Is This All That's Left For Us? Where Are The Real Jobs!

This is the outcome of trends that have been ongoing for decades. Obama has been in office for three years. ......

I simply don't understand how people have no sense of history or perspective. These idiots actually think American history started with the Founding Fathers...stopped...then started again in 2009. Idiots.
ok idiot you do realize the democrats have controlled congress for 60+ years in whole or in part since 1946?

Case in point.
 
C'mon....show me the quotes where anyone said "unemployment is best for the economy" and "the more unemployment the better"?

He said unemployment is better than actual jobs.

it's quite clear that Bam Bam wants to keep as many people collecting unemployment insurance as possible.

C'mon now. Stop telling me what you think he said or how you took it. Give me a link where he specifically said "unemployment is better than actual jobs"

If he thinks unemployment creates more jobs than an actual construction project then Bam Bam must think unemployment is better than jobs.
 
Right here.

Nondestructive testing

Nondestructive testing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Companies can't find enough skilled people to fill all the jobs available. Between 32-80 hours of classroom training, depending on method, and 800-1600 OJT hours to get certified and you can work as much as you want. Worldwide.

NDT Jobs Inspection Jobs API CWI 653 510 NACE ACI ICC ICBO NBIC ASHI NDT Resumes rope access inspector

Wiki is a job source? :lol:

You should have looked at the second link. I was using wiki to explain what nondestructive testing is.

Your inability to take the time to learn may explain why you had to start a thread whining about the lack of real jobs. It's not the economy it's your lack of initiative.

Your inability to make an argument stick is dully noted.
Why is unemployment still so high and the number of jobs being created minor and none effective?
 
Wiki is a job source? :lol:

You should have looked at the second link. I was using wiki to explain what nondestructive testing is.

Your inability to take the time to learn may explain why you had to start a thread whining about the lack of real jobs. It's not the economy it's your lack of initiative.

Your inability to make an argument stick is dully noted.
Why is unemployment still so high and the number of jobs being created minor and none effective?

Because people are lazy.

Your thread title asks "Where are the real jobs"? I linked to a jobs website and a career explanation and you dismissed it. I don't care about people not finding jobs, I get a couple job offers a month and work in a career that is severely undermanned.
 
You should have looked at the second link. I was using wiki to explain what nondestructive testing is.

Your inability to take the time to learn may explain why you had to start a thread whining about the lack of real jobs. It's not the economy it's your lack of initiative.

Your inability to make an argument stick is dully noted.
Why is unemployment still so high and the number of jobs being created minor and none effective?

Because people are lazy.

Your thread title asks "Where are the real jobs"? I linked to a jobs website and a career explanation and you dismissed it. I don't care about people not finding jobs, I get a couple job offers a month and work in a career that is severely undermanned.
There are no jobs
 
The petroleum/nat gas industries are practically begging for new hires.
The irony is, Obama is out to destroy two of the most successful prolific industries of the day.
 
Your inability to make an argument stick is dully noted.
Why is unemployment still so high and the number of jobs being created minor and none effective?

Because people are lazy.

Your thread title asks "Where are the real jobs"? I linked to a jobs website and a career explanation and you dismissed it. I don't care about people not finding jobs, I get a couple job offers a month and work in a career that is severely undermanned.
There are no jobs

You're just to lazy to look.
 
You mean welcome to the obama economy

No, it's the Bush economy. Obama wants to rebuild it, but Republicans won't allow government to invest in new technologies. It might create a Democratic landslide.

when will the left stop blaming bush? He's been gone for three years. Time for the man child to become a man and the left to cut the cord.

When? When Republicans stop obstructing government investing in new technology. While regressive right wingers are still arguing global warming is a hoax, China is eating our lunch.

Green China? You'd better believe it

China’s parliament, the National People’s Congress (NPC), recently considered a 'New Energy Industry Development Strategy’ which is to be adopted as a major policy document by the State Council (some changes are expected due to the Fukushima nuclear plant disaster).

According to this proposed development strategy, during 2011-2020, China will invest about $800 billion in seven green energy areas, namely, wind, solar, nuclear, bio-energy, hydro, coal cleaning and smart power grid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win!"

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwFvJog2dMw]John F. Kennedy: "We choose to go to the moon" speech - YouTube[/ame]
 
Education is for snobs.

We don't want our country run by smart people.

That's what's left.
 
The petroleum/nat gas industries are practically begging for new hires.
The irony is, Obama is out to destroy two of the most successful prolific industries of the day.

Why is there more drilling under Obama than Bush? Bush and the Republicans wanted that industry destroyed more? That's what your logic suggests.
 
The petroleum/nat gas industries are practically begging for new hires.
The irony is, Obama is out to destroy two of the most successful prolific industries of the day.

Why is there more drilling under Obama than Bush? Bush and the Republicans wanted that industry destroyed more? That's what your logic suggests.

Still waiting on that link.
 
No, it's the Bush economy. Obama wants to rebuild it, but Republicans won't allow government to invest in new technologies. It might create a Democratic landslide.

when will the left stop blaming bush? He's been gone for three years. Time for the man child to become a man and the left to cut the cord.

When? When Republicans stop obstructing government investing in new technology. While regressive right wingers are still arguing global warming is a hoax, China is eating our lunch.

Green China? You'd better believe it

China’s parliament, the National People’s Congress (NPC), recently considered a 'New Energy Industry Development Strategy’ which is to be adopted as a major policy document by the State Council (some changes are expected due to the Fukushima nuclear plant disaster).

According to this proposed development strategy, during 2011-2020, China will invest about $800 billion in seven green energy areas, namely, wind, solar, nuclear, bio-energy, hydro, coal cleaning and smart power grid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win!"

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwFvJog2dMw]John F. Kennedy: "We choose to go to the moon" speech - YouTube[/ame]

When Republicans stop obstructing government investing in new technology

Obama’s 2011 budget effectively shuts down NASA’s effort to return astronauts to the moon. So why is obama not wanting to make a better moon mission?

http://paranormaldailynews.com/2010...asas-effort-to-return-astronauts-to-the-moon/
 
The petroleum/nat gas industries are practically begging for new hires.
The irony is, Obama is out to destroy two of the most successful prolific industries of the day.

Why is there more drilling under Obama than Bush? Bush and the Republicans wanted that industry destroyed more? That's what your logic suggests.

Three things are apparent in this graph-
The sensitivity of drilling rig counts to the price of oil,
the lack of "more drilling" under Obama,
and your stupidity.
 

Attachments

  • $rig count.gif
    $rig count.gif
    15 KB · Views: 18
Last edited:
The Republicans are gonna get to that just as soon as they get done with the important contraception debate.
 
No, it's the Bush economy. Obama wants to rebuild it, but Republicans won't allow government to invest in new technologies. It might create a Democratic landslide.

when will the left stop blaming bush? He's been gone for three years. Time for the man child to become a man and the left to cut the cord.

The bullshit started with Reagan and Donald Regan. Rwingers want to worship Reagan but none of you idiots seem to recall he raised taxes 17 times. Not a typo---SEVENTEEN times.

He raised taxes so much that the top rate went from 70% to 28%.
Just awful! :lol:
 
The petroleum/nat gas industries are practically begging for new hires.
The irony is, Obama is out to destroy two of the most successful prolific industries of the day.

Why is there more drilling under Obama than Bush? Bush and the Republicans wanted that industry destroyed more? That's what your logic suggests.

Why are there fewer permits issued on Federal land under Obama?
 
when will the left stop blaming bush? He's been gone for three years. Time for the man child to become a man and the left to cut the cord.

When? When Republicans stop obstructing government investing in new technology. While regressive right wingers are still arguing global warming is a hoax, China is eating our lunch.

Green China? You'd better believe it

China’s parliament, the National People’s Congress (NPC), recently considered a 'New Energy Industry Development Strategy’ which is to be adopted as a major policy document by the State Council (some changes are expected due to the Fukushima nuclear plant disaster).

According to this proposed development strategy, during 2011-2020, China will invest about $800 billion in seven green energy areas, namely, wind, solar, nuclear, bio-energy, hydro, coal cleaning and smart power grid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win!"

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwFvJog2dMw]John F. Kennedy: "We choose to go to the moon" speech - YouTube[/ame]

When Republicans stop obstructing government investing in new technology

Obama’s 2011 budget effectively shuts down NASA’s effort to return astronauts to the moon. So why is obama not wanting to make a better moon mission?

http://paranormaldailynews.com/2010...asas-effort-to-return-astronauts-to-the-moon/

We went to the moon in 1969. It is idiotic to do it again, and very costly.

Returning to the moon faced formidable obstacles. For example, the new series of lunar flights would be the first for the country since Apollo 17 in 1972. In the years since, nearly every element of the Apollo program -- from skilled and trained workers to hardware and even launch pads -- had been either abandoned, converted to museum exhibits or refashioned to support the space shuttles, which began flying in 1981. No one knew whether -- or if -- the materials could be reconstituted.
 
When? When Republicans stop obstructing government investing in new technology. While regressive right wingers are still arguing global warming is a hoax, China is eating our lunch.

Green China? You'd better believe it

China’s parliament, the National People’s Congress (NPC), recently considered a 'New Energy Industry Development Strategy’ which is to be adopted as a major policy document by the State Council (some changes are expected due to the Fukushima nuclear plant disaster).

According to this proposed development strategy, during 2011-2020, China will invest about $800 billion in seven green energy areas, namely, wind, solar, nuclear, bio-energy, hydro, coal cleaning and smart power grid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win!"

John F. Kennedy: "We choose to go to the moon" speech - YouTube

When Republicans stop obstructing government investing in new technology

Obama’s 2011 budget effectively shuts down NASA’s effort to return astronauts to the moon. So why is obama not wanting to make a better moon mission?

http://paranormaldailynews.com/2010...asas-effort-to-return-astronauts-to-the-moon/

We went to the moon in 1969. It is idiotic to do it again, and very costly.

Returning to the moon faced formidable obstacles. For example, the new series of lunar flights would be the first for the country since Apollo 17 in 1972. In the years since, nearly every element of the Apollo program -- from skilled and trained workers to hardware and even launch pads -- had been either abandoned, converted to museum exhibits or refashioned to support the space shuttles, which began flying in 1981. No one knew whether -- or if -- the materials could be reconstituted.
Really? So we know all their is to know about the moon with 60 and 70's technology?
 

Forum List

Back
Top