Johnson was a hero years ago - we never knew

[skye]

And you stated yours and I stated mine.

That's right.

 

[francoHFW]

This is a lie. There was never a "lawsuit to overturn the election." There were lawsuits seeking to MAKE THE CASE in specific States that the results were either fatally compromised or fraudulent. If the case could not be made, in court, based on EVIDENCE adduced by the Plaintiffs, then these cases would have come to nothing.

But that's not what happened. The courts did whatever was necessary to quash the cases on procedural grounds (standing, timeliness, etc.). To this date, there has been no presentation of the "irregularities" of this election, specifically in "swing" States, in any forum that had the authority to find for the Plaintiffs.

There never has been any evidence of election fraud in 2020, it's a joke for brainwashed functional morons.

 

[g5000]

Mike Johnson tried to stop the steal. He should have been recognized as a hero then, but the media didn't cover what he did. We definitely need more like him.

---Johnson, who was elected House speaker Wednesday, led an amicus brief in support of a Texas lawsuit seeking to overturn Joe Biden's 2020 victory in four battleground states.---

---“President Trump called me this morning to express his great appreciation for our effort to file an amicus brief in the Texas case on behalf of concerned Members of Congress,” Johnson wrote in the December 2020 email---

Mike Johnson played a key role in efforts to overturn 2020 election

Johnson, who was elected House speaker Wednesday, led an amicus brief in support of a Texas lawsuit seeking to overturn Joe Biden's 2020 victory in four battleground states.

www.nbcnews.com

Trump lost.

When are you losers going to get over it?

You want some cheese with that whine?

 

[Crepitus]

No, it's all bunches of statistically absurd coincidences....Really!

Nothing "absurd" about having the same lack of evidence get pointed out over and over if you're stupid enough to keep trying to present it as if it means something.

 

[lennypartiv]

Johnson is no hero.

Yes he is, and in more ways than one.

 

[Dragonlady]

This is a lie. There was never a "lawsuit to overturn the election." There were lawsuits seeking to MAKE THE CASE in specific States that the results were either fatally compromised or fraudulent. If the case could not be made, in court, based on EVIDENCE adduced by the Plaintiffs, then these cases would have come to nothing.

But that's not what happened. The courts did whatever was necessary to quash the cases on procedural grounds (standing, timeliness, etc.). To this date, there has been no presentation of the "irregularities" of this election, specifically in "swing" States, in any forum that had the authority to find for the Plaintiffs.

The court, the court did not “quash” the cases. There were no cases to quash. They were just wild and bizarre claims on no evidence.

Emails are not evidence. An affidavit saying that someone witnessed bags of something being put in the postal truck, and driven off, is evidence of nothing.

Lawyers didn’t even go to the effort of interviewing the people who’s supposed affidavits they were using as evidence.

Giuliani even walked into court and said they weren’t claiming fraud after giving an interview on the courthouse steps saying they were claiming fraud.

This is why Giuliani, Powell, Lin Woods and Genna Ellis lost their licenses to practice law. Lying to the courts, will get you disbarred every single time, even though it’s not illegal to lie to the general public

The final statement in your post is an out and out lie. Every state in the union counted, held requested recounts, and audits before certifying the election.

In every single Quetion, every single state of 50 secretaries of state, certified the results of the election as true and fair. There isn’t a single outfit in the entire world, including the European scrutineers that Trump brought in to look at the election, who has claimed anything except the results were both fair and legal.

 

[BackAgain]

There was no steal..

You wouldn’t admit it if you knew for a fact that there had been a steal. You lowlife hack.

 

[BackAgain]

The court, the court did not “quash” the cases. There were no cases to quash. They were just wild and bizarre claims on no evidence.

Emails are not evidence. An affidavit saying that someone witnessed bags of something being put in the postal truck, and driven off, is evidence of nothing.

Lawyers didn’t even go to the effort of interviewing the people who’s supposed affidavits they were using as evidence.

Giuliani even walked into court and said they weren’t claiming fraud after giving an interview on the courthouse steps saying they were claiming fraud.

This is why Giuliani, Powell, Lin Woods and Genna Ellis lost their licenses to practice law. Lying to the courts, will get you disbarred every single time, even though it’s not illegal to lie to the general public

The final statement in your post is an out and out lie. Every state in the union counted, held requested recounts, and audits before certifying the election.

In every single Quetion, every single state of 50 secretaries of state, certified the results of the election as true and fair. There isn’t a single outfit in the entire world, including the European scrutineers that Trump brought in to look at the election, who has claimed anything except the results were both fair and legal.

Wrong, Lizardstink.

Almost every single case got rejected not based on the evidence. But based on procedural objections. Some perhaps should have been. But not all. And not on the fanciful bases manufactured by the courts.

 

[Dragonlady]

Wrong, Lizardstink.

Almost every single case got rejected not based on the evidence. But based on procedural objections. Some perhaps should have been. But not all. And not on the fanciful bases manufactured by the courts.

What part of there was no evidence did you not read? The procedural objections was the plaintiffs had no case and presented no evidence. Trump had no standing, and no one presented any evidence to claim any election irregularities.

Giuliani just walked into court and said we’d like you to overturn the election because we don’t like the results.

You need to stop believing right wing media tells you and start reading the court cases. Mindlessly believing what Fox News tells you is what got you into this mess in the first place.

Grow a spine and start verifying things and stop believing liars.

 

[BackAgain]

What part of there was no evidence did you not read? The procedural objections was the plaintiffs had no case and presented no evidence. Trump had no standing, and no one presented any evidence to claim any election irregularities.

Giuliani just walked into court and said we’d like you to overturn the election because we don’t like the results.

You need to stop believing right wing media tells you and start reading the court cases. Mindlessly believing what Fox News tells you is what got you into this mess in the first place.

Grow a spine and start verifying things and stop believing liars.

Wrong. When cases get dismissed on procedural grounds, evidence doesn’t get weighed. What part of reality confuses you retarded libturds the most?

 

[Marener]

Wrong, Lizardstink.

Almost every single case got rejected not based on the evidence. But based on procedural objections. Some perhaps should have been. But not all. And not on the fanciful bases manufactured by the courts.

Which case shouldn’t have been rejected?

The Texas case was pure hogwash. I doubt you meant that one.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

I honestly think what happened is there were irregularities, we should all know that going in, they used covid as an excuse for everything from mail-in ballots and harvesting to irregular time-lines and actions.

Let's say the election was fair and square. What was it, 160M votes? Biden the most ever, Trump the 2nd most. How do you think they accomplished that? That's written above, but add race riots and dehumanization to the equation, that was by the hands of Democracks.

The evidence of corruption is evidenced by who was "elected", Joe Biden. Nobody likes Kamala, and anyone who likes Joe can't be taken seriously. He's a creep, and just like his dad he's an aggressive car salesman, only in a political suit. Biden can't be expected to successfully take a dog out for a walk, but the left gave him the thumb's up as our leader, making a puppet of him. Not a successful puppet, he screws that up too, but a puppet none-the-less.

Where was his support during the election? None to find, he put folks in a basement, while his people went out to make safe spaces in a display of scare-tactics and communism. Surely you remember Kamala's speech(es) that nobody cared to attend. Everyone was what, 25 foot spacing, painted areas and masks. Meanwhile Trump had TONS of support all the way around.

So yeah, of course there's discontent and suspicion, and that triggered a few hundred + to riot Jan. 6th. Which the left knew would happen, but they're a devilish bunch, so they chose to make a narration of it, and blame Trump toward another attempt to rid of him; properly known as a false flag.

 

[Clipper]

Mike Johnson tried to stop the steal. He should have been recognized as a hero then, but the media didn't cover what he did. We definitely need more like him.

---Johnson, who was elected House speaker Wednesday, led an amicus brief in support of a Texas lawsuit seeking to overturn Joe Biden's 2020 victory in four battleground states.---

---“President Trump called me this morning to express his great appreciation for our effort to file an amicus brief in the Texas case on behalf of concerned Members of Congress,” Johnson wrote in the December 2020 email---

Mike Johnson played a key role in efforts to overturn 2020 election

Johnson, who was elected House speaker Wednesday, led an amicus brief in support of a Texas lawsuit seeking to overturn Joe Biden's 2020 victory in four battleground states.

www.nbcnews.com

Is that how Johnson was honored with his first taste of Trump's overfed fermented ass?

 

[francoHFW]

You wouldn’t admit it if you knew for a fact that there had been a steal. You lowlife hack.

Dems care about the truth dumbass. Try it.

 

[BluesLegend]

There never has been any evidence of election fraud in 2020, it's a joke for brainwashed functional morons.

FAKE NEWS from the chief of fake news poster. ^^^ There is plenty of evidence, but no matter how much surfaces the left continue to parrot the 'there's no evidence' narrative. Democrats have proven to be lying, cheating, election rigging gutter trash.

 

[BackAgain]

Which case shouldn’t have been rejected?

The Texas case was pure hogwash. I doubt you meant that one.

Zzz

Cases rejected on the alleged basis of “no standing” were disgraceful. Among others.

 

[BackAgain]

Dems care about the truth dumbass. Try it.

No you don’t. You detest truth, you cretin.

 

[Marener]

Zzz

Cases rejected on the alleged basis of “no standing” were disgraceful. Among others.

Standing is important. Letting anyone sue for anything is chaos.

Texas’s claims were absurd. It was merely a shortcut to get the same tired bullshit claims before the Supreme Court.

 

[francoHFW]

No you don’t. You detest truth, you cretin.

The entire world thinks you're a joke and horror, ignoramus...anti- American conspiracy garbage about great public servants..

 

[francoHFW]

FAKE NEWS from the chief of fake news poster. ^^^ There is plenty of evidence, but no matter how much surfaces the left continue to parrot the 'there's no evidence' narrative. Democrats have proven to be lying, cheating, election rigging gutter trash.

Sorry about reality and laws, dupe