What say you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He's a part of the Executive Branch. They're demanding Barr to bring them redacted information they already have. It is very dubious a court would do anything but reprimand the Congress in the strongest terms if the continue with this blackmail plot of theirs: threatening to hold Barr in contempt if he keeps refusing to let them force him to break the law. They're mentally sick people to pursue the Executive Branch people on a continuous basis. Right now, they're neglecting their legislative jobs. Barr is simply refusing them the right to force him to break the law.Complying with a Congressional subpoena is breaking the law?
Sununu said they were also trying to blackmail Barr with contempt to force him to give them redacted parts of the Mueller Report.
For Attorney General Barr it's a lose-lose situation what they're threatening to do!
He's a part of the Executive Branch. They're demanding Barr to bring them redacted information they already have. It is very dubious a court would do anything but reprimand the Congress in the strongest terms if the continue with this blackmail plot of theirs: threatening to hold Barr in contempt if he keeps refusing to let them force him to break the law. They're mentally sick people to pursue the Executive Branch people on a continuous basis. Right now, they're neglecting their legislative jobs. Barr is simply refusing them the right to force him to break the law.
Complying with a Congressional subpoena is breaking the law?
He's a part of the Executive Branch. They're demanding Barr to bring them redacted information they already have. It is very dubious a court would do anything but reprimand the Congress in the strongest terms if the continue with this blackmail plot of theirs: threatening to hold Barr in contempt if he keeps refusing to let them force him to break the law. They're mentally sick people to pursue the Executive Branch people on a continuous basis. Right now, they're neglecting their legislative jobs. Barr is simply refusing them the right to force him to break the law.
Complying with a Congressional subpoena is breaking the law?
Releasing certain elements of information is against the law, a law passed by Demoncrats! Barr is damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. If he complies with the law, they fine him, even imprison him. If he complies with their childish demands, the will prosecute him for violating their laws.Complying with a Congressional subpoena is breaking the law?
Releasing certain elements of information is against the law, a law passed by Demoncrats! Barr is damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. If he complies with the law, they fine him, even imprison him. If he complies with their childish demands, the will prosecute him for violating their laws.Complying with a Congressional subpoena is breaking the law?
I say they are exactly that, dumb!What say you?
Exposing grand jury testimony is a felony - which is what Comrade Nadler is demanding.
Releasing certain elements of information is against the law, a law passed by Demoncrats! Barr is damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. If he complies with the law, they fine him, even imprison him. If he complies with their childish demands, the will prosecute him for violating their laws.Complying with a Congressional subpoena is breaking the law?
Complying with a Congressional subpoena to product documents is not releasing information.
Exposing grand jury testimony is a felony - which is what Comrade Nadler is demanding.
So you're really trying to claim that Congress lacks the power to subpoena grand jury testimony? That the same Congress that created that law cannot subsequently subpoena the information?
What say you?