Indiana is for Bigots - video and Pence running for cover

[NYcarbineer]

So, we won't a religion to practice human sacrifice, or polygamy, for example, even if those are religious beliefs,

so we know it's permissible to limit religious freedom legally.

But if a religious practice violates someone else's civil rights to a lesser degree, why would it suddenly become illegal to limit that practice?

Where's the line?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Faggots should stop suing people who refuse to cater to their "lifestyle" and laws like this wouldn't be needed but of course the people in the right are blamed as usual. Indiana will survive and faggots will get over it.

This is a civil rights battle and all the usual suspects are lined up on the losing side.

Lifestyle choice is not a civil right.

Religion is a choice, in most cases, and that's protected so, relax little friend, we are just expanding the protected "choices".

Religion is protected by the Constitution. Faggotry is not.

 

[defcon4]

Be careful what you wish for. If people stopped sueing to redress their grievances they might start shooting instead.

They're fags. They can't see or shoot STRAIGHT. So that's not much of a concern.

I shoot quite well, thank you.

Hey guys! Place your kevlar covering your arse! There is a sharpshooter lurking around!

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

So, we won't a religion to practice human sacrifice, or polygamy, for example, even if those are religious beliefs,

so we know it's permissible to limit religious freedom legally.

But if a religious practice violates someone else's civil rights to a lesser degree, why would it suddenly become illegal to limit that practice?

Where's the line?

Nobody has a civil right to patronize a business.

 

[hazlnut]

Faggots should stop suing people who refuse to cater to their "lifestyle" and laws like this wouldn't be needed but of course the people in the right are blamed as usual. Indiana will survive and faggots will get over it.

This is a civil rights battle and all the usual suspects are lined up on the losing side.

Lifestyle choice is not a civil right.

Religion is a choice, in most cases, and that's protected so, relax little friend, we are just expanding the protected "choices".

Religion is protected by the Constitution. Faggotry is not.

Homophobes like you are mostly closeted homosexuals.

Come out of the closet. Know real freedom.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Faggots should stop suing people who refuse to cater to their "lifestyle" and laws like this wouldn't be needed but of course the people in the right are blamed as usual. Indiana will survive and faggots will get over it.

This is a civil rights battle and all the usual suspects are lined up on the losing side.

Lifestyle choice is not a civil right.

Religion is a choice, in most cases, and that's protected so, relax little friend, we are just expanding the protected "choices".

Religion is protected by the Constitution. Faggotry is not.

While you might believe that, it isn't true. It has a concept called Equal before the Law, which fucked you in this case.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

So, we won't a religion to practice human sacrifice, or polygamy, for example, even if those are religious beliefs,

so we know it's permissible to limit religious freedom legally.

But if a religious practice violates someone else's civil rights to a lesser degree, why would it suddenly become illegal to limit that practice?

Where's the line?

Nobody has a civil right to patronize a business.

Actually they do, depending upon the business.

 

[hazlnut]

So, we won't a religion to practice human sacrifice, or polygamy, for example, even if those are religious beliefs,

so we know it's permissible to limit religious freedom legally.

But if a religious practice violates someone else's civil rights to a lesser degree, why would it suddenly become illegal to limit that practice?

Where's the line?

Nobody has a civil right to patronize a business.

Running a business that serves the public is a privilege and you must follow local and federal laws.

The sidewalks and streets that bring customers to your business are owned by the community. You must serve everyone.

That trumps your twisted version of "Christianity."

Otherwise, operate your moonshine still in the backwoods and fuck your sister.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

So, we won't a religion to practice human sacrifice, or polygamy, for example, even if those are religious beliefs,

so we know it's permissible to limit religious freedom legally.

But if a religious practice violates someone else's civil rights to a lesser degree, why would it suddenly become illegal to limit that practice?

Where's the line?

Nobody has a civil right to patronize a business.

Running a business that serves the public is a privilege and you must follow local and federal laws.

The sidewalks and streets that bring customers to your business are owned by the community. You must serve everyone.

That trumps your twisted version of "Christianity."

Otherwise, operate your moonshine still in the backwoods and fuck your sister.

He's off the Rez. Fire-water likely causes him issues.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Faggots should stop suing people who refuse to cater to their "lifestyle" and laws like this wouldn't be needed but of course the people in the right are blamed as usual. Indiana will survive and faggots will get over it.

This is a civil rights battle and all the usual suspects are lined up on the losing side.

Lifestyle choice is not a civil right.

Religion is a choice, in most cases, and that's protected so, relax little friend, we are just expanding the protected "choices".

Religion is protected by the Constitution. Faggotry is not.

Homophobes like you are mostly closeted homosexuals.

Come out of the closet. Know real freedom.

When are you going to post videos of your "ok to be gay" tour in Yemen?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

This is a civil rights battle and all the usual suspects are lined up on the losing side.

Lifestyle choice is not a civil right.

Religion is a choice, in most cases, and that's protected so, relax little friend, we are just expanding the protected "choices".

Religion is protected by the Constitution. Faggotry is not.

Homophobes like you are mostly closeted homosexuals.

Come out of the closet. Know real freedom.

When are you going to post videos of your "ok to be gay" tour in Yemen?

Not okay there, so, you want to be like them right?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

So, we won't a religion to practice human sacrifice, or polygamy, for example, even if those are religious beliefs,

so we know it's permissible to limit religious freedom legally.

But if a religious practice violates someone else's civil rights to a lesser degree, why would it suddenly become illegal to limit that practice?

Where's the line?

Nobody has a civil right to patronize a business.

Running a business that serves the public is a privilege and you must follow local and federal laws.

The sidewalks and streets that bring customers to your business are owned by the community. You must serve everyone.

That trumps your twisted version of "Christianity."

Otherwise, operate your moonshine still in the backwoods and fuck your sister.

No, business owners do NOT have to serve everyone. That's just your misguided opinion. There is nothing in the Constitution that allows the federal government to force businesses to serve everyone who comes through their doors.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

So, we won't a religion to practice human sacrifice, or polygamy, for example, even if those are religious beliefs,

so we know it's permissible to limit religious freedom legally.

But if a religious practice violates someone else's civil rights to a lesser degree, why would it suddenly become illegal to limit that practice?

Where's the line?

Nobody has a civil right to patronize a business.

Running a business that serves the public is a privilege and you must follow local and federal laws.

The sidewalks and streets that bring customers to your business are owned by the community. You must serve everyone.

That trumps your twisted version of "Christianity."

Otherwise, operate your moonshine still in the backwoods and fuck your sister.

No, business owners do NOT have to serve everyone. That's just your misguided opinion. There is nothing in the Constitution that allows the federal government to force businesses to serve everyone who comes through their doors.

Seems as though your argument died, six decades ago at the Supreme Court. Now what?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Lifestyle choice is not a civil right.

Religion is a choice, in most cases, and that's protected so, relax little friend, we are just expanding the protected "choices".

Religion is protected by the Constitution. Faggotry is not.

Homophobes like you are mostly closeted homosexuals.

Come out of the closet. Know real freedom.

When are you going to post videos of your "ok to be gay" tour in Yemen?

Not okay there, so, you want to be like them right?

I want to point out the inconsistency of a "gay muslim". In countries where her religion is dominant, she would be hung. Why would anyone who preaches tolerance be part of such an intolerant religion? I know even you must have asked yourself this.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

So, we won't a religion to practice human sacrifice, or polygamy, for example, even if those are religious beliefs,

so we know it's permissible to limit religious freedom legally.

But if a religious practice violates someone else's civil rights to a lesser degree, why would it suddenly become illegal to limit that practice?

Where's the line?

Nobody has a civil right to patronize a business.

Running a business that serves the public is a privilege and you must follow local and federal laws.

The sidewalks and streets that bring customers to your business are owned by the community. You must serve everyone.

That trumps your twisted version of "Christianity."

Otherwise, operate your moonshine still in the backwoods and fuck your sister.

No, business owners do NOT have to serve everyone. That's just your misguided opinion. There is nothing in the Constitution that allows the federal government to force businesses to serve everyone who comes through their doors.

Seems as though your argument died, sex decades ago at the Supreme Court. Now what?

Just wanted to get on the record that you have sex on the brain.

 

[The Irish Ram]

My investment. My time. My business. My decisions. No one but me should be making the rules that my business operates under. If I am pro, eat here. If I am anti, eat somewhere else. But don't think for a minute you have any right to dictate to me what I do with what I own. Thank you Indiana for realizing that.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

So, we won't a religion to practice human sacrifice, or polygamy, for example, even if those are religious beliefs,

so we know it's permissible to limit religious freedom legally.

But if a religious practice violates someone else's civil rights to a lesser degree, why would it suddenly become illegal to limit that practice?

Where's the line?

Nobody has a civil right to patronize a business.

Running a business that serves the public is a privilege and you must follow local and federal laws.

The sidewalks and streets that bring customers to your business are owned by the community. You must serve everyone.

That trumps your twisted version of "Christianity."

Otherwise, operate your moonshine still in the backwoods and fuck your sister.

No, business owners do NOT have to serve everyone. That's just your misguided opinion. There is nothing in the Constitution that allows the federal government to force businesses to serve everyone who comes through their doors.

Seems as though your argument died, sex decades ago at the Supreme Court. Now what?

Just wanted to get on the record that you have sex on the brain.

It's a male thing.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

No one but me should be making the rules that my business operates under.

Tell us, do you have a plan to start living in the real world at some point?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Nobody has a civil right to patronize a business.

Running a business that serves the public is a privilege and you must follow local and federal laws.

The sidewalks and streets that bring customers to your business are owned by the community. You must serve everyone.

That trumps your twisted version of "Christianity."

Otherwise, operate your moonshine still in the backwoods and fuck your sister.

No, business owners do NOT have to serve everyone. That's just your misguided opinion. There is nothing in the Constitution that allows the federal government to force businesses to serve everyone who comes through their doors.

Seems as though your argument died, sex decades ago at the Supreme Court. Now what?

Just wanted to get on the record that you have sex on the brain.

It's a male thing.

Ok, that made me laugh. You deserve a Dewey Scream. Enjoy.

 

[hazlnut]

We need more shaming and ridicule of bigots and homophobes.

There should be a National Campaign ridiculing bigots who call themselves "Christian".