It Looks LIke That SOB bush Gets Caught Lying...AGAIN!!

I am of the opinion, though, that when it comes to war, you go all the way or not at all.

Well, we can agree with that. Hanoi should have received a few atom bombs and ended their BS before it started. AFghanistan, same-o
 
Normally I would say yes, but alas, they were LIED to by Bush to vote the way they did. His LIES were so good, only a few knew until years later after Bush started joking about his WMD LIES. After thousands had died, and Billions were wasted in his LYING pursuit. Of course you know that............ Don't you?? LOL!!! These fucking rightys haven't a clue, even today. I am not suppose to discuss their family's, so I won't. I just wonder what these rightys tell their next door neighbors wife & children about there war hero Bush, that gets back to his house.



Democrat Quotes on Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction




"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

snopes.com: Weapons of Mass Destruction Quotes

Two things.

First, for the people BEFORE 2001, they didn't attack Saddam, whatever they said, whatever the rhetoric.

For the people AFTER 2001, Bush lied about Iraq. Slam dunk. Yellowcake. Before the smoking gun becomes a mushroom cloud.

We knew it was Osama that attacked the US, NOT Saddam.

So there is no argument here. Bush let Bin Laden go. And he tricked America into attacking Iraq.

Those are the facts. And the proof? We are still in Iraq and Bin Laden is sending us love letters.

Yes, it's just that simple.

:lol::eusa_whistle:
 
You know, Bush Jr. told us a while ago that we didn't waterboard.

uhm I think he denied water boarding was torture...... he denied he did it at all? :eusa_eh: I never heard that can you link to it please?

Waterboarding is NOT torture. Every Marine gets waterboarded in training. Bush didn't lie, he said waterboarding was not toture...except if you are talking to a liberal pussy.
It's like the word "racism": Its meaning has been watered down to mean "something a liberal doesn't like"...and so it's useless as a meaningful word.
 
Bush admits it, so what is your problem?? Are facts beyond what the typical rightwinged trailer trash can Handel? All stuffed up with Rushkie BS for the day?

The world is better off without Saddam Hussein, Bush said, even though the invasion that toppled the Iraqi leader was based on faulty intelligence about the existence of weapons of mass destruction.

"When we didn't find weapons I felt terrible about it, sick about it and still do, because a lot of the case in removing Saddam Hussein was based upon weapons of mass destruction," Bush said. He added that Hussein was "equally dangerous" without WMDs.

So finally you admit there was no lie.

I admit nothing. He lied to get into Iraq, he found no WMDs, and now, according to him, his lie didn't pan out and he "terrible about it, sick about it ." That is just remorse for his crimes, but does not mean he didn't lie about WMDs. Bush asked for fake INTEL, and got what he asked for. Bush ignored the inspecters & everybody else that disagreed with him. He said he didn't care what the UN said, he was going in. Now he feels terrible?? LMAO!!! He probably feels terrible for a lot of things.................

Saddam didn't have much to fight with during the first gulf war. Then they impose economic sanctions on Iraq, have the UN prowling around for years looking for weapons, and somehow through all that, he was supposed to be able to build some deadly weapons that could destroy the US? I didn't believe it then, and it's pretty apparent now that it was a trumped up story.

Iraq was a rather small country surrounded by enemies, and it seemed that he wanted to give him neighbors the impression that his war power was stronger than it was--just to keep them at bay. But it's highly doubtful, with the combined intelligence work of the US and the UN, that the administration didn't know the truth.
 
Hahahahahahah!!!

The dumb Palooka CON is STILL on that RIDICULOUSLY ASSINIE story about 200Mil a day.

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!
icon_rotflmao.gif
icon_rotflmao.gif
icon_rotflmao.gif
icon_rotflmao.gif
icon_rotflmao.gif
icon_rotflmao.gif
icon_rotflmao.gif
icon_rotflmao.gif
icon_rotflmao.gif
icon_rotflmao.gif

Are you black or just stupid?

Yes he is black and what kind of ignorant asinine question is that?

Thanks Ringel, but don't worry, I don't get bothered when the true racism of a CON Bagger raises its head. I deal with this stuff all the time.

These people can't help themselves, they are sick.

I pity them.
 
I am of the opinion, though, that when it comes to war, you go all the way or not at all.

Well, we can agree with that. Hanoi should have received a few atom bombs and ended their BS before it started. AFghanistan, same-o

vietnam shouldn't have been fought. but since it was, I don't see why we didn't bomb the hell out of the north with conventional bombs. another example of fighting a war with one's hand tied around the nuts. carter's meddling started the our afghan mess.
 
Normally I would say yes, but alas, they were LIED to by Bush to vote the way they did. His LIES were so good, only a few knew until years later after Bush started joking about his WMD LIES. After thousands had died, and Billions were wasted in his LYING pursuit. Of course you know that............ Don't you?? LOL!!! These fucking rightys haven't a clue, even today. I am not suppose to discuss their family's, so I won't. I just wonder what these rightys tell their next door neighbors wife & children about there war hero Bush, that gets back to his house.



Democrat Quotes on Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction




"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

snopes.com: Weapons of Mass Destruction Quotes

Two things.

First, for the people BEFORE 2001, they didn't attack Saddam, whatever they said, whatever the rhetoric.

For the people AFTER 2001, Bush lied about Iraq. Slam dunk. Yellowcake. Before the smoking gun becomes a mushroom cloud.

We knew it was Osama that attacked the US, NOT Saddam.

So there is no argument here. Bush let Bin Laden go. And he tricked America into attacking Iraq.

Those are the facts. And the proof? We are still in Iraq and Bin Laden is sending us love letters.

Yes, it's just that simple.

serie_kapow-728628.jpg


What a WALLOPING blow!

icon_rotflmao.gif
icon_rotflmao.gif
icon_rotflmao.gif
 
Democrat Quotes on Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction




"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

snopes.com: Weapons of Mass Destruction Quotes

Two things.

First, for the people BEFORE 2001, they didn't attack Saddam, whatever they said, whatever the rhetoric.

For the people AFTER 2001, Bush lied about Iraq. Slam dunk. Yellowcake. Before the smoking gun becomes a mushroom cloud.

We knew it was Osama that attacked the US, NOT Saddam.

So there is no argument here. Bush let Bin Laden go. And he tricked America into attacking Iraq.

Those are the facts. And the proof? We are still in Iraq and Bin Laden is sending us love letters.

Yes, it's just that simple.


What a WALLOPING blow!

did you have to pay rdean for that?
 
I let Ebby know she got Koodoos.... :)

I think Bush will go down in history as the man who lied us into a war. His brand of history will never be known or believed, because historians will always argue against him. Perhaps 20 years from now, the Bush tapes & other documents will be revealed from their secret hiddy-ho, and America will learn the truth. Obama will be no exception.

I find it interesting that we can find out that BP deliberately refused to put a closure device on the well, that other Gulf rigs did, but to get the truth of our President through the records is unachievable. I find that unacceptable considering that information belongs to the people, good or bad, and it prevents justice from being done, and allows murders & such to go without punishment or be stopped.
I couldn't agree more.
 
Normally I would say yes, but alas, they were LIED to by Bush to vote the way they did. His LIES were so good, only a few knew until years later after Bush started joking about his WMD LIES. After thousands had died, and Billions were wasted in his LYING pursuit. Of course you know that............ Don't you?? LOL!!! These fucking rightys haven't a clue, even today. I am not suppose to discuss their family's, so I won't. I just wonder what these rightys tell their next door neighbors wife & children about there war hero Bush, that gets back to his house.

So, you're saying Democrats were fooled by a man too stupid to not choke on a pretzel.

Good job! :clap2:

Bush admits it, so what is your problem?? Are facts beyond what the typical rightwinged trailer trash can Handel? All stuffed up with Rushkie BS for the day?

The world is better off without Saddam Hussein, Bush said, even though the invasion that toppled the Iraqi leader was based on faulty intelligence about the existence of weapons of mass destruction.

"When we didn't find weapons I felt terrible about it, sick about it and still do, because a lot of the case in removing Saddam Hussein was based upon weapons of mass destruction," Bush said. He added that Hussein was "equally dangerous" without WMDs.
Think about it, genius:

Bush is stupid.

Bush fooled all the Democrats.

All the Democrats are even stupider than Bush.

Good job! :clap2:
 
Bush admits it, so what is your problem?? Are facts beyond what the typical rightwinged trailer trash can Handel? All stuffed up with Rushkie BS for the day?

The world is better off without Saddam Hussein, Bush said, even though the invasion that toppled the Iraqi leader was based on faulty intelligence about the existence of weapons of mass destruction.

"When we didn't find weapons I felt terrible about it, sick about it and still do, because a lot of the case in removing Saddam Hussein was based upon weapons of mass destruction," Bush said. He added that Hussein was "equally dangerous" without WMDs.

So finally you admit there was no lie.

I admit nothing. He lied to get into Iraq, he found no WMDs, and now, according to him, his lie didn't pan out and he "terrible about it, sick about it ." That is just remorse for his crimes, but does not mean he didn't lie about WMDs. Bush asked for fake INTEL, and got what he asked for. Bush ignored the inspecters & everybody else that disagreed with him. He said he didn't care what the UN said, he was going in. Now he feels terrible?? LMAO!!! He probably feels terrible for a lot of things.................

He didn't promise to find WMD, he said that Saddam had WMD. :cuckoo:
 
So finally you admit there was no lie.

I admit nothing. He lied to get into Iraq, he found no WMDs, and now, according to him, his lie didn't pan out and he "terrible about it, sick about it ." That is just remorse for his crimes, but does not mean he didn't lie about WMDs. Bush asked for fake INTEL, and got what he asked for. Bush ignored the inspecters & everybody else that disagreed with him. He said he didn't care what the UN said, he was going in. Now he feels terrible?? LMAO!!! He probably feels terrible for a lot of things.................

Saddam didn't have much to fight with during the first gulf war. Then they impose economic sanctions on Iraq, have the UN prowling around for years looking for weapons, and somehow through all that, he was supposed to be able to build some deadly weapons that could destroy the US? I didn't believe it then, and it's pretty apparent now that it was a trumped up story.

Iraq was a rather small country surrounded by enemies, and it seemed that he wanted to give him neighbors the impression that his war power was stronger than it was--just to keep them at bay. But it's highly doubtful, with the combined intelligence work of the US and the UN, that the administration didn't know the truth.

Most intelligence agencies in the world believed him. He was a very convincing player. Too convincing for his own good. Of course he didn't believe we would actually come back either.
 
You folks are kinda hard on the gentleman from Texas, aren't you? Compared to the POS we have for a President now, Bush wins hands down.

WRONG MFer!! America and the WORLD are 100 times better off now that that sorry sack of shat is out of office.

His dumb ass needs to be thrown UNDER the jail!!!

Wrong twat stank. Listen up, MFER, a/k/a Malcolm Ex-lax. America is vastly WORSE off now that your Obamessiah is busy infesting the White House. And because of that, the World is much worse off.

The sorry sack of shit is the one we presently call, "Mr. President."

His dumb ass needs to be tossed OUT of the White House. Election Day 2012 is such a terribly long time to have to wait for, but that's the time frame we are stuck with. Inauguration Day 2013 could turn out to be the start of one good final chance or America to save itself. Save itself from M'f'cking stupid twatwaffles like you, Malcolm Ex-lax.

Have a great day, now. Don't forget to wipe the President's jizz off your chin, schmuck, when you have finished your daily ritual of playing Monica Lewinsky for him. (Does he pretend he's at least a marginally competent President, like Bubba, when you are playing Monica for him? Does he make you wear a blue dress?)
 
So finally you admit there was no lie.

I admit nothing. He lied to get into Iraq, he found no WMDs, and now, according to him, his lie didn't pan out and he "terrible about it, sick about it ." That is just remorse for his crimes, but does not mean he didn't lie about WMDs. Bush asked for fake INTEL, and got what he asked for. Bush ignored the inspecters & everybody else that disagreed with him. He said he didn't care what the UN said, he was going in. Now he feels terrible?? LMAO!!! He probably feels terrible for a lot of things.................

He didn't promise to find WMD, he said that Saddam had WMD. :cuckoo:

So did quite a few other folks... like Clinton (both), Gore, Kerry, Albright, Berger, Reid, Levin, Daschle, Leiberman, McCain, Pelosi, Graham, Waxman, Kennedy....

Next...

:razz:
 
Normally I would say yes, but alas, they were LIED to by Bush to vote the way they did. His LIES were so good, only a few knew until years later after Bush started joking about his WMD LIES. After thousands had died, and Billions were wasted in his LYING pursuit. Of course you know that............ Don't you?? LOL!!! These fucking rightys haven't a clue, even today. I am not suppose to discuss their family's, so I won't. I just wonder what these rightys tell their next door neighbors wife & children about there war hero Bush, that gets back to his house.



Democrat Quotes on Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction




"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

snopes.com: Weapons of Mass Destruction Quotes

Two things.

First, for the people BEFORE 2001, they didn't attack Saddam, whatever they said, whatever the rhetoric.

For the people AFTER 2001, Bush lied about Iraq. Slam dunk. Yellowcake. Before the smoking gun becomes a mushroom cloud.

We knew it was Osama that attacked the US, NOT Saddam.

So there is no argument here. Bush let Bin Laden go. And he tricked America into attacking Iraq.

Those are the facts. And the proof? We are still in Iraq and Bin Laden is sending us love letters.

Yes, it's just that simple.

Do you have any knowledge of history?

What on earth was the First Gulf War about? And it was fought with the UN's approval.
 

Forum List

Back
Top