Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Nope. Their claim is that to the extent that election fraud took place, the electors supposedly “chosen” by the voters on election day were not the ones who actually won.Texas’s claim is about the electoral college. They’re claim is that the other state’s presidential electors voted wrong.
Have that pathetic attempt at a sentence taken out back and executed at dawn.A state can only sue another state on grounds of the electoral college since this id the only way states vote together for president.
Just like I said, the claim from Texas is that the electors voted wrong. They have no basis to make that claim.Nope. Their claim is that to the extent that election fraud took place, the electors supposedly “chosen” by the voters on election day were not the ones who actually won.
Do try to follow along.
Not at all what I said.Just like I said, the claim from Texas is that the electors voted wrong. They have no basis to make that claim.
Yes. Their complaint is that Pennsylvania’s electors voted for Biden and not Trump.Not at all what I said.
What you said is wrong.
A basis to say something they don’t say is irrelevant.
Again. Ignoring what they really complained about for your fantasy spin has nothing to do with reality.Yes. Their complaint is that Pennsylvania’s electors voted for Biden and not Trump.
Irrelevant. They don’t try.They do not get to tell other states who their electors are. That’s up to each state.
So you claim. But of course, you’re just being intentionally myopic.Texas is unaffected by that process. Texas has their electors. Their electors votes count. They do not have a right to an outcome.
Unless there was voter fraud that affected a national election.It’s idiotic to think one state could be harmed by the way another state ran their elections.
Yes, they really complained that the electors didn’t vote for who they thought they should vote for.Again. Ignoring what they really complained about for your fantasy spin has nothing to do with reality.
Irrelevant. They don’t try.
So you claim. But of course, you’re just being intentionally myopic.
There are 30 million residents of Texas. Their votes getting wiped out because of voter fraud in other states is just wrong.Just like I said, the claim from Texas is that the electors voted wrong. They have no basis to make that claim.
No they don’t. Texas voters get their presidential electors. Their votes counted. No one tried to take that away from them.There are 30 million residents of Texas. Their votes getting wiped out because of voter fraud in other states is just wrong.
Nope. You really do misunderstand. Or you’re willfully lying. Either way, your posts are nonsense.Yes, they really complained that the electors didn’t vote for who they thought they should vote for.
Thats the entire point. They can only be harmed if they have a right to an outcome, they don’t.
There is no vote dilution. There is no fraud. Just Texas being a pissy child.
And that’s why the Supreme Court didn’t put up with the nonsense.
They tried to fix the problems in states where there was voter fraud.No they don’t. Texas voters get their presidential electors. Their votes counted. No one tried to take that away from them.
They tried to take millions of other people’s votes.
They’re not in charge of prosecuting voter fraud other states.They tried to fix the problems in states where there was voter fraud.
correct!There was no steal..
