Journalists and Celebs Rush to Delete Tweets Slamming MAGA-Hat Kids

BWHAHAHAHAHA!!! You can't help but laugh at these idiots. They showed their true colors, and now they are trying to cover their tracks. They are all the lowest kind of bigots. These are the people who presume to be the judges of morality and ethical behavior.

Journalists and Celebs Rush to Delete Tweets Slamming MAGA-Hat Kids

Over the past 24 hours, journalists and public figures on Twitter have deleted previous posts slamming a group of MAGA hat-wearing teens for allegedly taunting a Native American vet, after more footage was released disputing the initial story. From CNN’s Jake Tapper to Dilbert cartoonist Scott Adams, many on the internet are sharing a fuller explanation of the initial viral story. Others, however, are very subtly just using the ‘delete’ button.

2z8romg.jpg

Luckily people have been preserving screen shots of many of the tweets in question, so they don't go down the memory hole.
They could become evidence in a number of prosecutions.

Very difficult. The only person who really could be accused of slander or libel would be the original poster, and that person has since deleted their account/been banned.

Also, the threats made against them are very difficult to prove as incitement, as usually incitement involves 1) speech 2) action
It was a Russian. You've all been manipulated.

Maybe you need some of this...

51CdEaFC4UL._SX342_QL70_.jpg
 
BWHAHAHAHAHA!!! You can't help but laugh at these idiots. They showed their true colors, and now they are trying to cover their tracks. They are all the lowest kind of bigots. These are the people who presume to be the judges of morality and ethical behavior.

Journalists and Celebs Rush to Delete Tweets Slamming MAGA-Hat Kids

Over the past 24 hours, journalists and public figures on Twitter have deleted previous posts slamming a group of MAGA hat-wearing teens for allegedly taunting a Native American vet, after more footage was released disputing the initial story. From CNN’s Jake Tapper to Dilbert cartoonist Scott Adams, many on the internet are sharing a fuller explanation of the initial viral story. Others, however, are very subtly just using the ‘delete’ button.

2z8romg.jpg


But what you'll never see are apologies.

.
 
BWHAHAHAHAHA!!! You can't help but laugh at these idiots. They showed their true colors, and now they are trying to cover their tracks. They are all the lowest kind of bigots. These are the people who presume to be the judges of morality and ethical behavior.

Journalists and Celebs Rush to Delete Tweets Slamming MAGA-Hat Kids

Over the past 24 hours, journalists and public figures on Twitter have deleted previous posts slamming a group of MAGA hat-wearing teens for allegedly taunting a Native American vet, after more footage was released disputing the initial story. From CNN’s Jake Tapper to Dilbert cartoonist Scott Adams, many on the internet are sharing a fuller explanation of the initial viral story. Others, however, are very subtly just using the ‘delete’ button.

2z8romg.jpg


But what you'll never see are apologies.

.
I saw one on Free Republic
 
What kind of Sick Puppies attack kids? These are the kinds of Predators we have in Canada, but these freaks are more overt about it.
 
BWHAHAHAHAHA!!! You can't help but laugh at these idiots. They showed their true colors, and now they are trying to cover their tracks. They are all the lowest kind of bigots. These are the people who presume to be the judges of morality and ethical behavior.

Journalists and Celebs Rush to Delete Tweets Slamming MAGA-Hat Kids

Over the past 24 hours, journalists and public figures on Twitter have deleted previous posts slamming a group of MAGA hat-wearing teens for allegedly taunting a Native American vet, after more footage was released disputing the initial story. From CNN’s Jake Tapper to Dilbert cartoonist Scott Adams, many on the internet are sharing a fuller explanation of the initial viral story. Others, however, are very subtly just using the ‘delete’ button.

2z8romg.jpg

Luckily people have been preserving screen shots of many of the tweets in question, so they don't go down the memory hole.
They could become evidence in a number of prosecutions.

Very difficult. The only person who really could be accused of slander or libel would be the original poster, and that person has since deleted their account/been banned.

Also, the threats made against them are very difficult to prove as incitement, as usually incitement involves 1) speech 2) action
Threatening to kill someone is a crime. It doesn't matter if the guy responsible deleted his account. The evidence is all over the internet. He still did the dirty deed.

One also has to have the means of doing so, or it is very difficult to prosecute.

The fighting words and incitement rules are very narrow, the only real exception being interestingly enough threatening people under Secret Service protection, and even then all you usually get is a "visit" and a warning to "stop doing that"
I think this might be illegal:

SNL Writer Offers B***j**s in Exchange for Someone Punching a Covington Catholic Student in the Face
 
Several conservative members of the media are walking back their condemnation of the Covington Catholic High School students who were accused of attempting to intimidate a Native American protester, after a video of the incident seemed to confirm those accusations were baseless.

The late John McCain’s daughter and Republican voice on "The View," Meghan McCain, said she “reacted too quickly” and “apologize[d] for being part of a media pile on.”

Conservative press apologizes for saying students harassed a Native American protester

Same tactic Project Veritas and the Rabid Right Wing Lying Press used to falsely discredit Acorn too.

Ops, look like it caught some of your own too.

You're being punked. Divide and conquer.
 
Luckily people have been preserving screen shots of many of the tweets in question, so they don't go down the memory hole.
They could become evidence in a number of prosecutions.

Very difficult. The only person who really could be accused of slander or libel would be the original poster, and that person has since deleted their account/been banned.

Also, the threats made against them are very difficult to prove as incitement, as usually incitement involves 1) speech 2) action
Threatening to kill someone is a crime. It doesn't matter if the guy responsible deleted his account. The evidence is all over the internet. He still did the dirty deed.

One also has to have the means of doing so, or it is very difficult to prosecute.

The fighting words and incitement rules are very narrow, the only real exception being interestingly enough threatening people under Secret Service protection, and even then all you usually get is a "visit" and a warning to "stop doing that"
I think this might be illegal:

SNL Writer Offers B***j**s in Exchange for Someone Punching a Covington Catholic Student in the Face

The blowjob isn't illegal because no money would change hands.

And again, for incitement there would have to be the possibility of action.
 
BWHAHAHAHAHA!!! You can't help but laugh at these idiots. They showed their true colors, and now they are trying to cover their tracks. They are all the lowest kind of bigots. These are the people who presume to be the judges of morality and ethical behavior.

Journalists and Celebs Rush to Delete Tweets Slamming MAGA-Hat Kids

Over the past 24 hours, journalists and public figures on Twitter have deleted previous posts slamming a group of MAGA hat-wearing teens for allegedly taunting a Native American vet, after more footage was released disputing the initial story. From CNN’s Jake Tapper to Dilbert cartoonist Scott Adams, many on the internet are sharing a fuller explanation of the initial viral story. Others, however, are very subtly just using the ‘delete’ button.

2z8romg.jpg


But what you'll never see are apologies.

.
I saw one on Free Republic


Never heard of them. But that's one out of how many thousands?

.
 
Luckily people have been preserving screen shots of many of the tweets in question, so they don't go down the memory hole.
They could become evidence in a number of prosecutions.

Very difficult. The only person who really could be accused of slander or libel would be the original poster, and that person has since deleted their account/been banned.

Also, the threats made against them are very difficult to prove as incitement, as usually incitement involves 1) speech 2) action
Threatening to kill someone is a crime. It doesn't matter if the guy responsible deleted his account. The evidence is all over the internet. He still did the dirty deed.

One also has to have the means of doing so, or it is very difficult to prosecute.

The fighting words and incitement rules are very narrow, the only real exception being interestingly enough threatening people under Secret Service protection, and even then all you usually get is a "visit" and a warning to "stop doing that"
I think this might be illegal:

SNL Writer Offers B***j**s in Exchange for Someone Punching a Covington Catholic Student in the Face

The Left is now officially screwed as is the MSM, lol. Everything they banked on is falling apart, and they have been proven to be liars. Anyone on any site who allows a Leftist to post a link to the MSM as proof of their talking point from here forward, just has no idea how to debate, lol.

The MSM has nuetered themselves, and we now would be fools to let them in to any conversation where credibility matters.

In other words——> the Left has lost its biggest ally. Let us keep it that way!


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 

Forum List

Back
Top