Laura Ingraham, David Hogg and the beginning of the end of free speech.

[JohnPrewett]

The Globalist minions in FBI and Mockingbird Stream Media cannot let David Hogg be seen for what he really is.
He and his cousin Emma Gonzales (Emma's mother a Hogg) were trained to be the prime stars of the Parkland false flag production.
David's former FBI father Kevin Hogg works for a company (Cubic) that creates false flag scenarios.
Cruz was picked to be the patsy before the event happened .... Much more likely Kevin Hogg was the shooter (or supplied the shooter) than Cruz was the shooter.
same as (for instance) LHOswald was picked to be the patsy months, if not years, before the JFK shooting.
Same as Pollard was picked to be patsy before the Vegas massacre (some of you may still remember that massacre).

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Laura Ingram said something about Hogg not getting into college and made fun of him (free speech, she is allowed her opinion).

Hogg then called for a boycott of her advertisers in response because he thought she was being hateful (she was, and he was simply expressing his free speech).

The advertisers thought about it, and decided to drop advertising from her program (free speech, the advertisers have the right to decide who they do or don't support).

Nope, no free speech was silenced in this situation, no matter how much Protectionist thinks it was.

No one's free speech is being violated here, that would require government intrusion to silence someone.

However, the more you work to punish people for what they say, in time people will become too afraid to speak their mind.
What Hogg and his lemmings are doing, take us down a dangerous road where the msm may pass on reporting certain stories for fear of these sort of attacks.

Wrong. The media will continue to report on stories they think are important to the viewers. Ingram wasn't reporting news, she was offering a snarky opinion on Hogg and his grades. Hogg's grades aren't news.

Laura Ingram offered an opinion, not news.

No, NOT wrong. Her opinion was made in public, just like any news story that might be just as provocative whether it's news, or an opinion piece. Media outlets afraid that they'll lose sponsors if they offend someone, or some group will be thinking twice whether to publish a piece or not.

This punk kid has every right to do what he did, but that doesn't mean it's a good thing.

What do you suggest Hogg should have done after Ingraham took a swipe at him?

Why should he have done anything ?

My god, there are millions of people on the internet saying much worse things about him than what she said. Is he going to go after them too ?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

This is all Ingraham said, and look at the over the top fallout.



Laura Ingraham
✔ @IngrahamAngle
David Hogg Rejected By Four Colleges To Which He Applied and whines about it. (Dinged by UCLA with a 4.1 GPA...totally predictable given acceptance rates.)

 

[idb]

This is all Ingraham said, and look at the over the top fallout.



Laura Ingraham
✔ @IngrahamAngle
David Hogg Rejected By Four Colleges To Which He Applied and whines about it. (Dinged by UCLA with a 4.1 GPA...totally predictable given acceptance rates.)

You're right...totally topical and not at all an off-topic attack on the individual.
David should have responded with a mention of the unseasonal weather.

 

[asaratis]

Laura Ingram said something about Hogg not getting into college and made fun of him (free speech, she is allowed her opinion).

Hogg then called for a boycott of her advertisers in response because he thought she was being hateful (she was, and he was simply expressing his free speech).

The advertisers thought about it, and decided to drop advertising from her program (free speech, the advertisers have the right to decide who they do or don't support).

Nope, no free speech was silenced in this situation, no matter how much Protectionist thinks it was.

No one's free speech is being violated here, that would require government intrusion to silence someone.

However, the more you work to punish people for what they say, in time people will become too afraid to speak their mind.
What Hogg and his lemmings are doing, take us down a dangerous road where the msm may pass on reporting certain stories for fear of these sort of attacks.

Wrong. The media will continue to report on stories they think are important to the viewers. Ingram wasn't reporting news, she was offering a snarky opinion on Hogg and his grades. Hogg's grades aren't news.

Laura Ingram offered an opinion, not news.

No, NOT wrong. Her opinion was made in public, just like any news story that might be just as provocative whether it's news, or an opinion piece. Media outlets afraid that they'll lose sponsors if they offend someone, or some group will be thinking twice whether to publish a piece or not.

This punk kid has every right to do what he did, but that doesn't mean it's a good thing.

What do you suggest Hogg should have done after Ingraham took a swipe at him?

Why should he have done anything ?

My god, there are millions of people on the internet saying much worse things about him than what she said. Is he going to go after them too ?

It's not him going after anyone. It is Media Matters, George Soros groups, and Hollywood celebrities going after the 2nd Amendment, guns owned by common folk, and conservative talk shows. They want guns confiscated and conservatives silenced.

 

[Faun]

Laura Ingram said something about Hogg not getting into college and made fun of him (free speech, she is allowed her opinion).

Hogg then called for a boycott of her advertisers in response because he thought she was being hateful (she was, and he was simply expressing his free speech).

The advertisers thought about it, and decided to drop advertising from her program (free speech, the advertisers have the right to decide who they do or don't support).

Nope, no free speech was silenced in this situation, no matter how much Protectionist thinks it was.

No one's free speech is being violated here, that would require government intrusion to silence someone.

However, the more you work to punish people for what they say, in time people will become too afraid to speak their mind.
What Hogg and his lemmings are doing, take us down a dangerous road where the msm may pass on reporting certain stories for fear of these sort of attacks.

Wrong. The media will continue to report on stories they think are important to the viewers. Ingram wasn't reporting news, she was offering a snarky opinion on Hogg and his grades. Hogg's grades aren't news.

Laura Ingram offered an opinion, not news.

No, NOT wrong. Her opinion was made in public, just like any news story that might be just as provocative whether it's news, or an opinion piece. Media outlets afraid that they'll lose sponsors if they offend someone, or some group will be thinking twice whether to publish a piece or not.

This punk kid has every right to do what he did, but that doesn't mean it's a good thing.

What do you suggest Hogg should have done after Ingraham took a swipe at him?

Why should he have done anything ?

My god, there are millions of people on the internet saying much worse things about him than what she said. Is he going to go after them too ?

So your answer is he should have done nothing and just let her snide comments stand unopposed? A reason to have done something is because she is a national figure with many followers.

 

[Faun]

This is all Ingraham said, and look at the over the top fallout.



Laura Ingraham
✔ @IngrahamAngle
David Hogg Rejected By Four Colleges To Which He Applied and whines about it. (Dinged by UCLA with a 4.1 GPA...totally predictable given acceptance rates.)

It was bad enough that she felt compelled to apologize for it.

 

[Faun]

No one's free speech is being violated here, that would require government intrusion to silence someone.

However, the more you work to punish people for what they say, in time people will become too afraid to speak their mind.
What Hogg and his lemmings are doing, take us down a dangerous road where the msm may pass on reporting certain stories for fear of these sort of attacks.

Wrong. The media will continue to report on stories they think are important to the viewers. Ingram wasn't reporting news, she was offering a snarky opinion on Hogg and his grades. Hogg's grades aren't news.

Laura Ingram offered an opinion, not news.

No, NOT wrong. Her opinion was made in public, just like any news story that might be just as provocative whether it's news, or an opinion piece. Media outlets afraid that they'll lose sponsors if they offend someone, or some group will be thinking twice whether to publish a piece or not.

This punk kid has every right to do what he did, but that doesn't mean it's a good thing.

What do you suggest Hogg should have done after Ingraham took a swipe at him?

Why should he have done anything ?

My god, there are millions of people on the internet saying much worse things about him than what she said. Is he going to go after them too ?

It's not him going after anyone. It is Media Matters, George Soros groups, and Hollywood celebrities going after the 2nd Amendment, guns owned by common folk, and conservative talk shows. They want guns confiscated and conservatives silenced.

Great, prove it was those folks, and not David Hogg, who motivated many of Laura Ingraham’s sponsors to pull their ads from her show....

 

[asaratis]

No one's free speech is being violated here, that would require government intrusion to silence someone.

However, the more you work to punish people for what they say, in time people will become too afraid to speak their mind.
What Hogg and his lemmings are doing, take us down a dangerous road where the msm may pass on reporting certain stories for fear of these sort of attacks.

Wrong. The media will continue to report on stories they think are important to the viewers. Ingram wasn't reporting news, she was offering a snarky opinion on Hogg and his grades. Hogg's grades aren't news.

Laura Ingram offered an opinion, not news.

No, NOT wrong. Her opinion was made in public, just like any news story that might be just as provocative whether it's news, or an opinion piece. Media outlets afraid that they'll lose sponsors if they offend someone, or some group will be thinking twice whether to publish a piece or not.

This punk kid has every right to do what he did, but that doesn't mean it's a good thing.

What do you suggest Hogg should have done after Ingraham took a swipe at him?

Why should he have done anything ?

My god, there are millions of people on the internet saying much worse things about him than what she said. Is he going to go after them too ?

So your answer is he should have done nothing and just let her snide comments stand unopposed? A reason to have done something is because she is a national figure with many followers.

It wasn't a snide remark. Some students with high GPA get rejected to make room for quota minority applicants.

 

[ChrisL]

the libs are on double duty, trying to take away two rights using one skinny kid! Imagine how stupid they must think we are.

 

[asaratis]

Wrong. The media will continue to report on stories they think are important to the viewers. Ingram wasn't reporting news, she was offering a snarky opinion on Hogg and his grades. Hogg's grades aren't news.

Laura Ingram offered an opinion, not news.

No, NOT wrong. Her opinion was made in public, just like any news story that might be just as provocative whether it's news, or an opinion piece. Media outlets afraid that they'll lose sponsors if they offend someone, or some group will be thinking twice whether to publish a piece or not.

This punk kid has every right to do what he did, but that doesn't mean it's a good thing.

What do you suggest Hogg should have done after Ingraham took a swipe at him?

Why should he have done anything ?

My god, there are millions of people on the internet saying much worse things about him than what she said. Is he going to go after them too ?

It's not him going after anyone. It is Media Matters, George Soros groups, and Hollywood celebrities going after the 2nd Amendment, guns owned by common folk, and conservative talk shows. They want guns confiscated and conservatives silenced.

Great, prove it was those folks, and not David Hogg, who motivated many of Laura Ingraham’s sponsors to pull their ads from her show....

Little David Hogg has 300,000 followers. "Those folks" paid for his rally.

 

[ChrisL]

No, NOT wrong. Her opinion was made in public, just like any news story that might be just as provocative whether it's news, or an opinion piece. Media outlets afraid that they'll lose sponsors if they offend someone, or some group will be thinking twice whether to publish a piece or not.

This punk kid has every right to do what he did, but that doesn't mean it's a good thing.

What do you suggest Hogg should have done after Ingraham took a swipe at him?

Why should he have done anything ?

My god, there are millions of people on the internet saying much worse things about him than what she said. Is he going to go after them too ?

It's not him going after anyone. It is Media Matters, George Soros groups, and Hollywood celebrities going after the 2nd Amendment, guns owned by common folk, and conservative talk shows. They want guns confiscated and conservatives silenced.

Great, prove it was those folks, and not David Hogg, who motivated many of Laura Ingraham’s sponsors to pull their ads from her show....

Little David Hogg has 300,000 followers. "Those folks" paid for his rally.

I can't imagine the types of people who would follow that skinny little clear back pack boy. Lol. Losers!

 

[asaratis]

What do you suggest Hogg should have done after Ingraham took a swipe at him?

Why should he have done anything ?

My god, there are millions of people on the internet saying much worse things about him than what she said. Is he going to go after them too ?

It's not him going after anyone. It is Media Matters, George Soros groups, and Hollywood celebrities going after the 2nd Amendment, guns owned by common folk, and conservative talk shows. They want guns confiscated and conservatives silenced.

Great, prove it was those folks, and not David Hogg, who motivated many of Laura Ingraham’s sponsors to pull their ads from her show....

Little David Hogg has 300,000 followers. "Those folks" paid for his rally.

I can't imagine the types of people who would follow that skinny little clear back pack boy. Lol. Losers!

Useful idiots of the left.

 

[Faun]

Wrong. The media will continue to report on stories they think are important to the viewers. Ingram wasn't reporting news, she was offering a snarky opinion on Hogg and his grades. Hogg's grades aren't news.

Laura Ingram offered an opinion, not news.

No, NOT wrong. Her opinion was made in public, just like any news story that might be just as provocative whether it's news, or an opinion piece. Media outlets afraid that they'll lose sponsors if they offend someone, or some group will be thinking twice whether to publish a piece or not.

This punk kid has every right to do what he did, but that doesn't mean it's a good thing.

What do you suggest Hogg should have done after Ingraham took a swipe at him?

Why should he have done anything ?

My god, there are millions of people on the internet saying much worse things about him than what she said. Is he going to go after them too ?

So your answer is he should have done nothing and just let her snide comments stand unopposed? A reason to have done something is because she is a national figure with many followers.

It wasn't a snide remark. Some students with high GPA get rejected to make room for quota minority applicants.

Take it up with Ingraham, she apologized for making a snide remark.

 

[Faun]

the libs are on double duty, trying to take away two rights using one skinny kid! Imagine how stupid they must think we are.

LOL

You have no idea how stupid we think you are.

 

[ChrisL]

the libs are on double duty, trying to take away two rights using one skinny kid! Imagine how stupid they must think we are.

LOL

You have no idea how stupid we think you are.

Not as stupid as you obviously. Thinking you are going to hoodwink people using some skinny little frightened boy when it comes to something as important as our rights and government tyranny? Too funny.

 

[ChrisL]

The only people this boy is affecting are the people who agreed with his viewpoints to begin with. The rest of us are against government tyranny and governmental controls over the people's natural and inherent rights.

 

[Faun]

No, NOT wrong. Her opinion was made in public, just like any news story that might be just as provocative whether it's news, or an opinion piece. Media outlets afraid that they'll lose sponsors if they offend someone, or some group will be thinking twice whether to publish a piece or not.

This punk kid has every right to do what he did, but that doesn't mean it's a good thing.

What do you suggest Hogg should have done after Ingraham took a swipe at him?

Why should he have done anything ?

My god, there are millions of people on the internet saying much worse things about him than what she said. Is he going to go after them too ?

It's not him going after anyone. It is Media Matters, George Soros groups, and Hollywood celebrities going after the 2nd Amendment, guns owned by common folk, and conservative talk shows. They want guns confiscated and conservatives silenced.

Great, prove it was those folks, and not David Hogg, who motivated many of Laura Ingraham’s sponsors to pull their ads from her show....

Little David Hogg has 300,000 followers. "Those folks" paid for his rally.

Don’t run away from your comment. We’re not talking about his rally. We’re talking about his push to get Ingraham’s sponsors to drop her. You said he didn’t do that. Prove he wasn’t the one who inspired that....

 

[Faun]

the libs are on double duty, trying to take away two rights using one skinny kid! Imagine how stupid they must think we are.

LOL

You have no idea how stupid we think you are.

Not as stupid as you obviously. Thinking you are going to hoodwink people using some skinny little frightened boy when it comes to something as important as our rights and government tyranny? Too funny.

He’s already motivated a gun bill to be passed in Florida, raising the legal age to purchase a gun to 21, which he (and other Parkland kids) managed in just a few weeks. And they’re just getting started. Now they’re working on motivating teens who are becoming eligible to vote, to vote out politicians opposed to restricting availability of certain types of guns to civilians. He’s making things happen while you bitch about him on a forum.

 

[asaratis]

What do you suggest Hogg should have done after Ingraham took a swipe at him?

Why should he have done anything ?

My god, there are millions of people on the internet saying much worse things about him than what she said. Is he going to go after them too ?

It's not him going after anyone. It is Media Matters, George Soros groups, and Hollywood celebrities going after the 2nd Amendment, guns owned by common folk, and conservative talk shows. They want guns confiscated and conservatives silenced.

Great, prove it was those folks, and not David Hogg, who motivated many of Laura Ingraham’s sponsors to pull their ads from her show....

Little David Hogg has 300,000 followers. "Those folks" paid for his rally.

Don’t run away from your comment. We’re not talking about his rally. We’re talking about his push to get Ingraham’s sponsors to drop her. You said he didn’t do that. Prove he wasn’t the one who inspired that....

Little David Hogg is a spokesman for his handlers. Nothing he says is original.