They rearrange the wording of one of those five things, dishonestly, and also extrapolate from them something not logical to extrapolate.
They also think it supports the TAG argument, which it does not.
1. I exist.
Supports the tag argument? No.
2. The Universe exists.
Supports the tag argument? Supports ANY & EVERY CREATION THEORY.
3. God is not disprovable.
Ok, not right now he is not, and right now he is also not provable. Supports the TAG? NO.
4. <INSERT ONE OF YOUR REARRANGED VERSIONS OF #4 HERE>
4 is where the real dishonesty has occurred. GT said that if an all knowing knower existed, than it's an axiom that they KNOW they're all knowing.
What they're attempting to dishonestly extrapolate from that, is the following:
-gt admits the all knowing knower EXISTS! (no, GT doesn't)
-gt admits that absolute knowledge needs a supreme mind as its source (no, GT doesn't)
-gt admits that if god exists, god is necessarily an all knower (no, GT doesn't)
-gt admits that if an all knower exists, it is necessarily the creator of everything (no, GT doesnt)
It's very clear who the liars are, and also those who don't understand what they THINK they're trying to say.