Jude 1 of The Bible's NT vs Gays: A Tutorial On Baking Cakes & Adoption

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Silhouette, Dec 5, 2017.

  1. Syriusly
    Online

    Syriusly Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    42,751
    Thanks Received:
    5,614
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +16,217
    LOL- yes- those are all gays in that parade in Japan.

    Arrested for what Silhouette? What is the crime that was committed there?

    And if you are so certain that crimes are being committed at Pride Parades- how come you never are there to report the crimes to the police?

    Why don't you ever report these 'crimes' you claim are occurring?
     
  2. Silhouette
    Online

    Silhouette Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2013
    Messages:
    21,389
    Thanks Received:
    1,447
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +7,031
    Do you have something to offer about the OP or are you going to keep lying about gay pride parades? As if people don't have eyes and google. It's like trying to lie about the desert having sand or lying about the traffic in LA's rush hour "not being that bad". It's just sad. I feel sorry for you.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. Silhouette
    Online

    Silhouette Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2013
    Messages:
    21,389
    Thanks Received:
    1,447
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +7,031
    I notice the conversation on other threads is steering towards obfuscation on a very clear matter. The gist of it is that LGBT cult bloggers are now saying if we let Christians object to serving gay marriage, it will lead towards a precedent (and they should know about where precedents lead, eh?) where people of faith can deny service to people based on race rejection.

    To that I say this:

    1. If LGBTers are so engrossed with precedent opening other doors, shouldn't polygamy already be legal by the strictest interpretation of Obergefell giving new class protection to deviant sex behaviors and the 14th Amendment thereafter being used, unable to deny polyamorists (polygamists) the same right under the 14th's umbrella of equality? I keep asking their various payroll bloggers here this question and they all in unison have dodged it using diversions, strawmen and ad hominem or just plain avoidance.

    2. LGBT has used a false premise to usher in precedent they believe will protect them here. They've asserted that "gay is inborn" while we know it is not. It is no more inborn that eating disorder compulsions or drug addiction. All started from normal behaviors gone haywire after birth via imprinting, tampering, conditioning and numbing compulsive behaviors. So deviant sex behaviors (except polygamy for some reason?) vs Christians is really a story of "no protection at all under the US Constitution, especially not if arbitrary (polygamy excluded?)" vs "protection in spades under the US Constitution."

    3. Race is never a reason to discriminate. No matter what. I'll make this very clear for the reader and the courts to put into opinion. A black man and woman walk into a Christian bakery and they are denied a wedding cake because they are black. Lawsuit, put the baker out of business with my blessing. Two black men walk into a Christian bakery and they are denied a wedding cake because the baker fears eternal damnation for using the vehicle of marriage to "normalize" homosexuality into the mainstream culture: protected. The two gay (black) men get no cake and have no recourse. This is true especially if there are five bakeries down the road who will participate in spreading homosexuality throughout our culture using the important icon vehicles of marriage, education and adoption (raising/educating new generations to see it as "normal") (as strictly forbidden under Jude 1 under promise of eternal soul death and torture for failing).
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  4. Silhouette
    Online

    Silhouette Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2013
    Messages:
    21,389
    Thanks Received:
    1,447
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +7,031
    I'm not a zealot Christian. My interest is more in law. I understand though that Jude 1 and Romans 1 is the "law" of Christians forbidding them from enabling the spread of homosexuality in a culture using the important social vehicles or icons of marriage, education or adoption. If they fail to stop enabling that spread, the Bible, their law, is clear that God will punish their immortal soul for eternity.

    I think it is important in the OP for everyone to understand the commandment of Jude 1. It is not a commandment to hate individual sinners, but the sin and more importantly facilitating the spread of the sin itself using "smooth speech, manipulation" and social icons to do so. Folks need to understand the Christian objection to get why Christian bakers may actually love their gay clients but CANNOT bake them a gay wedding cake, no matter what. And, you can't force a Christian to choose between eternal soul death or going out of business.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. Syriusly
    Online

    Syriusly Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    42,751
    Thanks Received:
    5,614
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +16,217
    You talking to yourself again Silhouette? That is not healthy.
     
  6. Syriusly
    Online

    Syriusly Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    42,751
    Thanks Received:
    5,614
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +16,217
    The gist of the Christian cult bloggers is that Christians shouldn't have to follow the same law that applies to Jews and Muslims and everyone else.
     
  7. Penelope
    Offline

    Penelope Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    23,110
    Thanks Received:
    1,892
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +9,353
    There weren't any ovens.
     
  8. Syriusly
    Online

    Syriusly Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    42,751
    Thanks Received:
    5,614
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +16,217
    You are just a a zealot. Your interest is more in attacking homosexuals in America.

    The topic is rather immaterial- as long as you can attack gays.
     
  9. Syriusly
    Online

    Syriusly Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    42,751
    Thanks Received:
    5,614
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +16,217
    Yeah they were marched into gas chambers.

    And then reduced to ashes something that wasn't an oven.

    Jews- and gays.
     
  10. Penelope
    Offline

    Penelope Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    23,110
    Thanks Received:
    1,892
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +9,353
    Well this is not a theocracy. If you want that move to Saudi Arabia. Most know Jude 1 but also realize there probably was not a Jude and the bible was wrote by men.

    Bake the cake or close shop.
     

Share This Page