Israel on Sunday confiscated nearly 1,000 acres of privately owned Palestinian land near an Israeli

Probably this one from 1922.



PALESTINE.


CORRESPONDENCE
WITH THE
PALESTINE ARAB DELEGATION
AND THE
ZIONIST ORGANISATION.


Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty.
JUNE, 1922.
LONDON:





PUBLISHED BY HIS MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE.
To be purchased directly from H.M. STATIONERY OFFICE, at the
following address:
Adastra House, Kingsway, London, W.C. 2; 120, George Street, Edinburgh:
York Street, Manchester; 1, St. Andre's Crescent, Cardiff;
15, Donegall Square West, Belfast; or through any Bookseller


Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable. -


- See more at: UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization British policy in Palestine Churchill White Paper - UK documentation Cmd. 1700 Non-UN document excerpts 1 July 1922


And you forget the People of Palestine in 1922 were the Jews, the arab muslims thought of themselves as Syrians or Egyptians until 1964 when Arafat stole the term to give his terrorist group some credibility.

No, the people of Palestine were Arab Palestinian people as shown in the correspondence. The Jews were Zionists and were represented by the Zionist Organization, also as stated in the correspondence. I guess your case of cognizant dissonance is getting worse. LOL

How many times do I have to slap you around with your own propaganda, you terrorist worshiping bitch?

A 364 of 3 September 1947

163. The Arabs of Palestine consider themselves as having a "natural" right to that country, although they have not been in possession of it as a sovereign nation.

166. The desire of the Arab people of Palestine to safeguard their national existence is a very natural desire. However, Palestinian nationalism, as distinct from Arab nationalism, is itself a relatively new phenomenon, which appeared only after the division of the "Arab rectangle" by the settlement of the First World War.

175. The Peel Commission, in referring to the matter, had noted in its report that "there was a time when Arab statesmen were willing to consider giving Palestine to the Jews, provided that the rest of Arab Asia was free. That condition was not fulfilled then, but it is on the eve of fulfilment now".

So, what does that have to do with the right of the people of Palestine to be treated the same as other people of the former Ottoman territories. What's your point? Because Palestinian nationalism was a recent phenomenon in 1922, it negates their right under Article 22 of the LoN Covenant?



Their rights under the LoN Covenant were upheld at all times, they themselves decided to make illegal demands that they knew would result in violence. They did not learn any lessons from their constant attacks and are still in the same position they were in 1923. The people of Palestine as you call them are proven illegal migrants that flooded in on the promise of work when the crops failed in Syria and Egypt.
 
Probably this one from 1922.



PALESTINE.


CORRESPONDENCE
WITH THE
PALESTINE ARAB DELEGATION
AND THE
ZIONIST ORGANISATION.


Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty.
JUNE, 1922.
LONDON:





PUBLISHED BY HIS MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE.
To be purchased directly from H.M. STATIONERY OFFICE, at the
following address:
Adastra House, Kingsway, London, W.C. 2; 120, George Street, Edinburgh:
York Street, Manchester; 1, St. Andre's Crescent, Cardiff;
15, Donegall Square West, Belfast; or through any Bookseller


Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable. -


- See more at: UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization British policy in Palestine Churchill White Paper - UK documentation Cmd. 1700 Non-UN document excerpts 1 July 1922




And you forget the People of Palestine in 1922 were the Jews, the arab muslims thought of themselves as Syrians or Egyptians until 1964 when Arafat stole the term to give his terrorist group some credibility.

Why did the Christians and Muslims call themselves the people of Palestine in their correspondence with Britain in 1922 as shown in the letters?




They didn't they called themselves Syrians, they used the term to mean MANDATE FOR PALESTINE and already had the name south Syria for the new Jew and Christian free state. Their battle cry was First the Saturday people, then the Sunday people.
 
Then why is my reply to the post still on the thread, You claimed that the Jews were gassing the arab muslims like the Nazis gassed the Jews and provided the video as your proof. You then faced ridicule and piss taking over your stupid comparison and tried to save face and failed.

You are a total moron and cant see that your Jew hatred is ruling your life
Maybe one day junior, when you grow up, you might start acting like a responsible adult. But until then, you're just a little lying 15 year old whose morally bankrupt.




Making you a spoilt brat of 12 who stamps their feet and throws themselves to the floor when they cant get their own way. Will have to start calling you Cartman
 
Exactly. The land was conquered Ottoman territory and after 700 years of Ottoman rule the conquering powers decided to give all of the land to Muslims, except for less than 1% was designated as the Jewish homeland, to which the land originally belonged. The Jews had maintained a love and presence in the land for over 3000 years. It is not up to a bunch of intolerant savage Arabs who are invaders themselves to make those kinds of decisions regarding land which wasn't ruled by Arabs for 700 years. Get with the program.



UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization British policy in Palestine Churchill White Paper - UK documentation Cmd. 1700 Non-UN document excerpts 1 July 1922

4. With regard to Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, I am to observe that this Article, in so far as it applies to territories severed from the Ottoman Empire, has been interpreted by the Principal Allied Powers in Articles 94 to 97 of the Treaty of Sevres, Syria and Iraq are explicitly referred to in Article 94 of that Treaty as having been provisionally recognised as Independent States, in accordance with the fourth paragraph of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations. Article 95, on the other hand, makes no such reference to Palestine. The reason for this is that, as stated in that Article, the Mandatory is to be responsible for putting into effect the Declaration originally made on the 2nd November, 1917, by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a National Home for the Jewish people.


6. Your Delegation and the community which they represent, imperfectly apprehend the interpretation placed by His Majesty's Government upon the policy of the National Home for the Jewish people. This interpretation was publicly given in Palestine on the 3rd June, 1921, by the High Commissioner in the following words :—

" These words (National Home) mean that the Jews, who are a people scattered throughout the world, but whose hearts are always turned to Palestine should be enabled to found here their home, and that some amongst them, within the limits fixed by numbers and the interests of the present population, should come to Palestine in order to help by their resources and efforts to develop the country to the advantage of all its inhabitants."

This interpretation was endorsed by the Secretary of State in his speech to the House of Commons on the 14th June, 1921. Mr. Churchill is reluctant to believe that your Delegation, or the people whom they represent, can entertain any objection in principle to the policy as thus interpreted.



Well it seems that the interpretation, stated in the letter (which was not validated by the LoN or later by the UN) was incorrect as the UN confirms that Palestine was a Class A Mandate. It was only because of the "mass movement of Jews to Palestine" after the Nazis came to power that it would require "the devising of solutions outside the framework of the normal evolution of a Class A Mandate". As A/364 confirms:

"15. It is not without significance that only since the rise of nazism to power in Germany, with the resultant mass movement of Jews to Palestine, has the Palestine question become sufficiently acute to require the devising of solutions outside the framework of the normal evolution of an "A" Mandate. Thus, all of the significant solutions devised for Palestine are of comparatively recent origin."

A 364 of 3 September 1947





MORE RACIST LIES as International Law granted the Jews of the world the right to migrate to Palestine and create their National Home. The Lon and later the UN should have sent in heavily armed troops to push the arab muslim illegal immigrants back to Syria and placed garrisons along the borders of Israel. It has always been the arab muslims resorting to violence and terrorism that has caused the problems because of their religious belief that all the world is Islamic owned land.
 
The Europeans had no sovereignty either. They were colonists.




No they were invited migrants who owned the land held in trust for them. The GREEDY ARROGANT arab muslims want everything and they are now finding they cant have it.
 
So what.
The Europeans had no sovereignty either. They were colonists.

A 364 of 3 September 1947


163. The Arabs of Palestine consider themselves as having a "natural" right to that country, although they have not been in possession of it as a sovereign nation.


166. The desire of the Arab people of Palestine to safeguard their national existence is a very natural desire. However, Palestinian nationalism, as distinct from Arab nationalism, is itself a relatively new phenomenon, which appeared only after the division of the "Arab rectangle" by the settlement of the First World War.

What does that prove? That Europeans had a right to colonize the land and evict the Christians and Muslims? You are a nutcase.




They evicted themselves if you read the reports, the one prepared to live in peace are still Israeli citizens, the ones resorting to violence are landless illegal immigrants.
 
Monte you haven't stated fact since your sock appeared on this forum. You post edited documents, lies, false propaganda, and neo Nazi garbage, all because you hate Jews more than you love life.

I have only stated fact. You only spout propaganda.




You post edited documents, lies, false propaganda, and neo Nazi garbage, all because you hate Jews more than you love life.
 
So what.
The Europeans had no sovereignty either. They were colonists.

A 364 of 3 September 1947


163. The Arabs of Palestine consider themselves as having a "natural" right to that country, although they have not been in possession of it as a sovereign nation.


166. The desire of the Arab people of Palestine to safeguard their national existence is a very natural desire. However, Palestinian nationalism, as distinct from Arab nationalism, is itself a relatively new phenomenon, which appeared only after the division of the "Arab rectangle" by the settlement of the First World War.

What does that prove? That Europeans had a right to colonize the land and evict the Christians and Muslims? You are a nutcase.

The land didn't belong to the Arabs for them to be colonized. As I clearly showed, the Jews kept a presence for 3000 years.

The Muslims and Christians owned more than 85% of the land after the Europeans bought as much as they could afford. Then they stole the rest.





NO they possessed it, which means they stole it from the original owners, and the MANDATE FOR PALESTINE decreed that the land was for the Jewish National Home and was held in trust by the LoN until such as they could declare independence and stand on their own feet. At that date the land became Jewish national land. Try reading other history reports other than islamomoron propaganda ones.
 
So what.
A 364 of 3 September 1947


163. The Arabs of Palestine consider themselves as having a "natural" right to that country, although they have not been in possession of it as a sovereign nation.


166. The desire of the Arab people of Palestine to safeguard their national existence is a very natural desire. However, Palestinian nationalism, as distinct from Arab nationalism, is itself a relatively new phenomenon, which appeared only after the division of the "Arab rectangle" by the settlement of the First World War.

What does that prove? That Europeans had a right to colonize the land and evict the Christians and Muslims? You are a nutcase.

The land didn't belong to the Arabs for them to be colonized. As I clearly showed, the Jews kept a presence for 3000 years.

The Muslims and Christians owned more than 85% of the land after the Europeans bought as much as they could afford. Then they stole the rest.

The people who stole were those that invaded, raped, looted and slaughtered in the Jewish holy land, aka the Arabs.

Mahmoud, your propaganda is failing, and you are flailing.

You have been drinking too much. Fact is not propaganda.




Then you have been smoking too much hashish
 
So what.
The Europeans had no sovereignty either. They were colonists.

A 364 of 3 September 1947


163. The Arabs of Palestine consider themselves as having a "natural" right to that country, although they have not been in possession of it as a sovereign nation.


166. The desire of the Arab people of Palestine to safeguard their national existence is a very natural desire. However, Palestinian nationalism, as distinct from Arab nationalism, is itself a relatively new phenomenon, which appeared only after the division of the "Arab rectangle" by the settlement of the First World War.

What does that prove? That Europeans had a right to colonize the land and evict the Christians and Muslims? You are a nutcase.

The land didn't belong to the Arabs for them to be colonized. As I clearly showed, the Jews kept a presence for 3000 years.

The Muslims and Christians owned more than 85% of the land after the Europeans bought as much as they could afford. Then they stole the rest.





NO they possessed it, which means they stole it from the original owners, and the MANDATE FOR PALESTINE decreed that the land was for the Jewish National Home and was held in trust by the LoN until such as they could declare independence and stand on their own feet. At that date the land became Jewish national land. Try reading other history reports other than islamomoron propaganda ones.
That is not what the Mandate said.
 
So what.
A 364 of 3 September 1947


163. The Arabs of Palestine consider themselves as having a "natural" right to that country, although they have not been in possession of it as a sovereign nation.


166. The desire of the Arab people of Palestine to safeguard their national existence is a very natural desire. However, Palestinian nationalism, as distinct from Arab nationalism, is itself a relatively new phenomenon, which appeared only after the division of the "Arab rectangle" by the settlement of the First World War.

What does that prove? That Europeans had a right to colonize the land and evict the Christians and Muslims? You are a nutcase.

The land didn't belong to the Arabs for them to be colonized. As I clearly showed, the Jews kept a presence for 3000 years.

The Muslims and Christians owned more than 85% of the land after the Europeans bought as much as they could afford. Then they stole the rest.





NO they possessed it, which means they stole it from the original owners, and the MANDATE FOR PALESTINE decreed that the land was for the Jewish National Home and was held in trust by the LoN until such as they could declare independence and stand on their own feet. At that date the land became Jewish national land. Try reading other history reports other than islamomoron propaganda ones.
That is not what the Mandate said.




LINK ?
 
So what.
What does that prove? That Europeans had a right to colonize the land and evict the Christians and Muslims? You are a nutcase.

The land didn't belong to the Arabs for them to be colonized. As I clearly showed, the Jews kept a presence for 3000 years.

The Muslims and Christians owned more than 85% of the land after the Europeans bought as much as they could afford. Then they stole the rest.





NO they possessed it, which means they stole it from the original owners, and the MANDATE FOR PALESTINE decreed that the land was for the Jewish National Home and was held in trust by the LoN until such as they could declare independence and stand on their own feet. At that date the land became Jewish national land. Try reading other history reports other than islamomoron propaganda ones.
That is not what the Mandate said.




LINK ?

No. It doesn't work that way. You Phoeny need to provide some neutral source that claims that the LoN and/or the Mandate for Palestine stated that the land in Palestine was held in trust by the British so that it could be given to the European Jews at the expense of 95% of the population (which was Christian and Muslim) at the time.

You will have a hard time finding anything of the sort. While that was probably the criminal intent of the British, putting it in writing or even stating the intention of committing such a crime against 95% of the population would have sunk the whole criminal colonial project.
 
So what.
What does that prove? That Europeans had a right to colonize the land and evict the Christians and Muslims? You are a nutcase.

The land didn't belong to the Arabs for them to be colonized. As I clearly showed, the Jews kept a presence for 3000 years.

The Muslims and Christians owned more than 85% of the land after the Europeans bought as much as they could afford. Then they stole the rest.





NO they possessed it, which means they stole it from the original owners, and the MANDATE FOR PALESTINE decreed that the land was for the Jewish National Home and was held in trust by the LoN until such as they could declare independence and stand on their own feet. At that date the land became Jewish national land. Try reading other history reports other than islamomoron propaganda ones.
That is not what the Mandate said.




LINK ?
The Avalon Project The Palestine Mandate
 
The land didn't belong to the Arabs for them to be colonized. As I clearly showed, the Jews kept a presence for 3000 years.

The Muslims and Christians owned more than 85% of the land after the Europeans bought as much as they could afford. Then they stole the rest.





NO they possessed it, which means they stole it from the original owners, and the MANDATE FOR PALESTINE decreed that the land was for the Jewish National Home and was held in trust by the LoN until such as they could declare independence and stand on their own feet. At that date the land became Jewish national land. Try reading other history reports other than islamomoron propaganda ones.
That is not what the Mandate said.




LINK ?

No. It doesn't work that way. You Phoeny need to provide some neutral source that claims that the LoN and/or the Mandate for Palestine stated that the land in Palestine was held in trust by the British so that it could be given to the European Jews at the expense of 95% of the population (which was Christian and Muslim) at the time.

You will have a hard time finding anything of the sort. While that was probably the criminal intent of the British, putting it in writing or even stating the intention of committing such a crime against 95% of the population would have sunk the whole criminal colonial project.




MANDATE FOR PALESTINE Abdul that became international law. It even gave the co-ordinates of the land allocated as the Jewish National home.


Delineating the final geographical area of Palestine designated for the Jewish National Home on September 16, 1922, as described by the Mandatory:


PALESTINE



INTRODUCTORY.


POSITION, ETC.​


Palestine lies on the western edge of the continent of Asia between Latitude 30º N. and 33º N., Longitude 34º 30’ E. and 35º 30’ E.

On the North it is bounded by the French Mandated Territories of Syria and Lebanon, on the East by Syria and Trans-Jordan, on the South-west by the Egyptian province of Sinai, on the South-east by the Gulf of Aqaba and on the West by the Mediterranean. The frontier with Syria was laid down by the Anglo-French Convention of the 23rd December, 1920, and its delimitation was ratified in 1923. Briefly stated, the boundaries are as follows: -

North. – From Ras en Naqura on the Mediterranean eastwards to a point west of Qadas, thence in a northerly direction to Metulla, thence east to a point west of Banias.

East. – From Banias in a southerly direction east of Lake Hula to Jisr Banat Ya’pub, thence along a line east of the Jordan and the Lake of Tiberias and on to El Hamme station on the Samakh-Deraa railway line, thence along the centre of the river Yarmuq to its confluence with the Jordan, thence along the centres of the Jordan, the Dead Sea and the Wadi Araba to a point on the Gulf of Aqaba two miles west of the town of Aqaba, thence along the shore of the Gulf of Aqaba to Ras Jaba.

South. – From Ras Jaba in a generally north-westerly direction to the junction of the Neki-Aqaba and Gaza-Aqaba Roads, thence to a point west-north-west of Ain Maghara and thence to a point on the Mediterranean coast north-west of Rafa.

West. – The Mediterranean Sea.





The Avalon Project The Palestine Mandate



The Palestine Mandate
The Council of the League of Nations:
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and

Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country; and

Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country



ART. 4.
An appropriate Jewish agency shall be recognised as a public body for the purpose of advising and co-operating with the Administration of Palestine in such economic, social and other matters as may affect the establishment of the Jewish national home and the interests of the Jewish population in Palestine, and, subject always to the control of the Administration to assist and take part in the development of the country.

The Zionist organization, so long as its organization and constitution are in the opinion of the Mandatory appropriate, shall be recognised as such agency. It shall take steps in consultation with His Britannic Majesty's Government to secure the co-operation of all Jews who are willing to assist in the establishment of the Jewish national home.

ART. 6.
The Administration of Palestine, while ensuring that the rights and position of other sections of the population are not prejudiced, shall facilitate Jewish immigration under suitable conditions and shall encourage, in co-operation with the Jewish agency referred to in Article 4, close settlement by Jews on the land, including State lands and waste lands not required for public purposes


ART. 7.
The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.



An official document that can be cross referenced with the many others making it unbiased and neutral.

YOU LOSE AGAIN abdul
 
The land didn't belong to the Arabs for them to be colonized. As I clearly showed, the Jews kept a presence for 3000 years.

The Muslims and Christians owned more than 85% of the land after the Europeans bought as much as they could afford. Then they stole the rest.





NO they possessed it, which means they stole it from the original owners, and the MANDATE FOR PALESTINE decreed that the land was for the Jewish National Home and was held in trust by the LoN until such as they could declare independence and stand on their own feet. At that date the land became Jewish national land. Try reading other history reports other than islamomoron propaganda ones.
That is not what the Mandate said.




LINK ?
The Avalon Project The Palestine Mandate





Which says


The Palestine Mandate
The Council of the League of Nations:
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and

Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country; and

Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country; and

Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have selected His Britannic Majesty as the Mandatory for Palestine; and

Whereas the mandate in respect of Palestine has been formulated in the following terms and submitted to the Council of the League for approval; and

Whereas His Britannic Majesty has accepted the mandate in respect of Palestine and undertaken to exercise it on behalf of the League of Nations in conformity with the following provisions; and

Whereas by the afore-mentioned Article 22 (paragraph 8), it is provided that the degree of authority, control or administration to be exercised by the Mandatory, not having been previously agreed upon by the Members of the League, shall be explicitly defined by the Council of the League Of Nations;


Clear enough for you or do you want taking through it word by word.
 

Forum List

Back
Top