Just a thought about terrorism! Let me know what u think!

Is the London Bombing related to September 11 Attack?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 13 72.2%
  • No!

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • In A Way Maybe?

    Votes: 3 16.7%
  • What are you talking about?

    Votes: 2 11.1%

  • Total voters
    18

Chad2000k

Rookie
Jan 1, 2004
61
2
0
Kansas
After the attacks on London, i started thinking which is sorta bad in my mind. Anyways when 9/11 happened everybody started pointing fingers and ended up pointing at the Al-quadea. Of course that maybe their MO or thier way of doing that stuff but what if theres a group out there that imitates them. First Pres. Bush says theres weapons of mass destruction in Iraq or afghanistan. The U.N. checked it out theres nothing there. So we deploy troops anyway. The rebels attack and bomb like they still do now. If u stop and think for a moment, what about that MO in all that street bombing? Does it match with the 9/11? Not really because its a plane crash. So isnt that an obivious reason, what if there is no Osama Bin Laden or what if he didnt do anything wrong or what if its just a guy dressed up like him because the real guy is dead. Now if u compare the Oklahoma City Bombing a while back, i dont have facts for this but this is what i know. We executed the guy that did it or the court says he did it, have u ever gotten the feeling that we have the wrong guy dead? Who knows it could be the Al-quadea group that had that MO and cornered that one guy or his group. So now the question raises London? They were bombed on the street just like in Iraq where its still goin on today but there hasnt been anything from them now because of the bombing this morning? Or is it the rebels left the country unnoticed and arrived in London to do it? These are just some thoughts and some things where u have to stop and think for a second why did that happen. Well let me know.
Latez
 
Chad2000k said:
After the attacks on London, i started thinking which is sorta bad in my mind. Anyways when 9/11 happened everybody started pointing fingers and ended up pointing at the Al-quadea. Of course that maybe their MO or thier way of doing that stuff but what if theres a group out there that imitates them. First Pres. Bush says theres weapons of mass destruction in Iraq or afghanistan. The U.N. checked it out theres nothing there. So we deploy troops anyway. The rebels attack and bomb like they still do now. If u stop and think for a moment, what about that MO in all that street bombing? Does it match with the 9/11? Not really because its a plane crash. So isnt that an obivious reason, what if there is no Osama Bin Laden or what if he didnt do anything wrong or what if its just a guy dressed up like him because the real guy is dead. Now if u compare the Oklahoma City Bombing a while back, i dont have facts for this but this is what i know. We executed the guy that did it or the court says he did it, have u ever gotten the feeling that we have the wrong guy dead? Who knows it could be the Al-quadea group that had that MO and cornered that one guy or his group. So now the question raises London? They were bombed on the street just like in Iraq where its still goin on today but there hasnt been anything from them now because of the bombing this morning? Or is it the rebels left the country unnoticed and arrived in London to do it? These are just some thoughts and some things where u have to stop and think for a second why did that happen. Well let me know.
Latez
You need to stop smoking so much herb bro. It is making you paranoid. You are making a lot of assumptions based on your obvious lack of knowledge. Not putting you down, just stating that you don't have all the facts straight nor do you seem to understand what is going on in this world. It is highly likely the bombs detonated in London today were detonated by English citizens or at least, recent immigrants.

Just a little question for you...

Did you know that the first three UK citizens killed in the fighting in Afghanistan were fighting for the Taliban? That should make you take pause and make you want to learn more about this enemy that is waging war on us - the west.
 
Chad2000k said:
After the attacks on London, i started thinking which is sorta bad in my mind. Anyways when 9/11 happened everybody started pointing fingers and ended up pointing at the Al-quadea. Of course that maybe their MO or thier way of doing that stuff but what if theres a group out there that imitates them. First Pres. Bush says theres weapons of mass destruction in Iraq or afghanistan. The U.N. checked it out theres nothing there. So we deploy troops anyway. The rebels attack and bomb like they still do now. If u stop and think for a moment, what about that MO in all that street bombing? Does it match with the 9/11? Not really because its a plane crash. So isnt that an obivious reason, what if there is no Osama Bin Laden or what if he didnt do anything wrong or what if its just a guy dressed up like him because the real guy is dead. Now if u compare the Oklahoma City Bombing a while back, i dont have facts for this but this is what i know. We executed the guy that did it or the court says he did it, have u ever gotten the feeling that we have the wrong guy dead? Who knows it could be the Al-quadea group that had that MO and cornered that one guy or his group. So now the question raises London? They were bombed on the street just like in Iraq where its still goin on today but there hasnt been anything from them now because of the bombing this morning? Or is it the rebels left the country unnoticed and arrived in London to do it? These are just some thoughts and some things where u have to stop and think for a second why did that happen. Well let me know.
Latez


:wtf: are you related to Hillary...another conspiracy theorist? :tinfoil:
 
Chad2000k said:
After the attacks on London, i started thinking which is sorta bad in my mind. Anyways when 9/11 happened everybody started pointing fingers and ended up pointing at the Al-quadea. Of course that maybe their MO or thier way of doing that stuff but what if theres a group out there that imitates them. First Pres. Bush says theres weapons of mass destruction in Iraq or afghanistan. The U.N. checked it out theres nothing there. So we deploy troops anyway. The rebels attack and bomb like they still do now. If u stop and think for a moment, what about that MO in all that street bombing? Does it match with the 9/11? Not really because its a plane crash. So isnt that an obivious reason, what if there is no Osama Bin Laden or what if he didnt do anything wrong or what if its just a guy dressed up like him because the real guy is dead. Now if u compare the Oklahoma City Bombing a while back, i dont have facts for this but this is what i know. We executed the guy that did it or the court says he did it, have u ever gotten the feeling that we have the wrong guy dead? Who knows it could be the Al-quadea group that had that MO and cornered that one guy or his group. So now the question raises London? They were bombed on the street just like in Iraq where its still goin on today but there hasnt been anything from them now because of the bombing this morning? Or is it the rebels left the country unnoticed and arrived in London to do it? These are just some thoughts and some things where u have to stop and think for a second why did that happen. Well let me know.
Latez

Terrorists -- those who wage war against noncombatants -- murderers -- should all be hunted down and shot. I don't care if AQ did this today or not. They STILL need to be hunted down and executed as well as the murdering scumsuckers that perpetrated the crime today.

There are NO innocent terrorists.

And it doesn't matter why it happened. There is no excuse for waging war against innocent civilians.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
Hillary? I dont even know which one.

Exactly why do people still wage war against innocent civilians? Because every one else is doin it so u do it too.
 
Chad2000k said:
Hillary? I dont even know which one.

Exactly why do people still wage war against innocent civilians? Because every one else is doin it so u do it too.
First off, terrorists and those that harbor them are not innocent. Secondly, isn't that pic in your avatar a HIND-D? If so, it explains a lot about your thinking.
 
Chad2000k said:
Hillary? I dont even know which one.

Exactly why do people still wage war against innocent civilians? Because every one else is doin it so u do it too.

Your statement doesn't make much sense; however, I assume you are implying the US military wages war against innocent civilians and I can assure you that such is not the case.
 
freeandfun1 said:
First off, terrorists and those that harbor them are not innocent. Secondly, isn't that pic in your avatar a HIND-D? If so, it explains a lot about your thinking.


The fact that he has a HIND MI for avatar shouldn't be taken as sign for his personality.
Don't judge him with it.

These attacks are probably terrorists, probably islam fundamentalist terrorists.
So, in one sens it has relation with 911. And also with the british intervention in Iraq.



But it showed the main weakness of the occidental cities : the transports.
The transports, metros, busses....are the easiest target for attempts.
 
padisha emperor said:
The fact that he has a HIND MI for avatar shouldn't be taken as sign for his personality.
Don't judge him with it.

These attacks are probably terrorists, probably islam fundamentalist terrorists.
So, in one sens it has relation with 911. And also with the british intervention in Iraq.



But it showed the main weakness of the occidental cities : the transports.
The transports, metros, busses....are the easiest target for attempts.
Have to agree with you PEs as far as the avatar goes, it doesn't mean a thing.

I also agree that the tranportation systems are ONE vulnerable aspect of Western cities. In comparison to the transportations sytems in Arab countries they are huge...most Arab countries do not have the extensive network of roads, railroads, and air facilities that Western countries have. Another thing that makes us vulnerable is the extensive economic infrastucture most Western countries enjoy....in the US we have malls that cover acres and acres of land, for example. The underlying element that makes us MOST vulnerable is the freedom we here in the US especially enjoy...the fact that it is illegal to "racially profile" for example means that those who would normally be stopped and questioned (Arab male, for example) are not. I am not trying to start something in this thread about profiling,,,,just using that as an example, so let's not go down that road.
 
CSM said:
Have to agree with you PEs as far as the avatar goes, it doesn't mean a thing.
I was being a bit facetious... chill out folks!

The underlying message was that if he admires Soviet (Russian, whatever) weaponry, then he must be a socialist... hence his thoughts... I thought you guys all had a bit of a sense of humor. I guess not.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: CSM
Um Let's see.... Al Qaeda goes on their website and says that they did it and threatened more attacks on the allies of the US if they didn't get out of Iraq and Afghanistan.... Tony Blair says then it is Al Qaeda who attacked.

The attacks have their type of style, AND THEY ADMIT TO IT! It isn't hard to figure out why people "jumped to the conclusion" that it was Al Qaeda...

:wtf:

What a maroon!
 
It doesn't even have to be al Qaeda for the events in London yesterday, the events in Madrid, and the events in NYC to be related.

It's Islamic fundamentalists attacking innocent westerners going about their day by day activites in an effort to intimidate the governments of those people to completely withdraw from the middle east (not just Afghanistan, not just Iraq, but all diplomatic, political, military, and/or economic aid to any country in that entire region) so they can then assume power themselves and create a sort of backwards 14th Century theocratic autocracy where women are shot in soccer stadiums for showing too much ankle.

Who cares what silly little nomenclature they use, it's the same tactic and the same philosophy all with the same ultimate purpose in mind.
 
Zhukov said:
...so they can then assume power themselves and create a sort of backwards 14th Century theocratic autocracy where women are shot in soccer stadiums for showing too much ankle.
And where they can plot and plan without interference their aims at spreading Islam worldwide... whether it be by intimidation or the sword.
 
I'm going to say the same thing here I've said elsewhere. They can call themselves Al Qaeda, they can call themselves the Taliban, they can call themselves the Mickey Mouse Club, it's all the same. Terrorists are terrorists, they have the same goals. We can either shut our eyes and hope they go away, or we can do something to stop them.
 
Jimmyeatworld said:
I'm going to say the same thing here I've said elsewhere. They can call themselves Al Qaeda, they can call themselves the Taliban, they can call themselves the Mickey Mouse Club, it's all the same. Terrorists are terrorists, they have the same goals. We can either shut our eyes and hope they go away, or we can do something to stop them.

sure, terrorists are terrorists, and their goal is to put chaos in our lives.

But their revendications can be different : money, retreat from Iraq, liberation of prisoneers....

It'sz why the investigations are important, when you know who is your ennemy, you can better fight and defeat him.
 
padisha emperor said:
sure, terrorists are terrorists, and their goal is to put chaos in our lives.
Nope, their goal is to eliminate you.
But their revendications can be different : money, retreat from Iraq, liberation of prisoneers....

It'sz why the investigations are important, when you know who is your ennemy, you can better fight and defeat him.
Regardless of their motivations, they need to die, simple enough.
 

Forum List

Back
Top