Comrade
Senior Member
José said:I always enter Saudi chatlines where I bash Saudi Arabias theocratic monarchy to my hearts content.
One of the less offensive things I say there is that travelling to Saudi is the closest experience one can get of living in a medieval feud without building a time machine.
Now ask yourself this:
Does the fact that the arab world is dominated by dictatorships somehow justifies the existance of a jewish racial dictatorship in the Middle East that denies citizenship and the right to rebuild their original communities to millions of displaced arabs?
I dont have to answer that question, because you cannot claim the fact that there is a jewish racial dictatorship. Let me reiterate;
1. Immigration policy into a sovereign state which is legislated by a democratically selected group of representatives is NOT what defines a dictatorship. Your version of apartheid in Isreal is confused, and has no resemblence to whathappened internally within the South African state.
2. Preferences revolving around nation of origin, social status, individual skillset, national security concerns and so on are entirely within the right of a sovereign state to determine. And you should really stop confusing race with religion. You realize there are black Jews, dont you?
3. A racial dictatorship would not allow equal civil rights (incl. Freedom to worship) and democratic representation to its more than 20% minority, as does Israel . I think you need a new catch phrase to make any sense here.
Does the fact that Africa is dominated by dictatorships somehow justified the existance of a boer racial dictatorship in the southern part of that continent that denied citizenship to millions of displaced black africans kept herded against their will in impoverished, overcrowded pseudo-republics called Bantustans?
You disregard the difference being that Israel has no sovereignty over Gaza and the West bank, and is in a de-facto state of war with the terrorists in those regions. Those regions are incapable and unwilling to form their own semblance of real democracy given their feeding off the teat of the UN and a social system of rewarding acts of aggression against the citizens of Isreal, which is a separate sovereign state capable of forming a stable, Liberal Democracy.
To solve this problem, we must cut the flow of money and arms to the Palestinians and make all international aid conditional based on accountable and sincere efforts at rebuilding a productive society. I'd like to see this conditional upon equal rights and individual liberties guaranteed by a Democratic and Representative government someday, but just getting the Palestinians working again is a start.
You cannot unleash such a society which arms its children and calls upon the deaths of all Jews upon a democratic and civil people and expect anything less than a complete bloodbath.
How can a racial dictatorship be legitimised by a standard dictatorship?
What kind of twisted logic is that?
Your trying to make some kind of contrued racial dictatorship more eeeevil than the standard one. Just to attack a Liberal democracy. Thats pretty twisted.
I believe that Aristotles work, Sophistic Refutations should be mandatory reading for anyone who wants to participate in any kind of debate, real world or online.
When I see arguments like that quoted above I sadly lose my faith on my species' ability to think properly.
Arent you the condescending one! Part of being brilliant is convincing others that you are. Youre not doing a great job here.
When you choose between a jewish ethnocracy like Israel, and a dictatorship like Syria, you are not choosing between a democracy and a dictatorship.
You are choosing between two kinds of dictatorships:
A racial dictatorship that denies civil rights to millions of displaced people whose only crime is to belong to the unofficial ethnicity.
And a dictatorship that denies civil rights to all its population.
And this is in fact a logical fallacy known as false dichotomy.
You dont have to make a choice between Israel and Syria, you can and must oppose both dictatorships.
You also imply that the fact that the lybian government denies many civil rights to its population somehow justifies the fact that Israel denies civil rights to millions of arab refugees.
THIS IS CLEARLY AN INVALID ARGUMENT, COMRADE.
Again, I see no proof of this racial dictatorship ruling Israel from you. That invalidates all of the above.
Bad behaviour does not justify bad behaviour and arab dictatorships do not justify jewish racial dictatorships.
If B is unproven to be related to A, then whether A is bad has no relation on B.
If you want to come into a message board and be taken seriously you have to present valid arguments, not flagrant logical fallacies.
Do you follow your own advice?