce w/ ginger and garlic. I love 'em

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

These "cultural appropriation" whiners are worse than infants throwing a tantrum and screaming "mine".
My ancestors were Scottish and I would be honored to see non-Scots wearing kilts, playing the pipes, and eating Haggis. If they were man enough that is.

 

[Old Rocks]

LOL Being of mostly Scotch heritage myself, I found out why you drink whiskey before indulging in Haggis. LOL Been to several Highland Games, and have seen every hue of human playing pipes in the pipe bands. Since the Scots were Britain's best fighters, and fought all over the empire, when they were not fighting, they were doing other things. So those other hues more than likely have legitimate Scot heritage.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

How were they defamed?

Who defamed them?

Describe this "case" you see.

Whites making burritos is cultural appropriation...it is not.

Of course it is.

I'm not saying that cultural appropriation is a bad thing, but your statement above (which you haven't attributed to anyone, a requirement for "defamation") isn't false (also a requirement for defamation).

Technically, a burrito is simply a flour tortilla with closed ends wrapped around a filling. The Mexican style meat, beans, and cheese type are the most common, but fillings can differ greatly. I make one stuffed with German style chicken and dumplings.

That sounds scrumptious. I often make 'em with an omelette in the morning, with whatever fillings strike my fancy at the time.

A little bit of filling goes a long way. I use about two tablespoons of filler per 7 inch tortilli burritio. With filler ingredients that aren't to liguidy you can strech that out to three tablespoons. I like to give them a quick fry in a pan with a film of olive oil to help them hold together and give them a crunchy texture.

Isn't that a chimichanga?

 

[Eloy]

Stealing recipes is wrong.

I'm not even sure it's possible to do that. Don't think you can even copyright it.

Food is food. You take ingredients A, B, C and D and make X. If two cooks make it exactly the same way, so what?

Personally I never make anything the same way twice. And I'll take models from anywhere, use what I like and toss what I don't, and add my own. Sounds like that's what these ladies did.

It is unethical to set-up a diner close to another and in competition by stealing the recipe of those who created it.

Still disagree. It's not possible to "steal" a recipe. If ingredients A, B, C and D go together, then they go together. It's simply following a model that works. There's no way a recipe can be "intellectual property". Especially when we're talking burritos. It's just a round flat bread rolled up with ---- whatever you put in there.

Ask a Mexican mother; she'll put you right.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Maybe the OP is suggesting we pass a law preventing the SJWs from talking to people

We need to start bodyslamming these fucking SJWs.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Ayup! And the market can be fickle.

Maybe the OP is suggesting we pass a law preventing the SJWs from talking to people.

And is it wrong for us to take issue over the reasons these SJWs decided that it's wrong for whites to make burritos? Is it wrong to think the ousting of Eich (Firefox) because of his position on gay marriage, was totally inappropriate?

No, not at all.

Sure there was no "force" or "policy", that ran these girls out of business...the real issue is SJWs squashing diversity, "Mexicans can only make burritos." Wanting to shut down other people's voice, business, whatever, when we should be voting and promoting freedom. THIS IS NOT FREEDOM, SJWs do NOT want nor BELIEVE in actual freedom. Not of speech, or conscious, beliefs, or religion.

40% of Millennials OK with limiting speech offensive to minorities

Poll: 51% of Democrats support criminalizing hate speech - Hot Air

LOOK at these articles, this is a very bad direction we are taking. Also ask yourself, what constitutes hate speech these days? The term hate speech has gotten immensely broader. This is the issue we are taking up with the social justice warriors in this situation. The fact that they do not believe in basic freedoms, to the point where they believe MAKING FOOD IS STRICTLY BASED ON SKIN COLOR!!!! This is straight up RACIST!! And these people are voting to have this agenda done. Get your head out of the sand and recognize this problem, we should together (left and right) shame these reincarnated puritans the same way they shamed these white girls out of business, something that they probably made a big financial risk to undertake and now are SOL. These SJWs are our new puritans.

"THIS IS NOT FREEDOM, SJWs do NOT want nor BELIEVE in actual freedom. Not of speech, or conscious, beliefs, or religion."

I have to agree with the last part. Most of the lefties I talk to either don't understand freedom, or fear it. But the same goes for most conservatives I talk to. And FREEDOM is exactly what this is. You have every right to complain about it, but no one's freedom is being violated.

Well I think there is a case for liable & slander, and in that case, yes freedoms were violated. Being a con artist is punishable since you are technically stealing from people, which is infringing on their property rights, there is no 1st amendment protecting people who use the first to infringe on others rights. Is it wrong to make and sell Mexican food as a non-Mexican? No not at all. Is it wrong to cause harm to defame a business who does so in order to effect their lively Hood, yes it is wrong. This does not make it wrong to be against non Mexicans making Mexican food, but when you take it to the level of publicly trying to shut down someone else's business...I think that's moving into slander and liable.

The word is "libel", not "liable".

iPhone thought better.

The contraction of "that is" makes "liable" the correct word.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Portland burrito shop forced to close amid accusations of cultural appropriation, stealing recipes

Just one week after Kooks Burritos in Portland, Ore., was featured in a profile for local publication Willamette Week, the pop-up Mexican food cart has closed down amid accusations that they ripped off their recipes.


Kali Wilgus and Liz “LC” Connelly, the two white women who started Kooks earlier this year, have been accused of stealing their techniques from the “tortilla ladies” of Puerto Nuevo, Mexico — because Connelly told Willamette Week that they gathered their recipes and tortilla-making processes during a holiday road-trip to the Baja California village.


"I picked the brains of every tortilla lady there in the worst broken Spanish ever, and they showed me a little of what they did," she told the site. "They told us the basic ingredients, and we saw them moving and stretching the dough similar to how pizza makers do before rolling it out with rolling pins.”


In the profile, which first ran May 16, Connelly also claimed that, when the Mexican cooks wouldn’t give up their trade secrets, she and Wilgus “were peeking into the windows of every kitchen, totally fascinated by how easy they made it look.”


Connelly then said she used a trial-and-error process to recreate a tortilla with the same flavor and texture after returning to Portland. She and Wilgus then opened their weekend pop-up inside a taco truck on SE Cesar Estrada Chavez Boulevard, and began serving their Mexican-style tortillas filled with California-inspired ingredients.


Though the eatery had been open for several months, the owners of Kooks were only recently accused of cultural appropriation by The Portland Mercury and Mic.com based on Connelly’s revelations.


"Because of Portland’s underlying racism, the people who rightly own these traditions and cultures that exist are already treated poorly," The Portland Mercury said, calling the closure of Kooks a "victory."


The article continues,"These appropriating businesses are erasing and exploiting their already marginalized identities for the purpose of profit and praise."...

"Stealing recipes"? Lmao, as if it's so hard to put meat, cheese, beans, cilantro, and salsa in a tortilla.

I guess liberals have to stop eating at Taco Bell, Del Taco, Chipotle, etc. due to cultural appropriation as well.

The Asian guy in the video was funny. Good job. We need to see more ridicule of these SJWs pushing this cultural appropriation bullshit. Like it was said in the video, " you are ruining the world."

 

[AvgGuyIA]

head's up your ass pal. Liberals are the people who wrote the Constitution and started this country. They had nothing to do with burrito roach coaches

Your brand of liberalism is nothing like the Founders. So-called "progressive" thinking leads to the insanity of SJWs. Keep it up. SJWs are forever linked to the Democrat party.

 

[sakinago]

Looks like the market has spoken.

Isn't that capitalism?

Ayup! And the market can be fickle.

Maybe the OP is suggesting we pass a law preventing the SJWs from talking to people.

And is it wrong for us to take issue over the reasons these SJWs decided that it's wrong for whites to make burritos? Is it wrong to think the ousting of Eich (Firefox) because of his position on gay marriage, was totally inappropriate?

No, not at all.

Sure there was no "force" or "policy", that ran these girls out of business...the real issue is SJWs squashing diversity, "Mexicans can only make burritos." Wanting to shut down other people's voice, business, whatever, when we should be voting and promoting freedom. THIS IS NOT FREEDOM, SJWs do NOT want nor BELIEVE in actual freedom. Not of speech, or conscious, beliefs, or religion.

40% of Millennials OK with limiting speech offensive to minorities

Poll: 51% of Democrats support criminalizing hate speech - Hot Air

LOOK at these articles, this is a very bad direction we are taking. Also ask yourself, what constitutes hate speech these days? The term hate speech has gotten immensely broader. This is the issue we are taking up with the social justice warriors in this situation. The fact that they do not believe in basic freedoms, to the point where they believe MAKING FOOD IS STRICTLY BASED ON SKIN COLOR!!!! This is straight up RACIST!! And these people are voting to have this agenda done. Get your head out of the sand and recognize this problem, we should together (left and right) shame these reincarnated puritans the same way they shamed these white girls out of business, something that they probably made a big financial risk to undertake and now are SOL. These SJWs are our new puritans.

"THIS IS NOT FREEDOM, SJWs do NOT want nor BELIEVE in actual freedom. Not of speech, or conscious, beliefs, or religion."

I have to agree with the last part. Most of the lefties I talk to either don't understand freedom, or fear it. But the same goes for most conservatives I talk to. And FREEDOM is exactly what this is. You have every right to complain about it, but no one's freedom is being violated.

Well I think there is a case for liable & slander, and in that case, yes freedoms were violated. Being a con artist is punishable since you are technically stealing from people, which is infringing on their property rights, there is no 1st amendment protecting people who use the first to infringe on others rights. Is it wrong to make and sell Mexican food as a non-Mexican? No not at all. Is it wrong to cause harm to defame a business who does so in order to effect their lively Hood, yes it is wrong. This does not make it wrong to be against non Mexicans making Mexican food, but when you take it to the level of publicly trying to shut down someone else's business...I think that's moving into slander and liable.

How were they defamed?

Who defamed them?

Describe this "case" you see.

Whites making burritos is cultural appropriation...it is not.