Is A Top Secret Document Concerning Nuclear Capabilities of a Foreign Country Trump's Personal Property?

[XponentialChaos]

What is an indictment?

You guys are so dumb.

 

[g5000]

View attachment 795892
Billiejeens thinks that g5000 misspelled the word 'indictment'

LOLLOLLLL

Ahhhh, is that what that was all about?

 

[g5000]

You could google up the nuclear capabilities of foreign countries. Only lefties could be hysterical about a document like that while freaking potential nuclear assassins are flooding our borders.

You know, I was going to say you could not be this fucking stupid. But then I stopped myself when I realized you actually are this fucking stupid.

 

[Billiejeens]

Ahhhh, is that what that was all about?
[/QUOTE]

No[/QUOTE]


No
You know it wasn't

 

[Billiejeens]

Wl

You guys are so dumb.

Why?

 

[XponentialChaos]

Wl

Why?

Because you're asking what an indictment is and you can't even respond to a post without messing it up.

Holy shit you're stupid.

 

[FA_Q2]

Sure they had intent. For God sakes man, the DOJ raided Biden's garage and took classified documents, same as what happened to Trump in Florida, the DOJ raided and took documents. And, Miss Hillary purposely deleted 30,000 emails after receiving a court order to retain them. What would you be saying if Trump had done that? You would have indicted him on 30,000 counts.

More fantasy.

They did not have intent. You saying so does not make it true. They did not 'raid' anything, that is an outright lie. Biden cooperated and therefor a raid was not necessary. Trump on the other hand acted like a child for an entire year before the feds got tired of allowing him to flaunt the law and raided him.

Funny that you claim I would be making a different statement had Trump been in Hillary's place when it is you blatantly doing so. All those people chanting 'lock her up' are now suddenly defending Trump. Talk about a double standard. Trump provided solid proof he actually violated the law with his own damn statements and while being recorded yet the right tries to pretend that he should not be prosecuted.

The facts are what they are. No amount of dancing in a circle and complaining about Hillary will change the fact that Trump illegally retained classified information, admitted from his own mouth he knew they were classified, admitted with his own mouth he never declassified them even though idiot simps have been trying to use that moronic excuse for a long time and, the real problem, he we willfully showed those documents to people he knew did not have the clearance to see them.

It is that last part that is the real problem. It is that last part you have no evidence or even real claims that others you bitch about have done. Trump was actually sharing classified information on purpose for clout. How fucking childish do you have to be to do such a thing.

 

[Independent thinker]

More fantasy.

They did not have intent. You saying so does not make it true. They did not 'raid' anything, that is an outright lie. Biden cooperated and therefor a raid was not necessary. Trump on the other hand acted like a child for an entire year before the feds got tired of allowing him to flaunt the law and raided him.

Funny that you claim I would be making a different statement had Trump been in Hillary's place when it is you blatantly doing so. All those people chanting 'lock her up' are now suddenly defending Trump. Talk about a double standard. Trump provided solid proof he actually violated the law with his own damn statements and while being recorded yet the right tries to pretend that he should not be prosecuted.

The facts are what they are. No amount of dancing in a circle and complaining about Hillary will change the fact that Trump illegally retained classified information, admitted from his own mouth he knew they were classified, admitted with his own mouth he never declassified them even though idiot simps have been trying to use that moronic excuse for a long time and, the real problem, he we willfully showed those documents to people he knew did not have the clearance to see them.

It is that last part that is the real problem. It is that last part you have no evidence or even real claims that others you bitch about have done. Trump was actually sharing classified information on purpose for clout. How fucking childish do you have to be to do such a thing.

And yet Hillary purposely destroyed records requested by subpoena and she skated.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

One of the 31 counts under the Espionage Act with which Donald J. Trump is being indicted involves his possession of a document concerning the nuclear capabilities of a foreign country.

The Presidential Records Act, which everyone who has an opinion about this should read, says that a former President may take his personal property home with him, but any documents in his possession are government property and must be turned over the custody of the Archivist upon leaving office.

Once the records are in the custody of the Archivist, the former president may be granted access to some records upon request for purposes of building a presidential library or for help aiding in the writing of a memoir, etc.

This Top Secret document had to be forcibly taken from Donald Trump. He hid it, along with several boxes of government property, including 30 other classified documents, from the government.

I would like to know who believes a Top Secret document which could cause grave harm to our national security bleevs this is Donald Trump's personal property.

Presidential Records (44 U.S.C. Chapter 22)

(44 U.S.C. Chapter 22) § 2201. Definitions § 2202. Ownership of Presidential records § 2203. Management and custody of Presidential records § 2204. Restrictions on access to Presidential records § 2205. Exceptions to restricted access § 2206. Regulations § 2207. Vice-Presidential records § Note...

www.archives.gov

Somebody as dubious as trump should not have these docs. It makes it very difficult for allies of the US to deal with America when thi form of theft is going on.

Our security depends on us all working together. That would be difficult if trump were re-elected.

 

[Marener]

And yet Hillary purposely destroyed records requested by subpoena and she skated.

You’re going to need evidence of this if you want to prosecute it.

You don’t have it.

 

[surada]

Somebody as dubious as trump should not have these docs. It makes it very difficult for allies of the US to deal with America when thi form of theft is going on.

Our security depends on us all working together. That would be difficult if trump were re-elected.

No US president has the authority to declassify nuclear secrets for the US or any other countries.

 

[Billiejeens]

Based on the laughing face - I now believe that GG does not know what an indictment is.

Replying to myself.

I really do not believe that any of the Loons on here know what an indictment is.

 

[Billiejeens]

You’re going to need evidence of this if you want to prosecute it.

You don’t have it.

That is not in dispute.

 

[Marener]

That is not in dispute.

The fact that you have no evidence to support the allegation is not in dispute.

 

[Billiejeens]

And yet Hillary purposely destroyed records requested by subpoena and she skated.

Damning records that led back to Benghazi.

The entire server/email fiasco was undertaken so that the Benghazi crimes and coverups would never be on the record.

 

[Billiejeens]

The fact that you have no evidence to support the allegation is not in dispute.

Hilliary admitted it.
So there is that.

 

[surada]

Damning records that led back to Benghazi.

The entire server/email fiasco was undertaken so that the Benghazi crimes and coverups would never be on the record.

Lolol you idiot. You don't know anything about Benghazi.

 

[Independent thinker]

You’re going to need evidence of this if you want to prosecute it.

You don’t have it.

LOL. She deleted 30,000 emails against a subpoena. Everyone knows that and she skated.

 

[Marener]

Hilliary admitted it.
So there is that.

She didn’t.
So there isn’t that.

 

[Marener]

LOL. She deleted 30,000 emails against a subpoena. Everyone knows that and she skated.

“Everybody knows that” isn't evidence.