Judge Cannon denies Trump's delay demand in classified document case

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Trump has no care to play because PRA will convict Trump.

 

[Lakhota]

 

[Lakhota]

 

[kyzr]

meme

Got a link or just a meme?

 

[kyzr]

tweet?

Is TuckFrump your joke news source?

 

[0311]

It just shows me that there is a two tier justice system in place.

No, it shows that Cannon knew she woud be reversed on appeal and quite likely fact a charge of judicial malpractice.

 

[0311]

What is sad is that you do not see the evil. Yes, it is you. What you support. The citizens in our nation have a lot of faults. Many are hidden. The removal of wealth will make those flaws rear their ugly head. Progs are doing it, and you think it is okay. Like it is normal. This is not the 1960's antiwar movement. There are several things colliding with each other. And the media is not balanced. It does not even report the nastiness and reasons for the violence here. Democracy caused this. Electing people who are not of the constitution and are of something else. With a half century we are heading into unexplored territory for us and receiving tens of millions of illegal people who have explored the same territory.

boo-fucking who.

 

[0311]

It does not change my premise, John.

Since when you, "have a premise"?

 

[0311]

Remember MAGA MAGGOTS, P01135809 appointed Judge Cannon.

She knew if she tried to dimiss this case, she would be overturned on appeal. Jack Smith had his appeal already written. She would have in all likelyhood face a charge of judicial malpractice as well.

The motion to dismiss had no constitutional foundation, it was a hail mary to kill the case and it failed. Cannon had no choice.

 

[skews13]

Who put the flea in her ear? Good ruling, Judge.

She saw the writing on the wall. She knew she was getting ready to be embarrassed again by the appeals court.

Smith made her an offer she couldn't refuse.

 

[whitehall]

Funny how routine court cases excite the left when the name Trump is included. It beats talking about real political issues like open borders and Biden's failure to deal with foreign policy.

 

[0311]

She saw the writing on the wall. She knew she was getting ready to be embarrassed again by the appeals court.

Smith made her an offer she couldn't refuse.

Her days of bending over for P01135809 are very limited.

 

[Clipper]

Her days of bending over for P01135809 are very limited.

She's pissed off at Smith because he handed her ass back to her on two appeals. She's so blatently in the tank for shit gibbon Trump it's almost laughable & she's making a mockery of the entire process.

 

[AntonToo]

View attachment 903395

Judge Aileen Cannon on Thursday denied former President Donald Trump's demand to delay court proceedings in his classified document case, court records show.

The Florida federal judge refused to postpone pretrial deadlines as she, Trump, and special counsel Jack Smith debate about how trial materials should be shared with the public.

Cannon hedged her ruling by saying she'll consider filings received past the deadlines she set if Trump's attorneys can prove they are necessary, notes Politico reporter Kyle Cheney, among the first to spot the filing.

Judge Cannon denies Trump's delay demand in classified document case

Judge Aileen Cannon on Thursday denied former President Donald Trump's demand to delay court proceedings in his classified document case, court records show. The Florida federal judge refused to postpone pretrial deadlines as she, Trump, and special counsel Jack Smith debate about how trial...

www.rawstory.com

Wow, that's a pleasant surprise! What do you think?

There is no surprise, if she would rule in favor of such ludecrous motion she would be 1. Appealed to 11th court and get overturned yet again. 2. Get kicked off for blatant incompetency or bias.

Instead, she is keeping that card on the table until the jury is selected, at which point her ruling cannot be appealed.

In other words exactly NOTHING Cannon is doing shows any interest in sane following of the law and everything she is doing is consistent with trying to cover for Trump, who appointed her.

 

[Lakhota]

There is no surprise, if she would rule in favor of such ludecrous motion she would be 1. Appealed to 11th court and get overturned yet again. 2. Get kicked off for blatant incompetency or bias.

Instead, she is keeping that card on the table until the jury is selected, at which point her ruling cannot be appealed.

In other words exactly NOTHING Cannon is doing shows any interest in sane following of the law and everything she is doing is consistent with trying to cover for Trump, who appointed her.

She isn't qualified to be a judge! She is dumb and heavily biased in Trump favor! She's a typical NaziCon!

 

[IDIOCRACY]

View attachment 903395

Judge Aileen Cannon on Thursday denied former President Donald Trump's demand to delay court proceedings in his classified document case, court records show.

The Florida federal judge refused to postpone pretrial deadlines as she, Trump, and special counsel Jack Smith debate about how trial materials should be shared with the public.

Cannon hedged her ruling by saying she'll consider filings received past the deadlines she set if Trump's attorneys can prove they are necessary, notes Politico reporter Kyle Cheney, among the first to spot the filing.

Judge Cannon denies Trump's delay demand in classified document case

Judge Aileen Cannon on Thursday denied former President Donald Trump's demand to delay court proceedings in his classified document case, court records show. The Florida federal judge refused to postpone pretrial deadlines as she, Trump, and special counsel Jack Smith debate about how trial...

www.rawstory.com

Wow, that's a pleasant surprise! What do you think?

I don't think it matters.

 

[kyzr]

What matters is how the PRA is interpreted.
1. Precedent says that whatever the president says is his personal property is his personal property based on the Clinton sock drawer lawsuit for his tapes.
2. Democrats are interpreting the PRA saying that every piece of paper belongs to the National Archives.

The truth is somewhere in-between, and Judge Cannon will try to assess how the PRA needs to be interpreted.

 

[WorldWatcher]

What matters is how the PRA is interpreted.
1. Precedent says that whatever the president says is his personal property is his personal property based on the Clinton sock drawer lawsuit for his tapes.

That's not correct. The Clinton case was about notes and tapes for a memoir, which such Personal Records are clearly defined in the PRA of 1978. No where does the Judicial Watch decision come even close to saying the Presidential Records (as defined in the PRA) can be classified as personal property.

As a matter of fact the PRA of 1978 clearly says Presidential Records remain the property of the United States Government.

But the PRA is a smoke screen that FPOTUS#45 is trying to use. The PRA of 1978 is CIVIL law and doesn't override CRIMINAL LAW, which is what the case is about. Specifically the Espionage Act (18 USC 793).

2. Democrats are interpreting the PRA saying that every piece of paper belongs to the National Archives.

No, actually it's people that have read and understand the PRA that disagree with FPOTUS#45 attempt to use it to stay out of jail.

Not every piece of paper, only Presidential Records.

Classified documents belong to the US Government can could fall under Presidential Records, in which case they would go to the NARA. Or they may be agency records would would be returned to the authoring agency. Depends on the source and contents.

The truth is somewhere in-between, and Judge Cannon will try to assess how the PRA needs to be interpreted.

No the truth, the law, and precedent are pretty clear. If Judge Cannon attempts to provide cover under the PRA for criminal acts it will not be her interpretation that will be followed, it will be the 11th Circuits application of the law by direction after an interlocutory appeal.

Such questions and correction of flawed rulings HAVE to be address before trial as it provides the potential for acquittal based on bad application of the law and precedent (from Judge Cannon's actions) because if the defendant is incorrectly acquitted it precludes appeal and retrial based on double jeopardy.

WW

 

[Seymour Flops]

Judge Cannon has been most favorable to the defense, and has said if a motion has merit she will consider it.

The case brought by Jack Smith is most favorable to the defense, being a collection of whines dressed up as an indictment.

Smith has failed to connect the dots between an action by Trump, and a criminal statute which that action violated.

 

[jbrownson0831]

She isn't qualified to be a judge! She is dumb and heavily biased in Trump favor! She's a typical NaziCon!

Dang judges who rule by law.
Where will you move skrewey??