Just read Wilson's testimony to the grand jury....WOW!

[JimH52]

Grand Jury Volume 5

Beginning on page 195. He was in a battle with Brown!

 

[Derideo_Te]

He would never have gotten away with that testimony in a regular trial.

The forensic evidence contradicts his testimony. According to Wilson he said that Brown was trying to hit him after the shot him in the hand. There should also have been a blood trail from the vehicle to the body. Wilson even said that Brown was holding his hand against his stomach (probably trying to stem the bleeding). Wilson made out that he thought that Brown was going for a gun.

The fact that there was no cross examination is criminal in my opinion.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

He would never have gotten away with that testimony in a regular trial.

The forensic evidence contradicts his testimony. According to Wilson he said that Brown was trying to hit him after the shot him in the hand. There should also have been a blood trail from the vehicle to the body. Wilson even said that Brown was holding his hand against his stomach (probably trying to stem the bleeding). Wilson made out that he thought that Brown was going for a gun.

The fact that there was no cross examination is criminal in my opinion.

Ya cause after all the evidence does not include browns blood in the car and on Wilson right?

 

[Katzndogz]

There was a blood trail that showed Brown running away then turning and charging back. It was one of the pieces of evidence that helped the jurors decide which of the witnesses were lying.

 

[007]

The forensic evidence contradicts his testimony.

That is a LIE!

The forensic evidence does in fact, corroborate everything Wilson said.

 

[Katzndogz]

There is no cross examination in a grand jury hearing. No one is making a determination of guilt or innocence. There is no direct examination. The jurors themselves can ask any question they want and objections are not permitted. The accused has no legal representative. Anything he says can be held against him at trial.

A grand jury hearing is the lowest possible threshold for holding over for trial. It's not reasonable doubt. It's only probable cause.

Does that help?

 

[Meathead]

The forensic evidence contradicts his testimony.

That is a LIE!

The forensic evidence does in fact, corroborate everything Wilson said.

Of course it does. A trial would have been even more of a wash than Zimmerman.

 

[Katzndogz]

The forensic evidence contradicts his testimony.

That is a LIE!

The forensic evidence does in fact, corroborate everything Wilson said.

Not all evidence was released to the internet prior to the hearing. Some wrongly assume that the evidence does not exist.

 

[bucs90]

Michael Brown got himself killed . Period.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Without a cross examination the testimony is biased. The GJ were not lawyers. They were not forensic experts. They were given one side of the story only. There are way too many questions that would have been answered in a genuine trial.

 

[Katzndogz]

Without a cross examination the testimony is biased. The GJ were not lawyers. They were not forensic experts. They were given one side of the story only. There are way too many questions that would have been answered in a genuine trial.

There is no such thing as a cross examination at a grand jury proceeding. The jury does not decide guilt or innocence. Cross examination is both unnecessary and illegal. The sole function of the grand jury is to determine if there is evidence no matter how slight to hold the accused over for trial.

Some juisdictions don't use a grand jury proceeding. The determination is done in a courtroom by a judge in a proceeding called a preliminary hearing. There is no cross examination allowed there either.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Without a cross examination the testimony is biased. The GJ were not lawyers. They were not forensic experts. They were given one side of the story only. There are way too many questions that would have been answered in a genuine trial.

There is no such thing as a cross examination at a grand jury proceeding. The jury does not decide guilt or innocence. Cross examination is both unnecessary and illegal. The sole function of the grand jury is to determine if there is evidence no matter how slight to hold the accused over for trial.

Some juisdictions don't use a grand jury proceeding. The determination is done in a courtroom by a judge in a proceeding called a preliminary hearing. There is no cross examination allowed there either.

The GJ was exploited as a means to avoid a jury trial. Had there been a genuine trial that testimony would have been subject to cross examination. That was a political move by the prosecutor to defeat the ends of justice in my opinion.

 

[Pop23]

Without a cross examination the testimony is biased. The GJ were not lawyers. They were not forensic experts. They were given one side of the story only. There are way too many questions that would have been answered in a genuine trial.

Huh?

It's a grand jury, it's done the way it's done because the threshold to indict is minuscule.

A ham sandwich accused of raping a pig will normally result in indictment.

Holy crap, understand the basics.

 

[Pop23]

Without a cross examination the testimony is biased. The GJ were not lawyers. They were not forensic experts. They were given one side of the story only. There are way too many questions that would have been answered in a genuine trial.

There is no such thing as a cross examination at a grand jury proceeding. The jury does not decide guilt or innocence. Cross examination is both unnecessary and illegal. The sole function of the grand jury is to determine if there is evidence no matter how slight to hold the accused over for trial.

Some juisdictions don't use a grand jury proceeding. The determination is done in a courtroom by a judge in a proceeding called a preliminary hearing. There is no cross examination allowed there either.

The GJ was exploited as a means to avoid a jury trial. Had there been a genuine trial that testimony would have been subject to cross examination. That was a political move by the prosecutor to defeat the ends of justice in my opinion.

This thread should be moved to the conspiracy section, and you should be fitted with a tin foil hat

 

[Derideo_Te]

This thread should be moved to the conspiracy section

Preferring genuine justice to a mislead GJ is a "conspiracy" on your planet?

 

[Pop23]

This thread should be moved to the conspiracy section

Preferring genuine justice to a mislead GJ is a "conspiracy" on your planet?

No, that's your delusion. I refuse to be your enabler.

 

[Meathead]

This thread should be moved to the conspiracy section

Preferring genuine justice to a mislead GJ is a "conspiracy" on your planet?

For "genuine" justice you don't take cases like these to trial for political purposes.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

He would never have gotten away with that testimony in a regular trial.

The forensic evidence contradicts his testimony. According to Wilson he said that Brown was trying to hit him after the shot him in the hand. There should also have been a blood trail from the vehicle to the body. Wilson even said that Brown was holding his hand against his stomach (probably trying to stem the bleeding). Wilson made out that he thought that Brown was going for a gun.

The fact that there was no cross examination is criminal in my opinion.

Forensics concluded Brown's blood was on the officers uniform, his squad car, and on the officers gun.

 

[Stephanie]

Can you Believe the whining over TWO (Brown and Martin) people killed out of 360 million people as if they were some SAINTS or something. Just unbelievable. We would of never heard of them at all if Obama hadn't poked his nose into States affairs, along with his LAPdog lamestream media DRIVING those two stories into A FRENZY. and they drove it so far, they along with Obama and Holders blessing have brought down rioting and looting on Innocent people in how many states.

there is something VERY wrong with our lamestream media and our President

 

[dannyboys]

This thread should be moved to the conspiracy section

Preferring genuine justice to a mislead GJ is a "conspiracy" on your planet?

Do us all a favor pal and fuck off.
You're a fucking joke.
Permanent Ignore