Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
continuing deflections duly noted
Ironic given that you are deflecting from the hard truth.
The storekeeper never reported a "robbery". Why not?
Just try answering that question.
But you can't because then you would have to face the hard truth.
The store owner doesn't report robberies because he would shortly be dead as a snitch.continuing deflections duly noted
Ironic given that you are deflecting from the hard truth.
The storekeeper never reported a "robbery". Why not?
Just try answering that question.
But you can't because then you would have to face the hard truth.
continuing deflections duly noted
Ironic given that you are deflecting from the hard truth.
The storekeeper never reported a "robbery". Why not?
Just try answering that question.
But you can't because then you would have to face the hard truth.
Watch the video, the clerk was a bit busy with a 300 lb thief at the time.
The law does not demand that a theft be reported by the owner. A bystander may report a crime in process
You continue to deflect from the FACT that when D Johnson was interviewed he clearly stated that Michael Brown STOLE the smokes.
You are delusional my friend.
The store owner doesn't report robberies because he would shortly be dead as a snitch.continuing deflections duly noted
Ironic given that you are deflecting from the hard truth.
The storekeeper never reported a "robbery". Why not?
Just try answering that question.
But you can't because then you would have to face the hard truth.
continuing deflections duly noted
Ironic given that you are deflecting from the hard truth.
The storekeeper never reported a "robbery". Why not?
Just try answering that question.
But you can't because then you would have to face the hard truth.
Watch the video, the clerk was a bit busy with a 300 lb thief at the time.
The law does not demand that a theft be reported by the owner. A bystander may report a crime in process
You continue to deflect from the FACT that when D Johnson was interviewed he clearly stated that Michael Brown STOLE the smokes.
You are delusional my friend.
You run away from the truth because you can't handle it. You invent rationalizations because it suits your own delusions. The facts don't fit your delusion so you believe the testimony of someone who you believe is lying about the "strong arming".
In essence you have zero credibility given what you "believe".
continuing deflections duly noted
Ironic given that you are deflecting from the hard truth.
The storekeeper never reported a "robbery". Why not?
Just try answering that question.
But you can't because then you would have to face the hard truth.
Watch the video, the clerk was a bit busy with a 300 lb thief at the time.
The law does not demand that a theft be reported by the owner. A bystander may report a crime in process
You continue to deflect from the FACT that when D Johnson was interviewed he clearly stated that Michael Brown STOLE the smokes.
You are delusional my friend.
You run away from the truth because you can't handle it. You invent rationalizations because it suits your own delusions. The facts don't fit your delusion so you believe the testimony of someone who you believe is lying about the "strong arming".
In essence you have zero credibility given what you "believe".
Moron, the fact is in the interview with Johnson who STATED his buddy MICHAEL BROWN STOLE THE SMOKES
You continue to prove you have serious delusions dude
It's actually what the clerk said.The store owner doesn't report robberies because he would shortly be dead as a snitch.continuing deflections duly noted
Ironic given that you are deflecting from the hard truth.
The storekeeper never reported a "robbery". Why not?
Just try answering that question.
But you can't because then you would have to face the hard truth.
Assumes facts not in evidence.
Maybe the store clerk felt intimidated and feared there might be reprisal in the future if he did. That would be the logical assumption.continuing deflections duly noted
The storekeeper never reported a "robbery". Why not?
Just try answering that question.
continuing deflections duly noted
Ironic given that you are deflecting from the hard truth.
The storekeeper never reported a "robbery". Why not?
Just try answering that question.
But you can't because then you would have to face the hard truth.
Watch the video, the clerk was a bit busy with a 300 lb thief at the time.
The law does not demand that a theft be reported by the owner. A bystander may report a crime in process
You continue to deflect from the FACT that when D Johnson was interviewed he clearly stated that Michael Brown STOLE the smokes.
You are delusional my friend.
You run away from the truth because you can't handle it. You invent rationalizations because it suits your own delusions. The facts don't fit your delusion so you believe the testimony of someone who you believe is lying about the "strong arming".
In essence you have zero credibility given what you "believe".
Moron, the fact is in the interview with Johnson who STATED his buddy MICHAEL BROWN STOLE THE SMOKES
You continue to prove you have serious delusions dude
That you have degenerated to ad hom attacks is a tacit admission that you cannot defend your feckless position.
In August when the first round of lootings happened "snitches get stitches" was spray painted on the wall of that store.Maybe the store clerk felt intimidated and feared there might be reprisal in the future if he did. That would be the logical assumption.continuing deflections duly noted
The storekeeper never reported a "robbery". Why not?
Just try answering that question.
Ironic given that you are deflecting from the hard truth.
The storekeeper never reported a "robbery". Why not?
Just try answering that question.
But you can't because then you would have to face the hard truth.
Watch the video, the clerk was a bit busy with a 300 lb thief at the time.
The law does not demand that a theft be reported by the owner. A bystander may report a crime in process
You continue to deflect from the FACT that when D Johnson was interviewed he clearly stated that Michael Brown STOLE the smokes.
You are delusional my friend.
You run away from the truth because you can't handle it. You invent rationalizations because it suits your own delusions. The facts don't fit your delusion so you believe the testimony of someone who you believe is lying about the "strong arming".
In essence you have zero credibility given what you "believe".
Moron, the fact is in the interview with Johnson who STATED his buddy MICHAEL BROWN STOLE THE SMOKES
You continue to prove you have serious delusions dude
That you have degenerated to ad hom attacks is a tacit admission that you cannot defend your feckless position.
Dipwad, to defend your reckless assertions you must be saying that Browns OWN FRIEND lied about Brown stealing the cigars.
Problem is, you provide no evidence to support that assertion. No screen capture of the "transaction" not even the method of payment.
If this was in a court, after your testimony you would no doubt here the following phrase from the judge:
The witness is dismissed, the jury will disregard the witnesses testimony.
De, now you've been dispatched. Get used to it.
at your feeble attempts to pretend that you are right.
No cross? It is just the prosecutor, it's a Grand Jury, not a trial.He would never have gotten away with that testimony in a regular trial.
The forensic evidence contradicts his testimony. According to Wilson he said that Brown was trying to hit him after the shot him in the hand. There should also have been a blood trail from the vehicle to the body. Wilson even said that Brown was holding his hand against his stomach (probably trying to stem the bleeding). Wilson made out that he thought that Brown was going for a gun.
The fact that there was no cross examination is criminal in my opinion.
Watch the video, the clerk was a bit busy with a 300 lb thief at the time.
The law does not demand that a theft be reported by the owner. A bystander may report a crime in process
You continue to deflect from the FACT that when D Johnson was interviewed he clearly stated that Michael Brown STOLE the smokes.
You are delusional my friend.
You run away from the truth because you can't handle it. You invent rationalizations because it suits your own delusions. The facts don't fit your delusion so you believe the testimony of someone who you believe is lying about the "strong arming".
In essence you have zero credibility given what you "believe".
Moron, the fact is in the interview with Johnson who STATED his buddy MICHAEL BROWN STOLE THE SMOKES
You continue to prove you have serious delusions dude
That you have degenerated to ad hom attacks is a tacit admission that you cannot defend your feckless position.
Dipwad, to defend your reckless assertions you must be saying that Browns OWN FRIEND lied about Brown stealing the cigars.
Problem is, you provide no evidence to support that assertion. No screen capture of the "transaction" not even the method of payment.
If this was in a court, after your testimony you would no doubt here the following phrase from the judge:
The witness is dismissed, the jury will disregard the witnesses testimony.
De, now you've been dispatched. Get used to it.
And if the way he told the story was the way it actually happened?Why is the dead punk automatically given the benefit of a doubt while the cop is flogged and put to the rack? There's something very wrong with the priorities here.That's what he says. And we all know cops don't lie.
Maybe because the cop has a lot to gain to tell the story in a way that reflects best on him.
Then he committed suicide by cop. Brown, that is. And I accept that he might have, because that is the only way that Wilson's story makes sense.
Actually, many of LEO kills on thugs are essentially, suicide by cop. I mean, the outcome was predictable
-Geaux
It is certainly not all predicated on Wilson's testimony. Forensics and the testimony of black eyewitnesses other than the skanks and thugs we saw on TV corroborated Wilson's testimony. I have a lot of respect for those witnesses who stepped forward with the truth.I don't know. I think a typical criminal has the goal of getting away with the crime. An unarmed guy charging straight at the cop who has ALREADY shot him, is blatantly committing suicide, not trying to get away with anything.
This is all predicated on Wilson's testimony being the whole truth. Which I'm not convinced of. However, the grand jury has decided.
It is certainly not all predicated on Wilson's testimony. Forensics and the testimony of black eyewitnesses other than the skanks and thugs we saw on TV corroborated Wilson's testimony. I have a lot of respect for those witnesses who stepped forward with the truth.I don't know. I think a typical criminal has the goal of getting away with the crime. An unarmed guy charging straight at the cop who has ALREADY shot him, is blatantly committing suicide, not trying to get away with anything.
This is all predicated on Wilson's testimony being the whole truth. Which I'm not convinced of. However, the grand jury has decided.
No, but it is satisfying to see the rule of law prevail over mob rule.It is certainly not all predicated on Wilson's testimony. Forensics and the testimony of black eyewitnesses other than the skanks and thugs we saw on TV corroborated Wilson's testimony. I have a lot of respect for those witnesses who stepped forward with the truth.I don't know. I think a typical criminal has the goal of getting away with the crime. An unarmed guy charging straight at the cop who has ALREADY shot him, is blatantly committing suicide, not trying to get away with anything.
This is all predicated on Wilson's testimony being the whole truth. Which I'm not convinced of. However, the grand jury has decided.
The system has spoken. It doesn't matter if you or I agree.
Without a cross examination the testimony is biased. The GJ were not lawyers. They were not forensic experts. They were given one side of the story only. There are way too many questions that would have been answered in a genuine trial.
