Israel's Border Wars - Is CENSORED really defending itself in 2023

[José]

This excerpt makes you wonder whether Yigal Allon and Moshe Dayan are Israel's or South Africa's national heroes, but this comparison is extremely unfair... to South Africa...

The white supremacist state never had a policy of murdering undocumented black south africans for not having a valid passport or pass to be in the country. They were simply arrested and sent back to their "countries" (read, bantustans) of origin.

ISRAEL'S BORDER WARS​

In private conversations and internal correspondence, Israeli officers made no bones about the policy of shooting infiltrators, armed or unarmed, bent on harvesting, grazing, resettlement, or sabotage.

On 4 June 1949, OC Southern Command General Yigal Allon said that he had declared an eight-kilometre-deep strip along the Israeli side of both the Israeli-Jordanian and Israeli-Egyptian borders 'military area: every stranger found in [them] will be shot, without interrogation'. (He claimed that his had reduced infiltration.)

A month later, on 3 July 1949, Dayan, OD Jerusalem District, wrote that 'our army has an order to shoot at anyone trying to cross the [Israeli-Jordanian] border to our side and at everyone found in "the security zone" (several kilometres deep along the border) who is not in possession of a special pass'. Dayan felt that the Jordanians had no right to 'interfere' with 'our tough [keshiha] behaviour towards infiltrators'. The following month, Dayan's assistant on the IJMAC declared: 'I did not commit myself that we would arrest rather than shoot trespassers. In previous instances, I informed the Legion representative that anyone crossing the border was endagering his life.'

Or, as the American military attaché in Tel Aviv put it, simply: the 'Israel defense policy is shoot to kill all Arabs violating frontiers'.

COMMENT:

They talked openly about the shoot-to-kill policy "in private conversations and internal correspondence", not in front of the international or even the Israeli press because even they were too embarrassed and ashamed to admit the carnage.

 

[José]

It's hard for people who were exposed to the false narrative that Palestinians attack and Israel retaliates their whole lives to come to terms with the fact that every attack on Israel is a reaction to Israel's shoot-to-kill policy described by Morris in Border Wars.

Some years ago, I told Dogmaphobe that between 48 and 56 Israel murdered more than 6.000 unarmed palestinians attempting to return to their homes without citing the source and his reaction was:

LIES!! STOP LYING JOSÉ!!

The only reason he's not calling me a liar again is the fact that this time I provided the source, so I'm protected behind Benny Morris' historic research.

 

[surada]

The historic events that unfolded in Palestine during the first months of 1948 and the following years were exaustively researched by the legendary israeli historian Benny Morris:

Just a humorous aside to lighten up things:

Morris is a fanatic dog lover.

When journalists from around the world go to Israel to interview him they all say Morris' dogs were walking around his home all the time. They say Morris had to interrupt the interview several times to intervene in their playful (and destructive) skirmishes.

His friends often say his two passions are:

1 The history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

2 Dogs.

but not necessarily in this order.

His most famous work describes the 1948 armed conflict that involved arab militias-guerrillas, and later arab armies and the zionist "militias" that constituted a real army in all but name and the uprooting of 700,000 palestinian arabs, the vast majority of them illiterate peasants:

But Morris also wrote a kind of sequence to his most famous work, the infinitely less known but no less important:

in which he delivers a detailed (and gruesome) survey of the border situation in the immediate aftermath of the 1948 war and the following years.

Israel's Border Wars describes the clash the gave origin to the present palestinian armed struggle, a clash that pitted the IDF, no longer against the arab militias and arab armies of the 1948 war, but against the hundreds of thousands of displaced palestinian peasants trying to resume their normal lives during and after the war (in what became the new state of Israel but what they continued to see as their homeland)

The basic message of the book is that the mental image that most people have about the conflict:

Palestinians attack Israel, Israel retaliates is based on a grotesque distortion of this post-1948 period described by Morris.

So let's make an exploratory journey into the pages of "Israel's Border Wars" and try to find an answer to the question that gave this thread its title:

"Is the Jewish Racial Dictatorship really defending itself in 2023?"

By 1948 the Zionists had killed over 600 British peacekeepers including Count Folke in who saved 30,000 Jews from the Holocaust.

Ruthless cruelty is not new.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

By 1948 the Zionists had killed over 600 British peacekeepers

How many innocent people had the Arabs in "Palestine" killed up to that date?

 

[José]

Originally posted by surada
By 1948 the Zionists had killed over 600 British peacekeepers including Count Folke in who saved 30,000 Jews from the Holocaust.

Ruthless cruelty is not new.

"British peacekeepers"...

Interesting name for the british army of occupation that, for 30 years, shoved zionist colonialism down the throat of the native population.

 

[José]

Originally posted by Toddsterpatriot
How many innocent people had the Arabs in "Palestine" killed up to that date?

Before the mass murder of Palestinians described in Israel's Border Wars, the native population of Palestine was more than willing to deport the european colonists back to Europe in a humane, dignified manner but in case you haven't noticed their homeland was under the foreign occupation of a superpower.

 

[José]

Notice the fear, the psychological distress Backagain, The Duke, Lord Long Rod and Lisa558 felt when they realized I was exposing the massacre of thousands of unarmed palestinians that gave rise to the present phase of the conflict:

Really, Evilcat?

his book "Israel's Border Wars" in which he cites Israel's "shoot-to-kill policy" and describes, in gruesome detail, the more than 8.000 unarmed palestinian peasants murdered in cold blood by the IDF

JOSÉ

You are as gullible as fuck.

You are more gullible than I thought.

You don’t like Israel. We get it.

Nobody gives a flip that you don’t like Israel.
You’re just another turn in the sewer.

Notice The Duke's defensive, frightened attitude:

If anything, the only thing surprising is the fact that that zionist hardliner wrote "Israel's Border Wars" at all... revealing the massacre of 8.000 unarmed palestinian peasants by the IDF durring the span of 8 years.

JOSÉ​

Due to the actions of HAMAS, there will be 8000 this week, easily.

See Lisa558 playing the anti-semitic card against me driven by the desperation of confronting the atrocities committed by the jewish racial dictatorship... As if the historical facts described by Benny Morris could be "anti-semitic":

More specifically, he is an antisemite who doesn’t like Jews.

LISA558​

To finish this post, take a look at Lord Long Rod's violent outburst, calling me a "toad", in a state of total desperation, being confronted with the historical validation of Israel's massacre of unarmed palestinian peasants:

The reason Backagain, Lisa, Dogmaphobe stubornly refuse to accept the facts laid out by Morris in Israel's Border Wars is the fact that it is extremely painful for them to abandon the idealized image of the jewish people that was created after WWII as the "super victims of the human history" always being harmed by Gentiles and never harming anyone.

Morris' book exposes the fact that the creation of Israel was as brutal, immoral and inhumane as any other ethnocracy like America, Australia or South Africa and that the suffering was inflicted by the jewish colonizers. The book destroys the moral relativism that says "both sides are wrong" and clearly shows that just like any other ethnocratic conflict in History, you have natives and colonizers, dispossessed and usurpers, dehumanized and dehumanizers.

Backagain, Lisa, Dogma and Duke cannot forgive Morris for the supreme heresy of shattering their most precious myth, the myth of the perpetual victimhood of the jewish people, the myth of the immaculate nature of the jewish state.

They refuse to believe the facts narrated by Morris just like 16th century astronomers refused to look through Galileo's telescope if they had to renounce to Aristotle's heaven.

At this point the whole debate becomes a religious issue much more than a political or historical one.

JOSÉ

^ This toad supports cutting heads off of Jewish babies!!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Before the mass murder of Palestinians described in Israel's Border Wars, the native population of Palestine was more than willing to deport the european colonists back to Europe in a humane, dignified manner but in case you haven't noticed their homeland was under the foreign occupation of a superpower.

You mean the Arabs on Ottoman land?