Jordon Peterson may soon go to jail

[whitehall]

Re-education camp? Wow, that sounds familiar. Does Canada have a gulog too?

 

[westwall]

That means the shooting is about to begin, I guess. Let it come...

Sad, but I fear true..

 

[MinTrut]

Court rules against Dr. Jordan Peterson, upholds regulatory group's requirement that he undergo 're-education' for expressing his opinions online: 'I will let the world know' | Blaze Media

A governing body for psychologists in Canada ordered Dr. Jordan Peterson to undergo re-education training after complete strangers took issue with views he had expressed online. He fought back, but a Canadian court just upheld the regulator's order. What's the background? Peterson was...

www.theblaze.com

The renown Canadian psychologist has been ordered to attend a re-education camp for offending people with his views.

He says he will not comply.

Really, it's best. All those who do not join the Left-wing group think cult will wind up there eventually.

Build more jails

We are going to need them.

He told someone to kill themself.

That’s disgusting, and he’s lucky to get away with just being asked to learn how to do better.

He’s a psychopath.

 

[MinTrut]

Translated: Liberals hate free speech from a medical professional because it provides factual information they find offensive. Like .. men can't be women.

So glad the United States hasn't stooped to this level with the sheer stupidity of placing punitive measures on speech.

Actually, what he did is against the law in the US.

 

[MinTrut]

OP is a lie. He has not been threatened by jail at all.
Why do you lie like this you lying fuck ?

If he doesn’t comply with re-education, which apparently he’s disinclined to do, he might end up in trouble, but otw, you’re correct - jail is not in the picture at the moment.

 

[jotathought]

Actually, what he did is against the law in the US.

Expressing an opinion is against the law?

 

[MinTrut]

Expressing an opinion is against the law?

Sometimes, as in the case of the repulsive behavior of Peterson.

He’s lucky the person didn’t follow his disgusting advice.

 

[ActionJackson]

So Big Shot.

Are you identifying your future shooting targets? Making a list?
Interviewing neighbors or surrounding neighborhoods?
Or are you just gonna 'wing-it' when you get the memo?

None of your business, Benedict!

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Translated: Liberals hate free speech from a medical professional because it provides factual information they find offensive. Like .. men can't be women.

So glad the United States hasn't stooped to this level with the sheer stupidity of placing punitive measures on speech.

If a Democrat wins the Presidency again - it will happen.

 

[Resnic]

Court rules against Dr. Jordan Peterson, upholds regulatory group's requirement that he undergo 're-education' for expressing his opinions online: 'I will let the world know' | Blaze Media

A governing body for psychologists in Canada ordered Dr. Jordan Peterson to undergo re-education training after complete strangers took issue with views he had expressed online. He fought back, but a Canadian court just upheld the regulator's order. What's the background? Peterson was...

www.theblaze.com

The renown Canadian psychologist has been ordered to attend a re-education camp for offending people with his views.

He says he will not comply.

Really, it's best. All those who do not join the Left-wing group think cult will wind up there eventually.

Build more jails

We are going to need them.

There are too many people in this world that seem to think they have a right to not be offended.

But what about people like Mr Peterson and myself? We're offended by those types of people, how come they aren't held responsible? Why is it he and I have to change?

This world has way too many soft and weak willed pussy ass bitches in it and they really need to go.

 

[Resnic]

Sometimes, as in the case of the repulsive behavior of Peterson.

He’s lucky the person didn’t follow his disgusting advice.

Care to tell us and provide a link to his disgusting behavior and bad advice and to explain your accusations?

Because the link above only showed where is retweeted a message thereby showing what someone actually said. So there is nothing wrong there.

He was critical of 2 politicians which if you ever watched a politician on tv you know they are constantly critical of each other and everyone is critical of them so again, nothing wrong there

And 3rd he was critical of a doctor which again isn't a crime or wrong. And unlike you he had a valid argument with substantial argument and reasoning as to why he said it.

What's disgusting here is you argue against a man (with no insight or savvy into the matter) but you say nothing about people calling for him to be re educated which in itself is far far far worse than some random internet strangers getting their feelings hurt.

 

[Toro]

Maybe if you triggered rubes engaged in The Forever Culture Wars had read what the court said, you wouldn’t be a perpetual state of meltdown. But hey, it’s easier to remain in a constant state of outrage and grievance!

The college's complaints committee concluded his controversial public statements could amount to professional misconduct and ordered Peterson to pay for a media coaching program — noting failure to comply could mean the loss of his licence to practice psychology in the province.​

Peterson filed for a judicial review, arguing his political commentary is not under the college's purview.​

Three Ontario Divisional Court judges unanimously dismissed Peterson's application, ruling that the college's decision falls within its mandate to regulate the profession in the public interest and does not affect his freedom of expression.​

"The order is not disciplinary and does not prevent Dr. Peterson from expressing himself on controversial topics; it has a minimal impact on his right to freedom of expression," the decision written by Justice Paul Schabas reads, in part.​

Peterson had said his statements were not made in his capacity as a clinical psychologist, but instead were "off-duty opinions" — an argument the court rejected.​

"Dr. Peterson sees himself functioning as a clinical psychologist 'in the broad public space' where he claims to be helping 'millions of people,"' Schabas wrote.​

​

"Peterson cannot have it both ways: he cannot speak as a member of a regulated profession without taking responsibility for the risk of harm that flows from him speaking in that trusted capacity."​

Oh, and another thing.

In an interview with CBC News, Peterson said he will take the training and broadcast it.​

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/jordan-peterson-court-case-decision-1.6943845

 

[jotathought]

Sometimes, as in the case of the repulsive behavior of Peterson.

He’s lucky the person didn’t follow his disgusting advice.

How is that illegal in the United States? What specifically?

 

[jotathought]

If a Democrat wins the Presidency again - it will happen.

I have no doubts that democrats / liberals / leftists will introduce punitive measures for "hate speech" ... like misgendering individuals.

 

[there4eyeM]

Peterson deserves to be supported by his compatriots.

 

[Toro]

How is that illegal in the United States? What specifically?

First, it’s not in the United States.

Second, it’s not illegal in Canada either.

Read what the court said instead of your Perpetual Outrage Machine Media.

 

[MinTrut]

There are too many people in this world that seem to think they have a right to not be offended.

But what about people like Mr Peterson and myself? We're offended by those types of people, how come they aren't held responsible? Why is it he and I have to change?

This world has way too many soft and weak willed pussy ass bitches in it and they really need to go.

The governing body was far too kind.

They should have simply thrown his sick ass out.

Disgusting human being.

 

[MinTrut]

Care to tell us and provide a link to his disgusting behavior and bad advice and to explain your accusations?

Already done upthread.

Because the link above only showed where is retweeted a message thereby showing what someone actually said. So there is nothing wrong there.

See above, and Google is your frenemy.

He was critical of 2 politicians which if you ever watched a politician on tv you know they are constantly critical of each other and everyone is critical of them so again, nothing wrong there

See above.

And 3rd he was critical of a doctor which again isn't a crime or wrong. And unlike you he had a valid argument with substantial argument and reasoning as to why he said it.

See above.

What's disgusting here is you argue against a man (with no insight or savvy into the matter) but you say nothing about people calling for him to be re educated which in itself is far far far worse than some random internet strangers getting their feelings hurt.

He’s lucky to still have his license.

He’s a psychopath.

 

[MinTrut]

Oh, and another thing.

In an interview with CBC News, Peterson said he will take the training and broadcast it.​

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/jordan-peterson-court-case-decision-1.6943845

This may not be legal.

But the guy’s a deranged psychopathic narcissist, so he doesn’t care.

Yet.

 

[MinTrut]

How is that illegal in the United States? What specifically?

Discussed upthread.