Is The Tea Party Really, Really Racist?

Discussion in 'Race Relations/Racism' started by PoliticalChic, Oct 30, 2011.

  1. PoliticalChic
    Online

    PoliticalChic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    55,956
    Thanks Received:
    15,716
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +25,087
    The radical liberal magazine, Jacobin (Liberals and Racism) had a kind of cutting-edge take on the liberal mantra that all of us on the Right are racist….whatever that means.

    Well written, and thoughtful, it’s worth reading in its entirety.
    If you’re short on time, read just 6a, and 6b. below. Here’s part:

    1. If liberalism appears to wobble on the edge of failure, the fault may arise not from anything liberals have done or have failed to do, but if anything from their own moral blamelessness: Liberalism, in this narrative, is faltering because its enlightened political project has run into a wall of blind, irrational racism.

    2. [The Tea Party produced] a virtual cottage industry developed on liberal websites devoted to spotting real or imputed racist sentiments in the Tea Party milieu…. The argument for the fundamentally racist essence of the opposition owed largely to a concept, drawn from the academic study of public opinion, known as “racial resentment.” Developed in its modern form by University of Michigan political scientist Donald Kinder and his collaborators, racial resentment is both a theory and a body of evidence that purport to illuminate the influence of racial hostility on the political opinions of American whites.

    3 ,,, , “old-fashioned” racism, based on the belief in the inherent inferiority of blacks and other non-whites, was widespread. Since the civil rights revolution, however, that type of racism has faded, only to be replaced by a newer and more subtle form of prejudice. The new version, originally called symbolic racism (now racial resentment), is a blend of anti-black sentiment and traditional individualist American values (the work ethic, personal responsibility, anti-statism), a concoction whose “color-blind” palatability only makes it that much more insidious. According to Kinder, racial resentment is now “the primary ingredient in white opinion on racial affairs.”

    4. ut one conclusion is clear: liberals who have seized on it to furnish themselves with a usable narrative are not so much enlisting in a noble fight against racism as they are indulging in an ideological evasion. Racial resentment is attractive to liberals less because the Right’s racial attitudes are backward (though they are), than because the dominant, non-racial part of its ideology – a reactionary Protestant-capitalist ethic that is deeply entrenched in American discourse – has never been met with any systematic liberal opposition.

    5. … a paper attempting to highlight the role of “racial resentment” in fostering white opposition to Obama’s health reform. Its findings were eagerly flagged on the usual websites like the Huffington Post (“Surprising Way Race Colors Attitudes to Health Care Reform”) and the American Prospect (“Race, Resentment, and Health Care Reform”)…. ). The paper’s findings sounded impressive: “Whites who were racially resentful were less likely to support the health care reform law, even after controlling for age, gender, education level, income level, employment status, party identification, political ideology, the respondent’s attitude towards President Obama and whether or not the individual had health insurance.”

    a. But the numbers looked less impressive. According to the data reported in the paper’s appendix, the effect of racial resentment on support for health care reform was miniscule – it was dwarfed by the effect of political party (more than twice as large), gender (more than three times as large), and, above all, attitudes toward Obama (almost eight times as large).

    b. The crudest sally into the racial resentment literature – and the one that got the most attention, being picked up by NPR, Salon, ThinkProgress, and others — was from the University of Washington’s Institute for the Study of Ethnicity, Race and Sexuality (WISER). The point of the WISER study, which was based on the group’s own poll of seven states (heavily weighted toward states in the Greater South, including none in the northeast), was to make the blunt point that the Tea Party is racist.

    6. As noted above, “racial resentment” is defined by its creators as a blend of racial animus and traditional American individualism. The first point to note, then, is that the label itself is somewhat misleading since, while it highlights the racial aspect of the attitude, it conceals the concept’s close kinship with the individualist ethos.

    a. If the “racial resentment” term itself is misleading, the interpretations put forward by liberals of its role in Tea Partyism or opposition to health care reform are doubly so…. The inference made by liberals is that while Tea Partiers may rant about stimulus or health care reform, what they’re really expressing deep down is their resentment of blacks. But this doesn’t follow, nor does the evidence seem to substantiate it.

    b. … to ask why liberals, when faced with the political idiom of the American Right, gravitate so insistently toward racialized accounts of their motives…. Unable or unwilling to articulate any coherent rebuttal of their opponents’ ideological rhetoric, liberals instinctively resort to accusations that the opposing ideology is covertly racist because racism – unlike Reaganite celebrations of the magic of the market – requires no refutation.


    Wow...and this from an arch liberal!
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2011
  2. Dragon
    Offline

    Dragon Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2011
    Messages:
    5,481
    Thanks Received:
    578
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +579
    LOL what's the difference between "really, really" racist, and just one really?
     
  3. blastoff
    Offline

    blastoff Undocumented Reg. User

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2009
    Messages:
    13,597
    Thanks Received:
    1,718
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    In a galaxy far far away...
    Ratings:
    +4,677
    It must be racist. After all, a few weeks ago some black stooge U.S. Representative said Tea Party folks wanna see blacks swinging from trees. If that's not racist I don't know what is.
     
  4. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist Deplorable Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    23,940
    Thanks Received:
    5,212
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +7,684
    Money shot:
    Why discuss the issues when you can just accuse the other person of racism?

    Another great post from Political Chick! :clap2:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. Bfgrn
    Offline

    Bfgrn Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Messages:
    16,829
    Thanks Received:
    2,480
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,060
    The FACT that the TP launched their first ever national convention with an opening racist, xenophobic speech calling for Jim Crow era sanctions to wildly cheering tea partiers was just misunderstood?

    “If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family anatidae on our hands.”
    Douglas Adams
     
  6. PoliticalChic
    Online

    PoliticalChic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    55,956
    Thanks Received:
    15,716
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +25,087
    "a. If the “racial resentment” term itself is misleading, the interpretations put forward by liberals of its role in Tea Partyism or opposition to health care reform are doubly so…. The inference made by liberals is that while Tea Partiers may rant about stimulus or health care reform, what they’re really expressing deep down is their resentment of blacks. But this doesn’t follow, nor does the evidence seem to substantiate it.

    b. … to ask why liberals, when faced with the political idiom of the American Right, gravitate so insistently toward racialized accounts of their motives…. Unable or unwilling to articulate any coherent rebuttal of their opponents’ ideological rhetoric, liberals instinctively resort to accusations that the opposing ideology is covertly racist because racism – unlike Reaganite celebrations of the magic of the market – requires no refutation."


    BoringFriendlessGuy....behind the times again.
     
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2011
  7. PoliticalChic
    Online

    PoliticalChic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    55,956
    Thanks Received:
    15,716
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +25,087

    In-drag, actually, the title is a little trap that I set to reveal who has read the article, or at least the OP summary, versus those with ADD who have read only the title.

    Thanks for participating in the study.
     
  8. Bfgrn
    Offline

    Bfgrn Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Messages:
    16,829
    Thanks Received:
    2,480
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,060
    Actually I am ahead of the times and ahead of the curve. Why are you avoiding facts? It is a FACT, the first national tea party convention opened with a racist, xenophobic speech by Tom Tancredo who blew the racist dog whistle to loud approval.

    What you are unwittingly doing PC, is trying to advance the conservative attack on language.
     
  9. PoliticalChic
    Online

    PoliticalChic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    55,956
    Thanks Received:
    15,716
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +25,087
    Poor, sad, Boring....
    watching the weapon that has proven successful to the mindless minions of the midden, you know, your side of the aisle, crumble to dust.

    "Racism"....Oooooooo!
    "Racist".....Ohhhhhh noooooo!

    Now, it's laughable.
    It's so five minutes ago....
    It's always Groundhog Day, isn't it?

    I understand that the Jacobin article is way beyond your ability to comprehend, so I went ahead and summarized it for you...
    ....and you still don't get it!


    A liberal intellectual, a rara avis if ever there was one, expounds on how empty the charge is....and always was!!!

    Poor, sad, BoringFriendlessGuy- what kind of vacuous charge will you try to copy from those Lefty talking point?
    It must be so frustrating to lack the abilty to think of one yourself, huh?


    But you’re probably the right one to ask this….do illiterate folks get the full effect of alphabet soup?
     
  10. Bfgrn
    Offline

    Bfgrn Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Messages:
    16,829
    Thanks Received:
    2,480
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,060
    So racism and xenophobia no longer exist. The right has deemed it so by decree.

    So when REAL racism and xenophobia manifest in rants from Tom Tancredo and the tea party calling for re-instituting Jim Crow laws, we must be silent.

    Just make the words go away...


    "I always believed as a speechwriter that if you could persuade the president to commit himself to certain words, he would feel himself committed to the ideas that underlay those words. And the big shock to me has been that although the president said the words, he just did not absorb the ideas. And that is the root of, maybe, everything."
    David Frum - Speechwriter for George W. Bush
     

Share This Page