Israel on Sunday confiscated nearly 1,000 acres of privately owned Palestinian land near an Israeli

[montelatici]

Exactly. The land was conquered Ottoman territory and after 700 years of Ottoman rule the conquering powers decided to give all of the land to Muslims, except for less than 1% was designated as the Jewish homeland, to which the land originally belonged. The Jews had maintained a love and presence in the land for over 3000 years. It is not up to a bunch of intolerant savage Arabs who are invaders themselves to make those kinds of decisions regarding land which wasn't ruled by Arabs for 700 years. Get with the program.



UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization British policy in Palestine Churchill White Paper - UK documentation Cmd. 1700 Non-UN document excerpts 1 July 1922

4. With regard to Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, I am to observe that this Article, in so far as it applies to territories severed from the Ottoman Empire, has been interpreted by the Principal Allied Powers in Articles 94 to 97 of the Treaty of Sevres, Syria and Iraq are explicitly referred to in Article 94 of that Treaty as having been provisionally recognised as Independent States, in accordance with the fourth paragraph of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations. Article 95, on the other hand, makes no such reference to Palestine. The reason for this is that, as stated in that Article, the Mandatory is to be responsible for putting into effect the Declaration originally made on the 2nd November, 1917, by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a National Home for the Jewish people.


6. Your Delegation and the community which they represent, imperfectly apprehend the interpretation placed by His Majesty's Government upon the policy of the National Home for the Jewish people. This interpretation was publicly given in Palestine on the 3rd June, 1921, by the High Commissioner in the following words :—

" These words (National Home) mean that the Jews, who are a people scattered throughout the world, but whose hearts are always turned to Palestine should be enabled to found here their home, and that some amongst them, within the limits fixed by numbers and the interests of the present population, should come to Palestine in order to help by their resources and efforts to develop the country to the advantage of all its inhabitants."

This interpretation was endorsed by the Secretary of State in his speech to the House of Commons on the 14th June, 1921. Mr. Churchill is reluctant to believe that your Delegation, or the people whom they represent, can entertain any objection in principle to the policy as thus interpreted.

Well it seems that the interpretation, stated in the letter (which was not validated by the LoN or later by the UN) was incorrect as the UN confirms that Palestine was a Class A Mandate. It was only because of the "mass movement of Jews to Palestine" after the Nazis came to power that it would require "the devising of solutions outside the framework of the normal evolution of a Class A Mandate". As A/364 confirms:

"15. It is not without significance that only since the rise of nazism to power in Germany, with the resultant mass movement of Jews to Palestine, has the Palestine question become sufficiently acute to require the devising of solutions outside the framework of the normal evolution of an "A" Mandate. Thus, all of the significant solutions devised for Palestine are of comparatively recent origin."

A 364 of 3 September 1947

 

[Roudy]

Big deal. Point is 99% of the land was established as Muslim Arab states, and Israel became the Jewish state.

There were no Palestinians or Palestinians people nor did the "Arab people of Palestine" have any sovereignty over the land at any time. The reason the land was allocated to the Jews was because Jews had maintained a presence throughout the millennia, and the land is holier for them than it is any other religion.

Israel has been the Jewish state for over 65 years now and succeeding and thriving. Move on, or keep spouting your lies and hatred, who gives a shit, Israel will continue moving forward Achmed.

 

[montelatici]

The Europeans had no sovereignty either. They were colonists.

 

[montelatici]

I just state fact, Ruddy.

 

[Roudy]

Probably this one from 1922.

PALESTINE.

CORRESPONDENCE
WITH THE
PALESTINE ARAB DELEGATION
AND THE
ZIONIST ORGANISATION.

Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty.
JUNE, 1922.
LONDON:




PUBLISHED BY HIS MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE.
To be purchased directly from H.M. STATIONERY OFFICE, at the
following address:
Adastra House, Kingsway, London, W.C. 2; 120, George Street, Edinburgh:
York Street, Manchester; 1, St. Andre's Crescent, Cardiff;
15, Donegall Square West, Belfast; or through any Bookseller
​

Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable. -


- See more at: UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization British policy in Palestine Churchill White Paper - UK documentation Cmd. 1700 Non-UN document excerpts 1 July 1922

And you forget the People of Palestine in 1922 were the Jews, the arab muslims thought of themselves as Syrians or Egyptians until 1964 when Arafat stole the term to give his terrorist group some credibility.

Why did the Christians and Muslims call themselves the people of Palestine in their correspondence with Britain in 1922 as shown in the letters?

Are you stooopid or blind? It says: "PALESTINE ARAB DELEGATION"

Jews weren't Arabs, dickhead. In 1922, there was going to be a Jewish Palestine, which is today's Israel, and an Arab Palestine which is today's Jordan.

 

[Roudy]

The Europeans had no sovereignty either. They were colonists.

A 364 of 3 September 1947


163. The Arabs of Palestine consider themselves as having a "natural" right to that country, although they have not been in possession of it as a sovereign nation.


166. The desire of the Arab people of Palestine to safeguard their national existence is a very natural desire. However, Palestinian nationalism, as distinct from Arab nationalism, is itself a relatively new phenomenon, which appeared only after the division of the "Arab rectangle" by the settlement of the First World War.

 

[montelatici]

So what.

The Europeans had no sovereignty either. They were colonists.

A 364 of 3 September 1947


163. The Arabs of Palestine consider themselves as having a "natural" right to that country, although they have not been in possession of it as a sovereign nation.


166. The desire of the Arab people of Palestine to safeguard their national existence is a very natural desire. However, Palestinian nationalism, as distinct from Arab nationalism, is itself a relatively new phenomenon, which appeared only after the division of the "Arab rectangle" by the settlement of the First World War.

What does that prove? That Europeans had a right to colonize the land and evict the Christians and Muslims? You are a nutcase.

 

[Roudy]

Monte you haven't stated fact since your sock appeared on this forum. You post edited documents, lies, false propaganda, and neo Nazi garbage, all because you hate Jews more than you love life.

 

[Roudy]

So what.

The Europeans had no sovereignty either. They were colonists.

A 364 of 3 September 1947


163. The Arabs of Palestine consider themselves as having a "natural" right to that country, although they have not been in possession of it as a sovereign nation.


166. The desire of the Arab people of Palestine to safeguard their national existence is a very natural desire. However, Palestinian nationalism, as distinct from Arab nationalism, is itself a relatively new phenomenon, which appeared only after the division of the "Arab rectangle" by the settlement of the First World War.

What does that prove? That Europeans had a right to colonize the land and evict the Christians and Muslims? You are a nutcase.

The land didn't belong to the Arabs for them to be colonized. As I clearly showed, the Jews kept a presence for 3000 years.

 

[montelatici]

Monte you haven't stated fact since your sock appeared on this forum. You post edited documents, lies, false propaganda, and neo Nazi garbage, all because you hate Jews more than you love life.

I have only stated fact. You only spout propaganda.

 

[montelatici]

So what.

The Europeans had no sovereignty either. They were colonists.

A 364 of 3 September 1947


163. The Arabs of Palestine consider themselves as having a "natural" right to that country, although they have not been in possession of it as a sovereign nation.


166. The desire of the Arab people of Palestine to safeguard their national existence is a very natural desire. However, Palestinian nationalism, as distinct from Arab nationalism, is itself a relatively new phenomenon, which appeared only after the division of the "Arab rectangle" by the settlement of the First World War.

What does that prove? That Europeans had a right to colonize the land and evict the Christians and Muslims? You are a nutcase.

The land didn't belong to the Arabs for them to be colonized. As I clearly showed, the Jews kept a presence for 3000 years.

The Muslims and Christians owned more than 85% of the land after the Europeans bought as much as they could afford. Then they stole the rest.

 

[Roudy]

The Europeans had no sovereignty either. They were colonists.

Hah? When will you get it right, lamebrain? The land was Ottoman territory for 700 years and then the Ottomans were defeated by the Europeans, who then proceeded to divide the conquered land into the many shithole Muslim states we see today. Arabs themselves spread out over the region by invading and slaughtering people, they were no less barbaric than the Ottomans, just not as effective militarily.

You know who didn't have sovereignty over the land for 700 years? Arabs and their newly invented name "Palestinians".

 

[Roudy]

So what.

The Europeans had no sovereignty either. They were colonists.

A 364 of 3 September 1947


163. The Arabs of Palestine consider themselves as having a "natural" right to that country, although they have not been in possession of it as a sovereign nation.


166. The desire of the Arab people of Palestine to safeguard their national existence is a very natural desire. However, Palestinian nationalism, as distinct from Arab nationalism, is itself a relatively new phenomenon, which appeared only after the division of the "Arab rectangle" by the settlement of the First World War.

What does that prove? That Europeans had a right to colonize the land and evict the Christians and Muslims? You are a nutcase.

The land didn't belong to the Arabs for them to be colonized. As I clearly showed, the Jews kept a presence for 3000 years.

The Muslims and Christians owned more than 85% of the land after the Europeans bought as much as they could afford. Then they stole the rest.

The people who stole were those that invaded, raped, looted and slaughtered in the Jewish holy land, aka the Arabs.

Mahmoud, your propaganda is failing, and you are flailing.

 

[montelatici]

The Europeans Jews didn't have sovereignty over the land either. At least the Christians and Muslims owned more than 85% of it in 1943.

 

[montelatici]

So what.

The Europeans had no sovereignty either. They were colonists.

A 364 of 3 September 1947


163. The Arabs of Palestine consider themselves as having a "natural" right to that country, although they have not been in possession of it as a sovereign nation.


166. The desire of the Arab people of Palestine to safeguard their national existence is a very natural desire. However, Palestinian nationalism, as distinct from Arab nationalism, is itself a relatively new phenomenon, which appeared only after the division of the "Arab rectangle" by the settlement of the First World War.

What does that prove? That Europeans had a right to colonize the land and evict the Christians and Muslims? You are a nutcase.

The land didn't belong to the Arabs for them to be colonized. As I clearly showed, the Jews kept a presence for 3000 years.

The Muslims and Christians owned more than 85% of the land after the Europeans bought as much as they could afford. Then they stole the rest.

The people who stole were those that invaded, raped, looted and slaughtered in the Jewish holy land, aka the Arabs.

Mahmoud, your propaganda is failing, and you are flailing.

You have been drinking too much. Fact is not propaganda.

 

[Roudy]

Monte you haven't stated fact since your sock appeared on this forum. You post edited documents, lies, false propaganda, and neo Nazi garbage, all because you hate Jews more than you love life.

I have only stated fact. You only spout propaganda.

What fact was that?

 

[Roudy]

The Europeans Jews didn't have sovereignty over the land either. At least the Christians and Muslims owned more than 85% of it in 1943.

You mean after they invaded they ended up owning more land. Sure, that's how Muslim animals operate. They pulled the same shit in Lebanon and Egypt. In Israel they invaded illegally in the hundreds of thousands in the late 18th century and early 19th as observed by legitimate sources. That's how Jerusalem changed from majority Jewish in 1850's to majority Muslim in early 19th. THEY INVADED. LOL

 

[Roudy]

So what.

A 364 of 3 September 1947


163. The Arabs of Palestine consider themselves as having a "natural" right to that country, although they have not been in possession of it as a sovereign nation.


166. The desire of the Arab people of Palestine to safeguard their national existence is a very natural desire. However, Palestinian nationalism, as distinct from Arab nationalism, is itself a relatively new phenomenon, which appeared only after the division of the "Arab rectangle" by the settlement of the First World War.

What does that prove? That Europeans had a right to colonize the land and evict the Christians and Muslims? You are a nutcase.

The land didn't belong to the Arabs for them to be colonized. As I clearly showed, the Jews kept a presence for 3000 years.

The Muslims and Christians owned more than 85% of the land after the Europeans bought as much as they could afford. Then they stole the rest.

The people who stole were those that invaded, raped, looted and slaughtered in the Jewish holy land, aka the Arabs.

Mahmoud, your propaganda is failing, and you are flailing.

You have been drinking too much. Fact is not propaganda.

Last I checked almost everybody on this board thinks you're a disgusting propagandist and a Jew hater.

Some self reflection is in order, but since you bigots have no self respect or shame, you keep humiliating yourself in public.

 

[Billo_Really]

You mean go Habs !

Although I did predict a Anaheim - Montreal final.

Lets go back to that day. You were comparing Israel to Nazis, and I made a list of comments like "Let me know when Israel does (something the Nazis did)
One of those comments was 'Let me know when Israel gasses the Palestinians.


You responded with something like "Oh really?" followed by a video of the IDF using tear gas during a Palestinian riot.

Would you say that is accurate ?

Yes.

 

[Billo_Really]

Then why is my reply to the post still on the thread, You claimed that the Jews were gassing the arab muslims like the Nazis gassed the Jews and provided the video as your proof. You then faced ridicule and piss taking over your stupid comparison and tried to save face and failed.

You are a total moron and cant see that your Jew hatred is ruling your life

Maybe one day junior, when you grow up, you might start acting like a responsible adult. But until then, you're just a little lying 15 year old whose morally bankrupt.