Judicial Ruling: Biden Oppressive Socialist Administrarion Can NOT Censor Free Speech In The US

Of course it is. Public health is the government's job. If someone is lying in such a way to promote a death-causing epidemic, it is the government's job to point that out.

It is the same government that has been by far the most prolific source of harmful lies and misinformation that has been seeking the power to label the truth as “lies and misinformation” and on that basis, to censor it.

The #CoronaHoax2020 is a perfect example. Government created a huge fake “crisis” out of a hyperbolized cold/flu outbreak, and used it as an excuse to seize and abuse unprecedented illegitimate power, to our great harm. And too many were stupid enough to fall for the hoax completely.
 
Let the record show that surada disagrees with protecting children from those that want to use them as sexual play toys.

1690208262843.png
 
Of course it is.

No, it's not.
Public health is the government's job. If someone is lying in such a way to promote a death-causing epidemic, it is the government's job to point that out.

No. In this case the question becomes: Who is right, the government or the doctor?

THAT is why government should not get involved. The government gets it wrong just as often as the individual and their views are just as biased as anyone else's.
And no, I don't believe in the PC "all viewpoints are equally valid" nonsense. Antivaxxer beliefs are dishonest and stupid, and it's good to point that out, even if it does trigger people.

If this is true then it's also true that vaxxer beliefs are dishonest and stupid.

The government and Democrats initially touted the vaccine as a preventative. This turned out not to be true as the vaxxed started contracting Covid anyway.

So they changed the narrative to "The vaccine will prevent you from contracting it again." This also turned out not to be true as some that were vaxxed - as already mentioned - got infected anyway and then later contracted it again.

So the narrative changed again and they were forced to finally settle on "The vaccine alleviates symptoms and renders death less likely."

This much appears to be true but the point is, for two years, the government pushed a vaccine claiming it could do things it in fact could not, and did not do. Why? Because they didn't know.

They had no fucking idea what was true or not true about Covid or the vaccine but they pushed it anyway.



Pointing out that someone is lying is not censoring them. Free speech cuts all ways.

Why should I trust an entity that lies as much as anyone else to tell me what are lies and what are not? Understand?
 
No, it's not.


No. In this case the question becomes: Who is right, the government or the doctor?

THAT is why government should not get involved. The government gets it wrong just as often as the individual and their views are just as biased as anyone else's.


If this is true then it's also true that vaxxer beliefs are dishonest and stupid.

The government and Democrats initially touted the vaccine as a preventative. This turned out not to be true as the vaxxed started contracting Covid anyway.

So they changed the narrative to "The vaccine will prevent you from contracting it again." This also turned out not to be true as some that were vaxxed - as already mentioned - got infected anyway and then later contracted it again.

So the narrative changed again and they were forced to finally settle on "The vaccine alleviates symptoms and renders death less likely."

This much appears to be true but the point is, for two years, the government pushed a vaccine claiming it could do things it in fact could not, and did not do. Why? Because they didn't know.

They had no fucking idea what was true or not true about Covid or the vaccine but they pushed it anyway.


Why should I trust an entity that lies as much as anyone else to tell me what are lies and what are not? Understand?
The United States has had many epidemics in the past. This virus was new.
 
THAT is why government should not get involved. The government gets it wrong just as often as the individual and their views are just as biased as anyone else's.

Especially when there are corrupt individuals within government that have a self-serving agenda to enrich and empower themselves to the harm of the public that they are supposed to serve. We certainly saw this very vividly demonstrated with the #CoronaHoax2020.
 
Especially when there are corrupt individuals within government that have a self-serving agenda to enrich and empower themselves to the harm of the public that they are supposed to serve. We certainly saw this very vividly demonstrated with the #CoronaHoax2020.
Where did you learn such harmful paranoid thinking? Is that Mormon?
 
No, but not just men can have a penis.
If a man presents without a penis, we rightly ask, "What went wrong?". Either he was involved in a horrific accident or was born with a horrible mutation. But you say, "Ahh, trans men don't have penises". If you have to qualify the term "Man", you're admitting they are not completely and totally men. Their bodies can be altered to look more masculine, but they're not men. And, one has to ask, how do they know they feel like a man when they are a woman and don't know how a man feels?
 
If a man presents without a penis, we rightly ask, "What went wrong?". Either he was involved in a horrific accident or was born with a horrible mutation. But you say, "Ahh, trans men don't have penises". If you have to qualify the term "Man", you're admitting they are not completely and totally men. Their bodies can be altered to look more masculine, but they're not men. And, one has to ask, how do they know they feel like a man when they are a woman and don't know how a man feels?
No, I'm not saying that trans men don't have a penis. Purely by accident you've started the appropriate conversation:


or was born with a horrible mutation.
 

Forum List

Back
Top