Left Wing Nuts!

Anarchists aren't lefties.

But please, continue to pretend they are people. It just cements my belief that the Republicans are more interested in staying in power than improving the country.

what cements your beliefs? this thread? :rofl:

they arent' people? :confused: they ARE people...radical dembot people.

you want to hold every mccain/palin supporters responsible for all the extremists in the republican party, no?

Anarchist want no government. Left wing democrats believe in government can do a lot more than any one person. So how are they the same again?
 
Anarchists damage property, block traffic, attack delegates with bleach
Pioneer Press
Article Last Updated: 09/02/2008 02:40:15 AM CDT


Anarchists who had threatened to "crash the convention" wreaked havoc Monday in downtown St. Paul as the Republican National Convention opened, shattering windows, throwing rocks, slashing tires and blocking traffic.

Their violence on the first day of the convention overshadowed an anti-war march that drew a fraction of the number expected.

The march, which sparked at least three free-speech court challenges, came off without a hitch. But breakaway groups of anarchists — some clad in black and others dressed as colorfully as clowns — kept police busy. Nearly 300 people had been arrested as of late Monday night.

Spasms of violence erupted throughout downtown as tear gas was fired and protesters — some angry, some insistent on dancing amid the chaos — played a game of cat-and-mouse as police, backed up by 150 Minnesota National Guard soldiers, alternately accommodated, confronted and chased roving bands intent on disrupting the convention.

Organizers of the Coalition to March on the RNC and End the War estimated 30,000 people showed up to march from the state Capitol to the Xcel Energy Center. They had expected 50,000.

Police put the crowd at about 10,000.

Anarchists damage property, block traffic, attack delegates with bleach - TwinCities.com

Glori, FYI ... the left doesn't have own anarchist philosophy. Anarchist philosophies ranges from social-libs (by world definition of liberal) to libertarians to neo-liberals. Most Tea party folks are quasi-anarchist. All these folks want very limited government, increased civil liberties, no wars and to be left alone. All of which are anarchist philosophies. (lib-er al = liberties. get it?) Don't let a fascist democrat hide behind the word "liberal" because it just isn't true. These people are progressives (fascists).
 
Last edited:
Why is it that every loner with an am radio and a GED can pass themselves off as Political Scientists? Ever notice how Fascism, Communism, Marxism, Socialism and now Anarchy all get pinned to the the Democrat donkey?

What would happen if all the angry pundits actually started spewing truth and facts instead of half truths and innuendo? They would find themselves out of work because it's more profitable in contemporary America to shout first, teach second.

I think it's because they feel threatened. If you look deep enough, you'll see that most of the screechers are WASPS.
 
Why is it that every loner with an am radio and a GED can pass themselves off as Political Scientists? Ever notice how Fascism, Communism, Marxism, Socialism and now Anarchy all get pinned to the the Democrat donkey?

What would happen if all the angry pundits actually started spewing truth and facts instead of half truths and innuendo? They would find themselves out of work because it's more profitable in contemporary America to shout first, teach second.

I think it's because they feel threatened. If you look deep enough, you'll see that most of the screechers are WASPS.
I see the screechers, as you so aptly named them, as one step away from sitting alone in their basement, a camo bandanna wrapped around their brow, single bare light bulb above as they polish an old bayonet while they mutter about the Deliverer and the Angel of Death. But that's just my concept.
 
I'm surprised it didn't make the news.

well

not realy

Dems don't like to aim thier cameras at thier own loons, keeps them from having to explain why they admire people that call for violence to get what they want.

Of course if they actually were cons, like some morons are suggesting, they would be blaming Beck and Palin for inciting riots.

It made the news in 2008. WTF? Slow news day yesterday? And look at all the members who have gone bye-bye since then. Hmmm...

No I was looking through some old threads and came across this and read Ravi's comment, and posted to it. After the last shooting kind of conflicts with what ravi said. Two years ago.
 
All you people that think anarchy is still a right wing ideology need to get their heads out of their asses.

Technically your right it is a form of No government, but out of a society with no government comes tyranny, usually in some variable form of communism.

Its actually more of a mechanism towards totalitarianism

The left knows this and that is why you have left wing scholars trying to incite violence and "anarchy"
 
I'm surprised it didn't make the news.

well

not realy

Dems don't like to aim thier cameras at thier own loons, keeps them from having to explain why they admire people that call for violence to get what they want.

Of course if they actually were cons, like some morons are suggesting, they would be blaming Beck and Palin for inciting riots.

It made the news in 2008. WTF? Slow news day yesterday? And look at all the members who have gone bye-bye since then. Hmmm...

No I was looking through some old threads and came across this and read Ravi's comment, and posted to it. After the last shooting kind of conflicts with what ravi said. Two years ago.
:confused: How so?
 
It made the news in 2008. WTF? Slow news day yesterday? And look at all the members who have gone bye-bye since then. Hmmm...

No I was looking through some old threads and came across this and read Ravi's comment, and posted to it. After the last shooting kind of conflicts with what ravi said. Two years ago.
:confused: How so?


How so?
09-05-2008, 12:13 PM

Anarchists aren't lefties.
But please, continue to pretend they are people. It just cements my belief that the Republicans are more interested in staying in power than improving the country.

Then you went on to blame republicans calling them anarchist. Longhner wasn't a republican. Everything shows that he was a left winger.
 
No I was looking through some old threads and came across this and read Ravi's comment, and posted to it. After the last shooting kind of conflicts with what ravi said. Two years ago.
:confused: How so?


How so?
09-05-2008, 12:13 PM

Anarchists aren't lefties.
But please, continue to pretend they are people. It just cements my belief that the Republicans are more interested in staying in power than improving the country.

Then you went on to blame republicans calling them anarchist. Longhner wasn't a republican. Everything shows that he was a left winger.
:rolleyes:

Anarchists aren't lefties. And neither is Longhner.
 
Seems like all the shooters become loner, whackos as soon as they start shooting.

Wonder if Giffords can heal up fast enough to run for President in 2012?
 
Last edited:


How so?
09-05-2008, 12:13 PM

Anarchists aren't lefties.
But please, continue to pretend they are people. It just cements my belief that the Republicans are more interested in staying in power than improving the country.

Then you went on to blame republicans calling them anarchist. Longhner wasn't a republican. Everything shows that he was a left winger.
:rolleyes:

Anarchists aren't lefties. And neither is Longhner.

Well then he's not anything right, conservative or tea party, as the media has suggested, so he must be a left winger following in the foot steps of Bill Ayers. Or are you saying that he is neither right nor left?
 
Last edited:
Anarchy has become a synonym for mayhem and violence rather than the Utopian ideal it really is. It is something to which we can aspire but which can never be attained. Because, if the human species is to be prevented from self annihilation by war or destruction of habitat, certain aspects of human nature, greed and selfishness for example, must be mitigated by government.
Outlawing human nature has failed whenever it's been tried.
 
Anarchists aren't lefties.

But please, continue to pretend they are people. It just cements my belief that the Republicans are more interested in staying in power than improving the country.

FYI, Ravi...while I agree with you from a poli-sci perspective?

The fact is that in Europe, a lot of EXTRMELY LEFT WING MARXIST COMMUNISTS refer to themselves as anarchists.

They do this, one supposes, since the theory is that communism requires NO CENTRAL authority.

I damned neared joined one of those groups (in France) until I had time to hear more about their long range poltical goals.

I was, in those days, convinced that anarchy was preferable to having any government.
 
"I'm as much an anarchist as I am a Marxist"~ William Ayers 2002

Obama's popularity is on the rise: Time to drag out ol' Bill Ayers and all the viral shit promulgated by the right wing noise machine three years ago. God you people are dumb.
 
All you people that think anarchy is still a right wing ideology need to get their heads out of their asses.

Technically your right it is a form of No government, but out of a society with no government comes tyranny, usually in some variable form of communism.

Its actually more of a mechanism towards totalitarianism

The left knows this and that is why you have left wing scholars trying to incite violence and "anarchy"

Sure. :lol:
 
How so?
09-05-2008, 12:13 PM



Then you went on to blame republicans calling them anarchist. Longhner wasn't a republican. Everything shows that he was a left winger.
:rolleyes:

Anarchists aren't lefties. And neither is Longhner.

Well then he's not anything right, conservative or tea party, as the media has suggested, so he must be a left winger following in the foot steps of Bill Ayers. Or are you saying that he is neither right nor left?

Loughner's internet history shows that he was a big believer that there is some conspiracy for a New World Order, so he therefore believed 911 was an inside job and that Obama is a Muslim plant. He's one of those most unfortunate people (we see some right on this board) who believe everything they read on the Internet. They get some spark of interest and then pursue anything (lies or not) that might support and justify those beliefs. To that extent, yes, he was an "anarchist," but had no left/right political leaning. He hated both.
 
Anarchists aren't lefties.

But please, continue to pretend they are people. It just cements my belief that the Republicans are more interested in staying in power than improving the country.

FYI, Ravi...while I agree with you from a poli-sci perspective?

The fact is that in Europe, a lot of EXTRMELY LEFT WING MARXIST COMMUNISTS refer to themselves as anarchists.

They do this, one supposes, since the theory is that communism requires NO CENTRAL authority.

I damned neared joined one of those groups (in France) until I had time to hear more about their long range poltical goals.

I was, in those days, convinced that anarchy was preferable to having any government.

Most people have done some pretty ignorant things in their formative years as we're flailing around trying to wean ourselves from our parents' influence and adopt our own ideologies. Dr. Spock of all people was once an anti-war activist in the 60s. He was actually the People's Party candidate for the 1972 Presidential Election! Yet that never influenced his own 'coming of age' softening (pun intended) as he developed popular suggestions on how best to raise a child.
 
:rolleyes:

Anarchists aren't lefties. And neither is Longhner.

Well then he's not anything right, conservative or tea party, as the media has suggested, so he must be a left winger following in the foot steps of Bill Ayers. Or are you saying that he is neither right nor left?

Loughner's internet history shows that he was a big believer that there is some conspiracy for a New World Order, so he therefore believed 911 was an inside job and that Obama is a Muslim plant. He's one of those most unfortunate people (we see some right on this board) who believe everything they read on the Internet. They get some spark of interest and then pursue anything (lies or not) that might support and justify those beliefs. To that extent, yes, he was an "anarchist," but had no left/right political leaning. He hated both.

Loughner's internet history shows that he was a big believer that there is some conspiracy for a New World Order, so he therefore believed 911 was an inside job

That isn't exactly a right winger is it?

To that extent, yes, he was an "anarchist," but had no left/right political leaning. He hated both

Thats exactly what I have always called him. If he is of any political interest that would be it.
 
"I'm as much an anarchist as I am a Marxist"~ William Ayers 2002

Obama's popularity is on the rise: Time to drag out ol' Bill Ayers and all the viral shit promulgated by the right wing noise machine three years ago. God you people are dumb.


Sorry I did not see obama mention in the quote you used. So why did you mention obama?
 

Forum List

Back
Top