Jens Mohr Thygesen "The J. F. Kennedy Assassination"

[the other mike]

The James Curtis Jenkins Revelations at JFK Lancer Confirm a Massive Medical Cover-up in 1963
The above evidence provided by Robinson and Reed proves that Dr. Humes perjured himself before both the Warren Commission and the ARRB, by claiming that he did not have to perform a craniotomy to remove JFK’s brain. Furthermore, the observations of Robinson and Reed indicate that autopsy technicians O’Connor and Jenkins were simply not in the morgue when that post-mortem surgery was performed by Humes. Since JFK’s body arrived at Bethesda in a shipping casket and body bag at 6:35 PM (per the Boyajian report of November 26, 1963, and the combined observations of Dennis David and Paul O’Connor), and then re-entered the morgue at 8:00 PM in the ceremonial bronze Dallas casket (per numerous witnesses, and the Joint Casket Team Report), I have concluded that it was during this 85-minute interregnum---a period of almost an hour and a half---that the clandestine surgery took place. O’Connor and Jenkins were clearly excluded from the morgue at the time, otherwise they would also remember the modified “skull cap” performed by Humes, just as Robinson and Reed did.

 

[the other mike]

From 2018.

 

[Soupnazi630]

There never was an autopsy or autopsy doctor in dallas.

The autopsy was performed in DC. It was performed at Bethesda which was chosen at the last minute By Jackie Kennedy. That little detail is important because it shows there was no time to coordinate a coverup with an autopsy. Contrary to myth the doctors who performed it were experienced experts who were not overseen or supervised by military flag officer.

The only doctors to examine him in Dallas were ER doctors whose expertise was in saving lives not evaluating wounds. They only had casual observation of his wounds and their casual observation is trumped by the experts who examined the wounds in detail

Now you're lying again.
It must get tiring on the soul.

No

Those are facts which you are willfully ignoring.

Once again there was no autopsy in Dallas. No autopsy doctor examined him in Dallas.

The only doctors In Dallas who examined him were emergency room doctors who only made casual observations after he was declared dead and such observations are trumped by in depth autopsies.

The Site of the autopsy was chosen by Jackie Kennedy on the way to DC and at the last minute leaving no time to prepare for a cover up.

The experienced experts were unsupervised and followed protocols.

Sorry but thems the facts

The only real problem is that the Secret Service DID remove the body illegally. But that is not so much evidence of a cover up as evidence of very pissed off federal agents who were shamed at failing in their duty.

The Parkland doctors confirmed he was shot from the front. So did JFK’s assistant press secretary. Many eye witnesses confirmed this too. So does the Zapruder film.

None of them did.

The parkland doctors only made casual observations as opposed to an autopsy which trumps their casual view.

No press secretary can confirm anything of a medical nature

No eyewitness confirmed it and the Zapruder film shows no such thing.

You have to lie rather than present evidence

Proof you are a dupe.

An emergency doctor who sees the president with the back of his head gone, can easily determine where the shot came from. Stop being a dupe for the CIA.

No he cannot .

An er doctor is trained to save lives and to perform life saving procedures

This is why we have autopsies performed by a different specialist. Just as an example I once knew a guy who was killed when his car hit a tree. The er doctors assumed the impact killed him due to the extensive trauma they observed. The autopsy revealed that he was dead before the impact because he had a heart attack which was why his car rammed into a tree

Such examples are common and again this is why we often have autopsies.

He er doctors only made casual observations which are trumped but the experienced experts who performed the autopsy.

That is fact and why you have no evidence

The CIA has nothing to do with this you paranoid fool.

 

[Faun]

Whether we prove these people guilty or not is irrelevant, because we know how they shaped our policies after JFK was gone. The Gulf of Tonkin false flag would not have happened and we would have never been in the Vietnam War, for starters. Fast forward to 9/11 and this endless war on terror merry-go-round we're stuck on....losing our civil liberties one after another.

And by the looks of candycorn, faun, soupnazi and whoever else - they're the infantry in the war to keep us in the dark, now that the fake media's been called out..

LOLOLOL

You fucking nut. None of us have any power to keep you in the dark. You're doing that to yourself.

That's why you're still pushing a 56 year old lie ?
Sure bud.

I'm not pushing any lie. You still have no evidence to support your bullshit.

 

[Soupnazi630]

.

The evidence shows he was the only shooter and was no patsy

You mean the available 'evidence' that isn't still classified and or redacted from public view ?

Which is the vast majority of evidence and no reason exists to suspect anything else.

 

[Faun]

He fired three shots and is the only one to fire any

He was no patsy


The warren commission report has tons of evidence supporting this and no one has debunked it least of all you.

You have zero evidence for your claims and have never cited any evidence

Never fired a shot since boot camp. Patsy all the way and on the FBI payroll.

Yes he did in fact shoot many times after boot camp.

He re qualified every year like all Marines. Shot himself with a pistol.

He went on hunting trips with his brother.

Occasionally visited ranges and shot targets.

he fired a shot at Edwin Walker and he shot Kennedy

He was no patsy and no evidence exists that he was paid by the FBI.

You are proven a liar again and the evidence shows he shot Kennedy. Just as I proved with evidence that you are wrong and a liar and LBJ followed JFKs escalation policy

Never shot at Walker either. Made up bull shit story and you bought it. LOL.

He shot at walker and shot Kennedy.

We have evidence of both you only have repeated assertions which are debunked by evidence.

Just like your assertion that he was a patsy and your false assertions about LBJs escalation

Never fired a shot. Patsy!!!

Then why'd he kill one cop and try to kill a second cop?

 

[gipper]

.

The evidence shows he was the only shooter and was no patsy

You mean the available 'evidence' that isn't still classified and or redacted from public view ?

Which is the vast majority of evidence and no reason exists to suspect anything else.

The vast majority of the evidence shows a coup took place in Dallas and that Oswald was the patsy. Why else would the CIA prevent documents from becoming public? Hell they wouldn’t let the American people see the Zapruder film for years. If Oswald acted alone, why all this secrecy that still is being done to this day.

This is yet another proof among thousands that proves the official story is bs.

 

[gipper]

Never fired a shot since boot camp. Patsy all the way and on the FBI payroll.

Yes he did in fact shoot many times after boot camp.

He re qualified every year like all Marines. Shot himself with a pistol.

He went on hunting trips with his brother.

Occasionally visited ranges and shot targets.

he fired a shot at Edwin Walker and he shot Kennedy

He was no patsy and no evidence exists that he was paid by the FBI.

You are proven a liar again and the evidence shows he shot Kennedy. Just as I proved with evidence that you are wrong and a liar and LBJ followed JFKs escalation policy

Never shot at Walker either. Made up bull shit story and you bought it. LOL.

He shot at walker and shot Kennedy.

We have evidence of both you only have repeated assertions which are debunked by evidence.

Just like your assertion that he was a patsy and your false assertions about LBJs escalation

Never fired a shot. Patsy!!!

Then why'd he kill one cop and try to kill a second cop?

He didn’t.

 

[Faun]

Yes he did in fact shoot many times after boot camp.

He re qualified every year like all Marines. Shot himself with a pistol.

He went on hunting trips with his brother.

Occasionally visited ranges and shot targets.

he fired a shot at Edwin Walker and he shot Kennedy

He was no patsy and no evidence exists that he was paid by the FBI.

You are proven a liar again and the evidence shows he shot Kennedy. Just as I proved with evidence that you are wrong and a liar and LBJ followed JFKs escalation policy

Never shot at Walker either. Made up bull shit story and you bought it. LOL.

He shot at walker and shot Kennedy.

We have evidence of both you only have repeated assertions which are debunked by evidence.

Just like your assertion that he was a patsy and your false assertions about LBJs escalation

Never fired a shot. Patsy!!!

Then why'd he kill one cop and try to kill a second cop?

He didn’t.

 

[Soupnazi630]

.

The evidence shows he was the only shooter and was no patsy

You mean the available 'evidence' that isn't still classified and or redacted from public view ?

Which is the vast majority of evidence and no reason exists to suspect anything else.

The vast majority of the evidence shows a coup took place in Dallas and that Oswald was the patsy. Why else would the CIA prevent documents from becoming public? Hell they wouldn’t let the American people see the Zapruder film for years. If Oswald acted alone, why all this secrecy that still is being done to this day.

This is yet another proof among thousands that proves the official story is bs.

There is no evidence of a coup

There are many mundane reasons to classify documents such as to protect assets and methods of gathering Intel

The they you refer to who would not let the public see the zapruder film was time/life magazines

Apparently you think they were involved which makes it thousands of people in a conspiracy where no one talked

The evidence is overwhelming that Oswald acted alone

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes he did in fact shoot many times after boot camp.

He re qualified every year like all Marines. Shot himself with a pistol.

He went on hunting trips with his brother.

Occasionally visited ranges and shot targets.

he fired a shot at Edwin Walker and he shot Kennedy

He was no patsy and no evidence exists that he was paid by the FBI.

You are proven a liar again and the evidence shows he shot Kennedy. Just as I proved with evidence that you are wrong and a liar and LBJ followed JFKs escalation policy

Never shot at Walker either. Made up bull shit story and you bought it. LOL.

He shot at walker and shot Kennedy.

We have evidence of both you only have repeated assertions which are debunked by evidence.

Just like your assertion that he was a patsy and your false assertions about LBJs escalation

Never fired a shot. Patsy!!!

Then why'd he kill one cop and try to kill a second cop?

He didn’t.

He did

Yet more massive evidence proves he did and none suggests otherwise

 

[gipper]

.

The evidence shows he was the only shooter and was no patsy

You mean the available 'evidence' that isn't still classified and or redacted from public view ?

Which is the vast majority of evidence and no reason exists to suspect anything else.

The vast majority of the evidence shows a coup took place in Dallas and that Oswald was the patsy. Why else would the CIA prevent documents from becoming public? Hell they wouldn’t let the American people see the Zapruder film for years. If Oswald acted alone, why all this secrecy that still is being done to this day.

This is yet another proof among thousands that proves the official story is bs.

There is no evidence of a coup

There are many mundane reasons to classify documents such as to protect assets and methods of gathering Intel

The they you refer to who would not let the public see the zapruder film was time/life magazines

Apparently you think they were involved which makes it thousands of people in a conspiracy where no one talked

The evidence is overwhelming that Oswald acted alone

It was a coup. Only dummies think otherwise.

 

[gipper]

Never shot at Walker either. Made up bull shit story and you bought it. LOL.

He shot at walker and shot Kennedy.

We have evidence of both you only have repeated assertions which are debunked by evidence.

Just like your assertion that he was a patsy and your false assertions about LBJs escalation

Never fired a shot. Patsy!!!

Then why'd he kill one cop and try to kill a second cop?

He didn’t.

 

[Faun]

.

The evidence shows he was the only shooter and was no patsy

You mean the available 'evidence' that isn't still classified and or redacted from public view ?

Which is the vast majority of evidence and no reason exists to suspect anything else.

The vast majority of the evidence shows a coup took place in Dallas and that Oswald was the patsy. Why else would the CIA prevent documents from becoming public? Hell they wouldn’t let the American people see the Zapruder film for years. If Oswald acted alone, why all this secrecy that still is being done to this day.

This is yet another proof among thousands that proves the official story is bs.

There is no evidence of a coup

There are many mundane reasons to classify documents such as to protect assets and methods of gathering Intel

The they you refer to who would not let the public see the zapruder film was time/life magazines

Apparently you think they were involved which makes it thousands of people in a conspiracy where no one talked

The evidence is overwhelming that Oswald acted alone

It was a coup. Only dummies think otherwise.

A coup that even Dallas police officers were in on? And how many federal agents? And how many foreign actors? And to this day, not one has ever spilled the beans.

Do you even realize you sound insane?

 

[Faun]

He shot at walker and shot Kennedy.

We have evidence of both you only have repeated assertions which are debunked by evidence.

Just like your assertion that he was a patsy and your false assertions about LBJs escalation

Never fired a shot. Patsy!!!

Then why'd he kill one cop and try to kill a second cop?

He didn’t.

 

[Soupnazi630]

.

The evidence shows he was the only shooter and was no patsy

You mean the available 'evidence' that isn't still classified and or redacted from public view ?

Which is the vast majority of evidence and no reason exists to suspect anything else.

The vast majority of the evidence shows a coup took place in Dallas and that Oswald was the patsy. Why else would the CIA prevent documents from becoming public? Hell they wouldn’t let the American people see the Zapruder film for years. If Oswald acted alone, why all this secrecy that still is being done to this day.

This is yet another proof among thousands that proves the official story is bs.

There is no evidence of a coup

There are many mundane reasons to classify documents such as to protect assets and methods of gathering Intel

The they you refer to who would not let the public see the zapruder film was time/life magazines

Apparently you think they were involved which makes it thousands of people in a conspiracy where no one talked

The evidence is overwhelming that Oswald acted alone

It was a coup. Only dummies think otherwise.

There is no evidence of a coup.
Only dummies believe in lame assertions with no evidence

 

[gipper]

You mean the available 'evidence' that isn't still classified and or redacted from public view ?

Which is the vast majority of evidence and no reason exists to suspect anything else.

The vast majority of the evidence shows a coup took place in Dallas and that Oswald was the patsy. Why else would the CIA prevent documents from becoming public? Hell they wouldn’t let the American people see the Zapruder film for years. If Oswald acted alone, why all this secrecy that still is being done to this day.

This is yet another proof among thousands that proves the official story is bs.

There is no evidence of a coup

There are many mundane reasons to classify documents such as to protect assets and methods of gathering Intel

The they you refer to who would not let the public see the zapruder film was time/life magazines

Apparently you think they were involved which makes it thousands of people in a conspiracy where no one talked

The evidence is overwhelming that Oswald acted alone

It was a coup. Only dummies think otherwise.

There is no evidence of a coup.
Only dummies believe in lame assertions with no evidence

Yes that is a good description of the WC. A lame assertion with no evidence. Thank you. You finally got it right.

 

[gipper]

Never fired a shot. Patsy!!!

Then why'd he kill one cop and try to kill a second cop?

He didn’t.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Which is the vast majority of evidence and no reason exists to suspect anything else.

The vast majority of the evidence shows a coup took place in Dallas and that Oswald was the patsy. Why else would the CIA prevent documents from becoming public? Hell they wouldn’t let the American people see the Zapruder film for years. If Oswald acted alone, why all this secrecy that still is being done to this day.

This is yet another proof among thousands that proves the official story is bs.

There is no evidence of a coup

There are many mundane reasons to classify documents such as to protect assets and methods of gathering Intel

The they you refer to who would not let the public see the zapruder film was time/life magazines

Apparently you think they were involved which makes it thousands of people in a conspiracy where no one talked

The evidence is overwhelming that Oswald acted alone

It was a coup. Only dummies think otherwise.

There is no evidence of a coup.
Only dummies believe in lame assertions with no evidence

Yes that is a good description of the WC. A lame assertion with no evidence. Thank you. You finally got it right.

No it is clearly what you are posting

You have only uninformed assertions with no evidence

The wc has evidence

Cite one passage of the wc which is a lie and provide evidence that it is a lie.

Don't evade like you always do answer the question

 

[gipper]

The vast majority of the evidence shows a coup took place in Dallas and that Oswald was the patsy. Why else would the CIA prevent documents from becoming public? Hell they wouldn’t let the American people see the Zapruder film for years. If Oswald acted alone, why all this secrecy that still is being done to this day.

This is yet another proof among thousands that proves the official story is bs.

There is no evidence of a coup

There are many mundane reasons to classify documents such as to protect assets and methods of gathering Intel

The they you refer to who would not let the public see the zapruder film was time/life magazines

Apparently you think they were involved which makes it thousands of people in a conspiracy where no one talked

The evidence is overwhelming that Oswald acted alone

It was a coup. Only dummies think otherwise.

There is no evidence of a coup.
Only dummies believe in lame assertions with no evidence

Yes that is a good description of the WC. A lame assertion with no evidence. Thank you. You finally got it right.

No it is clearly what you are posting

You have only uninformed assertions with no evidence

The wc has evidence

Cite one passage of the wc which is a lie and provide evidence that it is a lie.

Don't evade like you always do answer the question

Glad you finally realize the Warren Commission is bogus bull shit. Why did it take over 50 years? Are you slow?