Is the 'Russia Hacked the Election' Lie Starting to Die?

[bripat9643]

View attachment 114471

Or are there snowflakes still pushing it as gospel?

This is just the beginning and it's going to be a 1000 times worse than Watergate. This is why Trump has banned certain media outlets from attending daily press briefings. But it's not going to work.

Shep Smith of FOX NEWS, in the below video is stating that Trump campaign aids were on the phone with the Russians the VERY DAY that the DNC was being hacked. THOSE PHONE RECORDS NEVER GO AWAY.



If Republicans can do 8 separate investigations into Benghazi (with Obama in office) it's not to hard to imagine what Democrats will do with TREASON. With these massive protests all over the place, and what is going on in Republican town hall meetings right now, it's clear that Democrats will be taking over both houses in 2018.

Salt Lake City Utah



So Republicans have two options:

1. Remove Trump from office immediately to save their honor and the Republican party.
2. Burn the party down to the ground in 2018/2020 and beyond, by ignoring it, adding conspiracy and cover up to Treason.

how does anyone know when or if the DNC servers were hacked? the FBI never looked at them. WTF are you rambling about? pretendland again?

They know the exact date and time when it was hacked into dumbass. They have the records to prove the dates and exact time that phone calls where made by Trump campaign aids to Russian officials also.

Apparently you believe there is a connection between the two.

Proof?

Also, so what if we know the time when the DNC was hacked? I still haven't seen any proof that the Russians did it.

This is still under investigation and you will eventually get your proof. But phone records are always there, with dates and time and phone numbers. I doubt the media is making this up, especially when it's coming from YOUR channel FOX News.



CNN is confirming it too.
Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com

Which is why Trump has been banning media outlets, demanding to know who is leaking information to the media, etc. etc. etc. Trump's non stop denial throughout this that it was the Russians hacking into DNC databases just adds fuel to the fire.

This isn't going away anytime soon. If Republicans try and bury it, they might as well write their own obituaries. Because you can be assured that Democrats won't.

CNN's sources are the same as the NYT's: anonymous sources. In fact, the NYT is the actual source of the CNN story. You have fake news being used as a source for more fake news.

You are truly gullible.

 

[bripat9643]

how does anyone know when or if the DNC servers were hacked? the FBI never looked at them. WTF are you rambling about? pretendland again?

They know the exact date and time when it was hacked into dumbass. They have the records to prove the dates and exact time that phone calls where made by Trump campaign aids to Russian officials also.

Apparently you believe there is a connection between the two.

Proof?

Also, so what if we know the time when the DNC was hacked? I still haven't seen any proof that the Russians did it.

This is still under investigation and you will eventually get your proof. But phone records are always there, with dates and time and phone numbers. I doubt the media is making this up, especially when it's coming from YOUR channel FOX News.



CNN is confirming it too.
Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com

Which is why Trump has been banning media outlets, demanding to know who is leaking information to the media, etc. etc. etc. Trump's non stop denial throughout this that it was the Russians hacking into DNC databases just adds fuel to the fire.

This isn't going away anytime soon. If Republicans try and bury it, they might as well write their own obituaries. Because you can be assured that Democrats won't.

Again, you're only evidence is "anonymous sources." They are about as credible as Hillary explaining how she dodged sniper fire.

They are very credible sources. Shep Smith is not going to hang himself out on a line like he does in this video without something credible in front of him. There is ethics in journalism, believe it or not, and this isn't the Trump News Network, aka the Sean Hannity show.

1. Trump bans specific media outlets
2. Trump continually denied that it was the Russians--even at one point stating that "he knows" people that know more than the FBI, the CIA, the Department of Homeland Security and 13 other intelligence agencies.
3. Trump fires Flynn only after the media and intelligence sources outed him.
4. Trump threatens intelligence officials for leaking information.
5. McCain and Lindsey Graham have been all over this.
6. The senate has an ongoing investigation into Flynn's ties with Russia.
7. The senate has another investigation ongoing into the Russian hacking.

Now you can keep denying this all you want too, but clearly they have the phone records to prove that Trump campaign aids were in contact with high level Russian officials during the CAMPAIGN SEASON.

How do you know they are "credible?" You don't even know who they are.

 

[jc456]

The possible ties between Trump and Russia, explained

The Trumpettes can't handle the truth because they're petrified of it.

There is no "truth" to your paranoid conspiracy theories.

None

 

[oreo]

They know the exact date and time when it was hacked into dumbass. They have the records to prove the dates and exact time that phone calls where made by Trump campaign aids to Russian officials also.

Apparently you believe there is a connection between the two.

Proof?

Also, so what if we know the time when the DNC was hacked? I still haven't seen any proof that the Russians did it.

This is still under investigation and you will eventually get your proof. But phone records are always there, with dates and time and phone numbers. I doubt the media is making this up, especially when it's coming from YOUR channel FOX News.



CNN is confirming it too.
Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com

Which is why Trump has been banning media outlets, demanding to know who is leaking information to the media, etc. etc. etc. Trump's non stop denial throughout this that it was the Russians hacking into DNC databases just adds fuel to the fire.

This isn't going away anytime soon. If Republicans try and bury it, they might as well write their own obituaries. Because you can be assured that Democrats won't.

Again, you're only evidence is "anonymous sources." They are about as credible as Hillary explaining how she dodged sniper fire.

They are very credible sources. Shep Smith is not going to hang himself out on a line like he does in this video without something credible in front of him. There is ethics in journalism, believe it or not, and this isn't the Trump News Network, aka the Sean Hannity show.

1. Trump bans specific media outlets
2. Trump continually denied that it was the Russians--even at one point stating that "he knows" people that know more than the FBI, the CIA, the Department of Homeland Security and 13 other intelligence agencies.
3. Trump fires Flynn only after the media and intelligence sources outed him.
4. Trump threatens intelligence officials for leaking information.
5. McCain and Lindsey Graham have been all over this.
6. The senate has an ongoing investigation into Flynn's ties with Russia.
7. The senate has another investigation ongoing into the Russian hacking.

Now you can keep denying this all you want too, but clearly they have the phone records to prove that Trump campaign aids were in contact with high level Russian officials during the CAMPAIGN SEASON.

How do you know they are "credible?" You don't even know who they are.

I can look at my phone bill and see who I called what date and time it occurred and somehow you think this is "secret information"--LOL Just keep denying it. If Republicans won't do anything about it, be assured that Democrats will. Obama had the Russian phone lines wire tapped once he became aware that it was the Russians that were hacking into the DNC databases, and that's why they knew Flynn lied to Pence and he also lied to the FBI.
Flynn reportedly lied to FBI about sanctions talk with Russian envoy

You can be assured they know a lot more than what they're saying right now.

 

[BULLDOG]

Those that voted for Hillary Clinton are still peddling the Russian Hacking as why Clinton lost in Swing States while ignoring the reality Wikileaks did not cost Clinton a damn thing!

Maybe Clinton voters will soon focus on Jill Stein numbers in those swing states that Clinton should have won and ask how many of Sanders Primary Voters voted for Stein or stayed home because of how leadership in the DNC were making sure Clinton won the primary...

Instead of believing in the Russian hacks Clinton voters should be more angry at their leadership for being the dirty bastards they are!

Only CLINTON voters? Lol
Darrell Issa: We need an independent investigation into the Trump/ Putin ties and it's the law that Sessions should recuse himself from any of these investigations.

Again Wikileaks did not change the results of the vote.

The machines that you voted on were never hacked.

Instead of being mad at Wikileaks maybe those like you should get mad at the Democratic Leadership instead, and as for Issa comment, well how funny now you agree with him but during Obama tenure you thought he was another political whore!

You just don't get it. The slow drip of Wikileaks reports that we have no idea if they were even true, greatly influenced people's opinions. And then when Comey's nonexistent " investigation" came out days before the election, that sealed the deal for Trump. When Comey came out and said, " oops there really isnt an investigation, " it was too late.

I think even the hardest core Deplorables can agree that Putin influenced elections in Europe. Hell it's been confirmed.
So when the connection goes from Putin>>> to Assange>>>> to the press....the thought that Putin didn't manipulate or change the original data is very slim.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Man, that is the dumbest shit I've seen posted in this forum in the last 5 minutes.

Yes, we do know the emails were true. For one thing, no one ever denied that they were true. The reason they didn't is the fact that they can be verified to be genuine by codes imbedded in the email, but you just go on believing that Hillary isn't a great big douche bag like the emails showed.


Furthermore, there is no connection between Putin and Assange. The later has said may times that Russia was not the source of the emails.

Sure, it's been said many times. It's also been said many times that Trump isn't an idiot, and we see how wrong that is.

 

[jc456]

Those that voted for Hillary Clinton are still peddling the Russian Hacking as why Clinton lost in Swing States while ignoring the reality Wikileaks did not cost Clinton a damn thing!

Maybe Clinton voters will soon focus on Jill Stein numbers in those swing states that Clinton should have won and ask how many of Sanders Primary Voters voted for Stein or stayed home because of how leadership in the DNC were making sure Clinton won the primary...

Instead of believing in the Russian hacks Clinton voters should be more angry at their leadership for being the dirty bastards they are!

Only CLINTON voters? Lol
Darrell Issa: We need an independent investigation into the Trump/ Putin ties and it's the law that Sessions should recuse himself from any of these investigations.

Again Wikileaks did not change the results of the vote.

The machines that you voted on were never hacked.

Instead of being mad at Wikileaks maybe those like you should get mad at the Democratic Leadership instead, and as for Issa comment, well how funny now you agree with him but during Obama tenure you thought he was another political whore!

You just don't get it. The slow drip of Wikileaks reports that we have no idea if they were even true, greatly influenced people's opinions. And then when Comey's nonexistent " investigation" came out days before the election, that sealed the deal for Trump. When Comey came out and said, " oops there really isnt an investigation, " it was too late.

I think even the hardest core Deplorables can agree that Putin influenced elections in Europe. Hell it's been confirmed.
So when the connection goes from Putin>>> to Assange>>>> to the press....the thought that Putin didn't manipulate or change the original data is very slim.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Man, that is the dumbest shit I've seen posted in this forum in the last 5 minutes.

Yes, we do know the emails were true. For one thing, no one ever denied that they were true. The reason they didn't is the fact that they can be verified to be genuine by codes imbedded in the email, but you just go on believing that Hillary isn't a great big douche bag like the emails showed.


Furthermore, there is no connection between Putin and Assange. The later has said may times that Russia was not the source of the emails.

Assange is not capable of hacking e-mail servers so he got them from somewhere. Assange does have ties to Russia. He is a liar and nothing more.

Cause you know? How fking stupid do you think anyone is? Fk that

 

[oreo]

Those that voted for Hillary Clinton are still peddling the Russian Hacking as why Clinton lost in Swing States while ignoring the reality Wikileaks did not cost Clinton a damn thing!

Maybe Clinton voters will soon focus on Jill Stein numbers in those swing states that Clinton should have won and ask how many of Sanders Primary Voters voted for Stein or stayed home because of how leadership in the DNC were making sure Clinton won the primary...

Instead of believing in the Russian hacks Clinton voters should be more angry at their leadership for being the dirty bastards they are!

Only CLINTON voters? Lol
Darrell Issa: We need an independent investigation into the Trump/ Putin ties and it's the law that Sessions should recuse himself from any of these investigations.

Again Wikileaks did not change the results of the vote.

The machines that you voted on were never hacked.

Instead of being mad at Wikileaks maybe those like you should get mad at the Democratic Leadership instead, and as for Issa comment, well how funny now you agree with him but during Obama tenure you thought he was another political whore!

You just don't get it. The slow drip of Wikileaks reports that we have no idea if they were even true, greatly influenced people's opinions. And then when Comey's nonexistent " investigation" came out days before the election, that sealed the deal for Trump. When Comey came out and said, " oops there really isnt an investigation, " it was too late.

I think even the hardest core Deplorables can agree that Putin influenced elections in Europe. Hell it's been confirmed.
So when the connection goes from Putin>>> to Assange>>>> to the press....the thought that Putin didn't manipulate or change the original data is very slim.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Man, that is the dumbest shit I've seen posted in this forum in the last 5 minutes.

Yes, we do know the emails were true. For one thing, no one ever denied that they were true. The reason they didn't is the fact that they can be verified to be genuine by codes imbedded in the email, but you just go on believing that Hillary isn't a great big douche bag like the emails showed.


Furthermore, there is no connection between Putin and Assange. The later has said may times that Russia was not the source of the emails.

Sure, it's been said many times. It's also been said many times that Trump isn't an idiot, and we see how wrong that is.

Trump is a businessman that got away with a lot of things, but he won't get away with this. Collusion with a foreign adversary to interfere into an American National election is TREASON. And if Democrats can do 8 separate investigations into Benghazi, I think you can imagine what Democrats will do with TREASON when they take over in 2018.
Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com

 

[bripat9643]

Apparently you believe there is a connection between the two.

Proof?

Also, so what if we know the time when the DNC was hacked? I still haven't seen any proof that the Russians did it.

This is still under investigation and you will eventually get your proof. But phone records are always there, with dates and time and phone numbers. I doubt the media is making this up, especially when it's coming from YOUR channel FOX News.



CNN is confirming it too.
Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com

Which is why Trump has been banning media outlets, demanding to know who is leaking information to the media, etc. etc. etc. Trump's non stop denial throughout this that it was the Russians hacking into DNC databases just adds fuel to the fire.

This isn't going away anytime soon. If Republicans try and bury it, they might as well write their own obituaries. Because you can be assured that Democrats won't.

Again, you're only evidence is "anonymous sources." They are about as credible as Hillary explaining how she dodged sniper fire.

They are very credible sources. Shep Smith is not going to hang himself out on a line like he does in this video without something credible in front of him. There is ethics in journalism, believe it or not, and this isn't the Trump News Network, aka the Sean Hannity show.

1. Trump bans specific media outlets
2. Trump continually denied that it was the Russians--even at one point stating that "he knows" people that know more than the FBI, the CIA, the Department of Homeland Security and 13 other intelligence agencies.
3. Trump fires Flynn only after the media and intelligence sources outed him.
4. Trump threatens intelligence officials for leaking information.
5. McCain and Lindsey Graham have been all over this.
6. The senate has an ongoing investigation into Flynn's ties with Russia.
7. The senate has another investigation ongoing into the Russian hacking.

Now you can keep denying this all you want too, but clearly they have the phone records to prove that Trump campaign aids were in contact with high level Russian officials during the CAMPAIGN SEASON.

How do you know they are "credible?" You don't even know who they are.

I can look at my phone bill and see who I called what date and time it occurred and somehow you think this is "secret information"--LOL Just keep denying it. If Republicans won't do anything about it, be assured that Democrats will. Obama had the Russian phone lines wire tapped once he became aware that it was the Russians that were hacking into the DNC databases, and that's why they knew Flynn lied to Pence and he also lied to the FBI.
Flynn reportedly lied to FBI about sanctions talk with Russian envoy

You can be assured they know a lot more than what they're saying right now.

OK then, produce a phone bill showing someone in the Trump campaign contacting the Russians

 

[jc456]

Apparently you believe there is a connection between the two.

Proof?

Also, so what if we know the time when the DNC was hacked? I still haven't seen any proof that the Russians did it.

This is still under investigation and you will eventually get your proof. But phone records are always there, with dates and time and phone numbers. I doubt the media is making this up, especially when it's coming from YOUR channel FOX News.



CNN is confirming it too.
Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com

Which is why Trump has been banning media outlets, demanding to know who is leaking information to the media, etc. etc. etc. Trump's non stop denial throughout this that it was the Russians hacking into DNC databases just adds fuel to the fire.

This isn't going away anytime soon. If Republicans try and bury it, they might as well write their own obituaries. Because you can be assured that Democrats won't.

Again, you're only evidence is "anonymous sources." They are about as credible as Hillary explaining how she dodged sniper fire.

They are very credible sources. Shep Smith is not going to hang himself out on a line like he does in this video without something credible in front of him. There is ethics in journalism, believe it or not, and this isn't the Trump News Network, aka the Sean Hannity show.

1. Trump bans specific media outlets
2. Trump continually denied that it was the Russians--even at one point stating that "he knows" people that know more than the FBI, the CIA, the Department of Homeland Security and 13 other intelligence agencies.
3. Trump fires Flynn only after the media and intelligence sources outed him.
4. Trump threatens intelligence officials for leaking information.
5. McCain and Lindsey Graham have been all over this.
6. The senate has an ongoing investigation into Flynn's ties with Russia.
7. The senate has another investigation ongoing into the Russian hacking.

Now you can keep denying this all you want too, but clearly they have the phone records to prove that Trump campaign aids were in contact with high level Russian officials during the CAMPAIGN SEASON.

How do you know they are "credible?" You don't even know who they are.

I can look at my phone bill and see who I called what date and time it occurred and somehow you think this is "secret information"--LOL Just keep denying it. If Republicans won't do anything about it, be assured that Democrats will. Obama had the Russian phone lines wire tapped once he became aware that it was the Russians that were hacking into the DNC databases, and that's why they knew Flynn lied to Pence and he also lied to the FBI.
Flynn reportedly lied to FBI about sanctions talk with Russian envoy

You can be assured they know a lot more than what they're saying right now.

What a stupid post anytime you got evidence show us fkwad

 

[The Original Tree]

When The DNC comes out and finally admits that they actually never had any evidence of Russian Hacking them maybe America can get down to business and help Lefty get a damn backbone and a work ethic and get some shit done!

The only evidence we have of collusion is Obama's little Coup he is trying to run right now and he and Hillary's collusion with the Media and terrorists and illegals they used to carry out their dirty work.

And the only plot we have proof of occurred with the intent to affect the election was The DNC plot to rig the DNC primary.

 

[oreo]

This is still under investigation and you will eventually get your proof. But phone records are always there, with dates and time and phone numbers. I doubt the media is making this up, especially when it's coming from YOUR channel FOX News.



CNN is confirming it too.
Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com

Which is why Trump has been banning media outlets, demanding to know who is leaking information to the media, etc. etc. etc. Trump's non stop denial throughout this that it was the Russians hacking into DNC databases just adds fuel to the fire.

This isn't going away anytime soon. If Republicans try and bury it, they might as well write their own obituaries. Because you can be assured that Democrats won't.

Again, you're only evidence is "anonymous sources." They are about as credible as Hillary explaining how she dodged sniper fire.

They are very credible sources. Shep Smith is not going to hang himself out on a line like he does in this video without something credible in front of him. There is ethics in journalism, believe it or not, and this isn't the Trump News Network, aka the Sean Hannity show.

1. Trump bans specific media outlets
2. Trump continually denied that it was the Russians--even at one point stating that "he knows" people that know more than the FBI, the CIA, the Department of Homeland Security and 13 other intelligence agencies.
3. Trump fires Flynn only after the media and intelligence sources outed him.
4. Trump threatens intelligence officials for leaking information.
5. McCain and Lindsey Graham have been all over this.
6. The senate has an ongoing investigation into Flynn's ties with Russia.
7. The senate has another investigation ongoing into the Russian hacking.

Now you can keep denying this all you want too, but clearly they have the phone records to prove that Trump campaign aids were in contact with high level Russian officials during the CAMPAIGN SEASON.

How do you know they are "credible?" You don't even know who they are.

I can look at my phone bill and see who I called what date and time it occurred and somehow you think this is "secret information"--LOL Just keep denying it. If Republicans won't do anything about it, be assured that Democrats will. Obama had the Russian phone lines wire tapped once he became aware that it was the Russians that were hacking into the DNC databases, and that's why they knew Flynn lied to Pence and he also lied to the FBI.
Flynn reportedly lied to FBI about sanctions talk with Russian envoy

You can be assured they know a lot more than what they're saying right now.

OK then, produce a phone bill showing someone in the Trump campaign contacting the Russians

Someone is going to that--that's for dam sure--LOL It will either be leaked by intelligence agencies to the media, or Republicans will do it. One way or another it's coming out.

Trump has made plenty of enemies on the hill. He has insulted every intelligence agency in this country by insulting their intelligence. The media he continually attacks, so there are investigative reporters working 24 hours a day, 7 days a week on TRUMP.

Then he and his supporters have made plenty of Republican enemies on the hill that aren't going to run in and 'SAVE' him, especially knowing they're going to get their ass's kicked in 2018. Democrats sure aren't going to help him out. Besides Trump's typical physco babble interpreters who have been with him throughout this campaign--no one is going to be backing him over this one.

The smartest thing Republicans could do right now is to unseat the Comrade asap to save their own honor and the party, or burn the party down in 2018/2020 and beyond by trying to cover this up.

 

[jc456]

Let me continue from my link the Trumpies were too cowardly to read.

Claim 2: Russia has tried for years to manipulate Trump using lucrative business deals, and Russian operatives have collected compromising information that could potentially be used to blackmail Trump.

Evidence: These allegations are based on a 35-page dossier of opposition research on Trump, prepared by a former British intelligence officer hired by Trump’s Republican and Democratic rivals during the election. The dossier contained numerous explosive but unverified claims.

The man who prepared the original 35-page dossier, Christopher Steele, is respected for his intelligence work, particularly in Russia. However, because the claims remain uncorroborated, they should be viewed with skepticism.

The dossier circulated among Washington lawmakers, intelligence agents and journalists for months before becoming public knowledge, when unnamed U.S. officials told CNN in January 2017 that intelligence officers presented Trump with a summary of the document.

So opposition research by sleazy Democrats and neverTrump Republicans proves that Putin was in league with Trump?

That's a syllogism that only the brain damaged could agree with.

Isn't it funny the Libs can protect themselves but trump has to succumb to a libturd. Who do these stupid fks think they are? They want a fking fight? I'm in I'll take em on eyes wide open

 

[jc456]

Again Wikileaks did not change the results of the vote.

The machines that you voted on were never hacked.

Instead of being mad at Wikileaks maybe those like you should get mad at the Democratic Leadership instead, and as for Issa comment, well how funny now you agree with him but during Obama tenure you thought he was another political whore!

You just don't get it. The slow drip of Wikileaks reports that we have no idea if they were even true, greatly influenced people's opinions. And then when Comey's nonexistent " investigation" came out days before the election, that sealed the deal for Trump. When Comey came out and said, " oops there really isnt an investigation, " it was too late.

I think even the hardest core Deplorables can agree that Putin influenced elections in Europe. Hell it's been confirmed.
So when the connection goes from Putin>>> to Assange>>>> to the press....the thought that Putin didn't manipulate or change the original data is very slim.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Man, that is the dumbest shit I've seen posted in this forum in the last 5 minutes.

Yes, we do know the emails were true. For one thing, no one ever denied that they were true. The reason they didn't is the fact that they can be verified to be genuine by codes imbedded in the email, but you just go on believing that Hillary isn't a great big douche bag like the emails showed.


Furthermore, there is no connection between Putin and Assange. The later has said may times that Russia was not the source of the emails.

Assange is not capable of hacking e-mail servers so he got them from somewhere. Assange does have ties to Russia. He is a liar and nothing more.

NO one said he didn't get them "from somewhere," moron. What "ties" to Russia does he have?

MORON. Maybe Santa Claus gave Assange the e-mails. The fact is that Russian intelligence has the ability to hack servers and a motive to do so. Julian Assange did a show from the Ecuadorean Embassy for Russia Today. Russia Today gets it's money from the state which means Putin. Putin also defended Assange after his arrest for sexual misconduct. Also there were false e-mails in the legitimate ones. One said that Democrats would steal the election and supposedly used the stationary of Democrat senators. The FBI is investigating it.

But the fact is you know nothing shit. Fking PERIOD

 

[jc456]

how does anyone know when or if the DNC servers were hacked? the FBI never looked at them. WTF are you rambling about? pretendland again?

They know the exact date and time when it was hacked into dumbass. They have the records to prove the dates and exact time that phone calls where made by Trump campaign aids to Russian officials also.

Apparently you believe there is a connection between the two.

Proof?

Also, so what if we know the time when the DNC was hacked? I still haven't seen any proof that the Russians did it.

This is still under investigation and you will eventually get your proof. But phone records are always there, with dates and time and phone numbers. I doubt the media is making this up, especially when it's coming from YOUR channel FOX News.



CNN is confirming it too.
Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com

Which is why Trump has been banning media outlets, demanding to know who is leaking information to the media, etc. etc. etc. Trump's non stop denial throughout this that it was the Russians hacking into DNC databases just adds fuel to the fire.

This isn't going away anytime soon. If Republicans try and bury it, they might as well write their own obituaries. Because you can be assured that Democrats won't.

Again, you're only evidence is "anonymous sources." They are about as credible as Hillary explaining how she dodged sniper fire.

They are very credible sources. Shep Smith is not going to hang himself out on a line like he does in this video without something credible in front of him. There is ethics in journalism, believe it or not, and this isn't the Trump News Network, aka the Sean Hannity show.

1. Trump bans specific media outlets
2. Trump continually denied that it was the Russians--even at one point stating that "he knows" people that know more than the FBI, the CIA, the Department of Homeland Security and 13 other intelligence agencies, and he'll get back to us next week, or 3 weeks ago and never did.
3. Trump fires Flynn only after the media and intelligence sources outed him.
4. Trump threatens intelligence officials for leaking information.
5. McCain and Lindsey Graham have been all over this.
6. The senate has an ongoing investigation into Flynn's ties with Russia.
7. The senate has another investigation ongoing into the Russian hacking.

Now you can keep denying this all you want too, but clearly they have the phone records to prove that Trump campaign aids were in contact with high level Russian officials during the CAMPAIGN SEASON.

Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com

Trump is going to end up being Republicans worst nightmare.

Why do you fking care?

 

[oreo]

When The DNC comes out and finally admits that they actually never had any evidence of Russian Hacking them maybe America can get down to business and help Lefty get a damn backbone and a work ethic and get some shit done!

The only evidence we have of collusion is Obama's little Coup he is trying to run right now and he and Hillary's collusion with the Media and terrorists and illegals they used to carry out their dirty work.

And the only plot we have proof of occurred with the intent to affect the election was The DNC plot to rig the DNC primary.

Well here's one of your hero's, FBI director James Comey who also interfered into the election who is stating on video that the evidence is clear that the Russians hacked into DNC databases.
Senate Committee May Use Subpoenas in Russian Hacking Investigation

The only one who has continually denied it has been Trump. The FBI, the CIA, the Department of Homeland Security and 13 other intelligence agencies are all in agreement.

And so is Shep Smith of FOX NEWS



You might want to listen to the entire video--LOL What he says in this video is SHOCKING.

 

[g5000]

View attachment 114471

Or are there snowflakes still pushing it as gospel?

Hey, dumbshit. Even Trump knows the Russians interfered in our election. Do try to keep up.

That's why he invented the lie about five million illegals voting. To distract you tards from the truth.

 

[oreo]

You just don't get it. The slow drip of Wikileaks reports that we have no idea if they were even true, greatly influenced people's opinions. And then when Comey's nonexistent " investigation" came out days before the election, that sealed the deal for Trump. When Comey came out and said, " oops there really isnt an investigation, " it was too late.

I think even the hardest core Deplorables can agree that Putin influenced elections in Europe. Hell it's been confirmed.
So when the connection goes from Putin>>> to Assange>>>> to the press....the thought that Putin didn't manipulate or change the original data is very slim.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Man, that is the dumbest shit I've seen posted in this forum in the last 5 minutes.

Yes, we do know the emails were true. For one thing, no one ever denied that they were true. The reason they didn't is the fact that they can be verified to be genuine by codes imbedded in the email, but you just go on believing that Hillary isn't a great big douche bag like the emails showed.


Furthermore, there is no connection between Putin and Assange. The later has said may times that Russia was not the source of the emails.

Assange is not capable of hacking e-mail servers so he got them from somewhere. Assange does have ties to Russia. He is a liar and nothing more.

NO one said he didn't get them "from somewhere," moron. What "ties" to Russia does he have?

MORON. Maybe Santa Claus gave Assange the e-mails. The fact is that Russian intelligence has the ability to hack servers and a motive to do so. Julian Assange did a show from the Ecuadorean Embassy for Russia Today. Russia Today gets it's money from the state which means Putin. Putin also defended Assange after his arrest for sexual misconduct. Also there were false e-mails in the legitimate ones. One said that Democrats would steal the election and supposedly used the stationary of Democrat senators. The FBI is investigating it.

But the fact is you know nothing shit. Fking PERIOD

Are FACTS getting in the way of your Trump fantasy.

Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com

 

[jc456]

They know the exact date and time when it was hacked into dumbass. They have the records to prove the dates and exact time that phone calls where made by Trump campaign aids to Russian officials also.

Apparently you believe there is a connection between the two.

Proof?

Also, so what if we know the time when the DNC was hacked? I still haven't seen any proof that the Russians did it.

This is still under investigation and you will eventually get your proof. But phone records are always there, with dates and time and phone numbers. I doubt the media is making this up, especially when it's coming from YOUR channel FOX News.



CNN is confirming it too.
Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com

Which is why Trump has been banning media outlets, demanding to know who is leaking information to the media, etc. etc. etc. Trump's non stop denial throughout this that it was the Russians hacking into DNC databases just adds fuel to the fire.

This isn't going away anytime soon. If Republicans try and bury it, they might as well write their own obituaries. Because you can be assured that Democrats won't.

Again, you're only evidence is "anonymous sources." They are about as credible as Hillary explaining how she dodged sniper fire.

They are very credible sources. Shep Smith is not going to hang himself out on a line like he does in this video without something credible in front of him. There is ethics in journalism, believe it or not, and this isn't the Trump News Network, aka the Sean Hannity show.

1. Trump bans specific media outlets
2. Trump continually denied that it was the Russians--even at one point stating that "he knows" people that know more than the FBI, the CIA, the Department of Homeland Security and 13 other intelligence agencies.
3. Trump fires Flynn only after the media and intelligence sources outed him.
4. Trump threatens intelligence officials for leaking information.
5. McCain and Lindsey Graham have been all over this.
6. The senate has an ongoing investigation into Flynn's ties with Russia.
7. The senate has another investigation ongoing into the Russian hacking.

Now you can keep denying this all you want too, but clearly they have the phone records to prove that Trump campaign aids were in contact with high level Russian officials during the CAMPAIGN SEASON.

How do you know they are "credible?" You don't even know who they are.

Sure he does he's a fking gawd! He thinks he's entitled

 

[jc456]

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Man, that is the dumbest shit I've seen posted in this forum in the last 5 minutes.

Yes, we do know the emails were true. For one thing, no one ever denied that they were true. The reason they didn't is the fact that they can be verified to be genuine by codes imbedded in the email, but you just go on believing that Hillary isn't a great big douche bag like the emails showed.


Furthermore, there is no connection between Putin and Assange. The later has said may times that Russia was not the source of the emails.

Assange is not capable of hacking e-mail servers so he got them from somewhere. Assange does have ties to Russia. He is a liar and nothing more.

NO one said he didn't get them "from somewhere," moron. What "ties" to Russia does he have?

MORON. Maybe Santa Claus gave Assange the e-mails. The fact is that Russian intelligence has the ability to hack servers and a motive to do so. Julian Assange did a show from the Ecuadorean Embassy for Russia Today. Russia Today gets it's money from the state which means Putin. Putin also defended Assange after his arrest for sexual misconduct. Also there were false e-mails in the legitimate ones. One said that Democrats would steal the election and supposedly used the stationary of Democrat senators. The FBI is investigating it.

But the fact is you know nothing shit. Fking PERIOD

Are FACTS getting in the way of your Trump fantasy.

Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com

Which ones are those?

 

[jc456]

Again, you're only evidence is "anonymous sources." They are about as credible as Hillary explaining how she dodged sniper fire.

They are very credible sources. Shep Smith is not going to hang himself out on a line like he does in this video without something credible in front of him. There is ethics in journalism, believe it or not, and this isn't the Trump News Network, aka the Sean Hannity show.

1. Trump bans specific media outlets
2. Trump continually denied that it was the Russians--even at one point stating that "he knows" people that know more than the FBI, the CIA, the Department of Homeland Security and 13 other intelligence agencies.
3. Trump fires Flynn only after the media and intelligence sources outed him.
4. Trump threatens intelligence officials for leaking information.
5. McCain and Lindsey Graham have been all over this.
6. The senate has an ongoing investigation into Flynn's ties with Russia.
7. The senate has another investigation ongoing into the Russian hacking.

Now you can keep denying this all you want too, but clearly they have the phone records to prove that Trump campaign aids were in contact with high level Russian officials during the CAMPAIGN SEASON.

How do you know they are "credible?" You don't even know who they are.

I can look at my phone bill and see who I called what date and time it occurred and somehow you think this is "secret information"--LOL Just keep denying it. If Republicans won't do anything about it, be assured that Democrats will. Obama had the Russian phone lines wire tapped once he became aware that it was the Russians that were hacking into the DNC databases, and that's why they knew Flynn lied to Pence and he also lied to the FBI.
Flynn reportedly lied to FBI about sanctions talk with Russian envoy

You can be assured they know a lot more than what they're saying right now.

OK then, produce a phone bill showing someone in the Trump campaign contacting the Russians

Someone is going to that--that's for dam sure--LOL It will either be leaked by intelligence agencies to the media, or Republicans will do it. One way or another it's coming out.

Trump has made plenty of enemies on the hill. He has insulted every intelligence agency in this country by insulting their intelligence. The media he continually attacks, so there are investigative reporters working 24 hours a day, 7 days a week on TRUMP.

Then he and his supporters have made plenty of Republican enemies on the hill that aren't going to run in and 'SAVE' him, especially knowing they're going to get their ass's kicked in 2018. Democrats sure aren't going to help him out. Besides Trump's typical physco babble interpreters who have been with him throughout this campaign--no one is going to be backing him over this one.

The smartest thing Republicans could do right now is to unseat the Comrade asap to save their own honor and the party, or burn the party down in 2018/2020 and beyond by trying to cover this up.

Or not