Leading global warming sceptic sets out to prove hoax, for 2 years,changes sides.WSJ!

[Too Tall]

Interesting. Bring real data and real scientists into the discussion, and the discussion dies. You see, the politicization of this subject by the far right has created a position on their part that most are now seeing as a total lack of recognition of reality.

The scientists predicted that the warming would increase the number of extreme weather events, and those events would negatively impact agriculter around the world. And we have seen that is spades around the world. Now the 'Conservatives' have to explain to the farmers in the mid-west why what they are experiancing is really real. Swiss Re and Munich Re both state that we are seeing 3 to 5 times the extreme weather events that we saw thirty years ago.

Time for the scientists to hit back at the people that have been denigrating them for a couple of decades now.

As soon as they explain how CO2 caused the severe droughts in the 1930's, why is Greenland called Greenland, and how warm was it before the great Ice Age, I will listen.