Iran Of Course We ll Continue to Support Terrorists

[Freewill]

I guess this is just them being them. No need to worry, John Kerry has everything under control.

Iran Of Course We ll Continue to Support Terrorists Power Line

As I wrote here, the Obama administration, in the person of John Kerry, floated the absurd claim that Iran won’t expand its support for terrorism because it is not “allowed” to do so by U.N. resolutions that are unaffected by the abandonment of sanctions. More recently, as Paulnoted this afternoon, Kerry has professed to be “disturbed” by the fact that Iran’s Supreme Leader says Iran’s hostile policies, including its support for terrorist groups, “won’t change at all” as a result of the nuclear agreement.

 

[JoeB131]

not sure why Iran shouldn't fund groups it agrees with when the US, Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia are all funding groups.

Why is this our problem again?

 

[eagle1462010]

not sure why Iran shouldn't fund groups it agrees with when the US, Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia are all funding groups.

Why is this our problem again?

160 BILLION REASONS...............
That will be released as a result of the deal.................
No deal no 160 BILLION.............

 

[Freewill]

not sure why Iran shouldn't fund groups it agrees with when the US, Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia are all funding groups.

Why is this our problem again?

ISIS

 

[Camp]

not sure why Iran shouldn't fund groups it agrees with when the US, Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia are all funding groups.

Why is this our problem again?

160 BILLION REASONS...............
That will be released as a result of the deal.................
No deal no 160 BILLION.............

At some point we become outright thieves for continuing to hold those funds. Some of them have been held for 45 years. We are paying interest on them per international law. Sanctions are one thing, but holding onto assets that belong to Iran is something else. It has become an actual burden for us that helps create hatred of America and makes people all over the world view us as bullies and thieves. Why shouldn't they. We are using our superior strength to hold on to money and property that does not belong to us.

 

[eagle1462010]

not sure why Iran shouldn't fund groups it agrees with when the US, Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia are all funding groups.

Why is this our problem again?

160 BILLION REASONS...............
That will be released as a result of the deal.................
No deal no 160 BILLION.............

At some point we become outright thieves for continuing to hold those funds. Some of them have been held for 45 years. We are paying interest on them per international law. Sanctions are one thing, but holding onto assets that belong to Iran is something else. It has become an actual burden for us that helps create hatred of America and makes people all over the world view us as bullies and thieves. Why shouldn't they. We are using our superior strength to hold on to money and property that does not belong to us.

Give it to the families of our troops who lost their loved ones to Iranian made IED's.
To the 10's of thousands who suffered trauma due to IED's supplied by Iran...........
And tell them to kiss the money goodbye................no interest and not even a reach around.

 

[JoeB131]

not sure why Iran shouldn't fund groups it agrees with when the US, Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia are all funding groups.

Why is this our problem again?

160 BILLION REASONS...............
That will be released as a result of the deal.................
No deal no 160 BILLION.............

You mean the 160 billion that rightfully belongs to the people of Iran that we've frozen for 35 years even though they released the hostages 35 years ago?

You see, here's the thing. Right now, the people Iran is funding are the only ones really taking the fight to ISIS. This is actually a GOOD thing.

 

[JoeB131]

Give it to the families of our troops who lost their loved ones to Iranian made IED's.
To the 10's of thousands who suffered trauma due to IED's supplied by Iran...........
And tell them to kiss the money goodbye................no interest and not even a reach around.

Maybe we shouldn't have been in someone else's country.

You see, here's the thing about an IED. Someone local has to plant it.

 

[JoeB131]

not sure why Iran shouldn't fund groups it agrees with when the US, Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia are all funding groups.

Why is this our problem again?

ISIS

ISIS isn't being funded by Iran. Iran is actually backing the groups fighting ISIS.

 

[deltex1]

not sure why Iran shouldn't fund groups it agrees with when the US, Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia are all funding groups.

Why is this our problem again?

It's not whether they should or shouldn't...it's whether we should allow them. We shouldn't.

 

[eagle1462010]

Give it to the families of our troops who lost their loved ones to Iranian made IED's.
To the 10's of thousands who suffered trauma due to IED's supplied by Iran...........
And tell them to kiss the money goodbye................no interest and not even a reach around.

Maybe we shouldn't have been in someone else's country.

You see, here's the thing about an IED. Someone local has to plant it.

No shit sherlock. They have paramilitary groups that do that sort of thing............heard some of them went to see Allah early in Yemen............thanks to Saudi Arabia................

They trained............supplied.............and had direct indirect involvement that sent our people home in bags............

Fuck them and their so called money.

 

[Camp]

not sure why Iran shouldn't fund groups it agrees with when the US, Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia are all funding groups.

Why is this our problem again?

160 BILLION REASONS...............
That will be released as a result of the deal.................
No deal no 160 BILLION.............

At some point we become outright thieves for continuing to hold those funds. Some of them have been held for 45 years. We are paying interest on them per international law. Sanctions are one thing, but holding onto assets that belong to Iran is something else. It has become an actual burden for us that helps create hatred of America and makes people all over the world view us as bullies and thieves. Why shouldn't they. We are using our superior strength to hold on to money and property that does not belong to us.

Give it to the families of our troops who lost their loved ones to Iranian made IED's.
To the 10's of thousands who suffered trauma due to IED's supplied by Iran...........
And tell them to kiss the money goodbye................no interest and not even a reach around.

Don't pull out that fake give it to the families crap. I was pushing for and writing letters to congressman when we first learned that Iran was supplying high tech IED's. Bush did nothing but let it happen without a response. He used the fucking Reagan Doctrine of response to terrorist. Respond very little or not at all. Your General was in the position to make a stand and be heard when that disgusting time in American military history was taking place. He kept his mouth shut and went along with the program of no response when the proper response should have been bombing Iran after taking out their air defenses and air force followed by armored assault over their borders to destroy facilities on the Iraq - Iran border. Bush didn't have the balls and Gen. Odierno didn't have the balls, loyalty to his troops or character to do anything but meekly go along with that disgrace.

 

[eagle1462010]

not sure why Iran shouldn't fund groups it agrees with when the US, Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia are all funding groups.

Why is this our problem again?

160 BILLION REASONS...............
That will be released as a result of the deal.................
No deal no 160 BILLION.............

At some point we become outright thieves for continuing to hold those funds. Some of them have been held for 45 years. We are paying interest on them per international law. Sanctions are one thing, but holding onto assets that belong to Iran is something else. It has become an actual burden for us that helps create hatred of America and makes people all over the world view us as bullies and thieves. Why shouldn't they. We are using our superior strength to hold on to money and property that does not belong to us.

Give it to the families of our troops who lost their loved ones to Iranian made IED's.
To the 10's of thousands who suffered trauma due to IED's supplied by Iran...........
And tell them to kiss the money goodbye................no interest and not even a reach around.

Don't pull out that fake give it to the families crap. I was pushing for and writing letters to congressman when we first learned that Iran was supplying high tech IED's. Bush did nothing but let it happen without a response. He used the fucking Reagan Doctrine of response to terrorist. Respond very little or not at all. Your General was in the position to make a stand and be heard when that disgusting time in American military history was taking place. He kept his mouth shut and went along with the program of no response when the proper response should have been bombing Iran after taking out their air defenses and air force followed by armored assault over their borders to destroy facilities on the Iraq - Iran border. Bush didn't have the balls and Gen. Odierno didn't have the balls, loyalty to his troops or character to do anything but meekly go along with that disgrace.

So...............I commend you for your efforts................
Who the hell said I agreed with all the tactics of Bush.................I would have busted their asses for it.

 

[JoeB131]

not sure why Iran shouldn't fund groups it agrees with when the US, Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia are all funding groups.

Why is this our problem again?

It's not whether they should or shouldn't...it's whether we should allow them. We shouldn't.

No, actually we really don't have a lot of say in it. Unless we want to have another war and frankly, nothing Iran is doing is worth thousands of Americans coming home in body bags.

 

[JoeB131]

No shit sherlock. They have paramilitary groups that do that sort of thing............heard some of them went to see Allah early in Yemen............thanks to Saudi Arabia................

They trained............supplied.............and had direct indirect involvement that sent our people home in bags............

Fuck them and their so called money.

Again, why is any of this OUR problem?

 

[eagle1462010]

No shit sherlock. They have paramilitary groups that do that sort of thing............heard some of them went to see Allah early in Yemen............thanks to Saudi Arabia................

They trained............supplied.............and had direct indirect involvement that sent our people home in bags............

Fuck them and their so called money.

Again, why is any of this OUR problem?

They killed our people...............Not our problem..................Your a fucking nut.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

I guess this is just them being them. No need to worry, John Kerry has everything under control.

Iran Of Course We ll Continue to Support Terrorists Power Line

As I wrote here, the Obama administration, in the person of John Kerry, floated the absurd claim that Iran won’t expand its support for terrorism because it is not “allowed” to do so by U.N. resolutions that are unaffected by the abandonment of sanctions. More recently, as Paulnoted this afternoon, Kerry has professed to be “disturbed” by the fact that Iran’s Supreme Leader says Iran’s hostile policies, including its support for terrorist groups, “won’t change at all” as a result of the nuclear agreement.

Hopefully they'll ratchet up the rhetoric before Congress votes. A veto proof majority down vote will forever scuttle this horrible deal.

 

[JoeB131]

Hopefully they'll ratchet up the rhetoric before Congress votes. A veto proof majority down vote will forever scuttle this horrible deal.

No, it just means we won't be part of it. The UN will lift sanctions, and the Europeans, Russians and Chinese will resume trade.

This is what you guys don't get. We didn't start these negotiations. The British, French and Germans did. They let us join in, but if we muck it up, that's on us. Not them and not Iran.

 

[JoeB131]

They killed our people...............Not our problem..................Your a fucking nut.

Our people shouldn't have been over there and killed a lot of THEIR people. Don't go whining because you got a bloody nose in a fight you started.

Not
Our
Problem

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Hopefully they'll ratchet up the rhetoric before Congress votes. A veto proof majority down vote will forever scuttle this horrible deal.

No, it just means we won't be part of it. The UN will lift sanctions, and the Europeans, Russians and Chinese will resume trade.

This is what you guys don't get. We didn't start these negotiations. The British, French and Germans did. They let us join in, but if we muck it up, that's on us. Not them and not Iran.

Incorrect. The funds cannot be released without our say so, and the Europeans are pussies who dare not oppose us. This is our game, we started it and we're going to finish it.

Did you read the recent article that claims even states can refuse to honor any deal? Very interesting. What do you think the chances are New York will reverse its policy of blacklisting Iranian contracts and any business who deals with them?