JFK wouldn't be a Democrap today

[JakeStarkey]

The ultra right and the libertarians are very, very unhappy. They have every right to be.

 

[GoneBezerk]

JaketheFake is like a murderer pointing at the 6 year old calling them a criminal when the police is looking for a felon.

 

[JakeStarkey]

GB is having brain cramps.

 

[SniperFire]

Good comeback!

Iz da libruls!

No, the comeback is that you used a headline that lied about what Jeb said, and now you look like an ass trying to dance your way out of it.


LOL

Yes.

You're so clever.

Oh, bright shiny light!

In the meantime

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/269108-53-of-americans-think-republicans-are-too-extreme.html

Thank you, but you required a minimalist effort to bitchslap.

Up your game.

 

[JakeStarkey]

SniperFire is merely a spasm now, so Mr. Doosh

 

[Toro]

No, the comeback is that you used a headline that lied about what Jeb said, and now you look like an ass trying to dance your way out of it.


LOL

Yes.

You're so clever.

Oh, bright shiny light!

In the meantime

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/269108-53-of-americans-think-republicans-are-too-extreme.html

Thank you, but you required a minimalist effort to bitchslap.

Up your game.

Da ebil libruls own da meedya!

 

[SniperFire]

SniperFire is merely a spasm now, so Mr. Doosh

That 'spasm' you are experiencing was aimed at your NEOCON JFK poster.

LOL

 

[JakeStarkey]

Dance, Monkey, Dance, Mr. Doosh. MisFire fails again.

 

[Bfgrn]

So using your demented logic....Democraps today can discriminate against and punish Catholics today....even fine them if they don't bow to the black messiah's demands.

I wonder what JFK being a Catholic would think about Obamacare forcing birth control, etc on Catholic hospitals/organizations in the healthcare system.

Irony...it was conservatives who opposed JFK's candidacy BECAUSE he was a Catholic. They said he would take orders from the Pope. Kennedy decided to confront the issue of his religion, and deliver one of his greatest speeches at the Greater Houston Ministerial Association on September 12, 1960.

"But because I am a Catholic, and no Catholic has ever been elected President, the real issues in this campaign have been obscured--perhaps deliberately, in some quarters less responsible than this. So it is apparently necessary for me to state once again--not what kind of church I believe in, for that should be important only to me--but what kind of America I believe in.

I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute--where no Catholic prelate would tell the President (should he be Catholic) how to act, and no Protestant minister would tell his parishoners for whom to vote--where no church or church school is granted any public funds or political preference--and where no man is denied public office merely because his religion differs from the President who might appoint him or the people who might elect him.

I believe in an America that is officially neither Catholic, Protestant nor Jewish--where no public official either requests or accepts instructions on public policy from the Pope, the National Council of Churches or any other ecclesiastical source--where no religious body seeks to impose its will directly or indirectly upon the general populace or the public acts of its officials--and where religious liberty is so indivisible that an act against one church is treated as an act against all."

EDUCATE yourself.

You're confused. The Affordable Healthcare Act doesn't hold down any woman, pry open her mouth and jamb contraceptives down her throat. It affords reimbursement to ANY woman who wants to use contraceptives. It is a PERSONAL choice, and it should be the woman's decision; not the government and not the Church. It is up to the WOMAN to decide how she practices HER faith.

 

[Bfgrn]

The ultimate irony...

Republicans opposed JFK's tax cuts

In the 1950s and 1960s, federal deficits were relatively small compared to the size of the economy, but even during those flush years, Republican leadership was reluctant to advocate tax cuts. In 1953, for example, Dwight Eisenhower said the country “cannot afford to reduce taxes, reduce income, until we have in sight a program of expenditures that shows that the factors of income and of outgo will be balanced.”

And when his successor, John F. Kennedy, proposed sharp tax cuts in 1963, the more conservative Republicans in Congress initially opposed them because the cuts would expand the deficit.

The legislation eventually passed (after Kennedy’s assassination), but over the objections of about a third of the Republicans voting.


"The great enemy of truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived and dishonest – but the myth – persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."
President John F. Kennedy

 

[SniperFire]

The ultimate irony...

Republicans opposed JFK's tax cuts

In the 1950s and 1960s, federal deficits were relatively small compared to the size of the economy, but even during those flush years, Republican leadership was reluctant to advocate tax cuts. In 1953, for example, Dwight Eisenhower said the country “cannot afford to reduce taxes, reduce income, until we have in sight a program of expenditures that shows that the factors of income and of outgo will be balanced.”

And when his successor, John F. Kennedy, proposed sharp tax cuts in 1963, the more conservative Republicans in Congress initially opposed them because the cuts would expand the deficit.

The legislation eventually passed (after Kennedy’s assassination), but over the objections of about a third of the Republicans voting.


"The great enemy of truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived and dishonest – but the myth – persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."
President John F. Kennedy

Taxes are now primarily wealth redistributive.

It is much, much different now than in the pre Great Society era.

Hope this helps:

 

[JakeStarkey]

Thank heavens we are in a post pre-Great Society culture.

SS and Medicare are not welfare; We the People paid our premiums.

So it is food stamps and wicke etc that you resent.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The ultimate irony...

Republicans opposed JFK's tax cuts

In the 1950s and 1960s, federal deficits were relatively small compared to the size of the economy, but even during those flush years, Republican leadership was reluctant to advocate tax cuts. In 1953, for example, Dwight Eisenhower said the country “cannot afford to reduce taxes, reduce income, until we have in sight a program of expenditures that shows that the factors of income and of outgo will be balanced.”

And when his successor, John F. Kennedy, proposed sharp tax cuts in 1963, the more conservative Republicans in Congress initially opposed them because the cuts would expand the deficit.

The legislation eventually passed (after Kennedy’s assassination), but over the objections of about a third of the Republicans voting.


"The great enemy of truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived and dishonest – but the myth – persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."
President John F. Kennedy

Taxes are now primarily wealth redistributive.

It is much, much different now than in the pre Great Society era.

Hope this helps:

Kennedy, advocating for Medicare, 1962:

JFK Talks Medicare - 1962. | Newstalgia

...JFK a Republican today...

...well I have to admit it's not quite as retarded as the conservatives who claim MLK would be a Republican.

 

[SniperFire]

The ultimate irony...

Republicans opposed JFK's tax cuts

In the 1950s and 1960s, federal deficits were relatively small compared to the size of the economy, but even during those flush years, Republican leadership was reluctant to advocate tax cuts. In 1953, for example, Dwight Eisenhower said the country “cannot afford to reduce taxes, reduce income, until we have in sight a program of expenditures that shows that the factors of income and of outgo will be balanced.”

And when his successor, John F. Kennedy, proposed sharp tax cuts in 1963, the more conservative Republicans in Congress initially opposed them because the cuts would expand the deficit.

The legislation eventually passed (after Kennedy’s assassination), but over the objections of about a third of the Republicans voting.


"The great enemy of truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived and dishonest – but the myth – persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."
President John F. Kennedy

Taxes are now primarily wealth redistributive.

It is much, much different now than in the pre Great Society era.

Hope this helps:

Kennedy, advocating for Medicare, 1962:

JFK Talks Medicare - 1962. | Newstalgia

...JFK a Republican today...

...well I have to admit it's not quite as retarded as the conservatives who claim MLK would be a Republican.

Just like dubya, his political twin!

Neocons think alike, you know.


LOL

Bush signs landmark Medicare bill into law - CNN

 

[JakeStarkey]

SniperFire is being the Psychotic Doosh. Nothing new.