It’s Happening: A Case That Could Seriously Undermine Roe v. Wade Is Before SCOTUS

[Blackrook]

A Case That Could Seriously Undermine Roe v. Wade Is Before SCOTUS

Pro-aborts have seen the writing on the wall, Roe v. Wade will soon be overturned, or in someway rendered irrelevant indirectly by Louisiana's law that abortion doctors have to have hospital privileges.

That's why the push is on to have the states go beyond Roe v. Wade to legalize abortion all the way to the moment of birth, like they have just done in New York, and they tried to do in Virginia.

It will become a state to state battle and our nation will be divided between life states and death states, in the same way the states were once divided between free states and slave states.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

That's why democrats want abortions to be performed by hires right off the street.

 

[Blackrook]

That's why democrats want abortions to be performed by hires right off the street.

That's true, New York has brought back back alley abortions, only they will be performed inside the clinic.

 

[The Professor]

The law passed in Louisiana requires doctors performing abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. I expect the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) will find this restriction on abortions to be unconstitutional. My belief is based upon a SCOTUS decision in a similar case back in 2016. The entire decision is quite lengthy so I will give just two relevant excerpts

In 2013, the Texas Legislature enacted House Bill 2 (H. B. 2), which contains the two provisions challenged here. The "admittingprivileges requirement" provides that a "physician performing or inducing an abortion ... must, on the date [of service], have active admitting privileges at a hospital ... located not further than 30 miles from the" abortion facility. The "surgical-center requirement" requires an "abortion facility" to meet the "minimum standards ... for ambulatory surgical centers" under Texas law.

We conclude that neither of these provisions confers medical benefits sufficient to justify the burdens upon access that each imposes. Each places a substantial obstacle in the path of women seeking a previability abortion, each constitutes an undue burden on abortion access, Casey, supra, at 878, 112 S.Ct. 2791 (plurality opinion), and each violates the Federal Constitution. Amdt. 14, § 1.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12719084930434459940&q=Whole+Woman%E2%80%99s+Health+v.+Hellerstedt&hl=en&as_sdt=40006&as_vis=1

 

[GreenAndBlue]

This abortion issue has woke up the sleeping giant

Anger. Is rising fast all over

No other issue can bring such anger

Trump now has enough power to call up the military to make logic tests for voters. To stop electing crooks and murderers

 

[McRocket]

A Case That Could Seriously Undermine Roe v. Wade Is Before SCOTUS

Pro-aborts have seen the writing on the wall, Roe v. Wade will soon be overturned, or in someway rendered irrelevant indirectly by Louisiana's law that abortion doctors have to have hospital privileges.

That's why the push is on to have the states go beyond Roe v. Wade to legalize abortion all the way to the moment of birth, like they have just done in New York, and they tried to do in Virginia.

It will become a state to state battle and our nation will be divided between life states and death states, in the same way the states were once divided between free states and slave states.

NBC/WSJ poll: Support for Roe v. Wade hits new high

Even if Roe v. Wade is overturned...eventually the Dems will control the SCOTUS again.

And then the Dems in power will bring out an abortion legalization law and the SCOTUS will support it.

Support for abortion is growing - not shrinking.

Like it or not, abortion is here to stay - whether out in the open or in back alley clinic's.

AND THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO TO STOP IT.


BTW - I do NOT support abortion after there is brain activity. But before that - okay.

 

[GreenAndBlue]

A Case That Could Seriously Undermine Roe v. Wade Is Before SCOTUS

Pro-aborts have seen the writing on the wall, Roe v. Wade will soon be overturned, or in someway rendered irrelevant indirectly by Louisiana's law that abortion doctors have to have hospital privileges.

That's why the push is on to have the states go beyond Roe v. Wade to legalize abortion all the way to the moment of birth, like they have just done in New York, and they tried to do in Virginia.

It will become a state to state battle and our nation will be divided between life states and death states, in the same way the states were once divided between free states and slave states.

NBC/WSJ poll: Support for Roe v. Wade hits new high

Even if Roe v. Wade is overturned...eventually the Dems will control the SCOTUS again.

And then the Dems in power will bring out an abortion legalization law and the SCOTUS will support it.

Support for abortion is growing - not shrinking.

Like it or not, abortion is here to stay - whether out in the open or in back alley clinic's.

AND THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO TO STOP IT.


BTW - I do NOT support abortion after there is brain activity. But before that - okay.

Wrong trump and the men will make logic tests for voters. Which will
End all liberalism

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

A Case That Could Seriously Undermine Roe v. Wade Is Before SCOTUS

Pro-aborts have seen the writing on the wall, Roe v. Wade will soon be overturned, or in someway rendered irrelevant indirectly by Louisiana's law that abortion doctors have to have hospital privileges.

That's why the push is on to have the states go beyond Roe v. Wade to legalize abortion all the way to the moment of birth, like they have just done in New York, and they tried to do in Virginia.

It will become a state to state battle and our nation will be divided between life states and death states, in the same way the states were once divided between free states and slave states.

NBC/WSJ poll: Support for Roe v. Wade hits new high

Even if Roe v. Wade is overturned...eventually the Dems will control the SCOTUS again.

And then the Dems in power will bring out an abortion legalization law and the SCOTUS will support it.

Support for abortion is growing - not shrinking.

Like it or not, abortion is here to stay - whether out in the open or in back alley clinic's.

AND THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO TO STOP IT.


BTW - I do NOT support abortion after there is brain activity. But before that - okay.

Except when someone grows the brains and nerve to point out that it’s a man’s baby, too, stipulated upon the contract of copulation.
Dred Scott was once the law of the land much the same way as abortion; the result of judicial interpretation and not legislation.

 

[22lcidw]

A Case That Could Seriously Undermine Roe v. Wade Is Before SCOTUS

Pro-aborts have seen the writing on the wall, Roe v. Wade will soon be overturned, or in someway rendered irrelevant indirectly by Louisiana's law that abortion doctors have to have hospital privileges.

That's why the push is on to have the states go beyond Roe v. Wade to legalize abortion all the way to the moment of birth, like they have just done in New York, and they tried to do in Virginia.

It will become a state to state battle and our nation will be divided between life states and death states, in the same way the states were once divided between free states and slave states.

NBC/WSJ poll: Support for Roe v. Wade hits new high

Even if Roe v. Wade is overturned...eventually the Dems will control the SCOTUS again.

And then the Dems in power will bring out an abortion legalization law and the SCOTUS will support it.

Support for abortion is growing - not shrinking.

Like it or not, abortion is here to stay - whether out in the open or in back alley clinic's.

AND THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO TO STOP IT.


BTW - I do NOT support abortion after there is brain activity. But before that - okay.

The more women buy into this, the less respect they will get when mother nature takes its course with a humbling.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Anyone who tasks about Roe v Wade, either saving it or overturning it, is an idiot. The case is obsolete. There are much stronger, more detailed precedents that are now the standards used.

 

[Vastator]

A Case That Could Seriously Undermine Roe v. Wade Is Before SCOTUS

Pro-aborts have seen the writing on the wall, Roe v. Wade will soon be overturned, or in someway rendered irrelevant indirectly by Louisiana's law that abortion doctors have to have hospital privileges.

That's why the push is on to have the states go beyond Roe v. Wade to legalize abortion all the way to the moment of birth, like they have just done in New York, and they tried to do in Virginia.

It will become a state to state battle and our nation will be divided between life states and death states, in the same way the states were once divided between free states and slave states.

Life states also need to pen legislation similar to federal laws, that go after Americans who travel abroad to victimize minors outside US jurisdiction; by making it chargeable to murder ones child outside state lines, thus attempting to curtail state law in order to commit murder....

 

[Lesh]

It's not like we haven't told you folks what the stakes of elections would be.

Republicans kept saying that abortion rights were safe...and you believed them?

They're REPUBLICANS were God's sake

 

[Harpy Eagle]

A Case That Could Seriously Undermine Roe v. Wade Is Before SCOTUS

Pro-aborts have seen the writing on the wall, Roe v. Wade will soon be overturned, or in someway rendered irrelevant indirectly by Louisiana's law that abortion doctors have to have hospital privileges.

That's why the push is on to have the states go beyond Roe v. Wade to legalize abortion all the way to the moment of birth, like they have just done in New York, and they tried to do in Virginia.

It will become a state to state battle and our nation will be divided between life states and death states, in the same way the states were once divided between free states and slave states.

There are maybe two justices right now that might support the overturning of RvW...neither of which were appointed by Trump.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[The Original Tree]

Will SCOTUS be able to place restrictions on The Democrat Party's Cult of Death and Self Gratification?

Or will Infanticide become the New Religion and will we build altars for human sacrifice and dispose of the bloody baby bodies on the bonfire of our vanities?

Perhaps instead of "banning abortion" or placing restrictions on it, we simply remove economic incentives for it, and ban the sale of baby cadavers and baby body parts for "scientific research".

Following along this line, I believe that any so called "clinic" that performs abortions should not receive federal monies, and if it so chooses so be allowed to operate as a charity and fund itself through donations as a non profit.

 

[anynameyouwish]

A Case That Could Seriously Undermine Roe v. Wade Is Before SCOTUS

Pro-aborts have seen the writing on the wall, Roe v. Wade will soon be overturned, or in someway rendered irrelevant indirectly by Louisiana's law that abortion doctors have to have hospital privileges.

That's why the push is on to have the states go beyond Roe v. Wade to legalize abortion all the way to the moment of birth, like they have just done in New York, and they tried to do in Virginia.

It will become a state to state battle and our nation will be divided between life states and death states, in the same way the states were once divided between free states and slave states.

If you had a child and it grew up to be a lib/dem/gay atheist would you kill it?

 

[Lesh]

There are maybe two justices right now that might support the overturning of RvW...neither of which were appointed by Trump.

Yea sure.

We'll see how Gorsuch and the Kav vote

 

[DGS49]

This talk of "Roe v. Wade" being "overturned" is nonsense.

When you wade through all the bullshit of RvW, you find the following basic scenario: First trimester, there is a "right" to obtain an abortion; Second trimester, the state can "regulate" abortion; Third trimester, it's a person and you can't kill it.

This hasn't been the law in DECADES. Christ, under New York's new law, an "abortion" can be performed during childbirth!

What the USSC ought to do is simply decline to rule on abortion cases in the future, and saying that it is an issue that REQUIRES a constitutional amendment to define when PERSONHOOD begins. This is NOT a job for the fucking COURTS, but rather for the PEOPLES' REPRESENTATIVES in the Congress.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

A Case That Could Seriously Undermine Roe v. Wade Is Before SCOTUS

Pro-aborts have seen the writing on the wall, Roe v. Wade will soon be overturned, or in someway rendered irrelevant indirectly by Louisiana's law that abortion doctors have to have hospital privileges.

That's why the push is on to have the states go beyond Roe v. Wade to legalize abortion all the way to the moment of birth, like they have just done in New York, and they tried to do in Virginia.

It will become a state to state battle and our nation will be divided between life states and death states, in the same way the states were once divided between free states and slave states.

NBC/WSJ poll: Support for Roe v. Wade hits new high

Even if Roe v. Wade is overturned...eventually the Dems will control the SCOTUS again.

And then the Dems in power will bring out an abortion legalization law and the SCOTUS will support it.

Support for abortion is growing - not shrinking.

Like it or not, abortion is here to stay - whether out in the open or in back alley clinic's.

AND THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO TO STOP IT.


BTW - I do NOT support abortion after there is brain activity. But before that - okay.

Eventually, future generations will look back and agree that roe v wade was an abomination. Same thing happened with slavery. We look back at a disease that was corrected.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

This talk of "Roe v. Wade" being "overturned" is nonsense.

When you wade through all the bullshit of RvW, you find the following basic scenario: First trimester, there is a "right" to obtain an abortion; Second trimester, the state can "regulate" abortion; Third trimester, it's a person and you can't kill it.

This hasn't been the law in DECADES. Christ, under New York's new law, an "abortion" can be performed during childbirth!

What the USSC ought to do is simply decline to rule on abortion cases in the future, and saying that it is an issue that REQUIRES a constitutional amendment to define when PERSONHOOD begins. This is NOT a job for the fucking COURTS, but rather for the PEOPLES' REPRESENTATIVES in the Congress.

Virginia is now debating killing the baby after it is born.

 

[Cecilie1200]

That's why democrats want abortions to be performed by hires right off the street.

That's true, New York has brought back back alley abortions, only they will be performed inside the clinic.

It is a mystery to me how abortion advocates can insist that they're concerned about the best interests of women, and then fight to have serious, risky medical procedures performed by any schlub who wanders in off the street.