Israel offers to end the blockade; Hamas refuses

[P F Tinmore]

There is not enough information to decide if it is a good or bad deal.

lol There's more than enough information to know it would be enormously beneficial to the people living in Gaza.

Not really. They usually don't mention the clunkers.

There are no clunkers. The economy of Gaza would be revitalized and there would be no danger of war. If you had any interest at all in the welfare of the people in Gaza, you would be condemning Hamas for refusing this offer.

Like the "generous offer" presented to the Palestinians in 2000, nobody mentions the clunkers.

 

[toomuchtime_]

There is not enough information to decide if it is a good or bad deal.

lol There's more than enough information to know it would be enormously beneficial to the people living in Gaza.

Not really. They usually don't mention the clunkers.

There are no clunkers. The economy of Gaza would be revitalized and there would be no danger of war. If you had any interest at all in the welfare of the people in Gaza, you would be condemning Hamas for refusing this offer.

Like the "generous offer" presented to the Palestinians in 2000, nobody mentions the clunkers.

Why don't you just come clean and admit you cherish the conflict?

 

[P F Tinmore]

There is not enough information to decide if it is a good or bad deal.

lol There's more than enough information to know it would be enormously beneficial to the people living in Gaza.

Not really. They usually don't mention the clunkers.

There are no clunkers. The economy of Gaza would be revitalized and there would be no danger of war. If you had any interest at all in the welfare of the people in Gaza, you would be condemning Hamas for refusing this offer.

Like the "generous offer" presented to the Palestinians in 2000, nobody mentions the clunkers.

Why don't you just come clean and admit you cherish the conflict?

You say that because all you have seen is the Israeli propaganda version.

 

[Bleipriester]

Asking Hamas to disarm is a joke.

Why would asking Hamas to disarm and live at peace with Israel be a "joke"?

Both sides should disarm.

Why a double standard?

Israel recognized the sovereignty of Egypt and Jordan without requiring them to disarm.

Why not Palestine?

 

[Hollie]

Asking Hamas to disarm is a joke.

Why would asking Hamas to disarm and live at peace with Israel be a "joke"?

Both sides should disarm.

Why a double standard?

Israel recognized the sovereignty of Egypt and Jordan without requiring them to disarm.

Why not Palestine?

Maybe you should read the Hamas charter.

 

[Bleipriester]

Asking Hamas to disarm is a joke.

Why would asking Hamas to disarm and live at peace with Israel be a "joke"?

Both sides should disarm.

Why a double standard?

Israel recognized the sovereignty of Egypt and Jordan without requiring them to disarm.

Why not Palestine?

Maybe you should read the Hamas charter.

Hamas isnt Palestine.

 

[Hollie]

Why would asking Hamas to disarm and live at peace with Israel be a "joke"?

Both sides should disarm.

Why a double standard?

Israel recognized the sovereignty of Egypt and Jordan without requiring them to disarm.

Why not Palestine?

Maybe you should read the Hamas charter.

Hamas isnt Palestine.

Hamas controls a version of Pal'istan. Hamas was elected by Gaza'istanians to political office.

Have you read the Hamas charter?

 

[Bleipriester]

Both sides should disarm.

Why a double standard?

Israel recognized the sovereignty of Egypt and Jordan without requiring them to disarm.

Why not Palestine?

Maybe you should read the Hamas charter.

Hamas isnt Palestine.

Hamas controls a version of Pal'istan. Hamas was elected by Gaza'istanians to political office.

Have you read the Hamas charter?

I dont care for both sides desire to abolish each other.

 

[toomuchtime_]

lol There's more than enough information to know it would be enormously beneficial to the people living in Gaza.

Not really. They usually don't mention the clunkers.

There are no clunkers. The economy of Gaza would be revitalized and there would be no danger of war. If you had any interest at all in the welfare of the people in Gaza, you would be condemning Hamas for refusing this offer.

Like the "generous offer" presented to the Palestinians in 2000, nobody mentions the clunkers.

Why don't you just come clean and admit you cherish the conflict?

You say that because all you have seen is the Israeli propaganda version.

No, I say that because it is clear you don't see the Palestinians as people but only as political abstractions. Here you reject an offer that would have clearly improved the lives of the people living in Gaza by opening trade and travel to them, by producing at least tens of thousands of new jobs, by making them safer from further wars on the pretext of "hidden clunkers" because you see them only as a political movement and not as human beings.

 

[MJB12741]

Not really. They usually don't mention the clunkers.

There are no clunkers. The economy of Gaza would be revitalized and there would be no danger of war. If you had any interest at all in the welfare of the people in Gaza, you would be condemning Hamas for refusing this offer.

Like the "generous offer" presented to the Palestinians in 2000, nobody mentions the clunkers.

Why don't you just come clean and admit you cherish the conflict?

You say that because all you have seen is the Israeli propaganda version.

No, I say that because it is clear you don't see the Palestinians as people but only as political abstractions. Here you reject an offer that would have clearly improved the lives of the people living in Gaza by opening trade and travel to them, by producing at least tens of thousands of new jobs, by making them safer from further wars on the pretext of "hidden clunkers" because you see them only as a political movement and not as human beings.

Israel should stop making any offers at all to the Palestinians. And Israel should stop placating any of the endless Palestinian demands. Give them their Jew free Gaza & you get rocket missiles for a thank you.

 

[toomuchtime_]

There are no clunkers. The economy of Gaza would be revitalized and there would be no danger of war. If you had any interest at all in the welfare of the people in Gaza, you would be condemning Hamas for refusing this offer.

Like the "generous offer" presented to the Palestinians in 2000, nobody mentions the clunkers.

Why don't you just come clean and admit you cherish the conflict?

You say that because all you have seen is the Israeli propaganda version.

No, I say that because it is clear you don't see the Palestinians as people but only as political abstractions. Here you reject an offer that would have clearly improved the lives of the people living in Gaza by opening trade and travel to them, by producing at least tens of thousands of new jobs, by making them safer from further wars on the pretext of "hidden clunkers" because you see them only as a political movement and not as human beings.

Israel should stop making any offers at all to the Palestinians. And Israel should stop placating any of the endless Palestinian demands. Give them their Jew free Gaza & you get rocket missiles for a thank you.

They are there and Israel can't just ignore them. Liberman has previously said if there is another war Israel will retake Gaza and dismantle the whole Hamas infrastructure, but now he is giving the choice of peace and prosperity. The second choice is better for both Jews and Arabs but if Hamas chooses war again, Israel is prepared for that, too.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Not really. They usually don't mention the clunkers.

There are no clunkers. The economy of Gaza would be revitalized and there would be no danger of war. If you had any interest at all in the welfare of the people in Gaza, you would be condemning Hamas for refusing this offer.

Like the "generous offer" presented to the Palestinians in 2000, nobody mentions the clunkers.

Why don't you just come clean and admit you cherish the conflict?

You say that because all you have seen is the Israeli propaganda version.

No, I say that because it is clear you don't see the Palestinians as people but only as political abstractions. Here you reject an offer that would have clearly improved the lives of the people living in Gaza by opening trade and travel to them, by producing at least tens of thousands of new jobs, by making them safer from further wars on the pretext of "hidden clunkers" because you see them only as a political movement and not as human beings.

You are just blowing smoke. You don't know the details of the offer.

 

[danielpalos]

should we bargain with the Chinese for some new cities; anywhere it may be easy and convenient for Government?

 

[toomuchtime_]

There are no clunkers. The economy of Gaza would be revitalized and there would be no danger of war. If you had any interest at all in the welfare of the people in Gaza, you would be condemning Hamas for refusing this offer.

Like the "generous offer" presented to the Palestinians in 2000, nobody mentions the clunkers.

Why don't you just come clean and admit you cherish the conflict?

You say that because all you have seen is the Israeli propaganda version.

No, I say that because it is clear you don't see the Palestinians as people but only as political abstractions. Here you reject an offer that would have clearly improved the lives of the people living in Gaza by opening trade and travel to them, by producing at least tens of thousands of new jobs, by making them safer from further wars on the pretext of "hidden clunkers" because you see them only as a political movement and not as human beings.

You are just blowing smoke. You don't know the details of the offer.

We know enough about it to know it would have greatly improved the quality of life for the people lining in Gaza and we know enough about you to know you have no interest in the welfare of the people living in Gaza.

 

[danielpalos]

we can claim to be helping to "subsidize ancient secrets, now".

 

[P F Tinmore]

Like the "generous offer" presented to the Palestinians in 2000, nobody mentions the clunkers.

Why don't you just come clean and admit you cherish the conflict?

You say that because all you have seen is the Israeli propaganda version.

No, I say that because it is clear you don't see the Palestinians as people but only as political abstractions. Here you reject an offer that would have clearly improved the lives of the people living in Gaza by opening trade and travel to them, by producing at least tens of thousands of new jobs, by making them safer from further wars on the pretext of "hidden clunkers" because you see them only as a political movement and not as human beings.

You are just blowing smoke. You don't know the details of the offer.

We know enough about it to know it would have greatly improved the quality of life for the people lining in Gaza and we know enough about you to know you have no interest in the welfare of the people living in Gaza.

They should not fall into a trap like the one set for them in 2000.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Why don't you just come clean and admit you cherish the conflict?

You say that because all you have seen is the Israeli propaganda version.

No, I say that because it is clear you don't see the Palestinians as people but only as political abstractions. Here you reject an offer that would have clearly improved the lives of the people living in Gaza by opening trade and travel to them, by producing at least tens of thousands of new jobs, by making them safer from further wars on the pretext of "hidden clunkers" because you see them only as a political movement and not as human beings.

You are just blowing smoke. You don't know the details of the offer.

We know enough about it to know it would have greatly improved the quality of life for the people lining in Gaza and we know enough about you to know you have no interest in the welfare of the people living in Gaza.

They should not fall into a trap like the one set for them in 2000.

The problem is that when you say, they, you are talking about them as a movement, not as human beings seeking better lives for themselves and their families.

 

[P F Tinmore]

You say that because all you have seen is the Israeli propaganda version.

No, I say that because it is clear you don't see the Palestinians as people but only as political abstractions. Here you reject an offer that would have clearly improved the lives of the people living in Gaza by opening trade and travel to them, by producing at least tens of thousands of new jobs, by making them safer from further wars on the pretext of "hidden clunkers" because you see them only as a political movement and not as human beings.

You are just blowing smoke. You don't know the details of the offer.

We know enough about it to know it would have greatly improved the quality of life for the people lining in Gaza and we know enough about you to know you have no interest in the welfare of the people living in Gaza.

They should not fall into a trap like the one set for them in 2000.

The problem is that when you say, they, you are talking about them as a movement, not as human beings seeking better lives for themselves and their families.

WTF?

 

[toomuchtime_]

No, I say that because it is clear you don't see the Palestinians as people but only as political abstractions. Here you reject an offer that would have clearly improved the lives of the people living in Gaza by opening trade and travel to them, by producing at least tens of thousands of new jobs, by making them safer from further wars on the pretext of "hidden clunkers" because you see them only as a political movement and not as human beings.

You are just blowing smoke. You don't know the details of the offer.

We know enough about it to know it would have greatly improved the quality of life for the people lining in Gaza and we know enough about you to know you have no interest in the welfare of the people living in Gaza.

They should not fall into a trap like the one set for them in 2000.

The problem is that when you say, they, you are talking about them as a movement, not as human beings seeking better lives for themselves and their families.

WTF?

In all of your posts you show no interest in the welfare of Palestinians as individuals seeking better lives for themselves and their families but only as part of a political/military movement. In the present instance you reject the clear benefits to the people living in Gaza as insignificant on the pretext there may be some "hidden clunkers".

 

[MJB12741]

Why is it that Palestinian Israeli citizens want to remain in Israel rather than go live in some Arab country?