Is Liberalism a Mental Disorder ?

[protectionist]

Michael Alan Weiner (born March 31, 1942), better known by his professional name Michael Savage.

Seems to be a true statement.

Since 2009, Savage has been barred from entering the United Kingdom, for "seeking to provoke others to serious criminal acts and fostering hatred."

Another true comment.

Gotta wonder if he's related to Anthony Weiner. And does he have the same "hobby."

Despite your deflecting also from the OP, I'll ask upon what you base the notion that it is "true comment" to say that Michael was >> "seeking to provoke others to serious criminal acts and fostering hatred."

WHAT "serious criminal acts" ? WHAT "hatred" ? Hatred of What ?

PS - all your little jokes are just obvious deflections and indications of you running away from the content of the OP, which you still haven't faced the challenge of.

 

[protectionist]

Dude is so much of an asshole he was kicked out of a country. The right loves the guy and all the bs he spews and repeat the bs like lemmings. Sounds about right.

"Sounds" like you too are running away from the OP content, and using Michael Savage as a red herring. Got anything to say about the 7 examples of liberal contradictions ?

 

[IM2]

Anybody can pretend to be a tough guy if you can cut the other person's microphone. savage does it, anybody can.

I've heard Savage give callers much more time to speak, than I even care to listen to them. Quite a bit more than Mike Gallagher.

But what's this ?....a deflection from the content of the OP ? How about the 7 examples ?

There are no examples. What those7 sentences were was Savages lunacy.

 

[IM2]

Michael Alan Weiner (born March 31, 1942), better known by his professional name Michael Savage.

Seems to be a true statement.

Since 2009, Savage has been barred from entering the United Kingdom, for "seeking to provoke others to serious criminal acts and fostering hatred."

Another true comment.

Gotta wonder if he's related to Anthony Weiner. And does he have the same "hobby."

Despite your deflecting also from the OP, I'll ask upon what you base the notion that it is "true comment" to say that Michael was >> "seeking to provoke others to serious criminal acts and fostering hatred."

WHAT "serious criminal acts" ? WHAT "hatred" ? Hatred of What ?

PS - all your little jokes are just obvious deflections and indications of you running away from the content of the OP, which you still haven't faced the challenge of.

Ask the British government that question. I've not run from anything. I made my position clear real quick. Savage presents no contradictions and there is nothing to answer or any challenge made.

 

[protectionist]

There are no examples. What those7 sentences were was Savages lunacy.

HA HA. I see your denials of reality go beyond Affirmative Action. Your MO is to just pretend that things don't exist. Sure, IM2. You can go back to sleep now.
Pheeeeew! (high-pitched whistle)

Is there a doctor in the house ?

 

[Lumpy 1]

Savage changed his name because it is originally Michael Weiner lol.

So ?

A Weiner saved America when Hillary got her butt kicked in the last election..

You must love that liberal pervert Anthony...

 

[IM2]

There are no examples. What those7 sentences were was Savages lunacy.

HA HA. I see your denials of reality go beyond Affirmative Action. Your MO is to just pretend that things don't exist. Sure, IM2. You can go back to sleep now.
Pheeeeew! (high-pitched whistle)

Is there a doctor in the house ?

Th only one here denyng realoty is you. I guess I gotta consider that you're 72.

 

[WheelieAddict]

Dude is so much of an asshole he was kicked out of a country. The right loves the guy and all the bs he spews and repeat the bs like lemmings. Sounds about right.

"Sounds" like you too are running away from the OP content, and using Michael Savage as a red herring. Got anything to say about the 7 examples of liberal contradictions ?

You mean Michael Weiner?

 

[Lumpy 1]

The only thing Democrats are minimally good at is character assassinations, after that it's pretty well nothing unless it's another negative.

 

[McRocket]

Since the release of radio legend, Dr. Michael Savage's 20th book, in 2005, Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder, this topic has been discussed in bars, parks, fishing piers, coffeehouses, and just about everywhere. Savage makes many interesting points in his book, but I will point out some of my own just off the top of my head, which may be mentioned in Savage's book (which I have not read), or not.

I will go on record that yes, I believe liberalism is a mental disorder. So does this mean that I'm saying that I, myself (a liberal for 40 years), was mentally disturbed for most of my life ? We'll, I'm afraid so. Yes, it does.

Thankfully, in 2009, after the shocking Fort Hood, TX attack by jihadist Nidal Hasan that killed 13 US Army troops, and was fully supported by then POTUS Barrack Obama, I finally saw the light, and turned conservative, which I've been ever since. Being an Army veteran myself, seeing these troops mowed down while unable to defend themselves in one of Obama's nutcase gun-free zones, was just too much. Obama's inaction, despite pleas from Fort Hood Army brass to dishonorably discharge Hasan, was the first sign among others to come later, of Obama's jihadism.

How liberals could go on to vote for this man in 2012, after all his jihadist actions, was beyond belief, and beyond sanity. But there are many other aspects to the liberalism-mental disorder connection. Many of these have to do with liberals contradicting themselves (a sure sign of mental instability). Here's a few examples >>

1. Support gay rights, while simultaneously supporting Muslims.

2. Supporting women's rights, while simultaneously supporting Islam.

3. Supporting animal rights while simultaneously supporting Islam.

4. Supporting gun control, while simultaneously supporting the south Florida PROMISE Program.

5. Supporting jobs for Americans while simultaeously supporting illegal immigration.

6. Opposing racial discrimination, while simultaneously supporting Affirmative Action.

7. Supporting due process of law, while supporting unfounded accusations against political candidates (ex. Donald Trump, Roy Moore)

These are just a few examples. Some posters likely will have some others to cite, of well known and lesser known subjects.

Wholly shit...what a mind-bogglingly clueless post...where to begin?

You (I assume) are American. Freedom of religion is in the friggin' Constitution you ignoramus. One can allow people to practice a religion that they do not necessarily agree with.
Just because you support Muslim's right to exist and practice their religion...does NOT mean you support everything their 'God Club Manual' (the Quran) says.


Why do you not support slavery yet you support Christians as the Bible CLEARLY supports slavery MANY times:

'However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. (Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT)'

Even killing your slave is okay.

'When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property. (Exodus 21:20-21 NAB)'

Slavery – Evil Bible .com

And don't bother answering - I will not waste a second of my time reading it as you are FAR too clueless to waste any more of my time on.

BTW - any Christian morons who answer with the tired 'that is from the Old Testament' bullshit? My answer to that stupid point is: it is still in the Bible (the 'Christian God Club Manual').


Finally - I am neither lib nor con. And no one has a mental disorder just because they are lib or con.
What an absolutely stupid thing to suggest otherwise.

 

[protectionist]

Ask the British government that question. I've not run from anything. I made my position clear real quick. Savage presents no contradictions and there is nothing to answer or any challenge made.

I'm asking YOU, IM2.

You HAVE run away. You made NO POSITION whatsoever.

You know the contradictions are true and real. You just don't want to admit it. Liberals support Islam (Koran 4:24-wife beating), yet claim to support woman's rights. That's impossible. You know it. You won't admit it. That's pathological.

Islam is not only a violation of womens' rights, it is violation of US law, (and in many more ways than just 4:34)

 

[Lumpy 1]

Since the release of radio legend, Dr. Michael Savage's 20th book, in 2005, Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder, this topic has been discussed in bars, parks, fishing piers, coffeehouses, and just about everywhere. Savage makes many interesting points in his book, but I will point out some of my own just off the top of my head, which may be mentioned in Savage's book (which I have not read), or not.

I will go on record that yes, I believe liberalism is a mental disorder. So does this mean that I'm saying that I, myself (a liberal for 40 years), was mentally disturbed for most of my life ? We'll, I'm afraid so. Yes, it does.

Thankfully, in 2009, after the shocking Fort Hood, TX attack by jihadist Nidal Hasan that killed 13 US Army troops, and was fully supported by then POTUS Barrack Obama, I finally saw the light, and turned conservative, which I've been ever since. Being an Army veteran myself, seeing these troops mowed down while unable to defend themselves in one of Obama's nutcase gun-free zones, was just too much. Obama's inaction, despite pleas from Fort Hood Army brass to dishonorably discharge Hasan, was the first sign among others to come later, of Obama's jihadism.

How liberals could go on to vote for this man in 2012, after all his jihadist actions, was beyond belief, and beyond sanity. But there are many other aspects to the liberalism-mental disorder connection. Many of these have to do with liberals contradicting themselves (a sure sign of mental instability). Here's a few examples >>

1. Support gay rights, while simultaneously supporting Muslims.

2. Supporting women's rights, while simultaneously supporting Islam.

3. Supporting animal rights while simultaneously supporting Islam.

4. Supporting gun control, while simultaneously supporting the south Florida PROMISE Program.

5. Supporting jobs for Americans while simultaeously supporting illegal immigration.

6. Opposing racial discrimination, while simultaneously supporting Affirmative Action.

7. Supporting due process of law, while supporting unfounded accusations against political candidates (ex. Donald Trump, Roy Moore)

These are just a few examples. Some posters likely will have some others to cite, of well known and lesser known subjects.

Wholly shit...what a mind-bogglingly clueless post...where to begin?

You (I assume) are American. Freedom of religion is in the friggin' Constitution you ignoramus. One can allow people to practice a religion that they do not necessarily agree with.
Just because you support Muslim's right to exist and practice their religion...does NOT mean you support everything their 'God Club Manual' (the Quran) says.


Why do you not support slavery yet you support Christians as the Bible CLEARLY supports slavery MANY times:

'However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. (Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT)'

Even killing your slave is okay.

'When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property. (Exodus 21:20-21 NAB)'

Slavery – Evil Bible .com

And don't bother answering - I will not waste a second of my time reading it as you are FAR too clueless to waste any more of my time on.

BTW - and Christian morons who answer with the tired 'that is from the Old Testament' bullshit? My answer to that stupid point is: it is still in the Bible (the 'Christian God Club Manual').


Finally - I am neither lib nor con. And no one has a mental disorder just because they are lib or con.
What an absolutely stupid thing to suggest otherwise.

We'll decide how you fit in there Pocket Rocket, so far,your an ass, which isn't necessarily bad.

welcome to the USMB..

 

[protectionist]

Since the release of radio legend, Dr. Michael Savage's 20th book, in 2005, Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder, this topic has been discussed in bars, parks, fishing piers, coffeehouses, and just about everywhere. Savage makes many interesting points in his book, but I will point out some of my own just off the top of my head, which may be mentioned in Savage's book (which I have not read), or not.

I will go on record that yes, I believe liberalism is a mental disorder. So does this mean that I'm saying that I, myself (a liberal for 40 years), was mentally disturbed for most of my life ? We'll, I'm afraid so. Yes, it does.

Thankfully, in 2009, after the shocking Fort Hood, TX attack by jihadist Nidal Hasan that killed 13 US Army troops, and was fully supported by then POTUS Barrack Obama, I finally saw the light, and turned conservative, which I've been ever since. Being an Army veteran myself, seeing these troops mowed down while unable to defend themselves in one of Obama's nutcase gun-free zones, was just too much. Obama's inaction, despite pleas from Fort Hood Army brass to dishonorably discharge Hasan, was the first sign among others to come later, of Obama's jihadism.

How liberals could go on to vote for this man in 2012, after all his jihadist actions, was beyond belief, and beyond sanity. But there are many other aspects to the liberalism-mental disorder connection. Many of these have to do with liberals contradicting themselves (a sure sign of mental instability). Here's a few examples >>

1. Support gay rights, while simultaneously supporting Muslims.

2. Supporting women's rights, while simultaneously supporting Islam.

3. Supporting animal rights while simultaneously supporting Islam.

4. Supporting gun control, while simultaneously supporting the south Florida PROMISE Program.

5. Supporting jobs for Americans while simultaeously supporting illegal immigration.

6. Opposing racial discrimination, while simultaneously supporting Affirmative Action.

7. Supporting due process of law, while supporting unfounded accusations against political candidates (ex. Donald Trump, Roy Moore)

These are just a few examples. Some posters likely will have some others to cite, of well known and lesser known subjects.

Wholly shit...what a mind-bogglingly clueless post...where to begin?

You (I assume) are American. Freedom of religion is in the friggin' Constitution you ignoramus. One can allow people to practice a religion that they do not necessarily agree with.
Just because you support Muslim's right to exist and practice their religion...does NOT mean you support everything their 'God Club Manual' (the Quran) says.


Why do you not support slavery yet you support Christians as the Bible CLEARLY supports slavery MANY times:

'However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. (Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT)'

Even killing your slave is okay.

'When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property. (Exodus 21:20-21 NAB)'

Slavery – Evil Bible .com

And don't bother answering - I will not waste a second of my time reading it as you are FAR too clueless to waste any more of my time on.

BTW - and Christian morons who answer with the tired 'that is from the Old Testament' bullshit? My answer to that stupid point is: it is still in the Bible (the 'Christian God Club Manual').

Finally - I am neither lib nor con. And no one has a mental disorder just because they are lib or con.
What an absolutely stupid thing to suggest otherwise.

You really thought you had something going in this weak, hollow post didn't you ?

1. Islam is not a religion. That has been refuted 1000 times in this forum, for years (for your edification, since you're new here)

2. Islam is unconstitutional >> violation of Article 6, Section 2, part 1 (the Supremacy clause) So, NO, I (along with the Constitution) DON'T support Islam to exist in America. It should not. There should be no mosques, no Islamic centers, no Korans, no prayer rooms, no footwashing basins, etc. None.

3. I support Christianity as a faith of Christ, not necessarily of the Bible. I was raised as a kid a Catholic, which looks to the Pope, not the Bible as a source of inspiration. Almost all my life however, I have not been a Catholic, or attached to any religion, but just a non-denominational Christian.

4. Your philosophy here suggests that yes, you ARE liberal. And since you support Islam to exist in America, despite it's illegal supremacism (and scores of other law violations), do you simultaneously support womens' rights ? If so, how can that be possible ? (when Islam is a litany of oppression to women)

 

[IM2]

Ask the British government that question. I've not run from anything. I made my position clear real quick. Savage presents no contradictions and there is nothing to answer or any challenge made.

I'm asking YOU, IM2.

You HAVE run away. You made NO POSITION whatsoever.

You know the contradictions are true and real. You just don't want to admit it. Liberals support Islam (Koran 4:24-wife beating), yet claim to support woman's rights. That's impossible. You know it. You won't admit it. That's pathological.

Islam is not only a violation of womens' rights, it is violation of US law, (and in many more ways than just 4:34)

I've run from nothing. These are the claims pf a loon, not contradictions.

 

[protectionist]

I've run from nothing. These are the claims pf a loon, not contradictions.

FALSE: Koran 4:34 is a 1400 year sura of the Koran. It is FACT, not a "claim" And it is 100% contradictory to womens' rights (and to US law) - you have a habit of thinking you can make things you don't like go away , just by saying they don't exist.

You can't deny the contradictions. And you won't discuss them. You're running like a scared rabbit.

You are rapidly becoming the poster child for this thread >> Is Liberalism a Mental Disorder ?

 

[Lumpy 1]

Ask the British government that question. I've not run from anything. I made my position clear real quick. Savage presents no contradictions and there is nothing to answer or any challenge made.

I'm asking YOU, IM2.

You HAVE run away. You made NO POSITION whatsoever.

You know the contradictions are true and real. You just don't want to admit it. Liberals support Islam (Koran 4:24-wife beating), yet claim to support woman's rights. That's impossible. You know it. You won't admit it. That's pathological.

Islam is not only a violation of womens' rights, it is violation of US law, (and in many more ways than just 4:34)

I've run from nothing. These are the claims pf a loon, not contradictions.

So far, all you've offered up is insults, that a sure sign that all you've got is nothin.. Libby Buckwheat..

 

[IM2]

Since the release of radio legend, Dr. Michael Savage's 20th book, in 2005, Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder, this topic has been discussed in bars, parks, fishing piers, coffeehouses, and just about everywhere. Savage makes many interesting points in his book, but I will point out some of my own just off the top of my head, which may be mentioned in Savage's book (which I have not read), or not.

I will go on record that yes, I believe liberalism is a mental disorder. So does this mean that I'm saying that I, myself (a liberal for 40 years), was mentally disturbed for most of my life ? We'll, I'm afraid so. Yes, it does.

Thankfully, in 2009, after the shocking Fort Hood, TX attack by jihadist Nidal Hasan that killed 13 US Army troops, and was fully supported by then POTUS Barrack Obama, I finally saw the light, and turned conservative, which I've been ever since. Being an Army veteran myself, seeing these troops mowed down while unable to defend themselves in one of Obama's nutcase gun-free zones, was just too much. Obama's inaction, despite pleas from Fort Hood Army brass to dishonorably discharge Hasan, was the first sign among others to come later, of Obama's jihadism.

How liberals could go on to vote for this man in 2012, after all his jihadist actions, was beyond belief, and beyond sanity. But there are many other aspects to the liberalism-mental disorder connection. Many of these have to do with liberals contradicting themselves (a sure sign of mental instability). Here's a few examples >>

1. Support gay rights, while simultaneously supporting Muslims.

2. Supporting women's rights, while simultaneously supporting Islam.

3. Supporting animal rights while simultaneously supporting Islam.

4. Supporting gun control, while simultaneously supporting the south Florida PROMISE Program.

5. Supporting jobs for Americans while simultaeously supporting illegal immigration.

6. Opposing racial discrimination, while simultaneously supporting Affirmative Action.

7. Supporting due process of law, while supporting unfounded accusations against political candidates (ex. Donald Trump, Roy Moore)

These are just a few examples. Some posters likely will have some others to cite, of well known and lesser known subjects.

Wholly shit...what a mind-bogglingly clueless post...where to begin?

You (I assume) are American. Freedom of religion is in the friggin' Constitution you ignoramus. One can allow people to practice a religion that they do not necessarily agree with.
Just because you support Muslim's right to exist and practice their religion...does NOT mean you support everything their 'God Club Manual' (the Quran) says.


Why do you not support slavery yet you support Christians as the Bible CLEARLY supports slavery MANY times:

'However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. (Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT)'

Even killing your slave is okay.

'When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property. (Exodus 21:20-21 NAB)'

Slavery – Evil Bible .com

And don't bother answering - I will not waste a second of my time reading it as you are FAR too clueless to waste any more of my time on.

BTW - and Christian morons who answer with the tired 'that is from the Old Testament' bullshit? My answer to that stupid point is: it is still in the Bible (the 'Christian God Club Manual').

Finally - I am neither lib nor con. And no one has a mental disorder just because they are lib or con.
What an absolutely stupid thing to suggest otherwise.

You really thought you had something going in this weak, hollow post didn't you ?

1. Islam is not a religion. That has been refuted 1000 times in this forum, for years (for your edification, since you're new here)

2. Islam is unconstitutional >> violation of Article 6, Section 2, part 1 (the Supremacy clause) So, NO, I (along with the Constitution) DON'T support Islam to exist in America. It should not. There should be no mosques, no Islamic centers, no Korans, no prayer rooms, no footwashing basins, etc. None.

3. I support Christianity as a faith of Christ, not necessarily of the Bible. I was raised as a kid a Catholic, which looks to the Pope, not the Bible as a source of inspiration. Almost all my life however, I have not been a Catholic, or attached to any religion, but just a non-denominational Christian.

4. Your philosophy here suggests that yes, you ARE liberal. And since you support Islam to exist in America, despite it's illegal supremacism (and scores of other law violations), do you simultaneously support womens' rights ? If so, how can that be possible ? (when Islam is a litany of oppression to women)

Since when has Islam not been a religion? 9-11?

The supremacy clause has nothing to do with his.

Last, the right for Muslims to live and exist in the US just like everyone else is what "liberals" support. That does not mean they support violence against women. This is why no one is answering that crazy shit you posted from Savage.

 

[baileyn45]

Since the release of radio legend, Dr. Michael Savage's 20th book, in 2005, Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder, this topic has been discussed in bars, parks, fishing piers, coffeehouses, and just about everywhere. Savage makes many interesting points in his book, but I will point out some of my own just off the top of my head, which may be mentioned in Savage's book (which I have not read), or not.

I will go on record that yes, I believe liberalism is a mental disorder. So does this mean that I'm saying that I, myself (a liberal for 40 years), was mentally disturbed for most of my life ? We'll, I'm afraid so. Yes, it does.

Thankfully, in 2009, after the shocking Fort Hood, TX attack by jihadist Nidal Hasan that killed 13 US Army troops, and was fully supported by then POTUS Barrack Obama, I finally saw the light, and turned conservative, which I've been ever since. Being an Army veteran myself, seeing these troops mowed down while unable to defend themselves in one of Obama's nutcase gun-free zones, was just too much. Obama's inaction, despite pleas from Fort Hood Army brass to dishonorably discharge Hasan, was the first sign among others to come later, of Obama's jihadism.

How liberals could go on to vote for this man in 2012, after all his jihadist actions, was beyond belief, and beyond sanity. But there are many other aspects to the liberalism-mental disorder connection. Many of these have to do with liberals contradicting themselves (a sure sign of mental instability). Here's a few examples >>

1. Support gay rights, while simultaneously supporting Muslims.

2. Supporting women's rights, while simultaneously supporting Islam.

3. Supporting animal rights while simultaneously supporting Islam.

4. Supporting gun control, while simultaneously supporting the south Florida PROMISE Program.

5. Supporting jobs for Americans while simultaeously supporting illegal immigration.

6. Opposing racial discrimination, while simultaneously supporting Affirmative Action.

7. Supporting due process of law, while supporting unfounded accusations against political candidates (ex. Donald Trump, Roy Moore)

These are just a few examples. Some posters likely will have some others to cite, of well known and lesser known subjects.

Liberalism is not the problem. "Leftists" are. Liberals are intelligent decent people, "leftists" are pin headed clowns that believe their own bs and cannot be reasoned with. "leftists" do not believe in rational thought. Literally.

 

[IM2]

I've run from nothing. These are the claims pf a loon, not contradictions.

FALSE: Koran 4:34 is a 1400 year sura of the Koran. It is FACT, not a "claim" And it is 100% contradictory to womens' rights (and to US law) - you have a habit of thinking you can make things you don't like go away , just by saying they don't exist.

You can't deny the contradictions. And you won't discuss them. You're running like a scared rabbit.

You are rapidly becoming the poster child for this thread >> Is Liberalism a Mental Disorder ?

You show yourself to be the one with the mental disorder. This is only contradictions are in the mind of Savage and loons like yourself. I say things don't exist because they don't.

 

[IM2]

Since the release of radio legend, Dr. Michael Savage's 20th book, in 2005, Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder, this topic has been discussed in bars, parks, fishing piers, coffeehouses, and just about everywhere. Savage makes many interesting points in his book, but I will point out some of my own just off the top of my head, which may be mentioned in Savage's book (which I have not read), or not.

I will go on record that yes, I believe liberalism is a mental disorder. So does this mean that I'm saying that I, myself (a liberal for 40 years), was mentally disturbed for most of my life ? We'll, I'm afraid so. Yes, it does.

Thankfully, in 2009, after the shocking Fort Hood, TX attack by jihadist Nidal Hasan that killed 13 US Army troops, and was fully supported by then POTUS Barrack Obama, I finally saw the light, and turned conservative, which I've been ever since. Being an Army veteran myself, seeing these troops mowed down while unable to defend themselves in one of Obama's nutcase gun-free zones, was just too much. Obama's inaction, despite pleas from Fort Hood Army brass to dishonorably discharge Hasan, was the first sign among others to come later, of Obama's jihadism.

How liberals could go on to vote for this man in 2012, after all his jihadist actions, was beyond belief, and beyond sanity. But there are many other aspects to the liberalism-mental disorder connection. Many of these have to do with liberals contradicting themselves (a sure sign of mental instability). Here's a few examples >>

1. Support gay rights, while simultaneously supporting Muslims.

2. Supporting women's rights, while simultaneously supporting Islam.

3. Supporting animal rights while simultaneously supporting Islam.

4. Supporting gun control, while simultaneously supporting the south Florida PROMISE Program.

5. Supporting jobs for Americans while simultaeously supporting illegal immigration.

6. Opposing racial discrimination, while simultaneously supporting Affirmative Action.

7. Supporting due process of law, while supporting unfounded accusations against political candidates (ex. Donald Trump, Roy Moore)

These are just a few examples. Some posters likely will have some others to cite, of well known and lesser known subjects.

Liberalism is not the problem. "Leftists" are. Liberals are intelligent decent people, "leftists" are pin headed clowns that believe their own bs and cannot be reasoned with. "leftists" do not believe in rational thought. Literally.

Seems that as we look at this thread and many others it is those on the right who have major problems with rational thought.