Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The original jews murdered and stole the land from the Canaanite people.
True story
i don't think all criticism of israel is anti-semitism. but when the criticism is ONLY of israel and not of the terrorists, then one has to question the 'why's'.
but rabid terrorist defendars and liars like pf idiot are absolutely jew-haters.
i don't have breakdowns over what idiots on the internet do.
What terrorists are those? The people defending themselves from Israel's occupation. International law says they are not terrorists.
What does international law say about targeting innocent civilians like women and children?
I'd say that you get more in return from the Saudis and such.
The Israelis take your money and tell you piss off.
only to jew-haters.
Except Philistines aren't Palestinians. Actually Palestinians are just Jordanians by another name.
There was a two state solution in 1948. And Jordan was teh Arab state. Israel should deport the Palis to Jordan and get on with life.
The Permanent Court of International Justice and an International Court of Arbitration established by the Council of the League of Nations handed down rulings in 1925 which determined that Palestine and Transjordan were newly-created successor states of the Ottoman Empire as defined by international law
And a Partition Plan was voted on by the UN General Assembly late in 1947. The measure was to be sent to the Security Council. Hostilities broke out soon after the GA vote and the SC never had the chance to bring the matter up. So in essence the Jewish immigrant rose up agaisnt the British rulers and Arab citizens and declared independence in 1948, and won the ensuing war(s) against the Arab states (so far).
One has nothing to do with the other.
We differ on one point. The 1948 war was called by a UN Security Council resolution. No one "lost" that war. No one "won" that war. The UN armistice agreements of 1949 showed that Palestine's border remained unchanged from when it was defined in 1922. Israel was an occupation of the territory inside the Green Line which was specifically not a border. Israel won no land in that war.
only to jew-haters.
You know there is another name for "Jew Haters," doncha?
It's "democrats!"
What terrorists are those? The people defending themselves from Israel's occupation. International law says they are not terrorists.
What does international law say about targeting innocent civilians like women and children?
More Palestinian civilians than Israeli have been killed in the conflict, so you won't find either side qualifying for the white hat on that issue.
Besides, as difficult as it might be to accept, the right and wrong of the Israeli occupation is an issue to itself,
and whether or 'terrorism' occurs does not affect the issue of that right or wrong.
What does international law say about targeting innocent civilians like women and children?
More Palestinian civilians than Israeli have been killed in the conflict, so you won't find either side qualifying for the white hat on that issue.
Besides, as difficult as it might be to accept, the right and wrong of the Israeli occupation is an issue to itself,
and whether or 'terrorism' occurs does not affect the issue of that right or wrong.
perhaps that's because israelis don't use their civilians as shields...
unlike the terrorists of hamas.
A propagandist could interpret it in that way. Remember that is was Israel that invaded and occupied Palestine.
More Palestinian civilians than Israeli have been killed in the conflict, so you won't find either side qualifying for the white hat on that issue.
Besides, as difficult as it might be to accept, the right and wrong of the Israeli occupation is an issue to itself,
and whether or 'terrorism' occurs does not affect the issue of that right or wrong.
perhaps that's because israelis don't use their civilians as shields...
unlike the terrorists of hamas.
Yes, yes they do, google it.
Both sides are wrong in my opinion, just Israel has money and the US backing so they appear worse.
If roles were reversed and Palestine had the money and power, they'd be taking advantage of it the same way Israel does.
What terrorists are those? The people defending themselves from Israel's occupation. International law says they are not terrorists.
What does international law say about targeting innocent civilians like women and children?
Although settlers may be civilians (as are all Palestinians) they are not protected persons according to the Geneva convention.
Oh really? How many Palestinians from Jaffa had ever been to Jordan before 1948?
only to jew-haters.
You know there is another name for "Jew Haters," doncha?
It's "democrats!"
you mean democrats like chuck schumer? anthony weiner? joe lieberman?
don't you ever stop proving you're a moron?
leave something to the imagination.
Yes, yes they do, google it.
perhaps that's because israelis don't use their civilians as shields...
unlike the terrorists of hamas.
Yes, yes they do, google it.
Both sides are wrong in my opinion, just Israel has money and the US backing so they appear worse.
If roles were reversed and Palestine had the money and power, they'd be taking advantage of it the same way Israel does.
no. no they don't.
israelis have what they have because they fought and won and then worked instead of spending their time showing their kids terrorist mickey mouse so they'd go blow themselves up.
the world is funny like that.
now, before you lump me with the idiot neocons, i think there *should* be two states. but the pals can't have it without making a deal. they were offered 98% of what they wanted back when arafat was alive. but he refused to cut the deal because he knew the terrorists would kill him.
go check *that* out. his statement was 'i can't make a deal or "i'll be drinking tea with rabin".
again, you don't get what you want in this world by killing babies in carriages. any state that doesn't preserve defensible boarders is a non-starter... as it should be when dealing with people who've said they exist solely for your destruction.
stop apologizing for terrorists. they do not share equal ground with the israelis.
What history states is the the Palestinians were at home minding their own business when Israel came to take over their country. Israel has been crying self defense ever since.
What terrorists are those? The people defending themselves from Israel's occupation. International law says they are not terrorists.
What does international law say about targeting innocent civilians like women and children?
More Palestinian civilians than Israeli have been killed in the conflict, so you won't find either side qualifying for the white hat on that issue.
Besides, as difficult as it might be to accept, the right and wrong of the Israeli occupation is an issue to itself,
and whether or 'terrorism' occurs does not affect the issue of that right or wrong.
Yes, yes they do, google it.
That's not how it works, stupid. YOU make a claim, YOU back it up. Stupid.
you mean democrats like chuck schumer? anthony weiner? joe lieberman?
don't you ever stop proving you're a moron?
leave something to the imagination.
Yes, yes they do, google it.
That's not how it works, stupid. YOU make a claim, YOU back it up. Stupid.
Lol sure thing no problem.
