Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Ah I see the national investigative correspondent for NBC at the time is now a clown, you're a fucking joke.
It was verified by Michael Isikoff fucktard you have nothing but fallacious denials in support of your sick rape apologetics.
Media Matters? Fucking kill yourself dipshit.
I see so now Michael Isikoff is part of the vast right wing conspiracy. You people are laughable, there is nothing you will not do to support rape, you are sick in the head and should be sterilized.
I provided the full transcript and numerous verifications of its authenticity, the audio from 20 years ago didn't make it onto the internet you dumb ****.
Ah I see the national investigative correspondent for NBC at the time is now a clown, you're a fucking joke.
actually, Isakoff worked for Newsweek at the time. Lisa Meyers with her weird robotic gestures worked for NBC. The thing is, all they had at the end of the day was a woman who has told at least three conflicting stories.
It was verified by Michael Isikoff fucktard you have nothing but fallacious denials in support of your sick rape apologetics.
Isikoff is a hack. Where's the tape?
Media Matters? Fucking kill yourself dipshit.
Buddy, you have issues.
I see so now Michael Isikoff is part of the vast right wing conspiracy. You people are laughable, there is nothing you will not do to support rape, you are sick in the head and should be sterilized.
I provided the full transcript and numerous verifications of its authenticity, the audio from 20 years ago didn't make it onto the internet you dumb ****.
Okay, but if this tape existed, you can transfer it... I know, it's this amazing thing, but you really can.
If it existed.
You poor, deranged cuck, that was after she swore under oath that Clinton had not raped her. You said she did so to avoid being in Hillary’s crosshairs. But then she puts herself on Hillary’s target by going on national TV and lying about being raped. And thus, your argument about her lying under oath crumbles.Moron, try to keep up with your own stupidity, will ya?Holyfuckingshit!Sorry, cuck, she appeared on Dateline. Dateline is a nationally broadcast TV show, no subpoenas involved.
That was after she was already forced into the spotlight under subpoena you rape supporting slag.
You’re too fucking rightarded to even know what you’re talking about; you can’t even keep up with your own stories. You said...
”She gave that affidavit because she didn't want to come forward”
... moron.... if she didn’t want to come forward, she wouldn’t have voluntarily gone on national television. That’s why your lame excuse is dumber than dog shit.
Even worse for your idiocy, you claim...
”That was after she was already forced into the spotlight under subpoena you rape”
... imbecile.... she was not put into the spotlight by being subpoenaed— her identity was concealed as she testified under the name, “Jane Doe.” She put herself into the spotlight by going on national TV. She’s an attention craving whore who falsely claimed she was raped while she herself was cheating on her husband at the time.
She didn't come forward until after she was forced to under subpoena that interview was after she was already in the spotlight you laughable rape apologist ****.
You said she didn’t want to come forward but she voluntarily goes on national TV
You said she lied because she didn’t want to be in Hillary’s crosshairs— yet she voluntarily goes on national TV and puts herself dead center on Hillary’s target.
You said the subpoena put her in the spotlight when in reality, her identity was kept secret.
She didn't go on tv until after she was already forced into the spotlight under subpoena and her name had been leaked to the press you ignorant illiterate rape supporting ****:
Going public: 1999Edit
Rumors continued to circulate in tabloids and on talk radio, now with Broaddrick's name attached.[13] Broaddrick was upset by a tabloid report that she had been paid to keep quiet, and decided to agree to an interview with NBC's Lisa Myers. Myers interviewed her on January 20, 1999, the day after Clinton was impeached.
Juanita Broaddrick - Wikipedia
You claim there are tapes of her claiming she was raped — where are they?
I have provided the full transcript and and numerous articles and books verifying its authenticity, are you calling Michael Isikoff a liar?
You poor, deranged cuck, that was after she swore under oath that Clinton had not raped her. You said she did so to avoid being in Hillary’s crosshairs. But then she puts herself on Hillary’s target by going on national TV and lying about being raped. And thus, your argument about her lying under oath crumbles.Moron, try to keep up with your own stupidity, will ya?Holyfuckingshit!That was after she was already forced into the spotlight under subpoena you rape supporting slag.
You’re too fucking rightarded to even know what you’re talking about; you can’t even keep up with your own stories. You said...
”She gave that affidavit because she didn't want to come forward”
... moron.... if she didn’t want to come forward, she wouldn’t have voluntarily gone on national television. That’s why your lame excuse is dumber than dog shit.
Even worse for your idiocy, you claim...
”That was after she was already forced into the spotlight under subpoena you rape”
... imbecile.... she was not put into the spotlight by being subpoenaed— her identity was concealed as she testified under the name, “Jane Doe.” She put herself into the spotlight by going on national TV. She’s an attention craving whore who falsely claimed she was raped while she herself was cheating on her husband at the time.
She didn't come forward until after she was forced to under subpoena that interview was after she was already in the spotlight you laughable rape apologist ****.
You said she didn’t want to come forward but she voluntarily goes on national TV
You said she lied because she didn’t want to be in Hillary’s crosshairs— yet she voluntarily goes on national TV and puts herself dead center on Hillary’s target.
You said the subpoena put her in the spotlight when in reality, her identity was kept secret.
She didn't go on tv until after she was already forced into the spotlight under subpoena and her name had been leaked to the press you ignorant illiterate rape supporting ****:
Going public: 1999Edit
Rumors continued to circulate in tabloids and on talk radio, now with Broaddrick's name attached.[13] Broaddrick was upset by a tabloid report that she had been paid to keep quiet, and decided to agree to an interview with NBC's Lisa Myers. Myers interviewed her on January 20, 1999, the day after Clinton was impeached.
Juanita Broaddrick - Wikipedia
You claim there are tapes of her claiming she was raped — where are they?
I have provided the full transcript and and numerous articles and books verifying its authenticity, are you calling Michael Isikoff a liar?
As far as the tapes, transcripts are not tapes. Books are not tapes. You’ve firmly established there are no tapes.
As far Isakoff, asked and answered.
Spits the deranged cuck who actually just posted from ... wikipediaMedia Matters? Fucking kill yourself dipshit.
The transcript has been certified by no less than 3 articles and a book, Isikoff is a nationally recognized investigative journalist, your assertion that he is a hack proves you are not a serious person worth any consideration whatsoever, we're done here you rape supporting POS.
Spits the deranged cuck who actually just posted from ... wikipedia
Moron...You poor, deranged cuck, that was after she swore under oath that Clinton had not raped her. You said she did so to avoid being in Hillary’s crosshairs. But then she puts herself on Hillary’s target by going on national TV and lying about being raped. And thus, your argument about her lying under oath crumbles.Moron, try to keep up with your own stupidity, will ya?Holyfuckingshit!
You’re too fucking rightarded to even know what you’re talking about; you can’t even keep up with your own stories. You said...
”She gave that affidavit because she didn't want to come forward”
... moron.... if she didn’t want to come forward, she wouldn’t have voluntarily gone on national television. That’s why your lame excuse is dumber than dog shit.
Even worse for your idiocy, you claim...
”That was after she was already forced into the spotlight under subpoena you rape”
... imbecile.... she was not put into the spotlight by being subpoenaed— her identity was concealed as she testified under the name, “Jane Doe.” She put herself into the spotlight by going on national TV. She’s an attention craving whore who falsely claimed she was raped while she herself was cheating on her husband at the time.
She didn't come forward until after she was forced to under subpoena that interview was after she was already in the spotlight you laughable rape apologist ****.
You said she didn’t want to come forward but she voluntarily goes on national TV
You said she lied because she didn’t want to be in Hillary’s crosshairs— yet she voluntarily goes on national TV and puts herself dead center on Hillary’s target.
You said the subpoena put her in the spotlight when in reality, her identity was kept secret.
She didn't go on tv until after she was already forced into the spotlight under subpoena and her name had been leaked to the press you ignorant illiterate rape supporting ****:
Going public: 1999Edit
Rumors continued to circulate in tabloids and on talk radio, now with Broaddrick's name attached.[13] Broaddrick was upset by a tabloid report that she had been paid to keep quiet, and decided to agree to an interview with NBC's Lisa Myers. Myers interviewed her on January 20, 1999, the day after Clinton was impeached.
Juanita Broaddrick - Wikipedia
You claim there are tapes of her claiming she was raped — where are they?
I have provided the full transcript and and numerous articles and books verifying its authenticity, are you calling Michael Isikoff a liar?
As far as the tapes, transcripts are not tapes. Books are not tapes. You’ve firmly established there are no tapes.
As far Isakoff, asked and answered.
God you are a stupid ****, the affidavit came before she was forced into the spotlight under subpoena and that came before she got on tv to defend herself from tabloid accusations of bribery.
As to Isiloff your denials regarding his verification proves you are not a serious person worth any consideration whatsoever, we're done here.
God you are a stupid ****, the affidavit came before she was forced into the spotlight under subpoena and that came before she got on tv to defend herself from tabloid accusations of bribery.
The transcript has been certified by no less than 3 articles and a book, Isikoff is a nationally recognized investigative journalist, your assertion that he is a hack proves you are not a serious person worth any consideration whatsoever, we're done here you rape supporting POS.
If it's certified, they'd have no trouble producing it.
Come on, man, they've got more evidence of Bigfoot than they have of this tape.
God you are a stupid ****, the affidavit came before she was forced into the spotlight under subpoena and that came before she got on tv to defend herself from tabloid accusations of bribery.
Except, of course, she put forth the affadavit. Therefore, anything she says after that should be considered with a grain of salt.
Wikipedia is not a reliable source, ya dumb cuck, because anybody can edit it. For all anyone knows, you could have written that.Spits the deranged cuck who actually just posted from ... wikipedia
You see that number behind the wiki quote? That's called a citation you dumb ****.
There is no tape. That’s evident by your continued reference of a transcript because no such tape exists.God you are a stupid ****, the affidavit came before she was forced into the spotlight under subpoena and that came before she got on tv to defend herself from tabloid accusations of bribery.
Except, of course, she put forth the affadavit. Therefore, anything she says after that should be considered with a grain of salt.
She put forward the affidavit because she didn't want to come forward and the tape (certified by Michael Isikoff) proves the affidavit was a lie thus she was subpoenaed and forced to come forward by Starr.
Moron...You poor, deranged cuck, that was after she swore under oath that Clinton had not raped her. You said she did so to avoid being in Hillary’s crosshairs. But then she puts herself on Hillary’s target by going on national TV and lying about being raped. And thus, your argument about her lying under oath crumbles.Moron, try to keep up with your own stupidity, will ya?She didn't come forward until after she was forced to under subpoena that interview was after she was already in the spotlight you laughable rape apologist ****.
You said she didn’t want to come forward but she voluntarily goes on national TV
You said she lied because she didn’t want to be in Hillary’s crosshairs— yet she voluntarily goes on national TV and puts herself dead center on Hillary’s target.
You said the subpoena put her in the spotlight when in reality, her identity was kept secret.
She didn't go on tv until after she was already forced into the spotlight under subpoena and her name had been leaked to the press you ignorant illiterate rape supporting ****:
Going public: 1999Edit
Rumors continued to circulate in tabloids and on talk radio, now with Broaddrick's name attached.[13] Broaddrick was upset by a tabloid report that she had been paid to keep quiet, and decided to agree to an interview with NBC's Lisa Myers. Myers interviewed her on January 20, 1999, the day after Clinton was impeached.
Juanita Broaddrick - Wikipedia
You claim there are tapes of her claiming she was raped — where are they?
I have provided the full transcript and and numerous articles and books verifying its authenticity, are you calling Michael Isikoff a liar?
As far as the tapes, transcripts are not tapes. Books are not tapes. You’ve firmly established there are no tapes.
As far Isakoff, asked and answered.
God you are a stupid ****, the affidavit came before she was forced into the spotlight under subpoena and that came before she got on tv to defend herself from tabloid accusations of bribery.
As to Isiloff your denials regarding his verification proves you are not a serious person worth any consideration whatsoever, we're done here.
You said she lied under oath to avoid Hillary’s “bimbo eruptions.” If that were true, she never would have gone on national TV to call Hillary’s husband a rapist. After swearing he hadn’t actually raped her, no less.
As far as Isikoff, he wrote about hearsay, conveyed to him.
Where’s the tape?
There is none.
There is no tape. That’s evident by your continued reference of a transcript because no such tape exists.God you are a stupid ****, the affidavit came before she was forced into the spotlight under subpoena and that came before she got on tv to defend herself from tabloid accusations of bribery.
Except, of course, she put forth the affadavit. Therefore, anything she says after that should be considered with a grain of salt.
She put forward the affidavit because she didn't want to come forward and the tape (certified by Michael Isikoff) proves the affidavit was a lie thus she was subpoenaed and forced to come forward by Starr.
LOLOLOLOLMoron...You poor, deranged cuck, that was after she swore under oath that Clinton had not raped her. You said she did so to avoid being in Hillary’s crosshairs. But then she puts herself on Hillary’s target by going on national TV and lying about being raped. And thus, your argument about her lying under oath crumbles.Moron, try to keep up with your own stupidity, will ya?
You said she didn’t want to come forward but she voluntarily goes on national TV
You said she lied because she didn’t want to be in Hillary’s crosshairs— yet she voluntarily goes on national TV and puts herself dead center on Hillary’s target.
You said the subpoena put her in the spotlight when in reality, her identity was kept secret.
She didn't go on tv until after she was already forced into the spotlight under subpoena and her name had been leaked to the press you ignorant illiterate rape supporting ****:
Going public: 1999Edit
Rumors continued to circulate in tabloids and on talk radio, now with Broaddrick's name attached.[13] Broaddrick was upset by a tabloid report that she had been paid to keep quiet, and decided to agree to an interview with NBC's Lisa Myers. Myers interviewed her on January 20, 1999, the day after Clinton was impeached.
Juanita Broaddrick - Wikipedia
You claim there are tapes of her claiming she was raped — where are they?
I have provided the full transcript and and numerous articles and books verifying its authenticity, are you calling Michael Isikoff a liar?
As far as the tapes, transcripts are not tapes. Books are not tapes. You’ve firmly established there are no tapes.
As far Isakoff, asked and answered.
God you are a stupid ****, the affidavit came before she was forced into the spotlight under subpoena and that came before she got on tv to defend herself from tabloid accusations of bribery.
As to Isiloff your denials regarding his verification proves you are not a serious person worth any consideration whatsoever, we're done here.
You said she lied under oath to avoid Hillary’s “bimbo eruptions.” If that were true, she never would have gone on national TV to call Hillary’s husband a rapist. After swearing he hadn’t actually raped her, no less.
No you illiterate fucking moron, she lied on the affidavit and was forced to come forward under subpoena because of the contradictory tape from Paula Jone's private investigators, she was already in the spotlight when she appeared on tv to defend herself from tabloid accusations of bribery, god you are fucking dumb.
As far as Isikoff, he wrote about hearsay, conveyed to him.
Where’s the tape?
There is none.
No he didn't you dumb **** the tape was leaked to the press.
Who is they fucktard?
She put forward the affidavit because she didn't want to come forward and the tape (certified by Michael Isikoff) proves the affidavit was a lie thus she was subpoenaed and forced to come forward by Starr.
I didn’t say that. What a pity your position is so weak, you have to argue strawmen because you can’t argue what I actually said.There is no tape. That’s evident by your continued reference of a transcript because no such tape exists.God you are a stupid ****, the affidavit came before she was forced into the spotlight under subpoena and that came before she got on tv to defend herself from tabloid accusations of bribery.
Except, of course, she put forth the affadavit. Therefore, anything she says after that should be considered with a grain of salt.
She put forward the affidavit because she didn't want to come forward and the tape (certified by Michael Isikoff) proves the affidavit was a lie thus she was subpoenaed and forced to come forward by Starr.
Yes we know Isikoff is part of the vast right wing conspiracy now.
