- Thread starter
- #121
The only people bashing the statisticians who discovered female cancer is correlated to abortion is militant abortion-supporters.
Komen Foundation reverses funding decision of Planned Parenthood - CNN.com
(CNN) -- Faced with a deluge of opposition that included pressure from lawmakers and internal dissent, one of America's leading breast cancer advocacy groups on Friday reversed itself on a decision that would have cut off funding to some Planned Parenthood projects.
"We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving women's lives," the Susan G. Komen for the Cure Foundation said in a statement. "We will continue to fund existing grants, including those of Planned Parenthood, and preserve their eligibility to apply for future grants, while maintaining the ability of our affiliates to make funding decisions that meet the needs of their communities."
The group's earlier decision not to renew part of its longstanding partnership with Planned Parenthood, which operates hundreds of family clinics that perform abortions, triggered strong emotions across the country. It provoked objection even from some of its own affiliates...
With 54 million unborn American children died hideous deaths prior to their birth, this is not anything to write home about, kidrocks.
I was around when Roe v Wade passed, and didn't have much of an opinion on abortion at the time since only about 2,000 women a year were thought to need the procedure to prevent dangerous illegal abortions or from unthinkable experiences with a rapist asserting his fatherhood privileges on a threatened, frightened woman.
54 million unborn Americans in 40 years extinguished harshly by someone who hated the thought of having them around was not anticipated by anybody.
Abortion is dangerous and the evidence it could cause serious problems later in life was also not known. The alleged claims that it's not related to cancer reminds me of the tobacco industry who claimed cigarette smoking wasn't a big part of developing cancer, and they produced counterclaim "scientific" evidence supporting their claim in the 50s, which people, now dead of smoking related illnesses, believed.
Just exactly "who" has come up with that figure of "54 million" unborn Americans in 40 years I wonder? Is it un-challenged demagoguery? Really?
