Just Why Has Security Video Not Been Released?

Maybe because there is no reason law enforcement needs to release those kinds of things to the public during an ongoing investigation? Is there some sort of legal requirement for evidence to be available to the public during an investigation?
Then why do they release one showing him at a casino in 2011?

Because what he was doing at a casino 6 years ago isn't part of an ongoing investigation.
 
Maybe because there is no reason law enforcement needs to release those kinds of things to the public during an ongoing investigation? Is there some sort of legal requirement for evidence to be available to the public during an investigation?
Then why do they release one showing him at a casino in 2011?

Because what he was doing at a casino 6 years ago isn't part of an ongoing investigation.
So why are they showing the room and all the guns?
 
As a side note, when CNN first announced the shooter's name and identity, they made sure they mentioned "white" in the description. What a bunch of scumbags. When was the last time the fake news media mentioned "Black" or "Muslim" in the aftermath of an attack?
And they still don’t know the motive behind the Republican baseball shooting by a guy who hates Trump and Republicans and asked if these are Republicans before opening fire.
I would assume the public reaction would be tremendous and possibly lead to large protests and riots if this were another Leftie nutjob on a mission to massacre as many Trump supporters as possible.
 
Last edited:
If it were part of some conspiracy they would have just fabricated video evidence. So either way there would be video evidence. They simply haven't released anything.
 
As a side note, when CNN first announced the shooter's name and identity, they made sure they mentioned "white" in the description. What a bunch of scumbags. When was the last time the fake news media mentioned "Black" or "Muslim" in the aftermath of an attack?
And they still don’t know the motive behind the Republican baseball shooting by a guy who hates Trump and Republicans and asked if these are Republicans before opening fire.

Dear Weatherman2020

The debate over the baseball shooter was whether he was mindfully strategizing,
and deliberately trying to change the balance of votes and majority-rule
to change outcomes by eliminating Republican voters from Congress,
where he was fully aware and was not criminally insane.

Or whether he had somehow lost it and was acting out of criminal insanity.

There is a difference in mindset, such as the difference between when someone
kills a "woman because they have symbolic obsessive anger against women",
or they kill a "PARTICULAR woman as a planned strategy"
(such as the opponent in a custody case or a witness to a crime they seek to eradicate).

Because nobody can get into this guy's head after he's already dead,
no one is discussing this.

People will continue to discuss Muslim shooters and "rightwing" attackers or gun advocates,
because they want to get into the heads of people like that and address what is going on or going wrong.
 
Maybe because there is no reason law enforcement needs to release those kinds of things to the public during an ongoing investigation? Is there some sort of legal requirement for evidence to be available to the public during an investigation?
Geaux just doesn't want to believe any reports that interfere with his conspiracy theory.
 
CNN just reported authorities are saying Paddock took all the weapons up to the room himself based on security camera coverage. If so, why have we not seen these videos? I want to see him making the trips to eliminate other scenarios

-Geaux
Geaux4it
Maybe they don't want to promote MORE images of guns in the media.
At a sensitive time when this is getting so much media attention.
And the LAST thing we need is to "trigger" more copycats who might start competing for attention.

Maybe this guy was ready to end it for himself. He just won 40,000 in gambling,
but how much did he lose to get that much? What if he owed some bad people
more money than he could win and pay back. What if he was looking to die anyway?

And he wanted to go out with a bang, and get as much bang out of the media
as he could. He had access to internet to see what the reaction was and
where the police or responders were and when they would find him.

Maybe that's all he wanted. Was to control how he ended it
and make as big a scene as he could. So let's not encourage more of that, right?
 
Maybe because there is no reason law enforcement needs to release those kinds of things to the public during an ongoing investigation? Is there some sort of legal requirement for evidence to be available to the public during an investigation?
Then why do they release one showing him at a casino in 2011?

Because what he was doing at a casino 6 years ago isn't part of an ongoing investigation.
So why are they showing the room and all the guns?

They have 24 hour access to the room and guns. They didn't just throw them out there for the public to sift through.
 
As a side note, when CNN first announced the shooter's name and identity, they made sure they mentioned "white" in the description. What a bunch of scumbags. When was the last time the fake news media mentioned "Black" or "Muslim" in the aftermath of an attack?
And they still don’t know the motive behind the Republican baseball shooting by a guy who hates Trump and Republicans and asked if these are Republicans before opening fire.

Dear Weatherman2020

The debate over the baseball shooter was whether he was mindfully strategizing,
and deliberately trying to change the balance of votes and majority-rule
to change outcomes by eliminating Republican voters from Congress,
where he was fully aware and was not criminally insane.

Or whether he had somehow lost it and was acting out of criminal insanity.

There is a difference in mindset, such as the difference between when someone
kills a "woman because they have symbolic obsessive anger against women",
or they kill a "PARTICULAR woman as a planned strategy"
(such as the opponent in a custody case or a witness to a crime they seek to eradicate).

Because nobody can get into this guy's head after he's already dead,
no one is discussing this.

People will continue to discuss Muslim shooters and "rightwing" attackers or gun advocates,
because they want to get into the heads of people like that and address what is going on or going wrong.
Just last night MSNBC said the motive behind the Scalia shooting was unknown.
 
Maybe because there is no reason law enforcement needs to release those kinds of things to the public during an ongoing investigation? Is there some sort of legal requirement for evidence to be available to the public during an investigation?
Geaux just doesn't want to believe any reports that interfere with his conspiracy theory.
Well since most of us know about using guns and stuff, and you don't, there are too many things that don't add up.
 
As a side note, when CNN first announced the shooter's name and identity, they made sure they mentioned "white" in the description. What a bunch of scumbags. When was the last time the fake news media mentioned "Black" or "Muslim" in the aftermath of an attack?
And they still don’t know the motive behind the Republican baseball shooting by a guy who hates Trump and Republicans and asked if these are Republicans before opening fire.
In would assume the public reaction would be tremendous and possibly lead to large protests and riots if this were another Leftie nutjob on a mission to massacre as many Trump supporters as possible.
I wonder if he's a registered voter and who he voted for?
 
CNN just reported authorities are saying Paddock took all the weapons up to the room himself based on security camera coverage. If so, why have we not seen these videos? I want to see him making the trips to eliminate other scenarios

-Geaux

Law enforcement is under no obligation to quell your conspiracy theories when you demand it.

The footage will be released when it's released.
 
As a side note, when CNN first announced the shooter's name and identity, they made sure they mentioned "white" in the description. What a bunch of scumbags. When was the last time the fake news media mentioned "Black" or "Muslim" in the aftermath of an attack?
And they still don’t know the motive behind the Republican baseball shooting by a guy who hates Trump and Republicans and asked if these are Republicans before opening fire.
In would assume the public reaction would be tremendous and possibly lead to large protests and riots if this were another Leftie nutjob on a mission to massacre as many Trump supporters as possible.
I wonder if he's a registered voter and who he voted for?

Of course you do. But you won't ever know.

That won't stop you from making shit up, though.
 
As a side note, when CNN first announced the shooter's name and identity, they made sure they mentioned "white" in the description. What a bunch of scumbags. When was the last time the fake news media mentioned "Black" or "Muslim" in the aftermath of an attack?
And they still don’t know the motive behind the Republican baseball shooting by a guy who hates Trump and Republicans and asked if these are Republicans before opening fire.
In would assume the public reaction would be tremendous and possibly lead to large protests and riots if this were another Leftie nutjob on a mission to massacre as many Trump supporters as possible.
I wonder if he's a registered voter and who he voted for?
Maybe he just hates country music.
 
CNN just reported authorities are saying Paddock took all the weapons up to the room himself based on security camera coverage. If so, why have we not seen these videos? I want to see him making the trips to eliminate other scenarios

-Geaux


Maybe just maybe it's because they have an active investigation underway.
 
As a side note, when CNN first announced the shooter's name and identity, they made sure they mentioned "white" in the description. What a bunch of scumbags. When was the last time the fake news media mentioned "Black" or "Muslim" in the aftermath of an attack?
And they still don’t know the motive behind the Republican baseball shooting by a guy who hates Trump and Republicans and asked if these are Republicans before opening fire.

Dear Weatherman2020

The debate over the baseball shooter was whether he was mindfully strategizing,
and deliberately trying to change the balance of votes and majority-rule
to change outcomes by eliminating Republican voters from Congress,
where he was fully aware and was not criminally insane.

Or whether he had somehow lost it and was acting out of criminal insanity.

There is a difference in mindset, such as the difference between when someone
kills a "woman because they have symbolic obsessive anger against women",
or they kill a "PARTICULAR woman as a planned strategy"
(such as the opponent in a custody case or a witness to a crime they seek to eradicate).

Because nobody can get into this guy's head after he's already dead,
no one is discussing this.

People will continue to discuss Muslim shooters and "rightwing" attackers or gun advocates,
because they want to get into the heads of people like that and address what is going on or going wrong.
Just last night MSNBC said the motive behind the Scalia shooting was unknown.

Umm...

Scalia died of a heart attack. Did you mean Scalise?
 
As a side note, when CNN first announced the shooter's name and identity, they made sure they mentioned "white" in the description. What a bunch of scumbags. When was the last time the fake news media mentioned "Black" or "Muslim" in the aftermath of an attack?
And they still don’t know the motive behind the Republican baseball shooting by a guy who hates Trump and Republicans and asked if these are Republicans before opening fire.
In would assume the public reaction would be tremendous and possibly lead to large protests and riots if this were another Leftie nutjob on a mission to massacre as many Trump supporters as possible.
I wonder if he's a registered voter and who he voted for?

He's not registered to vote in either Nevada or Florida.
 

Forum List

Back
Top