Just Why Has Security Video Not Been Released?

[Geaux4it]

CNN just reported authorities are saying Paddock took all the weapons up to the room himself based on security camera coverage. If so, why have we not seen these videos? I want to see him making the trips to eliminate other scenarios

-Geaux

 

[Montrovant]

Maybe because there is no reason law enforcement needs to release those kinds of things to the public during an ongoing investigation? Is there some sort of legal requirement for evidence to be available to the public during an investigation?

 

[Geaux4it]

Maybe because there is no reason law enforcement needs to release those kinds of things to the public during an ongoing investigation? Is there some sort of legal requirement for evidence to be available to the public during an investigation?

I don't see why not. After San Bern we had coverage quickly. The question of how he got the weapons in the hotel is a pressing issue. The video would clearly rule out other questions

-Geaux

 

[bodecea]

Maybe because there is no reason law enforcement needs to release those kinds of things to the public during an ongoing investigation? Is there some sort of legal requirement for evidence to be available to the public during an investigation?

This is the same group of people who keep saying that all investigations should be releasing all their evidence for us to see in ongoing investigations.....like the Mueller investigation.

 

[miketx]

Maybe because there is no reason law enforcement needs to release those kinds of things to the public during an ongoing investigation? Is there some sort of legal requirement for evidence to be available to the public during an investigation?

Then why do they release one showing him at a casino in 2011?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Maybe because there is no reason law enforcement needs to release those kinds of things to the public during an ongoing investigation? Is there some sort of legal requirement for evidence to be available to the public during an investigation?

I don't see why not. After San Bern we had coverage quickly. The question of how he got the weapons in the hotel is a pressing issue. The video would clearly rule out other questions

-Geaux

You dont need to see the videos, peasant.

Just shut your mouth and be a good little consumer!

 

[koshergrl]

CNN just reported authorities are saying Paddock took all the weapons up to the room himself based on security camera coverage. If so, why have we not seen these videos? I want to see him making the trips to eliminate other scenarios

-Geaux

Because they're lying.

 

[Montrovant]

Maybe because there is no reason law enforcement needs to release those kinds of things to the public during an ongoing investigation? Is there some sort of legal requirement for evidence to be available to the public during an investigation?

Then why do they release one showing him at a casino in 2011?

I don't know. Then again, so what? I'm not involved in the crime or the investigation of the crime, and I haven't filed a FOI release request or anything of the sort. This incident just happened, complaining that every bit of video evidence isn't available through the media right now seems premature, at best.

 

[Roudy]

I also have a feeling they're hiding something. Guy takes ten deadly military style weapons into an expensive hotel room and mows down hundreds of people, and there isn't even a hint of motive yet? You can't say he "snapped" because clearly it was extremely well planned, and worked perfectly. Something really stinks here. Maybe it's another Leftie nutjob like the attacker in DC a few months ago, and the authorities are afraid of civil unrest? Or maybe he is indeed a convert to Islam and ISIS recruit and they are going through his digital fingerprints to see who else there is in the US planning an upcoming attack.

 

[Geaux4it]

Maybe because there is no reason law enforcement needs to release those kinds of things to the public during an ongoing investigation? Is there some sort of legal requirement for evidence to be available to the public during an investigation?

I don't see why not. After San Bern we had coverage quickly. The question of how he got the weapons in the hotel is a pressing issue. The video would clearly rule out other questions

-Geaux

You dont need to see the videos, peasant.

Just shut your mouth and be a good little consumer!

 

[miketx]

Maybe because there is no reason law enforcement needs to release those kinds of things to the public during an ongoing investigation? Is there some sort of legal requirement for evidence to be available to the public during an investigation?

Then why do they release one showing him at a casino in 2011?

I don't know. Then again, so what? I'm not involved in the crime or the investigation of the crime, and I haven't filed a FOI release request or anything of the sort. This incident just happened, complaining that every bit of video evidence isn't available through the media right now seems premature, at best.

No one has complained about "every bit of video evidence" not being available.

 

[Montrovant]

Maybe because there is no reason law enforcement needs to release those kinds of things to the public during an ongoing investigation? Is there some sort of legal requirement for evidence to be available to the public during an investigation?

I don't see why not. After San Bern we had coverage quickly. The question of how he got the weapons in the hotel is a pressing issue. The video would clearly rule out other questions

-Geaux

You dont need to see the videos, peasant.

Just shut your mouth and be a good little consumer!

 

[EvilCat Breath]

CNN just reported authorities are saying Paddock took all the weapons up to the room himself based on security camera coverage. If so, why have we not seen these videos? I want to see him making the trips to eliminate other scenarios

-Geaux

You would see him walking through the lobby carrying a suitcase.

Now, if we had cameras in the guestrooms, they would have shown everything.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

CNN just reported authorities are saying Paddock took all the weapons up to the room himself based on security camera coverage. If so, why have we not seen these videos? I want to see him making the trips to eliminate other scenarios

-Geaux

You would see him walking through the lobby carrying a suitcase.

Now, if we had cameras in the guestrooms, they would have shown everything.

Kinky!

 

[Weatherman2020]

The CIA is busy creating videos to hide the fact Trump and the Joos were behind it.

 

[Montrovant]

Maybe because there is no reason law enforcement needs to release those kinds of things to the public during an ongoing investigation? Is there some sort of legal requirement for evidence to be available to the public during an investigation?

Then why do they release one showing him at a casino in 2011?

I don't know. Then again, so what? I'm not involved in the crime or the investigation of the crime, and I haven't filed a FOI release request or anything of the sort. This incident just happened, complaining that every bit of video evidence isn't available through the media right now seems premature, at best.

No one has complained about "every bit of video evidence" not being available.

Who decides which bit of video evidence needs to be made available to the public immediately after an incident happens? I'm not saying evidence should remain hidden forever, but this shooting just occurred. Releasing evidence could impact the investigation, it could tip off possible other suspects, it could make it more difficult to find an impartial jury in the event of a trial, there could be regulations or laws regarding the release of security footage, perhaps the hotel would block its release, I don't know. I just find the idea that any particular piece of video evidence of a shooting that just occurred should already be available to the general public unrealistic.

 

[Windparadox]

`
`
The mandatory release of video footage by police is pretty much still a US constitutional gray area. There is no state law in Nevada requiring police to do so.

 

[shockedcanadian]

I'm guessing that in due time some these videos will be released. It's still very early and they want to comb through everything and every person on any video, anyone who shared an elevator with him etc before they release. They don't want to have a video released and the public sees something they missed, or an accomplice goes off the grid because he sees he is suspected of helping him.

One thing is for sure, for anyone looking at conspiracies and what have you, there is no way that the full and complete story doesn't see the light of day. There will be far too much pressure from the deceased families and the public. Some of these impacted were off duty cops, nurses, lawyers and many hundreds were impacted.

America will demand that this is done right. If not, Vegas stands to lose a great deal of money as people will have doubts about their safety, regardless of how irrational that is. This is the medias job also, to push for more details and information.

The problem with incomplete information is that it allows the imagination to fill in any missing details. You might recall that early on after the attack it was reported that a Hispanic woman was thrown out of the venue with her bf, and she apparently told these people "a lot of people are going to die tonight!" Everyone assumed she must be involved. More than likely, it was some drunk woman making empty threats in a moment of rage. They probably went home and dealt with a hangover in the morning, very fortunate they were thrown out of the venue as it were.

To me, as was stated, I lean to gambling problems/marital issues. Hell, she might have even had left him because of his gambling problems or debts. Without question, they need to talk to her on U.S soil, and the fact she isn't back in the U.S yet adds to the suspicion. Also, why did he have her Players Card that identified her on his persons when he committed this heinous act?

One final point to debunk any conspiracy theorists. There are literally hundreds of people from multiple police forces, including the FBI investigating this. If there was something not on the level in these videos, or someone else bringing bags into his room, someone would have leaked this information to a news network for a great reward. They wouldn't even need to remain anonymous and worry about repercussions as they would receive global support.

 

[Roudy]

As a side note, when CNN first announced the shooter's name and identity, they made sure they mentioned "white" in the description. What a bunch of scumbags. When was the last time the fake news media mentioned "Black" or "Muslim" in the aftermath of an attack?

 

[Weatherman2020]

As a side note, when CNN first announced the shooter's name and identity, they made sure they mentioned "white" in the description. What a bunch of scumbags. When was the last time the fake news media mentioned "Black" or "Muslim" in the aftermath of an attack?

And they still don’t know the motive behind the Republican baseball shooting by a guy who hates Trump and Republicans and asked if these are Republicans before opening fire.