Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's never stopped and the shit was happening in the north too. So it has just continued to happen. This case happened as result of a northern white cop who shot an unarmed black man 7 times in the back, then claimed his life was in danger.If it does, the response will be far different than it was from the democrats in the South.
Deny all you want but the fact he shot white people doesn't mean he is not a racist. Whites were killed during the civil rights movement, so you can quit denying.In order for his claim to have credibility, we have to have the local police, the FBI, AND the judge all out to get....drum roll, THE WHITE GUY, for doing what....drum roll, SHOOTING WHITE PEOPLE, and this makes them all...drum roll, RACISTS. That's why it's so ludicrous.
Look, I don't care if you agree or disagree with the rioters, they shouldn't have been there, shouldn't have been trying to set cars on fire, and shouldn't have been trying to attack anyone. If you're going to claim that Rittenhouse is a murderer because he went to the riot with a gun, the rioters are due for some charges as well, such as attempted murder, because they used weapons, including guns.
How about linking to some of those videos. I sure haven’t seen them and I’ve watched most of what’s available trying to understand the situation. Rittenhouse was carrying his rifle muzzle down and to the left in a patrol style sling. That’s not pointing it at anyone. You are a master of C&P so put your skills to work educating the rest of us.It's happening right now. So it is being allowed.
Rittenhouse is on film pointing his gun at people before anything happened. Now he had no business being there. He was not law enforcement, NG, or hired security. The car dealership he claimed to be protecting did not want him there. It is apparent that he was looking for trouble. People just don't rush people who are armed to start confrontations.
The jury asked for them. What you haven't seen is irrelevant.How about linking to some of those videos. I sure haven’t seen them and I’ve watched most of what’s available trying to understand the situation. Rittenhouse was carrying his rifle muzzle down and to the left in a patrol style sling. That’s not pointing it at anyone. You are a master of C&P so put your skills to work educating the rest of us.
Poor white communities aren't shitholes? Lol! I can take you down highway 24 here and show you nothing but dead small poor all white towns that are shitholes.
Again, the protest was because a unarmed black man was shot in the back 7 times by police. Rittenhouse was not a member of law enforcement or of the national guard. He had no business being there armed and out past curfew.
There is no narcissism here and wannabe white internal racism afflicted loons like you always want to deny the root cause of things because you're incapable of complex thought.
Of course I talk about the rioters, because their contribution to the mess is being ignored.Deny all you want but the fact he shot white people doesn't mean he is not a racist. Whites were killed during the civil rights movement, so you can quit denying.
You want to talk about rioters, but Rittenhouse was not legally authorized to defend against riots. He was no different than the rioters.
No they aren't but the fact Rittenhouse had no law enforcement authority is. So is the reason for the situation. Why wasn't Rittenhouse peacefully protesting an unwarranted shooting of a unarmed black man in the back 7 times.Of course I talk about the rioters, because their contribution to the mess is being ignored.
Do you just assume he is racist because he is white?Deny all you want but the fact he shot white people doesn't mean he is not a racist. Whites were killed during the civil rights movement, so you can quit denying.
You want to talk about rioters, but Rittenhouse was not legally authorized to defend against riots. He was no different than the rioters.
The jury asked for SOME of the videos. You are the one making the claim, you support it. It should be child’s play for someone with your skill at finding obscure racist tomes and rants.The jury asked for them. What you haven't seen is irrelevant.
That’s IM2s and Paul’s MODo you just assume he is racist because he is white?
Neither you nor I am he, so all we could do is hazard a guess as to why he was or wasn't doing something, so I'm not going to do that.No they aren't but the fact Rittenhouse had no law enforcement authority is. So is the reason for the situation. Why wasn't Rittenhouse peacefully protesting an unwarranted shooting of a unarmed black man in the back 7 times.
About 110 million people died in WW1 and 2 combined. Show me an african conflict close to that ?
I don’t know, but perhaps because it wasn’t an unwarranted shooting. The “victim” of the shooting was armed with a knife, had struggled with police, had been tased more than once during the altercation, was violating a protective order, and was moving towards a car with his children in it, in violation of said order. What would you have the police do that they didn’t? Should they have allowed someone so enraged that he shrugged off the effects of multiple tasings to kidnap his children and quite possibly endanger or harm them? The knife is no longer an alleged knife, he now admits to having it. So he WASN’T unarmed as you have claimed.No they aren't but the fact Rittenhouse had no law enforcement authority is. So is the reason for the situation. Why wasn't Rittenhouse peacefully protesting an unwarranted shooting of a unarmed black man in the back 7 times.
And after seeing them again came back with a not guilty verdict.The jury asked for them. What you haven't seen is irrelevant.
Say what? Are you saying that people that have guns can't be good guys? That is ludicrous.The insane notion of good guys with guns is ludicrous, yet republicans tell white this is the way to go
Don't play stupid.Say what? Are you saying that people that have guns can't be good guys? That is ludicrous.
i never had sex with that woman ms lewinskyI tried to think of a better title, but this fits the description. People here read this trifling mess and believe it as if it's the gospel. So lets look at this article.
Truth: Democrats Feed Racism to Control Our Black Community
BY VINCE EVERETT ELLISON JUN 12, 2020
First off the title is a lie. If democrats were actually doing that rest assured that 99 percent of the blacks in America would be republican. Now as I am black, I think I have a fair understanding of how blacks would do things if this was the circumstance.
For the past few months, we have witnessed the raw and unmasked Democrat Party, live and in living color. Their constituents are rioting, looting, and murdering because they have finally realized that there are only three areas where the government is supremely prolific and highly efficient: theft, incarceration, and killing.
The evidence produced from documentation show this comment to be inaccuate.
The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project documented the summer protests. The project recorded over 7,500 protests and found that more than 93 percent were peaceful. They cited over 2,400 locations and found that violence occurred in less than 220. The violence ranged from “fighting back against police” to vandalism, property destruction looting, road-blocking using barricades, burning tires or other materials.”This report also found that the over the top government response from president number 45 contributed to the violence. The federal response basically increased tension and violence. For example, in Portland the violence increased by 9 percent after President number 45 sent troops to that city. What ACLED found was that government intervened 3 times more in BLM demonstrations than any other.
“ ACLED also highlights a violent government response, in which authorities use force more often than not when they are present at protests and that they disproportionately used force while intervening in demonstrations associated with the BLM movement, relative to other types of demonstrations.”
Sanya Mansour, 93% of Black Lives Matter Protests Have Been Peaceful, New Report Finds
A funny thing was discovered during these protests,(well actually not so funny). The violence in many of these protests were from people who were more than likely not associated with Black Lives Matter. Seems that most of the violence came from infiltrators and counter protesters, many who were associated with white nationalist and paramilitary organization. These groups had an ally that often times helped to escalate the situation, then used violence to settle things down. That ally was law enforcement.
“Since Floyd’s killing, dozens of car-ramming attacks by individual perpetrators — in some cases acting independently with no reported affiliation, and in others linked to hate groups like the Ku Klux Klan — have been reported at demonstrations around the country. Other cases have involved those affiliated with the government, such as the military and law enforcement, including an on-duty police officer at a demonstration in Anaheim, California on 25 July; an off-duty police officer at a demonstration in Seattle, Washington on 4 July; an army sergeant at a demonstration in Austin, Texas on 25 July; and an off-duty jail correctional officer at a demonstration in Kokomo, Indiana on 30 May.”
Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project- Demonstrations & Political Violence In America: Summer 2020
In similar fashion the Radcliffe Institute at Harvard found that that 96.3% of the BLM protests had no property damage or police injuries, and in 97.7% of events, no injuries were reported at all.
But since this doesn't agree with the narrative, it's pawned off as liberal psuedo itellectualism or liberal bias.
Outside this “Iron Triangle” government fails horribly at education, protection, health care, economic development, border security, drug enforcement and infrastructure. Yet after months of economic collapse, pandemic hysteria and racial anarchy, where 60 years of Democrat Party abuse of Black America was revealed, black leadership still chooses the government as its vehicle to solve these indignities. Why? Because this is what the Democrats desire.
Another lie. Let us look at how things were for blacks 60 years ago. At this time 60 years ago, we still has jim crow. Jim crow was ended by the signature of a democratic president and a majority democratic vote. Republicans had from 1897 to end jim crow and did not. 60 years ago more than half the black population lived below poverty thanks to jim crow that both parties were complicit in maintaning. But let me skip a few years so we get to the crux of this lie.. From 1994-2007 republicans controlled the house. From 2000-2007 they controlled Washington and upwards of 30 states. From 2010-2018 republicans controlled both houses. From 2017-2019 they controlled Washington and I believe between 33-37 states. So when we read a righht winger talk about democratic abuse of blacks, the facts show this to be a lie.
Blacks turn to the federal government because if we depended on states we'd still be slaves. There has been no democratic abuse of black America and furthermore on the local level, republicans have every chance to win mayoral races so if they lose, perhaps it's the policies. And there really are no democratic or republican cities, a mayor does nothing major without the city council and most city councils are bi partisan.
Except for a brief time during Reconstruction, there has never been a time since its inception in 1800 that the Democrats have not had absolute control over most of the black population in America. They have used race in one way or another to maintain power ever since.
The fact that one-hundred fifty years since the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments were ratified and fifty-six years since the 1964 Civil Rights Act, blacks are still rioting over racism and still begging government to eradicate it, should tell us something: The Democrat Party uses racism to subdue and control black Americans, not eradicate racism to institute justice. Ending racism would end the Democrats’ stranglehold on Black America.
The problem with this lie is that free blacks during slavery were republicans. For example, Frederick Douglass. The fact this "article" misses is the many different ways both republicans and democrats subverted the laws that have been produced. This writer is delusional and this story is nothing but a 100 percent fact free racist rant. Republicans aren't interested in ending racism, they exist just like democrats and they have the same political stregnth and do nothing but bitch about what democrats aren't doing for blacks.
This narrative plays well to a base of white aversive racists, but we black folk want to see policy. Refusing to end qualified immunity for police is not a policy that is going to get blacks to join the republican party. And the republican record on economic development is abysmal. The reason why we are still fighting to end racism is because there are whites who won't stop being racis and that's, republican, democrat, libertarian, green, whatever.
The proof of this charge is evidenced in a June 4, 2020, Washington Post story, in which a devastating critique highlights the Democrat Party’s dismal failure, in its fake effort, to narrow the wealth gap between black and white Americans. Heather Long and Andrew Van Dam write, “In many ways, the gap between the finances of black and whites is still as wide as it was in 1968.” The story illustrates the fact that in 1968 the average black household had $6,674 in wealth compared to $70,786 for a white household. In 2016 the typical black household had $13,024 in wealth vs $149,703 for a white household.
Instead of accepting the reality that whites have not stopped the racism and in fact practices a more covert form, this intellectually lazy individual blames democrats. His lie misses the fact that since 1968, we have had 6 republican presidents and 4 democrats. What have republicans done? They increased the wealth gap using that trickle down nonsense. You know, that great republican plan for prosperity whereby we cut taxes for the very rich and they would create jobs.
In 1968 this was the case:
“What white Americans have never fully understood but what the Negro can never forget--is that white society is deeply implicated in the ghetto. White institutions created it, white institutions maintain it, and white society condones it. It is time now to turn with all the purpose at our command to the major unfinished business of this nation. It is time to adopt strategies for action that will produce quick and visible progress. It is time to make good the promises of American democracy to all citizens-urban and rural, white and black, Spanish-surname, American Indian, and every minority group.”
50 years later the Economic Policy Institute determined that things rremained basically the same. This was not because democrats were using race to keep black voters. That's just a stupid assertion, anyone who believes this is crazy and their opinions on matters of race cannot be taken seriously.
But to say this guy is racist, gets the crazy, but:
According to the Brookings Institution if people do these three things, they have a 98 percent chance to stay out of poverty: Get a high school diploma, work full time, and wait until age 21 and get married before having a baby. The Democrats know this. So they have intentionally destroyed the educational system in the inner cities, introduced sex to our children at an early age, and set up and maintained a welfare state that continues to destroy the traditional family.
Democrats have forbidden the black community even the foundational elements of survival by violating their inalienable right to self-defense and religious expression. They have told them they are victims, oppressed and discriminated against.
Now this is pure racist bs. Blacks do all these things and whites have babies unmarried before 21. But staying out of poverty involves being paid wages that are above poverty. When black men make 80 cents on the dollar earned by white men even with the same academic attainment and doing the same work and black women 63 cents in the same set of circumstances, the comments above show the person saying it is clueless. Democrats didn't destroy anything and democrats have not forbidden anything for black people. White racism is bi partisan and that is the problem. Democrats aren't telling us this, we live the experience and see it for ourselves.
Considering the extraordinary amount of crime in the inner-city communities along with the constant complaints of police brutality, this is an interesting phenomenon. Nevertheless, Democrat politicians continually vote to disarm the “hunted” citizens and the black Democrats vote to be disarmed.
Whites are arrested every year for 70 percent of the crime in America. Annually they lead in 90 percent of the crime categories used by the FBI in the Uniform Crime Reports. If anybody is told something it is whites who are republican. Blacks vote against guns because we see the killing and know that if we reduce access to deadly weapons, we reducing the shootings. The insane notion of good guys with guns is ludicrous, yet republicans tell white this is the way to go.
To secure 90% of the black vote for the Democrat Party, the black community is not being served, it is being occupied. This occupation is necessary for the cultural genocide that is taking place there. And like a patient, after spending all of their money and discovering that their physician is a quack and a con-man, blacks are asking hard questions. And some are rioting.
The Democrats said, “If you give us your children we will educate them”; they lied.
They said, “If you get rid of your men, we will provide for you”; they lied.
They said, “If you give us your guns we will protect you”; they lied.
Blacks who rioted, did so because for the last 100 years police have been allowed to murder blacks and lie. For 100 years blacks were republicans. Racists like this who feed the white community this bs do not mention this fact. Democrats cannot occupy people who CHOOSE to vote. There are no democrats in voting places telling blacks to vote democrat before they enter a voting booth. This guy and others associated with this site and others like it are feeding crazy to whites and working to increase racial division.
Again, republican politicians run for office, but you are not going to get black votes when you are a politician telling blacks they can't think for themselves but must be told that racism exists so they can believe they are victims.
Republicans have been for more stringent policing of non white communities as well as enacting laws allowing whites to kill people of color claiming to be standing their ground. Republicans offer nothing, vouchers don't solve funding formula issues based on property tax values. The refusal to pay a national living wage ensures the continuance of poverty. Instead of looking at these things, people on the right like this guy, want to play identty politics and to white racial resentment.
Racism in America is no longer a government problem. There is no governmental statute in America that condones racism. Today, there are thousands of laws against racism, yet it still exists. Government cannot stop racism.
And here is the excuse racists use in order to absolve themselves of personal responsibility. There is a reason racism still exists, there are whites who refuse to stop being racists. Let me end with this comment:
“There is very little truth in the old refrain that one cannot legislate equality. Laws not only provide concrete benefits, they can even change the hearts of men—some men, anyhow—for good or evil.”
Thurgood Marshall
i didnt realize that you are a republican
