Is life without God possible?

[anotherlife]

Life without god is possible, humans are proof of that, since there's actually zero proof that a real god exists, ipso facto, we've already been living without god.

The programmatic nature of human minds seems to point the opposite direction.

What the fuck does that mean?

If you put animals under stress, you get random reactions, mostly an automatic response to momental stimulus. When you put people under stress, you don't get that, you get a response that is a chain of pre installed steps. Someone had pre installed them.

.

If you put animals under stress, you get random reactions, mostly an automatic response to momental stimulus. When you put people under stress, you don't get that, you get a response that is a chain of pre installed steps. Someone had pre installed them.

^ link ^

.

Meet my biology teacher and his experiments. He is not stupid. He is truly evil, through and through. I hope his evil results will not become publications and links. Truly awful. But as a maths student, I can honestly and logically say that the above is true.

 

[anotherlife]

Life without god is possible, humans are proof of that, since there's actually zero proof that a real god exists, ipso facto, we've already been living without god.

The programmatic nature of human minds seems to point the opposite direction.

What the fuck does that mean?

If you put animals under stress, you get random reactions, mostly an automatic response to momental stimulus. When you put people under stress, you don't get that, you get a response that is a chain of pre installed steps. Someone had pre installed them.

It reads like English, but it makes no sense. I'm guessing that English isn't your first language. Try again, but this time, try to explain what you're talking about.

English is not my first language, indeed. I can thank it to my really good and perfect English teacher, and other students here from other countries whose first language is English. I prefer English a LOT more than French, because French is a weaponized language. I will think about how to describe better what I have seen about the programmatic human stress reactions and the current understanding of it. I am afraid, I would have to go into describing biological experiments and results in detail though, which would be really time consuming.

 

[ding]

Life without god is possible, humans are proof of that, since there's actually zero proof that a real god exists, ipso facto, we've already been living without god.

The programmatic nature of human minds seems to point the opposite direction.

What the fuck does that mean?

If you put animals under stress, you get random reactions, mostly an automatic response to momental stimulus. When you put people under stress, you don't get that, you get a response that is a chain of pre installed steps. Someone had pre installed them.

It reads like English, but it makes no sense. I'm guessing that English isn't your first language. Try again, but this time, try to explain what you're talking about.

English is not my first language, indeed. I can thank it to my really good and perfect English teacher, and other students here from other countries whose first language is English. I prefer English a LOT more than French, because French is a weaponized language. I will think about how to describe better what I have seen about the programmatic human stress reactions and the current understanding of it. I am afraid, I would have to go into describing biological experiments and results in detail though, which would be really time consuming.

And over his head and of no interest to him unless he could fund pleasure in making fun of it.

 

[Mudda]

I don't see a god, and same for a lot of people. So I'm living without a god. And your lack of proof of any singular creator of this universe proves that I can live without a god.

His spirit is within you whether you recognize it or not. He is pruning you whether you recognize it or not. So, no. You are not living without God, you just think you are.

So then why all the fuss about getting non-believers to believe?

That's all in your head. Don't believe. Problem solved.

Nice to see you completely beaten down.

Consider it my present to you.

Actually, it was a present to myself.

 

[Mudda]

Life without god is possible, humans are proof of that, since there's actually zero proof that a real god exists, ipso facto, we've already been living without god.

The programmatic nature of human minds seems to point the opposite direction.

What the fuck does that mean?

If you put animals under stress, you get random reactions, mostly an automatic response to momental stimulus. When you put people under stress, you don't get that, you get a response that is a chain of pre installed steps. Someone had pre installed them.

It reads like English, but it makes no sense. I'm guessing that English isn't your first language. Try again, but this time, try to explain what you're talking about.

English is not my first language, indeed. I can thank it to my really good and perfect English teacher, and other students here from other countries whose first language is English. I prefer English a LOT more than French, because French is a weaponized language. I will think about how to describe better what I have seen about the programmatic human stress reactions and the current understanding of it. I am afraid, I would have to go into describing biological experiments and results in detail though, which would be really time consuming.

T'es un enculeur d'animaux.

 

[Mudda]

The programmatic nature of human minds seems to point the opposite direction.

What the fuck does that mean?

If you put animals under stress, you get random reactions, mostly an automatic response to momental stimulus. When you put people under stress, you don't get that, you get a response that is a chain of pre installed steps. Someone had pre installed them.

It reads like English, but it makes no sense. I'm guessing that English isn't your first language. Try again, but this time, try to explain what you're talking about.

English is not my first language, indeed. I can thank it to my really good and perfect English teacher, and other students here from other countries whose first language is English. I prefer English a LOT more than French, because French is a weaponized language. I will think about how to describe better what I have seen about the programmatic human stress reactions and the current understanding of it. I am afraid, I would have to go into describing biological experiments and results in detail though, which would be really time consuming.

And over his head and of no interest to him unless he could fund pleasure in making fun of it.

I found some pleasure in making fun of YOU, and only because you were so obnoxious earlier on.

 

[there4eyeM]

Is life without God possible?

The question imposes the affirmative.

 

[frigidweirdo]

It is easy if we assume a God, then we can say that your life starts and ends with God. But what if we assume that there is no god?

If there is no God, then your life starts and ends with your parents. Obviously it then starts with your parents. Within these constraints, everything that happens in your life that your parents don't control is selfish.

Every life has a dependency on its environment, and the individual personal capability of the life itself. So an atheistic imposition demands, that the parents also control all aspects of the environment and personal capabilities of the life they start.

Can this be guaranteed, and maintained continuously and unconditionally? In other words can an atheistic view in a school or family be maintained without failure?

Discuss.

Everything we can imagine is possible, we could just be a computer program for all we know. But some people can't cope with anything that is possible so they make stuff up.

 

[there4eyeM]

It appears to be daunting, even intolerable, for most people to take seriously that one is totally unique and a set of one's own original, unduplicable, unshareable experiences and perceptions. In other words, that one is alone and responsible in the deepest existential sense for one's choices, moral, religious and other. Above all, few are ready to see that everything is relative. It is also a very dangerous thing to tell people, as it is so easily mishandled as information.

 

[ding]

His spirit is within you whether you recognize it or not. He is pruning you whether you recognize it or not. So, no. You are not living without God, you just think you are.

So then why all the fuss about getting non-believers to believe?

That's all in your head. Don't believe. Problem solved.

Nice to see you completely beaten down.

Consider it my present to you.

Actually, it was a present to myself.

I wouldn't have expected you to see it any other way.

 

[ding]

What the fuck does that mean?

If you put animals under stress, you get random reactions, mostly an automatic response to momental stimulus. When you put people under stress, you don't get that, you get a response that is a chain of pre installed steps. Someone had pre installed them.

It reads like English, but it makes no sense. I'm guessing that English isn't your first language. Try again, but this time, try to explain what you're talking about.

English is not my first language, indeed. I can thank it to my really good and perfect English teacher, and other students here from other countries whose first language is English. I prefer English a LOT more than French, because French is a weaponized language. I will think about how to describe better what I have seen about the programmatic human stress reactions and the current understanding of it. I am afraid, I would have to go into describing biological experiments and results in detail though, which would be really time consuming.

And over his head and of no interest to him unless he could fund pleasure in making fun of it.

I found some pleasure in making fun of YOU, and only because you were so obnoxious earlier on.

Thank you for proving my point.

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

 

[ding]

It is easy if we assume a God, then we can say that your life starts and ends with God. But what if we assume that there is no god?

If there is no God, then your life starts and ends with your parents. Obviously it then starts with your parents. Within these constraints, everything that happens in your life that your parents don't control is selfish.

Every life has a dependency on its environment, and the individual personal capability of the life itself. So an atheistic imposition demands, that the parents also control all aspects of the environment and personal capabilities of the life they start.

Can this be guaranteed, and maintained continuously and unconditionally? In other words can an atheistic view in a school or family be maintained without failure?

Discuss.

Everything we can imagine is possible, we could just be a computer program for all we know. But some people can't cope with anything that is possible so they make stuff up.

No. Not everything we can imagine is possible. Only the potential is possible. Sure we could be in a computer program, but that would require a programmer as the creator, right? One that would assign rules/limits for our potential, progression and cause and effect responses.

 

[Mudda]

So then why all the fuss about getting non-believers to believe?

That's all in your head. Don't believe. Problem solved.

Nice to see you completely beaten down.

Consider it my present to you.

Actually, it was a present to myself.

I wouldn't have expected you to see it any other way.

I think the bible says "turn the other cheek", not "spread 'em". .

 

[Mudda]

If you put animals under stress, you get random reactions, mostly an automatic response to momental stimulus. When you put people under stress, you don't get that, you get a response that is a chain of pre installed steps. Someone had pre installed them.

It reads like English, but it makes no sense. I'm guessing that English isn't your first language. Try again, but this time, try to explain what you're talking about.

English is not my first language, indeed. I can thank it to my really good and perfect English teacher, and other students here from other countries whose first language is English. I prefer English a LOT more than French, because French is a weaponized language. I will think about how to describe better what I have seen about the programmatic human stress reactions and the current understanding of it. I am afraid, I would have to go into describing biological experiments and results in detail though, which would be really time consuming.

And over his head and of no interest to him unless he could fund pleasure in making fun of it.

I found some pleasure in making fun of YOU, and only because you were so obnoxious earlier on.

Thank you for proving my point.

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

So pleasure isn't allowed in your religion? No wonder you're so grumpy.

 

[ding]

That's all in your head. Don't believe. Problem solved.

Nice to see you completely beaten down.

Consider it my present to you.

Actually, it was a present to myself.

I wouldn't have expected you to see it any other way.

I think the bible says "turn the other cheek", not "spread 'em". .

I think you are only here to amuse yourself. That doesn't speak well of you or the life you are living. I pity you like I pity the fools that pull wings off of flies or harm animals for their pleasure. Your only driver in your life is personal pleasure. That will catch up to you.

 

[Mudda]

Nice to see you completely beaten down.

Consider it my present to you.

Actually, it was a present to myself.

I wouldn't have expected you to see it any other way.

I think the bible says "turn the other cheek", not "spread 'em". .

I think you are only here to amuse yourself. That doesn't speak well of you or the life you are living. I pity you like I pity the fools that pull wings off of flies or harm animals for their pleasure. Your only driver in your life is personal pleasure. That will catch up to you.

I'm a vegetarian, I don't harm animals for my pleasure, that would be you. Check mate brah.

 

[ding]

It appears to be daunting, even intolerable, for most people to take seriously that one is totally unique and a set of one's own original, unduplicable, unshareable experiences and perceptions. In other words, that one is alone and responsible in the deepest existential sense for one's choices, moral, religious and other. Above all, few are ready to see that everything is relative. It is also a very dangerous thing to tell people, as it is so easily mishandled as information.

That's because we live in a shared universe with shared consequences and everything is connected and there is a cause and effect relationship. Everything has evolved since Creation. Consciousness is not immune from this process and is in fact the endgame of this process.

 

[ding]

Consider it my present to you.

Actually, it was a present to myself.

I wouldn't have expected you to see it any other way.

I think the bible says "turn the other cheek", not "spread 'em". .

I think you are only here to amuse yourself. That doesn't speak well of you or the life you are living. I pity you like I pity the fools that pull wings off of flies or harm animals for their pleasure. Your only driver in your life is personal pleasure. That will catch up to you.

I'm a vegetarian, I don't harm animals for my pleasure, that would be you. Check mate brah.

Don't let that fool you, you are feeding the same wolf. When you leave this planet the world will be a better place.

 

[Mudda]

It appears to be daunting, even intolerable, for most people to take seriously that one is totally unique and a set of one's own original, unduplicable, unshareable experiences and perceptions. In other words, that one is alone and responsible in the deepest existential sense for one's choices, moral, religious and other. Above all, few are ready to see that everything is relative. It is also a very dangerous thing to tell people, as it is so easily mishandled as information.

That's because we live in a shared universe with shared consequences and everything is connected and there is a cause and effect relationship. Everything has evolved since Creation. Consciousness is not immune from this process and is in fact the endgame of this process.

Nice personal opinion, but you've presented no proof. Again.

 

[Mudda]

When you leave this planet the world will be a better place.

So you admit that you're not a Catholic? Or you just don't know what a Catholic actually is?